We definitely need more women in public office

[Billy000]

Oh there it is. The blatant sexism sometimes seen on this forum. I already know any women in office are smarter than you.

What could be more blatantly sexist than thinking that a person's sex has anything to do with that person's fitness for public office, as proclaimed in your OP?

We do not need more women in public office, nor less. What we need is more people in public office who re competent and qualified,and who will govern in strict accordance with this nation's Constitution. I don't care if they're male or female, black, white Asian, Hispanic, or whatever.

Okay, nothing I said has anything to do with giving special treatment to women.

 

[Dragonlady]

Okay but none like Hillary.

The way Hillary was treated is exactly why there are so few women running for office. Or Pelosi, or Warren, or Waters.

 

[theHawk]

I won’t get into why there aren’t more women in office except by saying that not enough women even try to run for office in the first place. I think this is something feminists do not want to admit.

However.

We DEFINITELY need more women in public office. They are just as capable of handling the job as men. And more importantly, they - on average - have personality traits that men often lack on average.

1) They are more willing to comprise across the aisle. Women in Committee in congress have demonstrated this ability over men.

2) They also are more empathetic both on an emotional level and a cognitive level. They are more willing to be sympathetic to the plight of the poor and shrinking middle class. Moreover, they have the fairness of mind to consider an opposing perspective which in turn contributes to their ability to compromise.

3) They don’t have the egos men often have.

4) Oh, and for the most part, they aren’t sex perverts.

Again, I stress, these observations are ON AVERAGE. Obviously a lot of men have these attributes just as a lot of women lack them.

The last thing we need are more feminist c*nts in places of power.
Until they pick up the slack in career fields of the dirtiest and dangerous jobs, as well as the technical ones that require brain power, we don’t need more in positions of power, especially positions over men who actually do most of the hard and dirty work women never do.

 

[skye]

Okay but none like Hillary.

The way Hillary was treated is exactly why there are so few women running for office. Or Pelosi, or Warren, or Waters.

Hillary was treated like the witch that she is!

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

I won’t get into why there aren’t more women in office except by saying that not enough women even try to run for office in the first place. I think this is something feminists do not want to admit.

However.

We DEFINITELY need more women in public office. They are just as capable of handling the job as men. And more importantly, they - on average - have personality traits that men often lack on average.

1) They are more willing to comprise across the aisle. Women in Committee in congress have demonstrated this ability over men.

That's how nations are dismantled by increment.

2) They also are more empathetic both on an emotional level and a cognitive level. They are more willing to be sympathetic to the plight of the poor and shrinking middle class. Moreover, they have the fairness of mind to consider an opposing perspective which in turn contributes to their ability to compromise.

That's how nations go broke, spending the product of the nation on those who produce nothing themselves beyond urine and feces.

3) They don’t have the egos men often have.

That's how nations surrender to the whims of other nations.

4) Oh, and for the most part, they aren’t sex perverts.

Sounds like a personal opinion.

As usual your moronic misogyny is repetitive and lacks any sort of substance.

Try history, from the beginning.

Not misogyny. I merely recognize the differences.

 

[Billy000]

I won’t get into why there aren’t more women in office except by saying that not enough women even try to run for office in the first place. I think this is something feminists do not want to admit.

However.

We DEFINITELY need more women in public office. They are just as capable of handling the job as men. And more importantly, they - on average - have personality traits that men often lack on average.

1) They are more willing to comprise across the aisle. Women in Committee in congress have demonstrated this ability over men.

That's how nations are dismantled by increment.

2) They also are more empathetic both on an emotional level and a cognitive level. They are more willing to be sympathetic to the plight of the poor and shrinking middle class. Moreover, they have the fairness of mind to consider an opposing perspective which in turn contributes to their ability to compromise.

That's how nations go broke, spending the product of the nation on those who produce nothing themselves beyond urine and feces.

3) They don’t have the egos men often have.

That's how nations surrender to the whims of other nations.

4) Oh, and for the most part, they aren’t sex perverts.

Sounds like a personal opinion.

As usual your moronic misogyny is repetitive and lacks any sort of substance.

Try history, from the beginning.

Not misogyny. I merely recognize the differences.

