What exactly did they do?

[Care4all]

Read the latest indicments, dope.

Playing dumb only makes you appear dumb.

The indictments do not say anything about trump or his people, they do not involve collusion at all. They claim some Russians broke into Hillary's server, perhaps she should have had some security? They claim the Russians broke into Podesta server perhaps he should have had some security?

Yes they should of had better security. But why are so many people saying that the hacking never happened? Just look at this thread and all the deniers of the Russians efforts.

Several reasons. ONE Wikilinks DENIES they got the info from a hack, two Hillary and Podesta REFUSED to turn over the servers..

lie lie lies of your new god....



Says John Podesta "refused to give the DNC server to the FBI and the CIA. Disgraceful!"

— Donald Trump on Friday, July 7th, 2017 in a tweet


Did John Podesta deny CIA and FBI access to DNC server, as Donald Trump claims?
By Manuela Tobias on Tuesday, July 11th, 2017 at 11:12 a.m.


In the midst of talks on the global economy, climate change and immigration at the Group of 20 summit in Germany, President Donald Trump said there was another issue grabbing attention.

"Everyone here is talking about why John Podesta refused to give the DNC server to the FBI and the CIA. Disgraceful!"


We’ll set aside the question of what "everybody" was talking about in Hamburg. A bigger issue is that Trump’s premise about Podesta, who was Hillary Clinton’s campaign chair, gets the facts wrong on several counts.

John Podesta’s role
Trump claimed that Podesta denied handing over a DNC server to intelligence agencies, but Podesta never chaired the DNC, nor had any involvement in the DNC’s handling of their email server, according to DNC spokesperson Adrienne Watson.

"I had nothing to do with the Democratic National Committee — I chaired Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign," Podesta wrote in an op-ed for the Washington Post. "So there was no DNC server for me to refuse to give, and I was never asked for one."

No one claimed Podesta is the guy responsible for not turning over the server to the FBI, dingbat.

Straw man argument.

your lying god did.... pay attention!

Says John Podesta "refused to give the DNC server to the FBI and the CIA. Disgraceful!"

 

[Care4all]

We keep hearing from all sides that the Russians interfered with our 2016 election, but I have yet to hear any of them say exactly what the Russians did, where they did it, or which votes were influenced by it.

this is a serious inquiry, what did they Russians do? where, when, to who? which states?

Heir Mewler cant find anything, the IG cant find anything. So someone tell us, what did they do?

Read the latest indicments, dope.

Playing dumb only makes you appear dumb.

Indictments aren’t evidence didn’t you hear judge Ellis?

the Russian Military Intell agents indicted are welcome to come here and defend themselves in their trial....

 

[Care4all]

here is the latest ( but not the last ) round of indictments that go into detail about who, what, where, when, & how...

https://www.justice.gov/file/1080281/download

you're welcome.

so they released the truth from documents found in the unsecure DNC server?

1. why wasn't the server secure?
2. if looking at data on an unsecure server is a crime, what is the crime?

So putting these emails out for public view helped Hillary to lose? Is that the claim?

There is no evidence that the Russians hacked the DNC server. That's what the DNC tells us, but we have no reason to believe it.

Read the latest indictments from the Justice
Dept, QTARD.

we have read them, 12 Russian citizens indicted for allegedly hacking into the DNC servers. US law does not apply to Russian citizens operating in Russia. the indictments are a waste of time and money. And, since the FBI and DOJ never looked at the DNC servers, can you tell us how they know they were hacked and by who?

Why do you keep lying??? Why? The FBI had a copy of the DNC server.... That is all that is needed.

You did not read the indictment.... and you are INCORRECT that a person has to be here in the United States, in order to commit cyber crimes, bank fraud, money laundering crimes and be indicted for them, idiot....

Guccifer the Romanian hacker was captured and brought here to stand trial for his cyber crimes and got 4 years in prison here, back in 2016...

sheesh, what is WRONG WITH YOU?

 

[Care4all]

Hilary did that all on her own.

nope, she actually did not... it was spurred and fueled by the Russian hacks and timed leaks and propaganda articles that tied in with the releases of the stolen merchandise.

Assange was screaming and yelling at the Russian hackers to get the stolen emails to him QUICKLY so Assange could release them with the negative propaganda news articles that they prepared to spin a story at the same time of the release.... SAYING that he, Assange, wanted to release them before the Democratic Convention, for the most impact in his and the Russian's goal of dividing Bernie supporters and Hillary supporters....

it worked.

