Watch: The attack on Temple Mount caught on video

They then used the incident and their lies to again close access for Muslims to their holy land.

If Muslims want access to their holy land, they need to stop killing people on that holy land. Seems reasonable to me.

This is a sacred space. Muslims need to treat it as such.
 
They then used the incident and their lies to again close access for Muslims to their holy land.

If Muslims want access to their holy land, they need to stop killing people on that holy land. Seems reasonable to me.

This is a sacred space. Muslims need to treat it as such.

and yet there are muslims that would desecrate Mecca by bombing or killing there.
 
exact story word for word shows up every few months with no more truth to it in the last ten years

anyway, the mount will be reopened on Sunday to worshipers and tourists
 
Originally posted by WillHaftawaite
"Editing quotes. You may selectively quote, provided that it does not change the context or meaning of the quote. When you comment on the quote, do it outside of the quote box. Do not post inside of the quote box."

You're barking up the wrong tree, Will.

I didn't change a single word Old Man Clanton said.
This is your quote:
"Originally posted by Old Man Clanton
They goddamned sure weren't using military tactics, hiding in a church and if the soldiers hadn't been there they would have shot civilians."

Please link to it.
 
News: Temple Mount was opened for prayer this morning, closed again because of riots.

Two days after the devastating attack that cost the lives of 2 policemen, all the gates for Muslims who want to pray were opened.
Cameras and magnometers were installed in the entrances. After a short time the compound was closed because Muslims REFUSED SECURITY CHECKS.

http://www.nrg.co.il/online/1/ART2/886/758.html
 
The Waqf refuses to enter the compound.

The reason:
2438452-46.jpg



Police chief on "How did the weapons get into the compound?"


Elshayach explained: "for years tens of thousands enter each Friday, they don't go through check, like one would go before entering a secured area. It's not like the Western Wall. If someone succeeds to pass a weapon to the Western Wall, then he's passing security measures and filter. And if he passes that which should have identify him then certainly there's a fault".

In this case, because You cannot pass 180,000 people to the entrance through such limited gates, therefore it's clear that it's much easier to bring a weapon to the Temple Mount. You don't have to bring it this morning, it could be brought in 2 weeks ago, half a year, a year ago."


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Waqf doesn't want to clean the area of weapons, but calls Jews that visit there under security - a 'provocation'..or an 'act of war'.

Do You remember Abbas using the 'murabatin' word referring to those who rioted in the mosque? You should check what it means.
 
Last edited:
Of course not as the idea of taking land by force was the antithesis of Jewish belief prior to the zionist animals who changed all that. I have explained this multiple times. Try to keep up.
 
The Waqf refuses to enter the compound.

The reason:
2438452-46.jpg



Police chief on "How did the weapons get into the compound?"


Elshayach explained: "for years tens of thousands enter each Friday, they don't go through check, like one would go before entering a secured area. It's not like the Western Wall. If someone succeeds to pass a weapon to the Western Wall, then he's passing security measures and filter. And if he passes that which should have identify him then certainly there's a fault".

In this case, because You cannot pass 180,000 people to the entrance through such limited gates, therefore it's clear that it's much easier to bring a weapon to the Temple Mount. You don't have to bring it this morning, it could be brought in 2 weeks ago, half a year, a year ago."


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Waqf doesn't want to clean the area of weapons, but calls Jews that visit there under security - a 'provocation'..or an 'act of war'.

Do You remember Abbas using the 'murabatin' word referring to those who rioted in the mosque? You should check what it means.
Great news!
 
Of course not as the idea of taking land by force was the antithesis of Jewish belief prior to the zionist animals who changed all that. I have explained this multiple times. Try to keep up.
What's the matter Achmed, you upset that Israel was one land Muslim savages couldn't take by force?
 
BREAKING: Islamist Death Cultists, errr, umm, I mean Peaceful Inner Strugglers™, call for Rage™, Open The Gates of Hell™, etc., etc.


Fatah calls for violence and “rage” following Friday terror attack - PMW Bulletins

PMW Bulletins
Fatah calls for violence and “rage” following Friday terror attack





I'm guessing that Mahmoud "keys to the mansion" Abbas will be checking his pay-per-view subscription to see if his islamo-minions will mouth the bait and launch themselves into that "islamo-rage" that will generate another pile of dead gee-had wannabes.
 
BREAKING: Islamist Death Cultists, errr, umm, I mean Peaceful Inner Strugglers™, call for Rage™, Open The Gates of Hell™, etc., etc.


Fatah calls for violence and “rage” following Friday terror attack - PMW Bulletins

PMW Bulletins
Fatah calls for violence and “rage” following Friday terror attack





I'm guessing that Mahmoud "keys to the mansion" Abbas will be checking his pay-per-view subscription to see if his islamo-minions will mouth the bait and launch themselves into that "islamo-rage" that will generate another pile of dead gee-had wannabes.

