Watch: Tucker Carlson has had enough of David Hogg rips him to shreds in epic new rant

[Toddsterpatriot]

And this is where kids like Hogg get these ridiculous ideas. It's bullshit. It's another false dichotomy and non sequitur. It does not necessarily follow that because you support 2nd Amendment rights that your priority is not protecting the children. 2nd Amendment supporters simply don't think that banning assault weapons or guns in general will fix the problem. And demonizing 2nd Amendment supporters will most certainly not fix the problem.

Hogg and his fellow students understand the situation better than conservatives give them credit for

They saw what happened after Sandy Hook. Politicians gave platitudes and laid low till it passé day away

These students are holding their hands to the fire. Elections are seven months away.....can they keep up the pressure?

They may or may not understand the situation better than conservatives give them credit for but Hogg and others like him are still wrong to think that these people don't care about the children just because they're 2nd Amendment supporters.

We had 19 six year olds slaughtered at Sandy Hook and did not even expand background checks
We care more about not inconveniencing gun owners than we do about the safety of children

Hogg is correct

We had 19 six year olds slaughtered at Sandy Hook and did not even expand background checks

What would expanded background checks have done for the victims at Sandy Hook?

Hogg is correct

Hogg is a whiney ****.

Hogg has a dog in the fight. He was under fire and had friends senselessly killed.
We saw children slaughtered at Sandy Hook and did nothing but offer thoughts and prayers

Hogg and his classmates have seen how the game is played. Feign Shock, offer empty promises and wait for the outrage to go away

In an election year, they realize they must keep the pressure on. Go after NRA funding and watch politicians scramble

Hogg has a dog in the fight. He was under fire and had friends senselessly killed.

It's true, even morons sometimes witness tragedy.
It doesn't increase their IQ any.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

And this is where kids like Hogg get these ridiculous ideas. It's bullshit. It's another false dichotomy and non sequitur. It does not necessarily follow that because you support 2nd Amendment rights that your priority is not protecting the children. 2nd Amendment supporters simply don't think that banning assault weapons or guns in general will fix the problem. And demonizing 2nd Amendment supporters will most certainly not fix the problem.

Hogg and his fellow students understand the situation better than conservatives give them credit for

They saw what happened after Sandy Hook. Politicians gave platitudes and laid low till it passé day away

These students are holding their hands to the fire. Elections are seven months away.....can they keep up the pressure?

They may or may not understand the situation better than conservatives give them credit for but Hogg and others like him are still wrong to think that these people don't care about the children just because they're 2nd Amendment supporters.

We had 19 six year olds slaughtered at Sandy Hook and did not even expand background checks
We care more about not inconveniencing gun owners than we do about the safety of children

Hogg is correct

We had 19 six year olds slaughtered at Sandy Hook and did not even expand background checks

Did the shooter go through a background check to get his firearms?

You do what you can

You can’t confiscate 300 million firearms. If we really wanted to cut gun deaths, we would ban handguns like other nations did. But that aint happening

So the best we can do is nibble at the edges. Expand background checks, ban bump stocks, ban high capacity magazines. Enhance restrictions on criminals, domestic abusers, mentally infirm

Won’t stop all killings ...but it is a start

You can’t confiscate 300 million firearms. If we really wanted to cut gun deaths, we would ban handguns like other nations did. But that aint happening

If banning handguns was a way to cut gun deaths, it would have cut gun deaths in Chicago. It didn't work.

 

[Camp]

Hogg and his fellow students understand the situation better than conservatives give them credit for

They saw what happened after Sandy Hook. Politicians gave platitudes and laid low till it passé day away

These students are holding their hands to the fire. Elections are seven months away.....can they keep up the pressure?

They may or may not understand the situation better than conservatives give them credit for but Hogg and others like him are still wrong to think that these people don't care about the children just because they're 2nd Amendment supporters.

We had 19 six year olds slaughtered at Sandy Hook and did not even expand background checks
We care more about not inconveniencing gun owners than we do about the safety of children

Hogg is correct

We had 19 six year olds slaughtered at Sandy Hook and did not even expand background checks

Did the shooter go through a background check to get his firearms?

No, an accurate or complete one.was not allowed. A background check excluding juvenile records protects dangerous juveniles from complete checks. His juvenile record was excluded.

another nonresponse to the question

As long as it addressed the question it was responsive. Your question did not and does not ask a clearly definable coherent question.

 

[rightwinger]

WATCH: Tucker Carlson has had ENOUGH of David Hogg; Rips him to shreds in epic new rant
On Friday night, Fox News’ Tucker Carlson ripped into the media’s obsession with Parkland survivor David Hogg, who has been calling for our guns to be taken away. This deranged young man has also received unending support from the media, which has given him a bigger platform to speak on.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Of course he does anyone who doesn't hate America would shred this pos to the ground.
Hogg is a little to full of himself and if thinks his generation is going to strip the guns lmfao , freedom breeds freedom *****......... and there will be just as many patriots when you finally grow up which won't be until you are in you 40's but either way........ dream on parasite you ain't gonna break AMerica!!

Tucker.......I'm sure he "ripped Hogg to shreds" from a safe distance.

Tucker has never been under fire or seen his friends slaughtered

David Hogg has

 

[Auld Phart]

They may or may not understand the situation better than conservatives give them credit for but Hogg and others like him are still wrong to think that these people don't care about the children just because they're 2nd Amendment supporters.

We had 19 six year olds slaughtered at Sandy Hook and did not even expand background checks
We care more about not inconveniencing gun owners than we do about the safety of children

Hogg is correct

We had 19 six year olds slaughtered at Sandy Hook and did not even expand background checks

Did the shooter go through a background check to get his firearms?

No, an accurate or complete one.was not allowed. A background check excluding juvenile records protects dangerous juveniles from complete checks. His juvenile record was excluded.

another nonresponse to the question

As long as it addressed the question it was responsive. Your question did not and does not ask a clearly definable coherent question.

you didn't find this 'clearly definable and coherent'?

Did the shooter go through a background check to get his firearms?

 

[rightwinger]

Hogg and his fellow students understand the situation better than conservatives give them credit for

They saw what happened after Sandy Hook. Politicians gave platitudes and laid low till it passé day away

These students are holding their hands to the fire. Elections are seven months away.....can they keep up the pressure?

They may or may not understand the situation better than conservatives give them credit for but Hogg and others like him are still wrong to think that these people don't care about the children just because they're 2nd Amendment supporters.

We had 19 six year olds slaughtered at Sandy Hook and did not even expand background checks
We care more about not inconveniencing gun owners than we do about the safety of children

Hogg is correct

We had 19 six year olds slaughtered at Sandy Hook and did not even expand background checks

Did the shooter go through a background check to get his firearms?

You do what you can

You can’t confiscate 300 million firearms. If we really wanted to cut gun deaths, we would ban handguns like other nations did. But that aint happening

So the best we can do is nibble at the edges. Expand background checks, ban bump stocks, ban high capacity magazines. Enhance restrictions on criminals, domestic abusers, mentally infirm

Won’t stop all killings ...but it is a start

You can’t confiscate 300 million firearms. If we really wanted to cut gun deaths, we would ban handguns like other nations did. But that aint happening

If banning handguns was a way to cut gun deaths, it would have cut gun deaths in Chicago. It didn't work.

Maybe if Trump built a wall around Chicago to keep guns from coming in from gun loving states

Severely restricting handguns has worked in NYC

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

They may or may not understand the situation better than conservatives give them credit for but Hogg and others like him are still wrong to think that these people don't care about the children just because they're 2nd Amendment supporters.

We had 19 six year olds slaughtered at Sandy Hook and did not even expand background checks
We care more about not inconveniencing gun owners than we do about the safety of children

Hogg is correct

We had 19 six year olds slaughtered at Sandy Hook and did not even expand background checks

Did the shooter go through a background check to get his firearms?

You do what you can

You can’t confiscate 300 million firearms. If we really wanted to cut gun deaths, we would ban handguns like other nations did. But that aint happening

So the best we can do is nibble at the edges. Expand background checks, ban bump stocks, ban high capacity magazines. Enhance restrictions on criminals, domestic abusers, mentally infirm

Won’t stop all killings ...but it is a start

You can’t confiscate 300 million firearms. If we really wanted to cut gun deaths, we would ban handguns like other nations did. But that aint happening

If banning handguns was a way to cut gun deaths, it would have cut gun deaths in Chicago. It didn't work.

