‘We have been devastated’: Brampton man calls for accountability after wife dies from sepsis following birth of newborn son

shockedcanadian

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2012
Messages
43,702
Reaction score
42,742
Points
3,605
If any of you want to come to Canada feel free to do so.

RIP. Another victim of our healthcare system. A horrible way to die after giving birth to new life. I can't even imagine how her husband is feeling. A new child but at the expense of his wife.

Lawfare or healthcare abuse, it's a one way street in Canada. It took an American nurse to drive to Canada to try and get the Canadian doctors to listen as she correctly knew what was occurring. The arrogance in Ontario is astounding so of course they ignored her. Just another cog in our corrupt system.

Now she is dead.


Everything started off fine after Ravinder Kaur Sidhu gave birth to her third child, but she would never make it back to her home in Brampton, Ont., dying days later at the hospital. Her husband, Gurinder Sidhu, says she died from postpartum sepsis after a multi-organ failure, something he believes could have been prevented if her symptoms were properly addressed at the start.

The couple went to Mississauga’s Credit Valley Hospital on June 18 and in the early morning hours the following day, they welcomed their newborn son.

Sidhu says the delivery went fine, but noted Ravinder had a tear in her vagina that required stitches.


According to a timeline of events compiled by Sidhu, Ravinder broke out in a fever and violent shakes at around 11:15 a.m. For a brief period of time, Sidhu says Ravinder had trouble speaking.

“She’s vomiting, she has so much pain in the pelvic area,” Sidhu recounted. He said the doctors conducted a blood test but not the type that would determine whether bacteria were growing in her blood stream.

“They should have administered broad-based antibiotics while you wait for the blood culture (test) and whatever comes in the blood culture, then you do the... targeting antibiotics, but nothing was done in our case and the whole day was wasted.”

Sidhu says his wife would not receive any antibiotics for about 30 hours after she started displaying symptoms.

On June 20, Sidhu says, Ravinder’s sister—an ICU nurse practicing in Buffalo, N.Y.—drove to Credit Valley to advocate for her sister “after observing gross negligent behaviour” at the hospital. Sidhu said her sister warned that Ravinder appeared to be going through septic shock but that observation was ignored.

Sidhu says Ravinder developed Group A strep bacterial infection at the Mississauga-based hospital. The attending doctors first believed Ravinder’s pain was caused by giving birth but when they suspected she had sepsis, Sidhu said, they changed their theory to suggest the infection stemmed from an acupuncture treatment she received a few days prior—ignoring the second-degree tear she developed from giving birth.

The infection, Sidhu says, severely damaged his wife’s uterus and spread down to her leg.

On June 21 she received a leg debridement surgery—a procedure to remove infected tissue—as she had developed necrotizing fasciitis, a flesh-eating disease that can occur in childbirth or surgery. It is something that should be treated quickly to prevent the infection from spreading and before sepsis develops, according to the Sepsis Alliance, a U.S.-based patient advocacy organization.
 
If any of you want to come to Canada feel free to do so.

RIP. Another victim of our healthcare system. A horrible way to die after giving birth to new life. I can't even imagine how her husband is feeling. A new child but at the expense of his wife.

Lawfare or healthcare abuse, it's a one way street in Canada. It took an American nurse to drive to Canada to try and get the Canadian doctors to listen as she correctly knew what was occurring. The arrogance in Ontario is astounding so of course they ignored her. Just another cog in our corrupt system.

Now she is dead.


Everything started off fine after Ravinder Kaur Sidhu gave birth to her third child, but she would never make it back to her home in Brampton, Ont., dying days later at the hospital. Her husband, Gurinder Sidhu, says she died from postpartum sepsis after a multi-organ failure, something he believes could have been prevented if her symptoms were properly addressed at the start.

The couple went to Mississauga’s Credit Valley Hospital on June 18 and in the early morning hours the following day, they welcomed their newborn son.

Sidhu says the delivery went fine, but noted Ravinder had a tear in her vagina that required stitches.


According to a timeline of events compiled by Sidhu, Ravinder broke out in a fever and violent shakes at around 11:15 a.m. For a brief period of time, Sidhu says Ravinder had trouble speaking.

“She’s vomiting, she has so much pain in the pelvic area,” Sidhu recounted. He said the doctors conducted a blood test but not the type that would determine whether bacteria were growing in her blood stream.

“They should have administered broad-based antibiotics while you wait for the blood culture (test) and whatever comes in the blood culture, then you do the... targeting antibiotics, but nothing was done in our case and the whole day was wasted.”

Sidhu says his wife would not receive any antibiotics for about 30 hours after she started displaying symptoms.

On June 20, Sidhu says, Ravinder’s sister—an ICU nurse practicing in Buffalo, N.Y.—drove to Credit Valley to advocate for her sister “after observing gross negligent behaviour” at the hospital. Sidhu said her sister warned that Ravinder appeared to be going through septic shock but that observation was ignored.

Sidhu says Ravinder developed Group A strep bacterial infection at the Mississauga-based hospital. The attending doctors first believed Ravinder’s pain was caused by giving birth but when they suspected she had sepsis, Sidhu said, they changed their theory to suggest the infection stemmed from an acupuncture treatment she received a few days prior—ignoring the second-degree tear she developed from giving birth.

The infection, Sidhu says, severely damaged his wife’s uterus and spread down to her leg.

On June 21 she received a leg debridement surgery—a procedure to remove infected tissue—as she had developed necrotizing fasciitis, a flesh-eating disease that can occur in childbirth or surgery. It is something that should be treated quickly to prevent the infection from spreading and before sepsis develops, according to the Sepsis Alliance, a U.S.-based patient advocacy organization.


"Approximately 800 women in the US die each year during pregnancy and within 42 days after delivery. The estimated maternal mortality rate was 26.4 per 100 000 live births in 2015."

"All developed countries did better: 4.4 per 100 000 live births in Sweden, 9.2 in the United Kingdom, and 7.3 in Canada."

So, the US which spends like 3 times more than the UK on healthcare, has a much higher mortality rate from pregnancies.

Why do you think that is?

Even in Canada it's more than three times lower.
 

"Approximately 800 women in the US die each year during pregnancy and within 42 days after delivery. The estimated maternal mortality rate was 26.4 per 100 000 live births in 2015."

"All developed countries did better: 4.4 per 100 000 live births in Sweden, 9.2 in the United Kingdom, and 7.3 in Canada."

So, the US which spends like 3 times more than the UK on healthcare, has a much higher mortality rate from pregnancies.

Why do you think that is?

Even in Canada it's more than three times lower.
Maybe you have a worse arrogance problem in your healthcare system than we do.

Our system is just taxed so doctors have to always decide "do I run this test and cost the system _____ dollars"?

It's not very comforting. Even with my health issues I tried to avoid them.
 
Maybe you have a worse arrogance problem in your healthcare system than we do.

Our system is just taxed so doctors have to always decide "do I run this test and cost the system _____ dollars"?

It's not very comforting. Even with my health issues I tried to avoid them.

Sure, but imagine that if Canada spent anywhere near what the US spends, it'd be a terrific system.

For some reason people don't want to pay taxes, but will pay three times more for health insurance, and they get screwed over at every stage of the healthcare process, starting with giving 15% to the insurance company so they can be told "sorry, no".
 
Sure, but imagine that if Canada spent anywhere near what the US spends, it'd be a terrific system.

For some reason people don't want to pay taxes, but will pay three times more for health insurance, and they get screwed over at every stage of the healthcare process, starting with giving 15% to the insurance company so they can be told "sorry, no".
Yeah but we pay a hell of a lot higher taxes outside of California or maybe some in New York.

Police states are very expensive and even more unaccountable
 
Yeah but we pay a hell of a lot higher taxes outside of California or maybe some in New York.

Police states are very expensive and even more unaccountable
How much more do you pay?


I did this, in Ontario you'd pay $26,153 in tax on $100,000 wage. That's federal tax, provincial tax, pension and insurance.


In Texas you'd be paying $21,491. So, yeah, $5,000 a year more in taxes in Ontario than Texas.

In Texas you get to pay for your own health insurance. So, if you have pre-existing health conditions, you're going to lose out. If you are older, you lose out.
~
I looked up how much you'd pay in Texas, says $200 to $600 a month for an individual. I'm thinking this is low. Then I find another that says the lowest is $300 a month.


That's for "young adults".

For seniors it's $1000 a month, the LOWEST. That's $12,000 a year. In Anderson county the lowest is $468 and not a single one is under $400 a month.

That's already your $5,000 a month you've saved. And what do you get? The cheapest health insurance package for the youngest people.

"

What are the downsides of a cheap health insurance plan?​

Compared to higher-priced plans, cheap health insurance has higher out-of-pocket costs, including deductibles and copays. More expensive plans reduce out-of-pocket expenses and offer more extensive health care coverage.
"

You get to pay every time you go to hospital, so, your $5,000 a year is if you don't go to hospital.