Yeah, because men have the physical advantage. It’s not like those basic caveman even thought about giving them power.

 

[Billy000]

I won’t get into why there aren’t more women in office except by saying that not enough women even try to run for office in the first place. I think this is something feminists do not want to admit.

However.

We DEFINITELY need more women in public office. They are just as capable of handling the job as men. And more importantly, they - on average - have personality traits that men often lack on average.

1) They are more willing to comprise across the aisle. Women in Committee in congress have demonstrated this ability over men.

2) They also are more empathetic both on an emotional level and a cognitive level. They are more willing to be sympathetic to the plight of the poor and shrinking middle class. Moreover, they have the fairness of mind to consider an opposing perspective which in turn contributes to their ability to compromise.

3) They don’t have the egos men often have.

4) Oh, and for the most part, they aren’t sex perverts.

Again, I stress, these observations are ON AVERAGE. Obviously a lot of men have these attributes just as a lot of women lack them.

The last thing we need are more feminist c*nts in places of power.
Until they pick up the slack in career fields of the dirtiest and dangerous jobs, as well as the technical ones that require brain power, we don’t need more in positions of power, especially positions over men who actually do most of the hard and dirty work women never do.

God you’re stupid. You do know that many men stay away from female dominated professions right?

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Okay, nothing I said has anything to do with giving special treatment to women.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Oh there it is. The blatant sexism sometimes seen on this forum. I already know any women in office are smarter than you.

What could be more blatantly sexist than thinking that a person's sex has anything to do with that person's fitness for public office, as proclaimed in your OP?

We do not need more women in public office, nor less. What we need is more people in public office who re competent and qualified,and who will govern in strict accordance with this nation's Constitution. I don't care if they're male or female, black, white Asian, Hispanic, or whatever.

I 100% agree. But I don't think you loserterians have any idea about how broad the constitutions really is so I guess we socialist will be winning some elections in the future.

 

[skye]

I won’t get into why there aren’t more women in office except by saying that not enough women even try to run for office in the first place. I think this is something feminists do not want to admit.

However.

We DEFINITELY need more women in public office. They are just as capable of handling the job as men. And more importantly, they - on average - have personality traits that men often lack on average.

1) They are more willing to comprise across the aisle. Women in Committee in congress have demonstrated this ability over men.

2) They also are more empathetic both on an emotional level and a cognitive level. They are more willing to be sympathetic to the plight of the poor and shrinking middle class. Moreover, they have the fairness of mind to consider an opposing perspective which in turn contributes to their ability to compromise.

3) They don’t have the egos men often have.

4) Oh, and for the most part, they aren’t sex perverts.

Again, I stress, these observations are ON AVERAGE. Obviously a lot of men have these attributes just as a lot of women lack them.

The last thing we need are more feminist c*nts in places of power.
Until they pick up the slack in career fields of the dirtiest and dangerous jobs, as well as the technical ones that require brain power, we don’t need more in positions of power, especially positions over men who actually do most of the hard and dirty work women never do.

I agree with you wholeheartedly theHawk!

 

[Dragonlady]

Okay but none like Hillary.

The way Hillary was treated is exactly why there are so few women running for office. Or Pelosi, or Warren, or Waters.

Hillary was treated like the witch that she is!

No she was treated like the witch Republicans claim she is. 30 years Republicans have lied about Hillary Clinton.

At the beginning of the campaign I was disappointed. I wanted a woman to run but not Hillary. Didn’t like her and then I asked myself why I didn’t like her and I started researching all the things I believed about Hillary and discovered that all of the things I disliked about her was based on lies Republicans have been telling about her since Bill was President.

 

[Crixus]

I won’t get into why there aren’t more women in office except by saying that not enough women even try to run for office in the first place. I think this is something feminists do not want to admit.

However.

We DEFINITELY need more women in public office. They are just as capable of handling the job as men. And more importantly, they - on average - have personality traits that men often lack on average.

1) They are more willing to comprise across the aisle. Women in Committee in congress have demonstrated this ability over men.

2) They also are more empathetic both on an emotional level and a cognitive level. They are more willing to be sympathetic to the plight of the poor and shrinking middle class. Moreover, they have the fairness of mind to consider an opposing perspective which in turn contributes to their ability to compromise.