Maybe if Trump built a wall around Chicago to keep guns from coming in from gun loving states

Severely restricting handguns has worked in NYC

Excellent idea! We need to build the wall to cut gun deaths.

Severely restricting handguns has worked in NYC

No gun lovers near NYC? How low is gun violence in NYC?

 

[airplanemechanic]

Why do Republicans support people who shoot children?

Why do liberals use those victims to push their political agenda?

 

[rightwinger]

We had 19 six year olds slaughtered at Sandy Hook and did not even expand background checks
We care more about not inconveniencing gun owners than we do about the safety of children

Hogg is correct

We had 19 six year olds slaughtered at Sandy Hook and did not even expand background checks

Did the shooter go through a background check to get his firearms?

You do what you can

You can’t confiscate 300 million firearms. If we really wanted to cut gun deaths, we would ban handguns like other nations did. But that aint happening

So the best we can do is nibble at the edges. Expand background checks, ban bump stocks, ban high capacity magazines. Enhance restrictions on criminals, domestic abusers, mentally infirm

Won’t stop all killings ...but it is a start

You can’t confiscate 300 million firearms. If we really wanted to cut gun deaths, we would ban handguns like other nations did. But that aint happening

If banning handguns was a way to cut gun deaths, it would have cut gun deaths in Chicago. It didn't work.

Maybe if Trump built a wall around Chicago to keep guns from coming in from gun loving states

Severely restricting handguns has worked in NYC

Excellent idea! We need to build the wall to cut gun deaths.

Severely restricting handguns has worked in NYC

No gun lovers near NYC? How low is gun violence in NYC?

Gun violence is at record lows in NYC

Strict laws work

 

[rightwinger]

Why do Republicans support people who shoot children?

Why do liberals use those victims to push their political agenda?

Because we stand up for victims

Conservatives blame them

 

[airplanemechanic]

No, you USE victims.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

Maybe, maybe not. But they still don't dictate gun policy. If the NRA has some conservatives by the balls it's because they allowed it to happen.

money.....

Yes, of course it's about money. But the NRA still does not dictate gun policy.

And don't kid yourself into thinking that Democrat politicians are not taking money from lobby groups.

actually, right now it has been dictating gun policy, including the writing of statutes. that's what lobbyists do. and GOP pols are subject to their influence because you don't find one-issue NRA voters anywhere but the reddest states.

I'm not familiar with this issue. Can you give me an example of an NRA lobbyist dictating gun policy?

right now about 2% of Americans have 50% of the country's guns. those 2% are the one-issue voters. you see them spamming this board with NRA propaganda. the rest of the country wants enough regulation to prevent people who shouldn't have guns from getting them. that doesn't require bans. it doesn't require any infringement on the 2nd. it only requires a willingness to target the dangerously ill, felons and domestic abusers to make huge inroads.

the next posts you see will include some type of BS that those changes "won't end gun violence". that's probably true. but we basically have a mass shooting a day in this country. that's obscene and we don't look at any other problem and say "oh well, it won't solve the problem 100% so we won't do anything"

Pro 2nd Amendment people are not suggesting we do nothing in lieu of banning firearms. They and the NRA have proposed alternative measures to approach the problem but, just as you say 2nd Amendment supporters do, pro gun control advocates say it won't solve the problem. So around and around we go.

And the deputies on scene made sure he had access to his victims of choice.

The NRA doesn't dictate gun policy in this country, contrary to what most liberals may believe.

The NRA has conservatives by the balls

Young people like David Hogg want to hold them accountable

Maybe, maybe not. But they still don't dictate gun policy. If the NRA has some conservatives by the balls it's because they allowed it to happen.

money.....

Yes, of course it's about money. But the NRA still does not dictate gun policy.

And don't kid yourself into thinking that Democrat politicians are not taking money from lobby groups.

who said democrats don't take money from lobbying groups? just wondering.

Liberals have been vilifying conservative politicians for taking money from the NRA so you tell me.

but democrats don't take money from the gun manufacturers' lobby. do they?