"Peaceful Inner Strugglers" :lmao:

Maybe they're just suffering from severe constipation.
 
Of course not as the idea of taking land by force was the antithesis of Jewish belief prior to the zionist animals who changed all that. I have explained this multiple times. Try to keep up.

Israel was forced to fight...they had been attacked
Nope. You idiots just claim that. It was the Europeans while calling themselves jews who started all of this crap when they took the holy land by force.

And remember that that is the antithesis of Judaism.
 
Temple Mount closed again because Mufti and Waqf demand Muslims not submit to security checks.

Mahmoud al-Aloul, deputy chief of the Palestinian Authority, told a Ramallah radio station that the new security measures were “an insult” and “unacceptable. We absolutely refuse to these measures. Israel must prevent settlers from entering the compound.” It was the permission that Israel gave to Jews to enter the compound that was responsible for the terror attack. “Israel and the army are to blame for the attack,” he said. “We must stop them from taking over the Al Aqsa Mosque.”



What a bizarre reversal of facts. It was the presence of Jews in a Jewish Holy Place which "caused" the terror attack.

The message from the Mufti, the Waqf and the PA is clear: the Temple Mount is for Muslims only and we'll smuggle guns and murder people if Muslim exclusivity is not upheld. We reject the right of the Jewish people to self-preservation, even in holy, sacred places. We reject the right of the sovereigns of Israel to protect it citizens, guests and visitors, using security measures.

I'm not so upset at the three terrorists. I really do believe that there are extremists who are willing to commit evil acts. But the response by the Mufti, and Waqf and the PA is appalling.

Its time for a new status quo. The Temple Mount and all shared *cough stolen cough* sacred spaces must be under the control of people who believe in protected and equal access. If the Waqf, the PA, Palestinians and Muslims in general can't get on board with that, then they don't deserve to be a part of it.

A reminder of the terms of agreement for religious significance made between Jordan and Israel:

Article 9. Places of Historical and Religious Significance and Interfaith Relations

1. Each Party will provide freedom of access to places of religious and historical significance.

2. In this regard, in accordance with the Washington Declaration, Israel respects the present special role of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan in Muslim Holy shrines in Jerusalem. When negotiations on the permanent status will take place, Israel will give high priority to the Jordanian historic role in these shrines.

3. The Parties will act together to promote interfaith relations among the three monotheistic religions, with the aim of working towards religious understanding, moral commitment, freedom of religious worship, and tolerance and peace.
 
Temple Mount closed again because Mufti and Waqf demand Muslims not submit to security checks.

Mahmoud al-Aloul, deputy chief of the Palestinian Authority, told a Ramallah radio station that the new security measures were “an insult” and “unacceptable. We absolutely refuse to these measures. Israel must prevent settlers from entering the compound.” It was the permission that Israel gave to Jews to enter the compound that was responsible for the terror attack. “Israel and the army are to blame for the attack,” he said. “We must stop them from taking over the Al Aqsa Mosque.”



What a bizarre reversal of facts. It was the presence of Jews in a Jewish Holy Place which "caused" the terror attack.

The message from the Mufti, the Waqf and the PA is clear: the Temple Mount is for Muslims only and we'll smuggle guns and murder people if Muslim exclusivity is not upheld. We reject the right of the Jewish people to self-preservation, even in holy, sacred places. We reject the right of the sovereigns of Israel to protect it citizens, guests and visitors, using security measures.

I'm not so upset at the three terrorists. I really do believe that there are extremists who are willing to commit evil acts. But the response by the Mufti, and Waqf and the PA is appalling.

Its time for a new status quo. The Temple Mount and all shared *cough stolen cough* sacred spaces must be under the control of people who believe in protected and equal access. If the Waqf, the PA, Palestinians and Muslims in general can't get on board with that, then they don't deserve to be a part of it.

A reminder of the terms of agreement for religious significance made between Jordan and Israel:

Article 9. Places of Historical and Religious Significance and Interfaith Relations

1. Each Party will provide freedom of access to places of religious and historical significance.

2. In this regard, in accordance with the Washington Declaration, Israel respects the present special role of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan in Muslim Holy shrines in Jerusalem. When negotiations on the permanent status will take place, Israel will give high priority to the Jordanian historic role in these shrines.

3. The Parties will act together to promote interfaith relations among the three monotheistic religions, with the aim of working towards religious understanding, moral commitment, freedom of religious worship, and tolerance and peace.
And the zionist animals stealing the holy continues...
 
And the zionist animals stealing the holy continues...

Stealing the holy? You mean to tell me that you think Israel is stealing the Holy Place? By installing security equipment to prevent people being murdered?!

You have a twisted, twisted mind.
 
What a bizarre reversal of facts. It was the presence of Jews in a Jewish Holy Place which "caused" the terror attack.
Yes, what a bizarre reversal of facts indeed.

How is it that people defending themselves from an invading army are terrorists?

And why did they chase the "terrorists" to Al-Aqsa prior to executing them?
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom