Were the Sons of Liberty "Domestic Terrorists"

[Jitss617]

Back in those days, Liberals used to hunt down Conservatives and tar and feather them

We call them the good ole days

Confiscating guns not allowing free-speech ,, that was liberals? Lol wow

Give an example

The red coats came to confiscate guns, Sam Adams had to hide in fear of being arrested for SPEAKING.. that’s sounds like democrats not republicans.

 

[Weatherman2020]

According to the British ruling class they were.

But trying to put antifa commie goons in the SoL frame is a bridge way too far.

Antifa has been much more restrained. That's just a historical fact

Sons of Liberty never attacked nor wished to change elected political leaders.

Your analogy is BS.

Who do you think Thomas Hutchinson was?
The Governor

Thomas Hutchinson was an appointed politician, as were most in that era.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Was the Boston Tea Party a terrorist act?

Tea was owned by the British East India Company. While technically private, it was owned by the elite and served as a government identity.

 

[Agit8r]

A common myth. But no.

The right supports free-market capitalism. The left does not and neither did Hitler nor Mussolini.

The right support limited government. The left supports an all-powerful government as did Hitler and Mussolini.

The right supports citizens being able to keep more of their own money. The left supports higher taxes on the rich and middle-class and so did Hitler and Mussolini.

The right supports the right to own and carry guns. The left does not and neither did Hitler nor Mussolini.

The right supports keeping healthcare in the private sector. The left does not and neither did Hitler nor Mussolini.

The right supports keeping education at the state level. The left supports federal control of the education system as did Hitler and Mussolini.

Fascism, like its ideological cousins (socialism & communism), are ALL synonymous with much of modern leftist ideology today. Yea, Hitler and Mussolini were leftists, like you.

If you note the content of the economics paper, they were a market based system up until the outbreak of war, and still acknowledged private property of ethnic Germans even thereafter. This has been the model that "conservatives" have followed to subvert democracy (or I should say republicanism with a lower case "r"). And the sad thing is, they are succeeding. If you examine the facts, they will set you free.

Edited to add: With regard to the bit about education, I will refer you to the link in my signature line.

They were NOT free-market economies. You can't just look at what they said but also at what they actually DID.

I cited the source for may assertion: http://www.ub.edu/graap/nazi.pdf

Can you?

Private ownership exists under fascism, but that doesn't mean that major companies are free to operate independently of the government.

In theory, major companies are governed by the charters. They are incorporated under the government. That isn't inherently a fascist principal. And neither is private ownership of any sort. The point being they are not mutually exclusive. And neither falls under the heading of left wing. What matters is not right or left. What matters is stopping this current movement toward authoritarian license by elected officials and their devotees. It is treason.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Back in those days, Liberals used to hunt down Conservatives and tar and feather them

We call them the good ole days

Confiscating guns not allowing free-speech ,, that was liberals? Lol wow

Give an example

The red coats came to confiscate guns, Sam Adams had to hide in fear of being arrested for SPEAKING.. that’s sounds like democrats not republicans.

They came for our guns.
So we shot them.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

By comparing antifa to the Sons of Liberty democrats are justifying rebellion and overthrowing the government. They are saying it's the same thing.

If this is the direction democrats are going, it will be a very interesting ride.

 

[Agit8r]

According to the British ruling class they were.

But trying to put antifa commie goons in the SoL frame is a bridge way too far.

Antifa has been much more restrained. That's just a historical fact

Sons of Liberty never attacked nor wished to change elected political leaders.

Your analogy is BS.

Who do you think Thomas Hutchinson was?
The Governor

Thomas Hutchinson was an appointed politician, as were most in that era.

He was an elected official in Massachusetts prior to being appointed though. It isn't just like he was a Russian puppet. That would certainly have justified every act of violence against him.

 

[mikegriffith1]

The Sons of Liberty:

• Disguised themselves
  
  
• Caused millions of dollars worth of damage to public, corporate, and private property.
  
  
• Harassed supporters of the mad king until they fled fled the land
  
  
• Engaged in acts of cruel violence upon those they viewed as enemies.

I guess Antifa has some catching up to do! Sons of Liberty American History 1765

Oh, my heavens. It is absurd to compare the Sons of Liberty to Antifa. That is just obscene. This is a good example of the surreal nonsense and absurd, amoral analysis that we are now hearing from extremist liberals.

 

[badbob85037]

The Sons of Liberty:

• Disguised themselves
  
  
• Caused millions of dollars worth of damage to public, corporate, and private property.
  
  
• Harassed supporters of the mad king until they fled fled the land
  
  
• Engaged in acts of cruel violence upon those they viewed as enemies.

View attachment 275269

I guess Antifa has some catching up to do!

Sons of Liberty American History 1765

n
They were patriots .They won so they wrote the history. Antifa are spoiled brats that still live in their parents basement and like Joe will remain in the basement.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

When (mostly) lefties try to use the American Revolution to justify an argument about modern domestic terrorism and anarchy and the decadence that goes along with it you know they are willing agents for foreign propaganda and/or victims of a sub-standard education system.

Or.
They support revolution and the violent overthrow of the government.

 

[mikegriffith1]

SMH. It is absurd to compare Antifa to the Sons of Liberty. The Sons of Liberty were fighting for American freedom and independence. Antifa is fighting to destroy American freedom and independence. Antifa wants to turn America into another socialist country, the very opposite of what the Sons of Liberty wanted.

 

[Agit8r]

SMH. It is absurd to compare Antifa to the Sons of Liberty. The Sons of Liberty were fighting for American freedom and independence. Antifa is fighting to destroy American freedom and independence. Antifa wants to turn America into another socialist country, the very opposite of what the Sons of Liberty wanted.

It was about much the same things

 

[Flash]

The Sons of Liberty:

• Disguised themselves
  
  
• Caused millions of dollars worth of damage to public, corporate, and private property.
  
  
• Harassed supporters of the mad king until they fled fled the land
  
  
• Engaged in acts of cruel violence upon those they viewed as enemies.

I guess Antifa has some catching up to do! Sons of Liberty American History 1765

Oh, my heavens. It is absurd to compare the Sons of Liberty to Antifa. That is just obscene. This is a good example of the surreal nonsense and absurd, amoral analysis that we are now hearing from extremist liberals.

These stupid uneducated confused Moon Bats are tying to compare men that were overthrowing a monarchy to establish a Constitutional Republic to Communists that are trying to undo the Constitutional Republic.

These Moon Bats don't know any more about History than they do Economics, Climate Science, Biology, Ethics or the Constitution.

 

[Agit8r]

Same kinda stuff. The redcoats wear blue now

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/10/30/philadelphia-fop-posts-toddler/

 

[Agit8r]

There is no republic as long as things like this can happen. https://www.newsobserver.com/news/local/article246861942.html

 

[whitehall]

The British were the terrorists.