Weird Tim Walz says his inability to speak proper English is why people think he lied about his military service

[jknowgood]

Of course you're not.

But let a republican do the same and he soils his diaper.

 

[struth]

You mean a bunch of citizens were in the streets, going to the mayor's house to protest police misconduct, which is totally their right under the first amendment, but these two ******* loons said, "Eek, Black People" and started brandishing their gun comicallly.



The protestors didn't do anything wrong.

No brownshirts that ripped down a gate to gain access to their property, and marched there after firebombing and looting in the city.

Demafasict brownshirts are terrorist

 

[JoeB131]

No brownshirts that ripped down a gate to gain access to their property, and marched there after firebombing and looting in the city.

Demafasict brownshirts are terrorist

Oh, no, a "Gate"? really?

A Mayor who lives in a gated community has no business being a mayor.

 

[struth]

Oh, no, a "Gate"? really?

A Mayor who lives in a gated community has no business being a mayor.

Correct a gate. Brownshirts have no right to destroy private property and trespass. I get it makes you nervous when people stand up to your terrorism

 

[Unkotare]

Oh, no, a "Gate"? really?

A Mayor who lives in a gated community has no business being a mayor.

How many more excuses are you going to make for the mob, hypocrite? You're a disgrace.

 

[daveman]

You see your gun as being like your dick?

That explains much. Most of you guys are compensating.

Established fact, that after the CDC did the Kellerman Study, (which found a gun in the home is 43 times more likely to kill an family member than a bad guy) the NRA ran off to Congress and demanded that gun studies be stopped. It was ironically called "The Dickey Amendment", which about says it all.

https://www.npr.org/2018/04/05/599773911/how-the-nra-worked-to-stifle-gun-violence-research

Don't you think it's strange (rhetorical question -- you don't think at all) that the CDC then went on to conduct more studies?

That Time The CDC Asked About Defensive Gun Uses​

In particular, a 2013 study ordered by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and conducted by The National Academies’ Institute of Medicine and National Research Council reported that, “Defensive use of guns by crime victims is a common occurrence”:

Almost all national survey estimates indicate that defensive gun uses by victims are at least as common as offensive uses by criminals, with estimates of annual uses ranging from about 500,000 to more than 3 million, in the context of about 300,000 violent crimes involving firearms in 2008.

Kleck looked at some previously unpublished results from the CDC surveys conducted in the 1990s and concluded:

In 1996, 1997, and 1998, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) conducted large-scale surveys asking about defensive gun use (DGU) in four to six states. Analysis of the raw data allows the estimation of the prevalence of DGU for those areas. Estimates based on CDC’s surveys confirm estimates for the same sets of states based on data from the 1993 National Self-Defense Survey (Kleck and Gertz 1995). Extrapolated to the U.S. as a whole CDC’s survey data imply that defensive uses of guns by crime victims are far more common than offensive uses by criminals. CDC has never reported these results.

CDC Gun Violence Study's Findings Not What Obama Wanted​

It was under these raw and highly charged circumstances that President Obama asked the CDC in January to perform the study. He was surely looking to manufacture a crisis that he could take advantage of.

What that study revealed, though, does not fit in with the media-Democrat message.

"Almost all national survey estimates indicate that defensive gun uses by victims are at least as common as offensive uses by criminals," says the report, which was completed in June and ignored in the mainstream press.

The study, which was farmed out by the CDC to the Institute of Medicine and National Research Council, also revealed that while there were "about 300,000 violent crimes involving firearms in 2008," the estimated number of defensive uses of guns ranges "from about 500,000 to more than 3 million per year."

Here are a few more salient points from the study:

• "Whether gun restrictions reduce firearm-related violence is an unresolved issue."

• "Studies that directly assessed the effect of actual defensive uses of guns have found consistently lower injury rates among gun-using crime victims compared with victims who used other self-protective strategies."

• One "body of research" (Kleck and Gertz, 1995) cited by the study found "estimated annual gun use for self-defense" to be "up to 2.5 million incidents, suggesting that self-defense can be an important crime deterrent."

• "There is empirical evidence that gun turn-in programs are ineffective."

Does anyone recall this study getting extensive media coverage or the administration plugging its key findings? Of course not. It doesn't support their anti-Second Amendment, anti-gun ideology. It's therefore ignored as if it never happened at all.

_______________________

And here you are, wanting to disarm Americans.

Why do you want people defenseless against criminals?

 

[daveman]

You mean a bunch of citizens were in the streets, going to the mayor's house to protest police misconduct, which is totally their right under the first amendment, but these two ******* loons said, "Eek, Black People" and started brandishing their gun comicallly.



The protestors didn't do anything wrong.

No doubt in part because the McCloskeys were using their 2nd Amendment rights.

 

[daveman]

Oh, no, a "Gate"? really?

