We all know when democrats will start impeachment investigation..

[dudmuck]

An impeachment investigation meaning investigating whether or not there are grounds to impeach?

Good luck with that.

Keep in mind that although half the country may support impeachment, half do not.

A higher percentage of people support impeaching Trump now than the percentage of adults who supported impeaching Nixon at the beginning of the Watergate hearings in 1973.

By June of that year, as the televised hearings had just kicked off, public support for Nixon's impeachment was at just 19%, according to Gallup polling data obtained by the Washington Post.

 

[WheelieAddict]

during the election probably in April 2020
They will say how can you vote for trump he’s being impeached lol
More than half of House Democrats on board with Trump impeachment inquiry

So stupid Nancy.. we know your game

Exactly
The Dems will say that if we reelect Trump they will impeach him.
That will suppress Trump's voters.
And then they WINNNN!!

It's true, republicans are cult like sheep who will vote for whomever Fox news will tell them too. Porno first lady, "businessman" whose companies were scams. Keep being good christians and "patriots" lol

 

[MoonPie]

An impeachment investigation meaning investigating whether or not there are grounds to impeach?

Good luck with that.

Keep in mind that although half the country may support impeachment, half do not.

A higher percentage of people support impeaching Trump now than the percentage of adults who supported impeaching Nixon at the beginning of the Watergate hearings in 1973.

By June of that year, as the televised hearings had just kicked off, public support for Nixon's impeachment was at just 19%, according to Gallup polling data obtained by the Washington Post.

You can't compare Nixon supporters to Trump supporters.

Ignoring how half the country feels is what got us Trump in the first place.

 

[leftwinger]

If he hadn't and wasn't obstructing as we speak, too bad, he only has himself to blame.

Ohh he obstructed?? What was he found guilty of?? Mic drop

Not yet, did you not hear the Mueller say he'd be indicted if he wasn't the Potus.

Not yet, did you not hear the Mueller say he'd be indicted if he wasn't the Potus.

He said "Could be". But what moron would try? With no violations. The phony "investigation" was concluded w/o interference.

 

[dudmuck]

An impeachment investigation meaning investigating whether or not there are grounds to impeach?

Good luck with that.

Keep in mind that although half the country may support impeachment, half do not.

A higher percentage of people support impeaching Trump now than the percentage of adults who supported impeaching Nixon at the beginning of the Watergate hearings in 1973.

By June of that year, as the televised hearings had just kicked off, public support for Nixon's impeachment was at just 19%, according to Gallup polling data obtained by the Washington Post.

You can't compare Nixon supporters to Trump supporters.

Ignoring how half the country feels is what got us Trump in the first place.

The polls compare all people.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

If he hadn't and wasn't obstructing as we speak, too bad, he only has himself to blame.

Ohh he obstructed?? What was he found guilty of?? Mic drop

Not yet, did you not hear the Mueller say he'd be indicted if he wasn't the Potus.

Actually he NEVER said that and in fact clarified in the Congressional hearing he never intended that to be the talking point.

 

[MoonPie]

An impeachment investigation meaning investigating whether or not there are grounds to impeach?

Good luck with that.

Keep in mind that although half the country may support impeachment, half do not.

A higher percentage of people support impeaching Trump now than the percentage of adults who supported impeaching Nixon at the beginning of the Watergate hearings in 1973.

By June of that year, as the televised hearings had just kicked off, public support for Nixon's impeachment was at just 19%, according to Gallup polling data obtained by the Washington Post.

You can't compare Nixon supporters to Trump supporters.

Ignoring how half the country feels is what got us Trump in the first place.

The polls compare all people.

Nixon was the 1970's. Society isn't quite the same anymore and won't react the same way.

Remember, the Watergate break-in was an actual crime. Trump is accused of obstructing an investigation into a 'crime' he didn't commit in the first place (collusion, which isn't a crime).

Nixon absolutely did try to fire the investigator - repeatedly - in order to cover up an actual crime committed. We can't compare that to Trump firing Comey.

What will definitely happen is even deeper divisions in the nation as a whole and probably too within both parties. I can't see how that's a good thing.

 

[HappyJoy]

during the election probably in April 2020
They will say how can you vote for trump he’s being impeached lol
More than half of House Democrats on board with Trump impeachment inquiry

So stupid Nancy.. we know your game

The election isn't held in April. It's held in November.
And you're calling Nancy stupid?

you have to give Jitss617 a break, his grasp of the English language is really shitty. I am torn on if he is a bad Russian bot or just some kid that never made it past the 8th grade

Both.

 

[Jitss617]

during the election probably in April 2020
They will say how can you vote for trump he’s being impeached lol
More than half of House Democrats on board with Trump impeachment inquiry

So stupid Nancy.. we know your game

The election isn't held in April. It's held in November.
And you're calling Nancy stupid?

you have to give Jitss617 a break, his grasp of the English language is really shitty. I am torn on if he is a bad Russian bot or just some kid that never made it past the 8th grade

Both.

