Unexpectedly!
Just like Obummer they say, LOLZ!
If you like your plan you can keep your plan!
www.dailywire.com
Can’t you hire a fact checkers? A Fox Fact checker?
Just start your own app too!
If republicans would benefit from fact checkers they’d use them.
ONe of the "most respected" newspapers in the country, are basing it's operations on positive assumptions about Biden's administration.
That is not us doing anything. That is them admitting that they will be treating teh dem administration under different rules than they treated the republican administration.
We no longer have a Free Press in this country.
That is a real problem.
You act as if republicans and conservative media organizations won’t be fact checking Biden’s every word.
They didn’t find that reagan, bush, Clinton, bush and Obama lied daily. No need to treat every future president like they treated liar trump.
What "conservative" media organizations?
Fox, oan, newsmax.
You guys have enough money to get this done.
Fox? Conservative?
Newsmax DOES fact check the Reich media.
According to DW, a German news outlet, here is a fact-check of the most popular COVID-19 treatments.
www.newsmax.com
Suddenly fox isn’t conservative? Another excellent attempt to try to move this country more to the right. By suggesting fox isn’t right. Clever bullshit
You don't pay any attention to what's going on around you at all, do you?
On Saturday around noon Fox News anchor Brett Baier posted an innocuous tweet, urging people to tune
redstate.com
research demonstrates increasing levels of consolidation, with many media industries already
highly concentrated and
dominated by a very small number of firms.
Globally, large media conglomerates include
Bertelsmann,
National Amusements (
ViacomCBS),
Sony Corporation,
News Corp,
Comcast,
The Walt Disney Company,
AT&T Inc.,
Fox Corporation,
Hearst Communications,
MGM Holdings Inc.,
Grupo Globo (South America), and
Lagardère Group.
As of 2020, the largest media conglomerates in terms of revenue are
Comcast, The Walt Disney Company, AT&T, and
ViacomCBS, per
Forbes.
Us liberals were not happy the day Bill Clinton allowed this to happen. You Republicans pushed to get this passed. So now you're telling me these handful of mega corporations are liberal? Bullshit. They are censored though.
Increased concentration of media ownership can lead to
corporate censorship affecting a wide range of critical thought.
corporate censorship in the news publishing business, observing that it can occur as
self-censorship. They note that it is "virtually impossible to document", because it is covert.
Jonathan Alter states that "In a tight job market, the tendency is to avoid getting yourself or your boss in trouble. So an adjective gets dropped, a story skipped, a punch pulled … It's like that
Sherlock Holmesstory – the dog that didn't bark.
[8] Those clues are hard to find." The head of the
Media Access Project notes that such self-censorship is not misreporting or false reporting, but simply
not reporting at all. Self-censorship is not the product of "dramatic conspiracies", according to Croteau and Hoynes, but simply the interaction of many small daily decisions. Journalists want to keep their jobs and editors support the interests of the company. These many small actions and non-actions accumulate to produce (in their words) "homogenized, corporate-friendly media".
Nichols and McChesney
[9] opine that "the maniacal media baron as portrayed in
James Bond films or profiles of
Rupert Murdoch is far less a danger than the cautious and compromised editor who seeks to 'balance' a responsibility to readers or viewers with a duty to serve his boss and the advertisers". They state that "even among journalists who entered the field for the noblest of reasons" there is a tendency to avoid any controversial journalism that might embroil the news company in a battle with a powerful corporation or a government agency. They observe that although such conflicts "have always been the stuff of great journalism" they are "very bad business", and that "in the current climate business trumps journalism just about every time".
Croteau and Hoynes
[7] report that such corporate censorship in journalism is commonplace, reporting the results of studies revealing that more than 40%
[10] of journalists and news executives stating that they had deliberately engaged in such censorship by avoiding newsworthy stories or softening the tones of stories. More than a third of the respondents stated that news organizations would ignore news that might hurt their financial interests. A similar fraction stated that they self-censored in order to further, or not endanger, their careers.