And it goes up, every year, year after year and every year you're paying some dooshbag to sit there and tell you how you're not getting this and not getting that and you've got the wrong kind of cancer for them to give a damn.

It's better in Canada, you lose your job, you don't pay, and you still get.
 
How much more do you pay?


I did this, in Ontario you'd pay $26,153 in tax on $100,000 wage. That's federal tax, provincial tax, pension and insurance.


In Texas you'd be paying $21,491. So, yeah, $5,000 a year more in taxes in Ontario than Texas.

In Texas you get to pay for your own health insurance. So, if you have pre-existing health conditions, you're going to lose out. If you are older, you lose out.
~
I looked up how much you'd pay in Texas, says $200 to $600 a month for an individual. I'm thinking this is low. Then I find another that says the lowest is $300 a month.


That's for "young adults".

For seniors it's $1000 a month, the LOWEST. That's $12,000 a year. In Anderson county the lowest is $468 and not a single one is under $400 a month.

That's already your $5,000 a month you've saved. And what do you get? The cheapest health insurance package for the youngest people.

"

What are the downsides of a cheap health insurance plan?​

Compared to higher-priced plans, cheap health insurance has higher out-of-pocket costs, including deductibles and copays. More expensive plans reduce out-of-pocket expenses and offer more extensive health care coverage.
"

You get to pay every time you go to hospital, so, your $5,000 a year is if you don't go to hospital.

And it goes up, every year, year after year and every year you're paying some dooshbag to sit there and tell you how you're not getting this and not getting that and you've got the wrong kind of cancer for them to give a damn.

It's better in Canada, you lose your job, you don't pay, and you still get.
Yeah but with your healthcare system in Texas you aren't going to wait 15 hours in an emergency room. We have had many die on the floor waiting.

I mean that's 3rd World stuff.

We have lost too much talent. This talent generates employment when they create businesses. "Making it" in Canada, is getting a government job.
 
Yeah but with your healthcare system in Texas you aren't going to wait 15 hours in an emergency room. We have had many die on the floor waiting.

I mean that's 3rd World stuff.

We have lost too much talent. This talent generates employment when they create businesses. "Making it" in Canada, is getting a government job.

Maybe not.

But imagine how much Canada could do if it spent the same as the US.


Texas, $8,406 per person in 2020. That's $260 billion.

Canada spent $336 billion in 2022. That's $142 billion US.

So, Texas is spending $118 billion more a year on healthcare, which is 83% of what Canada spends MORE.

Canada has 41 million people, Texas 32 million people.

So Texas spends 83% more and it has 11 million people more.

Canada's paying $3,380 US a year. Imagine how great your healthcare system would be if you were spending $6,000 a year. It'd be much better than Texas.

That's the problem here. Politicians say "paying taxes is bad" and then "pay more for health insurance".

And what do MOST PEOPLE GET in Texas? They get screwed, they don't get good health care, the rich do.
 
Maybe not.

But imagine how much Canada could do if it spent the same as the US.


Texas, $8,406 per person in 2020. That's $260 billion.

Canada spent $336 billion in 2022. That's $142 billion US.

So, Texas is spending $118 billion more a year on healthcare, which is 83% of what Canada spends MORE.

Canada has 41 million people, Texas 32 million people.

So Texas spends 83% more and it has 11 million people more.

Canada's paying $3,380 US a year. Imagine how great your healthcare system would be if you were spending $6,000 a year. It'd be much better than Texas.

That's the problem here. Politicians say "paying taxes is bad" and then "pay more for health insurance".

And what do MOST PEOPLE GET in Texas? They get screwed, they don't get good health care, the rich do.
Did you see the graph I posted earler today though? Texas is 83k per capita, Canada 52k

1756352439842.webp
 
Did you see the graph I posted earler today though? Texas is 83k per capita, Canada 52k

View attachment 1155333

Yeah, and what does that mean?

Texas's mean income for the first quintile is $14,000 a year and represents 3.25%.

Where would these people be better off? In a state where the average health care is their mean income or Canada?

The second quintile is $38,000, that's another 9%. So, where would these people be better off?

The bottom 50% of people in Texas have a family earning $40,000 or less. You take out how much for health insurance for that family and you're broke.

half the people can't really afford to live in Texas.
 
Back
Top Bottom