So...
how many of you can say you didn't convict him until you had the facts? As in, today?
Well, in all seriousness, it wasn't the charges that mattered, it was the things he said in defense of himself that led me to believe he was guilty, not some belief that he's guilty just because he's a Democrat.
Very true. If he had said no, the photo wasn't him, and his account was hacked by what he is assuming was a prankster, but he has turned the incident over to the proper authorities and expects appropriate measures to be taken, the media would have checked his story. If it was all verified, there would have been a couple of days of Weiner jokes and that would have been the end of it.
The fact that he didn't turn it over to anybody, wouldn't say whether the photo was him, etc. etc. etc. was a dead giveaway to anybody paying attention that he was lying through his teeth and was most likely guilty as sin. Clinton's sex problem was magnified when he tried to smear a private citizen to save his own bacon, and Weiner hasn't fared any better when he tried to do that.
But hey, Weiner hasn't ever promoted any family values or personal ethics, so he's okay doing this stuff, right? It's only bad if you pretend that you're good.
Well, to a Democrat the obvious isn't so apparent.