A Mayor who lives in a gated community has no business being a mayor.

Oh, stop pretending you're not okay with your Masters living in luxury.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Not seeing a problem.

The point he was making is that weapon designed for a battlefield has no business being on our streets.

I wish we discuss that, but we won't.

Of course they do, ESPECIALLY if designed for a battlefield. That's what our streets are.

 

[JoeB131]

Don't you think it's strange (rhetorical question -- you don't think at all) that the CDC then went on to conduct more studies?

Except... they really didn't. Collating every other study, including bullshit like Lott's studies, isn't a study.

No doubt in part because the McCloskeys were using their 2nd Amendment rights.

There's no right to menace people in public with guns. If there were, every cop who shot a black guy for having a gun should to right to jail.

Oh, stop pretending you're not okay with your Masters living in luxury.

As long as they are accountable, I don't care.

Accountable means that, yes, we can protest outside your house.

 

[daveman]

Except... they really didn't. Collating every other study, including bullshit like Lott's studies, isn't a study.



There's no right to menace people in public with guns. If there were, every cop who shot a black guy for having a gun should to right to jail.


As long as they are accountable, I don't care.

Accountable means that, yes, we can protest outside your house.

"It doesn't agree with my programming, so it's not real!"

Run along, Comrade. No Communism for you!

 

[JoeB131]

"It doesn't agree with my programming, so it's not real!"

Run along, Comrade. No Communism for you!

Absurd studies shouldn't be treated as absurd.

When someone like Lott Claims there are 5 million DGU's a year, when we only have 200 self-defense homicides by civilians, you realize how absurd the claims are.

Think about it... you guys fantasize all day about murdering a "criminal" like George Zimmerman did. Yet you have 5 million opportunities and you all manage to not kill anyone.

 

[daveman]

Absurd studies shouldn't be treated as absurd.

When someone like Lott Claims there are 5 million DGU's a year, when we only have 200 self-defense homicides by civilians, you realize how absurd the claims are.

Think about it... you guys fantasize all day about murdering a "criminal" like George Zimmerman did. Yet you have 5 million opportunities and you all manage to not kill anyone.

News flash, Skippy: The vast majority of people don't WANT to kill other people. Even gun owners. Many criminals are discouraged by the the would-be victim showing he's armed.

There is so much absolute bullshit in your head. No wonder you're a Commie.

 

[BluesLegend]

Weird Tim Walz says his inability to speak proper English is why people think he lied about his military service​

So in response to his whopper lie, he told another whopper lie...sounds very Dem.

 

[BluesLegend]

Dems just admit it, your candidates are filthy lying scumbags!

 

[Thinker101]

Not seeing a problem.

The point he was making is that weapon designed for a battlefield has no business being on our streets.

I wish we discuss that, but we won't.

Yep, KamelToe agrees with you.

 

[blackhawk]

He didn’t outright lie but he did distort stuff and left some things intentionally in my opinion vague. When he talks about weapons he carried it was most likely in basic training or as an instructor but he doesn’t say and leaves the impression it was in combat. He talks about his unit being deployed to the Middle East in the gulf war it was leaving out that during that time he was sent to Italy again leaving the impression he was in a combat zone. During all the time from then to now he never clarified any of that which also included the discrepancies about his rank.

 

[JoeB131]

News flash, Skippy: The vast majority of people don't WANT to kill other people. Even gun owners. Many criminals are discouraged by the the would-be victim showing he's armed.

There is so much absolute bullshit in your head. No wonder you're a Commie.

Oh, I agree, nobody WANTS to kill anyone.

I'm sure the guy who shot his wife when they got into an argument over a burnt pot roast didn't want to kill his wife when he bought the gun, or the guy who shot his neighbor when the dog shit on his lawn. Guns in the home lead to tragedies.

 

[JoeB131]

He didn’t outright lie but he did distort stuff and left some things intentionally in my opinion vague. When he talks about weapons he carried it was most likely in basic training or as an instructor but he doesn’t say and leaves the impression it was in combat. He talks about his unit being deployed to the Middle East in the gulf war it was leaving out that during that time he was sent to Italy again leaving the impression he was in a combat zone. During all the time from then to now he never clarified any of that which also included the discrepancies about his rank.

Because no one really cared all that much.

Now that party that is running a guy who used fake bone spurs to avoid Vietnam wants to make a big deal about this.

 

[daveman]

Oh, I agree, nobody WANTS to kill anyone.

I'm sure the guy who shot his wife when they got into an argument over a burnt pot roast didn't want to kill his wife when he bought the gun, or the guy who shot his neighbor when the dog shit on his lawn. Guns in the home lead to tragedies.

They also prevent tragedies.

Oh, wait, I forgot, sorry -- you believe a criminal getting shot breaking into a home is a tragedy.