Collin Peterson and Henry Cuellar, both Democrat congressmen from Minnesota and Texas, respectively, took money from the NRA this year. Sanford Bishop (Democrat from Georgia) and Henry Cuellar took money from the NRA in 2016. John Barrow, Nick Rahall, Collin Peterson and Sanford Bishop, Democrat congressmen from Georgia, West Virginia, Minnesota and Georgia, respectively, took money from the NRA in 2014. Need I go on?

are people dying because of any lobbies democrats fund?

Well, if it's true that people are dying as a direct result of NRA political contributions then yes, people are dying because of Democrat lobbyist contributions to the tune of over 600,000 killed each year. That's roughly the number of babies killed annually because of the abortion lobby contributions.

on background checks (which is really the bulk of what people are talking about)

NRA Chief's Bogus Background Check Claims - FactCheck.org

Analysis | Fact-checking Trump, NRA claims on gun background checks

NRA funding

How The Gun Industry Funnels Tens Of Millions Of Dollars To The NRA


oh... and this is why NRA money matters in an election (part of which I've already elaborated upon)

The real reason the NRA’s money matters in elections

I took a look at all these and I see that they give a lot of money to politicians and whatnot but I see nothing here to suggest that the NRA dictates gun policy.

and hiding behind being "Pro 2nd amendment" is nonsense. you aren't "pro 2nd amendment". you're pro unlimited access to unlimited weapons by people who shouldn't be allowed to have those weapons.

Um, no. This is nothing short of demonizing your opponent because by doing so, in your mind, it renders his/her arguments as less valid. If he's an amoral monster then his arguments can have no credence. It's a classic debate tactic that does nothing more than express your personal opinion of your opponent's character and contributes nothing to the debate.

Having said that, speaking for myself, being pro 2nd Amendment only means I support the right to bear arms. Why the hell would I want unlimited access to unlimited weapons for people who shouldn't have them?

and that has NEVER been what the 2nd amendment stands for. not ever... until NRA propaganda .... on behalf of gun manufacturers.

oh... there's a shooting at a school? 17 people were murdered? no problem. ... buy more guns, right?

If you're referring to the jump in gun sales after a shooting, this happens because people fear that the shooting will bring legislation that will prevent them from buying in the future.

 

[DrLove]

democrats don't take money from the NRA?



House Democrats Take NRA Cash, Block Disclosure

Will - get serious

$5,900,000
given to Republicans in 2016 election cycle

$106,000
given to Democrats in 2016 election cycle

The gun lobby: See how much your representative gets

 

[airplanemechanic]

are people dying because of any lobbies democrats fund?

Yep. Planned Parenthood is killing kids faster than conservatives could ever hope to shoot them in schools.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

If he's not too young to say "****" every other word in an interview without parental repercussions then he's not too young to be attacked for his views.

Personally, I don't care one way or the other about Hogg or what he's trying to do. But what concerns me is what Tucker brought up in the video and that is that Hogg argues from a false paradigm that if you don't advocate for more gun control then you're a monster who wants to see more kids killed. This crap is patently false and was most likely spoon fed to him by other liberals via the media and whatnot. It's intellectually dishonest and lazy and renders one incapable of having a reasoned debate on the issue.

Hogg is highlighting the priorities of the right

It is not protecting children

And this is where kids like Hogg get these ridiculous ideas. It's bullshit. It's another false dichotomy and non sequitur. It does not necessarily follow that because you support 2nd Amendment rights that your priority is not protecting the children. 2nd Amendment supporters simply don't think that banning assault weapons or guns in general will fix the problem. And demonizing 2nd Amendment supporters will most certainly not fix the problem.

Hogg and his fellow students understand the situation better than conservatives give them credit for

They saw what happened after Sandy Hook. Politicians gave platitudes and laid low till it passé day away

These students are holding their hands to the fire. Elections are seven months away.....can they keep up the pressure?

They may or may not understand the situation better than conservatives give them credit for but Hogg and others like him are still wrong to think that these people don't care about the children just because they're 2nd Amendment supporters.

We had 19 six year olds slaughtered at Sandy Hook and did not even expand background checks
We care more about not inconveniencing gun owners than we do about the safety of children

Hogg is correct

Hogg is full of shit. It's still a false dichotomy no matter how you spin it. Every time there is a shooting pro gun control people say we should do this or that and pro 2nd Amendment people say "I don't think that will work. I think we should try this."