3) They don’t have the egos men often have.

4) Oh, and for the most part, they aren’t sex perverts.

Again, I stress, these observations are ON AVERAGE. Obviously a lot of men have these attributes just as a lot of women lack them.

Only if they are hawt. No more mud sharks and hags. I say strippers for Congress!

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

I 100% agree. But I don't think you loserterians have any idea about how broad the constitutions really is so I guess we socialist will be winning some elections in the future.

Yeah...sure....you did REAL well at winning in Venezuela. If you like dumbass Dictators and starvation. Keep up the good work.

(sarcasm.....you probably won't figure that out)

 

[Shrimpbox]

Oh, and I’ll also add that any woman currently holding public office is a hell of a lot smarter than the idiot in the White House.

Yeah right, Maxine Waters is a real Einstein.

 

[Billy000]

Okay, nothing I said has anything to do with giving special treatment to women.

View attachment 161617

Well because the only thing you can come back with is some meme created by an 8th grader, I’ll assume you know I’m right.

 

[skye]

Oh, and I’ll also add that any woman currently holding public office is a hell of a lot smarter than the idiot in the White House.

Yeah right, Maxine Waters is a real Einstein.

haaaaa .....LOL

 

[Dale Smith]

Oh, and I’ll also add that any woman currently holding public office is a hell of a lot smarter than the idiot in the White House.

I have ZERO complaints about Trump.....what complaints do you believe that I should have???

BE specific........

 

[Dragonlady]

1. I won’t get into why there aren’t more women in office except by saying that not enough women even try to run for office in the first place. I think this is something feminists do not want to admit.

However.

We DEFINITELY need more women in public office. They are just as capable of handling the job as men. And more importantly, they - on average - have personality traits that men often lack on average.

1) They are more willing to comprise across the aisle. Women in Committee in congress have demonstrated this ability over men.

2) They also are more empathetic both on an emotional level and a cognitive level. They are more willing to be sympathetic to the plight of the poor and shrinking middle class. Moreover, they have the fairness of mind to consider an opposing perspective which in turn contributes to their ability to compromise.

3) They don’t have the egos men often have.

4) Oh, and for the most part, they aren’t sex perverts.

Again, I stress, these observations are ON AVERAGE. Obviously a lot of men have these attributes just as a lot of women lack them.

The last thing we need are more feminist c*nts in places of power.
Until they pick up the slack in career fields of the dirtiest and dangerous jobs, as well as the technical ones that require brain power, we don’t need more in positions of power, especially positions over men who actually do most of the hard and dirty work women never do.

Says the guy who isn’t a misogynist.

The day a man pushes a 9 pound baby out of his body through a hole no bigger than his two fingers, then we’ll talk about the hard dirty work no man does because women do a lot of hard dirty and technical jobs too.

Misogynist piece of shit.

 

[theHawk]

I won’t get into why there aren’t more women in office except by saying that not enough women even try to run for office in the first place. I think this is something feminists do not want to admit.

However.

We DEFINITELY need more women in public office. They are just as capable of handling the job as men. And more importantly, they - on average - have personality traits that men often lack on average.

1) They are more willing to comprise across the aisle. Women in Committee in congress have demonstrated this ability over men.

2) They also are more empathetic both on an emotional level and a cognitive level. They are more willing to be sympathetic to the plight of the poor and shrinking middle class. Moreover, they have the fairness of mind to consider an opposing perspective which in turn contributes to their ability to compromise.

3) They don’t have the egos men often have.

4) Oh, and for the most part, they aren’t sex perverts.

Again, I stress, these observations are ON AVERAGE. Obviously a lot of men have these attributes just as a lot of women lack them.

The last thing we need are more feminist c*nts in places of power.
Until they pick up the slack in career fields of the dirtiest and dangerous jobs, as well as the technical ones that require brain power, we don’t need more in positions of power, especially positions over men who actually do most of the hard and dirty work women never do.

God you’re stupid. You do know that many men stay away from female dominated professions right?

Like what professions? Pole dancing?

 

[basquebromance]

we need zero women in public office. except Mad Maxine Waters. she's just too entertaining.