Merchandise? Not sure you know what that word means.

Assange has stated repeatedly that the leaks did not come from the Russians. But thats really beside the point.

You're pissed that hillary got exposed for who she is. A crooked *****!!!

Here's a clue, it didn't expose anything... What you got from it, is propaganda articles that Assange along with a Journalist who he allowed to read the parts Assange highlighted of the emails ahead of time, and delivered a pure propaganda article spun in the negative....

Just show me ANY thing that you believed was shown from ANY of the emails,

and I will show you, how the spin on it, was not completely true or not true at all....

But you can't even SHOW what the emails exposed, yet you keep repeating the same propaganda that the emails showed how rotten Hillary was....

So what did these emails say, that you refer to?

And I am upset that their private emails of both the campaign and DNC were stolen, anyone should be! It's a BREAK IN just like Watergate, and the President, just like Nixon, is involved in a COVER-UP, TO HIS EYEBALLS.

But in this case, it is WORSE, because the Trump campaign got their help from the thieves, who were working with the Russian government Military Intelligence assigned by Putin to interfere and meddle in our democratic election process... they aided and abetted the enemy imo and many others too.

If Obama had done one tenth of what the Trump campaign and Trump has done, he would have been impeached by the Republicans already.

If Hillary was president and had done what the Trump campaign has done with working with Russia to bring Trump down, she would have been impeached already by this Republican congress.

If this were the times of respectable Republicans serving in congress as there were in Nixon's time, there would have been extensive, live on TV serious hearings before all of the citizens in this nation, and Trump would have been impeached by now.....

there is absolutely no way in the world you can deny that....

The emails were published in their entirety. No one in the fake media or the Hillary campaign contested their accuracy.

You lose, douchebag.

Not only published in their entirety, but in a searchable database.
WikiLeaks - The Podesta Emails
WikiLeaks - Search the DNC email database

but where are or which are the emails that made Hillary evil, a cheat? what terms would you 'search' under??

 

[playtime]

here is the latest ( but not the last ) round of indictments that go into detail about who, what, where, when, & how...

https://www.justice.gov/file/1080281/download

you're welcome.

so they released the truth from documents found in the unsecure DNC server?

1. why wasn't the server secure?
2. if looking at data on an unsecure server is a crime, what is the crime?

So putting these emails out for public view helped Hillary to lose? Is that the claim?

You keep being presented with the evidence you're asking for, and every time you divert to Hillary.

**** Hillary, I dont care about that corrupt hag. But the fact that an enemy nation hacked us in an attempt to sway our elections should piss off any red blooded American.

i literally just read a post on another thread from a poster who basically was thanking russia/putin because that made hillary lose.

Let's see now...

The FBI refuses to analyze the DNC server. The justice department refuses to prosecute Hillary for destroying 30k government emails, and the NSA who monitors all and knows all...offers nothing.

Looks like a massive set up. No?

Could it be as simple as the ruling class did all they could to get their corrupt girl in the White House and when that didn't happen, they got vindictive?

Why would anyone accept anything from the criminals in the ruling class?

hillary colluded with russia to..................... lose.

that's the ultimate rw spin machine at it's best.

 

[playtime]

Hillary did not fabricate a dossier and never used any of the information in it. I did not see any ads about Trump and Golden Showers

I understand Hillary did not fabricate the dossier, although she paid for it....in more ways than one. I also understand she didn't wipe down her server, not even with a cloth, but she sure as hell paid for someone to do it. Which holds her responsible.

Irrelevant

If Hillary funded the dossier, why didn’t she use it?
Trump repeatedly used the information provided by Putin

She is using it, dumbass. Why do you think we have this witchhunt?

The investigation began in july and the warrant wasn't granted until oct, you QTARD fuckwit.

the FISA warrants used the lies in the dossier as their justification, the FISA judge was lied to.

^^^ fake news ^^^.

The central argument in the Nunes memo may have just been debunked

 

[bripat9643]

We keep hearing from all sides that the Russians interfered with our 2016 election, but I have yet to hear any of them say exactly what the Russians did, where they did it, or which votes were influenced by it.

this is a serious inquiry, what did they Russians do? where, when, to who? which states?

Heir Mewler cant find anything, the IG cant find anything. So someone tell us, what did they do?

Read the latest indicments, dope.

Playing dumb only makes you appear dumb.

Indictments aren’t evidence didn’t you hear judge Ellis?

the Russian Military Intell agents indicted are welcome to come here and defend themselves in their trial....