If I honestly don't think that, say, banning assault weapons will fix the problem, it does not in any way suggest that I don't care about kids getting killed. It only means that we disagree on how we should approach the problem. That's it.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

If he's not too young to say "****" every other word in an interview without parental repercussions then he's not too young to be attacked for his views.

Personally, I don't care one way or the other about Hogg or what he's trying to do. But what concerns me is what Tucker brought up in the video and that is that Hogg argues from a false paradigm that if you don't advocate for more gun control then you're a monster who wants to see more kids killed. This crap is patently false and was most likely spoon fed to him by other liberals via the media and whatnot. It's intellectually dishonest and lazy and renders one incapable of having a reasoned debate on the issue.

Hogg is highlighting the priorities of the right

It is not protecting children

And this is where kids like Hogg get these ridiculous ideas. It's bullshit. It's another false dichotomy and non sequitur. It does not necessarily follow that because you support 2nd Amendment rights that your priority is not protecting the children. 2nd Amendment supporters simply don't think that banning assault weapons or guns in general will fix the problem. And demonizing 2nd Amendment supporters will most certainly not fix the problem.

Hogg and his fellow students understand the situation better than conservatives give them credit for

They saw what happened after Sandy Hook. Politicians gave platitudes and laid low till it passé day away

These students are holding their hands to the fire. Elections are seven months away.....can they keep up the pressure?

They may or may not understand the situation better than conservatives give them credit for but Hogg and others like him are still wrong to think that these people don't care about the children just because they're 2nd Amendment supporters.

Tell it to the parents of Sandy Hook

Why?

 

[Auld Phart]

democrats don't take money from the NRA?



House Democrats Take NRA Cash, Block Disclosure

Will - get serious

$5,900,000
given to Republicans in 2016 election cycle

$106,000
given to Democrats in 2016 election cycle

The gun lobby: See how much your representative gets

Politico?

hahahahaha

the fact remains, no matter the amounts, democrats receive funds from firearm lobbyists

 

[rightwinger]

Hogg is highlighting the priorities of the right

It is not protecting children

And this is where kids like Hogg get these ridiculous ideas. It's bullshit. It's another false dichotomy and non sequitur. It does not necessarily follow that because you support 2nd Amendment rights that your priority is not protecting the children. 2nd Amendment supporters simply don't think that banning assault weapons or guns in general will fix the problem. And demonizing 2nd Amendment supporters will most certainly not fix the problem.

Hogg and his fellow students understand the situation better than conservatives give them credit for

They saw what happened after Sandy Hook. Politicians gave platitudes and laid low till it passé day away

These students are holding their hands to the fire. Elections are seven months away.....can they keep up the pressure?

They may or may not understand the situation better than conservatives give them credit for but Hogg and others like him are still wrong to think that these people don't care about the children just because they're 2nd Amendment supporters.

We had 19 six year olds slaughtered at Sandy Hook and did not even expand background checks
We care more about not inconveniencing gun owners than we do about the safety of children

Hogg is correct

Hogg is full of shit. It's still a false dichotomy no matter how you spin it. Every time there is a shooting pro gun control people say we should do this or that and pro 2nd Amendment people say "I don't think that will work. I think we should try this."

If I honestly don't think that, say, banning assault weapons will fix the problem, it does not in any way suggest that I don't care about kids getting killed. It only means that we disagree on how we should approach the problem. That's it.

Hogg is just a kid

A kid who understand the election cycle. He, and his Parkland friends ....as well a students around the country will go after politicians who cater to the NRA and accept funding

If you disagree with his methods, you are free to protest on your own

 

[DrLove]

Politico?

hahahahaha

the fact remains, no matter the amounts, democrats receive funds from firearm lobbyists

Is Open Secrets more to your liking?

National Rifle Assn: Recipients | OpenSecrets

C'mon Will - I said get SERIOUS

 

[Auld Phart]

Politico?

hahahahaha

the fact remains, no matter the amounts, democrats receive funds from firearm lobbyists

Is Open Secrets more to your liking?

National Rifle Assn: Recipients | OpenSecrets

C'mon Will - I said get SERIOUS

Bud, I never said Republicans don't receive the lions share of the funds.....

I was slapping the little girl that claimed NO Democrats received funds.

(thanks for helping me prove my point)