Who did you vote for?

 

[22lcidw]

during the election probably in April 2020
They will say how can you vote for trump he’s being impeached lol
More than half of House Democrats on board with Trump impeachment inquiry

So stupid Nancy.. we know your game

Exactly
The Dems will say that if we reelect Trump they will impeach him.
That will suppress Trump's voters.
And then they WINNNN!!

It's true, republicans are cult like sheep who will vote for whomever Fox news will tell them too. Porno first lady, "businessman" whose companies were scams. Keep being good christians and "patriots" lol

So what you are saying is way back before the 2016 election even a couple of years before, voters were told to pick Trump. FOX news is not conservative. It has a few moderate to conservative pundits with daily shows and is moving leftward. There are no conservative news channels on cable TV. Frankly, there is a market for stations that are compatible to CNN and MSNBC to start. But the globalist owners are not about to do that.

 

[dudmuck]

An impeachment investigation meaning investigating whether or not there are grounds to impeach?

Good luck with that.

Keep in mind that although half the country may support impeachment, half do not.

A higher percentage of people support impeaching Trump now than the percentage of adults who supported impeaching Nixon at the beginning of the Watergate hearings in 1973.

By June of that year, as the televised hearings had just kicked off, public support for Nixon's impeachment was at just 19%, according to Gallup polling data obtained by the Washington Post.

You can't compare Nixon supporters to Trump supporters.

Ignoring how half the country feels is what got us Trump in the first place.

The polls compare all people.

Nixon was the 1970's. Society isn't quite the same anymore and won't react the same way.

Remember, the Watergate break-in was an actual crime. Trump is accused of obstructing an investigation into a 'crime' he didn't commit in the first place (collusion, which isn't a crime).

Nixon absolutely did try to fire the investigator - repeatedly - in order to cover up an actual crime committed. We can't compare that to Trump firing Comey.

What will definitely happen is even deeper divisions in the nation as a whole and probably too within both parties. I can't see how that's a good thing.

Firing Comey is the least of all this.
Trump can be guilty of obstruction even if there was no underlying crime. Trump pressured witnesses to be uncooperative with investigation. He asked senior official to lie or mislead public. And tried to fire special council.

if Trump were running for any other office in the entire country, he would have already been charged with a serious federal crime. But because that office was the Presidency and he "won", he is now immune to any and all laws because of his position, which he has because of illegal foreign interference that he welcomed with open arms.

 

[jc456]

during the election probably in April 2020
They will say how can you vote for trump he’s being impeached lol
More than half of House Democrats on board with Trump impeachment inquiry

So stupid Nancy.. we know your game

Have at it. That guarantees trump’s victory

 

[RetiredGySgt]

An impeachment investigation meaning investigating whether or not there are grounds to impeach?

Good luck with that.

Keep in mind that although half the country may support impeachment, half do not.

A higher percentage of people support impeaching Trump now than the percentage of adults who supported impeaching Nixon at the beginning of the Watergate hearings in 1973.

By June of that year, as the televised hearings had just kicked off, public support for Nixon's impeachment was at just 19%, according to Gallup polling data obtained by the Washington Post.

You can't compare Nixon supporters to Trump supporters.

Ignoring how half the country feels is what got us Trump in the first place.

The polls compare all people.

Nixon was the 1970's. Society isn't quite the same anymore and won't react the same way.

Remember, the Watergate break-in was an actual crime. Trump is accused of obstructing an investigation into a 'crime' he didn't commit in the first place (collusion, which isn't a crime).

Nixon absolutely did try to fire the investigator - repeatedly - in order to cover up an actual crime committed. We can't compare that to Trump firing Comey.

What will definitely happen is even deeper divisions in the nation as a whole and probably too within both parties. I can't see how that's a good thing.

Firing Comey is the least of all this.
Trump can be guilty of obstruction even if there was no underlying crime. Trump pressured witnesses to be uncooperative with investigation. He asked senior official to lie or mislead public. And tried to fire special council.

if Trump were running for any other office in the entire country, he would have already been charged with a serious federal crime. But because that office was the Presidency and he "won", he is now immune to any and all laws because of his position, which he has because of illegal foreign interference that he welcomed with open arms.

Sorry RETARD but the President ACTUALLY has the authority to fire a special prosecutor. And Mueller already testified NO ONE obstructed his investigation UNDER OATH to Congress.

 

[dudmuck]

A higher percentage of people support impeaching Trump now than the percentage of adults who supported impeaching Nixon at the beginning of the Watergate hearings in 1973.

By June of that year, as the televised hearings had just kicked off, public support for Nixon's impeachment was at just 19%, according to Gallup polling data obtained by the Washington Post.

You can't compare Nixon supporters to Trump supporters.

Ignoring how half the country feels is what got us Trump in the first place.

The polls compare all people.