We all know that isn't going to happen, including Mueller. He's counting on it.

 

[bripat9643]

here is the latest ( but not the last ) round of indictments that go into detail about who, what, where, when, & how...

https://www.justice.gov/file/1080281/download

you're welcome.

so they released the truth from documents found in the unsecure DNC server?

1. why wasn't the server secure?
2. if looking at data on an unsecure server is a crime, what is the crime?

So putting these emails out for public view helped Hillary to lose? Is that the claim?

There is no evidence that the Russians hacked the DNC server. That's what the DNC tells us, but we have no reason to believe it.

Read the latest indictments from the Justice
Dept, QTARD.

we have read them, 12 Russian citizens indicted for allegedly hacking into the DNC servers. US law does not apply to Russian citizens operating in Russia. the indictments are a waste of time and money. And, since the FBI and DOJ never looked at the DNC servers, can you tell us how they know they were hacked and by who?

Why do you keep lying??? Why? The FBI had a copy of the DNC server.... That is all that is needed.

You did not read the indictment.... and you are INCORRECT that a person has to be here in the United States, in order to commit cyber crimes, bank fraud, money laundering crimes and be indicted for them, idiot....

Guccifer the Romanian hacker was captured and brought here to stand trial for his cyber crimes and got 4 years in prison here, back in 2016...

sheesh, what is WRONG WITH YOU?

That's Romania, not Russian, dipstick.

 

[rightwinger]

so they released the truth from documents found in the unsecure DNC server?

1. why wasn't the server secure?
2. if looking at data on an unsecure server is a crime, what is the crime?

So putting these emails out for public view helped Hillary to lose? Is that the claim?

There is no evidence that the Russians hacked the DNC server. That's what the DNC tells us, but we have no reason to believe it.

Read the latest indictments from the Justice
Dept, QTARD.

we have read them, 12 Russian citizens indicted for allegedly hacking into the DNC servers. US law does not apply to Russian citizens operating in Russia. the indictments are a waste of time and money. And, since the FBI and DOJ never looked at the DNC servers, can you tell us how they know they were hacked and by who?

Why do you keep lying??? Why? The FBI had a copy of the DNC server.... That is all that is needed.

You did not read the indictment.... and you are INCORRECT that a person has to be here in the United States, in order to commit cyber crimes, bank fraud, money laundering crimes and be indicted for them, idiot....

Guccifer the Romanian hacker was captured and brought here to stand trial for his cyber crimes and got 4 years in prison here, back in 2016...

sheesh, what is WRONG WITH YOU?

That's Romania, not Russian, dipstick.

Nyet

 

[Vel]

nope, she actually did not... it was spurred and fueled by the Russian hacks and timed leaks and propaganda articles that tied in with the releases of the stolen merchandise.

Assange was screaming and yelling at the Russian hackers to get the stolen emails to him QUICKLY so Assange could release them with the negative propaganda news articles that they prepared to spin a story at the same time of the release.... SAYING that he, Assange, wanted to release them before the Democratic Convention, for the most impact in his and the Russian's goal of dividing Bernie supporters and Hillary supporters....

it worked.

Merchandise? Not sure you know what that word means.

Assange has stated repeatedly that the leaks did not come from the Russians. But thats really beside the point.

You're pissed that hillary got exposed for who she is. A crooked *****!!!

Here's a clue, it didn't expose anything... What you got from it, is propaganda articles that Assange along with a Journalist who he allowed to read the parts Assange highlighted of the emails ahead of time, and delivered a pure propaganda article spun in the negative....

Just show me ANY thing that you believed was shown from ANY of the emails,

and I will show you, how the spin on it, was not completely true or not true at all....

But you can't even SHOW what the emails exposed, yet you keep repeating the same propaganda that the emails showed how rotten Hillary was....

So what did these emails say, that you refer to?

And I am upset that their private emails of both the campaign and DNC were stolen, anyone should be! It's a BREAK IN just like Watergate, and the President, just like Nixon, is involved in a COVER-UP, TO HIS EYEBALLS.

But in this case, it is WORSE, because the Trump campaign got their help from the thieves, who were working with the Russian government Military Intelligence assigned by Putin to interfere and meddle in our democratic election process... they aided and abetted the enemy imo and many others too.

If Obama had done one tenth of what the Trump campaign and Trump has done, he would have been impeached by the Republicans already.

If Hillary was president and had done what the Trump campaign has done with working with Russia to bring Trump down, she would have been impeached already by this Republican congress.

If this were the times of respectable Republicans serving in congress as there were in Nixon's time, there would have been extensive, live on TV serious hearings before all of the citizens in this nation, and Trump would have been impeached by now.....

there is absolutely no way in the world you can deny that....

The emails were published in their entirety. No one in the fake media or the Hillary campaign contested their accuracy.

You lose, douchebag.

Not only published in their entirety, but in a searchable database.
WikiLeaks - The Podesta Emails
WikiLeaks - Search the DNC email database

but where are or which are the emails that made Hillary evil, a cheat? what terms would you 'search' under??

There are thousands of emails. If you're looking for those quoted in media, just go back and pull key phrases from old news articles to start your search. I've read through many at random and it's been an enlightening slog. You can find the true believers as well as those that know they're peddling bullshit to the public. I find it humorous that many show the insiders strategizing on how to get Trump as the Republican nominee because they thought he'd be easy to beat. Have fun in your search.

 

[jc456]

We keep hearing from all sides that the Russians interfered with our 2016 election, but I have yet to hear any of them say exactly what the Russians did, where they did it, or which votes were influenced by it.

this is a serious inquiry, what did they Russians do? where, when, to who? which states?

Heir Mewler cant find anything, the IG cant find anything. So someone tell us, what did they do?

Read the latest indicments, dope.

Playing dumb only makes you appear dumb.

Indictments aren’t evidence didn’t you hear judge Ellis?

the Russian Military Intell agents indicted are welcome to come here and defend themselves in their trial....

I'd love to see it, then they'd have to actually release the no evidence they don't have. LOL, you think they have evidence.

 

[gipper]

here is the latest ( but not the last ) round of indictments that go into detail about who, what, where, when, & how...

https://www.justice.gov/file/1080281/download

you're welcome.

so they released the truth from documents found in the unsecure DNC server?

1. why wasn't the server secure?
2. if looking at data on an unsecure server is a crime, what is the crime?

So putting these emails out for public view helped Hillary to lose? Is that the claim?

You keep being presented with the evidence you're asking for, and every time you divert to Hillary.

**** Hillary, I dont care about that corrupt hag. But the fact that an enemy nation hacked us in an attempt to sway our elections should piss off any red blooded American.

i literally just read a post on another thread from a poster who basically was thanking russia/putin because that made hillary lose.

Let's see now...

The FBI refuses to analyze the DNC server. The justice department refuses to prosecute Hillary for destroying 30k government emails, and the NSA who monitors all and knows all...offers nothing.

Looks like a massive set up. No?

Could it be as simple as the ruling class did all they could to get their corrupt girl in the White House and when that didn't happen, they got vindictive?

Why would anyone accept anything from the criminals in the ruling class?

hillary colluded with russia to..................... lose.

that's the ultimate rw spin machine at it's best.

She did. She got even more rich from the uranium deal.

Who colluded with Russia other than Hillary?

 

[jc456]

here is the latest ( but not the last ) round of indictments that go into detail about who, what, where, when, & how...

https://www.justice.gov/file/1080281/download

you're welcome.

so they released the truth from documents found in the unsecure DNC server?

1. why wasn't the server secure?
2. if looking at data on an unsecure server is a crime, what is the crime?

So putting these emails out for public view helped Hillary to lose? Is that the claim?

You keep being presented with the evidence you're asking for, and every time you divert to Hillary.

**** Hillary, I dont care about that corrupt hag. But the fact that an enemy nation hacked us in an attempt to sway our elections should piss off any red blooded American.

i literally just read a post on another thread from a poster who basically was thanking russia/putin because that made hillary lose.

Let's see now...

The FBI refuses to analyze the DNC server. The justice department refuses to prosecute Hillary for destroying 30k government emails, and the NSA who monitors all and knows all...offers nothing.

Looks like a massive set up. No?

Could it be as simple as the ruling class did all they could to get their corrupt girl in the White House and when that didn't happen, they got vindictive?

Why would anyone accept anything from the criminals in the ruling class?

hillary colluded with russia to..................... lose.

that's the ultimate rw spin machine at it's best.

not at all, she never in a million years thought she'd lose. It's why all the butthurt still today.

 

[rightwinger]

so they released the truth from documents found in the unsecure DNC server?

1. why wasn't the server secure?
2. if looking at data on an unsecure server is a crime, what is the crime?

So putting these emails out for public view helped Hillary to lose? Is that the claim?

You keep being presented with the evidence you're asking for, and every time you divert to Hillary.