Nixon was the 1970's. Society isn't quite the same anymore and won't react the same way.

Remember, the Watergate break-in was an actual crime. Trump is accused of obstructing an investigation into a 'crime' he didn't commit in the first place (collusion, which isn't a crime).

Nixon absolutely did try to fire the investigator - repeatedly - in order to cover up an actual crime committed. We can't compare that to Trump firing Comey.

What will definitely happen is even deeper divisions in the nation as a whole and probably too within both parties. I can't see how that's a good thing.

Firing Comey is the least of all this.
Trump can be guilty of obstruction even if there was no underlying crime. Trump pressured witnesses to be uncooperative with investigation. He asked senior official to lie or mislead public. And tried to fire special council.

if Trump were running for any other office in the entire country, he would have already been charged with a serious federal crime. But because that office was the Presidency and he "won", he is now immune to any and all laws because of his position, which he has because of illegal foreign interference that he welcomed with open arms.

Sorry RETARD but the President ACTUALLY has the authority to fire a special prosecutor. And Mueller already testified NO ONE obstructed his investigation UNDER OATH to Congress.

President cannot directly fire special counsel. Only the deputy attorney general who appointed Mueller can fire him and only for cause. But Trump could fire the DAG, or order the special-counsel regulations repealed and fire Mueller himself.

Firing without cause would trigger a constitutional crisis.

Mueller testified under oath: no exoneration and could be charged after leaving office.

"You believe that he committed -- you could charge the president of the United States with obstruction of justice after he left office?" Buck asked again.

"Yes," Mueller answered.

 

[gallantwarrior]

An impeachment investigation meaning investigating whether or not there are grounds to impeach?

Good luck with that.

Keep in mind that although half the country may support impeachment, half do not.

A higher percentage of people support impeaching Trump now than the percentage of adults who supported impeaching Nixon at the beginning of the Watergate hearings in 1973.

By June of that year, as the televised hearings had just kicked off, public support for Nixon's impeachment was at just 19%, according to Gallup polling data obtained by the Washington Post.

Your percentages depend on your source. Every poll is biased and unreliable. But you will believe that information supporting your own personal bias.

 

[dudmuck]

An impeachment investigation meaning investigating whether or not there are grounds to impeach?

Good luck with that.

Keep in mind that although half the country may support impeachment, half do not.

A higher percentage of people support impeaching Trump now than the percentage of adults who supported impeaching Nixon at the beginning of the Watergate hearings in 1973.

By June of that year, as the televised hearings had just kicked off, public support for Nixon's impeachment was at just 19%, according to Gallup polling data obtained by the Washington Post.

Your percentages depend on your source. Every poll is biased and unreliable. But you will believe that information supporting your own personal bias.

The poll in 1973 was a gallup poll, you can read about it here.

In November, Gallup showed the percentage of Americans thinking that the president should leave office jumping from 19% in June to 38%, but still, 51% did not support impeachment and an end to Nixon’s presidency.

 

[MoonPie]

An impeachment investigation meaning investigating whether or not there are grounds to impeach?

Good luck with that.

Keep in mind that although half the country may support impeachment, half do not.

A higher percentage of people support impeaching Trump now than the percentage of adults who supported impeaching Nixon at the beginning of the Watergate hearings in 1973.

By June of that year, as the televised hearings had just kicked off, public support for Nixon's impeachment was at just 19%, according to Gallup polling data obtained by the Washington Post.

You can't compare Nixon supporters to Trump supporters.

Ignoring how half the country feels is what got us Trump in the first place.

The polls compare all people.

Nixon was the 1970's. Society isn't quite the same anymore and won't react the same way.

Remember, the Watergate break-in was an actual crime. Trump is accused of obstructing an investigation into a 'crime' he didn't commit in the first place (collusion, which isn't a crime).

Nixon absolutely did try to fire the investigator - repeatedly - in order to cover up an actual crime committed. We can't compare that to Trump firing Comey.

What will definitely happen is even deeper divisions in the nation as a whole and probably too within both parties. I can't see how that's a good thing.

Firing Comey is the least of all this.
Trump can be guilty of obstruction even if there was no underlying crime. Trump pressured witnesses to be uncooperative with investigation. He asked senior official to lie or mislead public. And tried to fire special council.

if Trump were running for any other office in the entire country, he would have already been charged with a serious federal crime. But because that office was the Presidency and he "won", he is now immune to any and all laws because of his position, which he has because of illegal foreign interference that he welcomed with open arms.

Mueller only agreed that a president could be indicted after leaving office, as in any president. He also didn't indicate if Trump should face any charges.

That is not true and Mueller clarified his remarks:

"I want to go back to one thing that was said this morning by Mr. Lieu, who said, and I quote, ‘You didn't charge the president because of the OLC opinion.’

That is not the correct way to say it. As we say in the report and as I said in the opening, we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime."

Could Trump be indicted after leaving office?