**** Hillary, I dont care about that corrupt hag. But the fact that an enemy nation hacked us in an attempt to sway our elections should piss off any red blooded American.

i literally just read a post on another thread from a poster who basically was thanking russia/putin because that made hillary lose.

Let's see now...

The FBI refuses to analyze the DNC server. The justice department refuses to prosecute Hillary for destroying 30k government emails, and the NSA who monitors all and knows all...offers nothing.

Looks like a massive set up. No?

Could it be as simple as the ruling class did all they could to get their corrupt girl in the White House and when that didn't happen, they got vindictive?

Why would anyone accept anything from the criminals in the ruling class?

hillary colluded with russia to..................... lose.

that's the ultimate rw spin machine at it's best.

She did. She got even more rich from the uranium deal.

Who colluded with Russia other than Hillary?

There was no uranium deal

Just more conservative fantasy

 

[rightwinger]

so they released the truth from documents found in the unsecure DNC server?

1. why wasn't the server secure?
2. if looking at data on an unsecure server is a crime, what is the crime?

So putting these emails out for public view helped Hillary to lose? Is that the claim?

You keep being presented with the evidence you're asking for, and every time you divert to Hillary.

**** Hillary, I dont care about that corrupt hag. But the fact that an enemy nation hacked us in an attempt to sway our elections should piss off any red blooded American.

i literally just read a post on another thread from a poster who basically was thanking russia/putin because that made hillary lose.

Let's see now...

The FBI refuses to analyze the DNC server. The justice department refuses to prosecute Hillary for destroying 30k government emails, and the NSA who monitors all and knows all...offers nothing.

Looks like a massive set up. No?

Could it be as simple as the ruling class did all they could to get their corrupt girl in the White House and when that didn't happen, they got vindictive?

Why would anyone accept anything from the criminals in the ruling class?

hillary colluded with russia to..................... lose.

that's the ultimate rw spin machine at it's best.

not at all, she never in a million years thought she'd lose. It's why all the butthurt still today.

Trump never thought he would win

Didn’t realize how gullible the public is

 

[Care4all]

Merchandise? Not sure you know what that word means.

Assange has stated repeatedly that the leaks did not come from the Russians. But thats really beside the point.

You're pissed that hillary got exposed for who she is. A crooked *****!!!

Here's a clue, it didn't expose anything... What you got from it, is propaganda articles that Assange along with a Journalist who he allowed to read the parts Assange highlighted of the emails ahead of time, and delivered a pure propaganda article spun in the negative....

Just show me ANY thing that you believed was shown from ANY of the emails,

and I will show you, how the spin on it, was not completely true or not true at all....

But you can't even SHOW what the emails exposed, yet you keep repeating the same propaganda that the emails showed how rotten Hillary was....

So what did these emails say, that you refer to?

And I am upset that their private emails of both the campaign and DNC were stolen, anyone should be! It's a BREAK IN just like Watergate, and the President, just like Nixon, is involved in a COVER-UP, TO HIS EYEBALLS.

But in this case, it is WORSE, because the Trump campaign got their help from the thieves, who were working with the Russian government Military Intelligence assigned by Putin to interfere and meddle in our democratic election process... they aided and abetted the enemy imo and many others too.

If Obama had done one tenth of what the Trump campaign and Trump has done, he would have been impeached by the Republicans already.

If Hillary was president and had done what the Trump campaign has done with working with Russia to bring Trump down, she would have been impeached already by this Republican congress.

If this were the times of respectable Republicans serving in congress as there were in Nixon's time, there would have been extensive, live on TV serious hearings before all of the citizens in this nation, and Trump would have been impeached by now.....

there is absolutely no way in the world you can deny that....

The emails were published in their entirety. No one in the fake media or the Hillary campaign contested their accuracy.

You lose, douchebag.

Not only published in their entirety, but in a searchable database.
WikiLeaks - The Podesta Emails
WikiLeaks - Search the DNC email database

but where are or which are the emails that made Hillary evil, a cheat? what terms would you 'search' under??

There are thousands of emails. If you're looking for those quoted in media, just go back and pull key phrases from old news articles to start your search. I've read through many at random and it's been an enlightening slog. You can find the true believers as well as those that know they're peddling bullshit to the public. I find it humorous that many show the insiders strategizing on how to get Trump as the Republican nominee because they thought he'd be easy to beat. Have fun in your search.

I just want to know, the emails that made the right wing chant she was crooked....

what made you, or Bri Pat and the all in unison right wingers take the positions you have...out of these emails, to think and say clinton was evil, a cheat, and crooked? What stood out in these emails that made you all take this position?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

I think it was pretty unusual. I haven't found that Wikileaks had anything to gain by offering that. I haven't seen that they've offered rewards for anything else.

come on, are you saying that wikileaks only published information damaging to Hillary? The Rich murder raises some valid questions, as does the Vince Foster suicide and the Ron Brown plane crash. We are entitled to know the truth. Are you afraid of the truth?

Some of the craziness that repeated enough times makes people believe it

Hear the one about Hillary and the pizza shop sex slaves?

That is what Hillary had to deal with..........Actual Fake News

I didn't pay much attention to that type of nonsense and I doubt that many others did either. I did however, pay a lot of attention to the emails showing that the democrat primary was rigged and to the fact that the MSM was meeting with HIllary to outline their "strategy".

The primary was not rigged and Hillary actually received the most votes

Something Crooked Donnie cannot say

were you unconscious during 2016? the dem super delegates overrode the votes of the dem primary voters in order to deny Bernie and give the nomination to crooked Hillary.

the entire PV vote delta was in California. 3 million more caliprunians voted for Hillary than for Trump, BFD, Trump got 306 EC votes and that's how we elect presidents.

were you unconscious during 2016? the dem super delegates overrode the votes of the dem primary voters in order to deny Bernie and give the nomination to crooked Hillary.

Liar.

Clinton won hadily with regular delegates. She didn't need a single super to beat Sanders, loser.

RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 â?? Democratic Delegate Count

 

[Care4all]

so they released the truth from documents found in the unsecure DNC server?

1. why wasn't the server secure?
2. if looking at data on an unsecure server is a crime, what is the crime?

So putting these emails out for public view helped Hillary to lose? Is that the claim?

You keep being presented with the evidence you're asking for, and every time you divert to Hillary.

**** Hillary, I dont care about that corrupt hag. But the fact that an enemy nation hacked us in an attempt to sway our elections should piss off any red blooded American.

i literally just read a post on another thread from a poster who basically was thanking russia/putin because that made hillary lose.

Let's see now...

The FBI refuses to analyze the DNC server. The justice department refuses to prosecute Hillary for destroying 30k government emails, and the NSA who monitors all and knows all...offers nothing.

Looks like a massive set up. No?

Could it be as simple as the ruling class did all they could to get their corrupt girl in the White House and when that didn't happen, they got vindictive?

Why would anyone accept anything from the criminals in the ruling class?

hillary colluded with russia to..................... lose.

that's the ultimate rw spin machine at it's best.

She did. She got even more rich from the uranium deal.

Who colluded with Russia other than Hillary?

too funny! you are smarter than that!

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Still waiting for anyone to tell us exactly what the Russians did, how it influenced the election, where they did it, which votes were affected, and whether whatever they did had any affect on the final outcome.

All we hear is that the Russians got some data from the unsecured DNC servers and Hillary's illegal private unsecured server, and that that data somehow got released by wikileaks. Where is the crime? Where is the collusioin? How did any of this change the election?

I love these threads

OP asks....Can anyone tell me what the Russians did?

He gets seven pages telling him what the Russians did and he comes back with.....Can anyone tell me what the Russians did?

the only problem is that not one of you has answered the basic question. So they got into the DNC servers---not illegal, so they bought a few thousand dollars of facebook ads---------not illegal. How many votes were changed? Tell us or STFU.

If the Russians had a goal it was to divide us and get us screaming at each other, in that they succeeded---------again not illegal.


What was illegal under US law, however, was Obama trying to influence the brexit vote and the Israeli elections, but you don't care about that because you worship the Kenyan messiah over all else.

the only problem is that not one of you has answered the basic question. So they got into the DNC servers---not illegal,

Another lie.

Hacking is a felony, dope.

 

[Claudette]

We keep hearing from all sides that the Russians interfered with our 2016 election, but I have yet to hear any of them say exactly what the Russians did, where they did it, or which votes were influenced by it.

this is a serious inquiry, what did they Russians do? where, when, to who? which states?

Heir Mewler cant find anything, the IG cant find anything. So someone tell us, what did they do?

They hacked the DNC servers and Obama and his intelligence people and cyber folks knew it and decided to do nothing.

Hell the FBI warned the DNC IT guy and he did nothing.

They should be asking the Obama folks and the DNC IT guy why they did nothing.