Was this the trump government's policy agenda all along?

[Toddsterpatriot]

The point is Republican voting (red) states are the most welfare dependent. But yes, you are right about New Mexico also being a poor state as well. Doesn't change the fact that white-trash Republican voters in Appalachian and southern states suck more off the gubmint welfare tit than your imaginary illegal aliens.

The point is Republican voting (red) states are the most welfare dependent.

That's awful!
How much welfare spending should we cut?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

As long as we are talking about eliminating government spending waste we can't ignore the real culprit, corporate welfare.

This study tallies corporate welfare in the federal budget and finds that the government spends $181 billion a year on aid to businesses. That figure is based on a broad definition of corporate welfare, which includes direct cash subsidies and indirect industry support. The study then discusses 12 reasons to cut corporate welfare, including the political corruption and economic damage it causes.

More industries are becoming dependent on the federal government and driven by politics, which is a dangerous move toward central planning in the economy. Cutting corporate welfare would free markets, boost growth, and trim alarmingly high federal budget deficits.

https://www.cato.org/policy-analysis/corporate-welfare-federal-budget-0

Excellent idea. End corporate subsidies. Especially "green" energy subsidies.

 

[Lesh]

Excellent idea. End corporate subsidies. Especially "green" energy subsidies.

Yeah

End corporate subsidies…

Yeah. That’ll happen…

 

[White 6]

I repeat, slowly this time for the retarded. He's always promised that all illegal in this country will be deported. All of them. Mass deportation. The "largest deportation program in American history." Criminals will be prioritized

Not happening. Outright lying and racism does not help your cause.

I repeat slowly for the mentally incompetent with short memory, he said he was going to start with the violent criminals, but did not, so he lied, again. He did not say he was going to arrest everybody with brown skin and sort them out later, just to make sure, no matter if legal immigrant or even naturalize or born here Americans. He mentioned not of that shit. So, what is that all about, lies by omission? Lies by intentional omission are simply lies.

 

[Rogue AI]

The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) amended 8 U.S.C. § 1325 to provide that an alien apprehended while entering or attempting to enter the United States at a time or place other than as designated by immigration officers shall be subject to a civil penalty.

If they are within the US borders they are no longer 'entering or attempting to enter'. Try harder.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Didn't you also vote to have all those Epstein files released as well?

Wasn’t on top of my list but sure why not.

 

[berg80]

If they are within the US borders they are no longer 'entering or attempting to enter'. Try harder.

If you have proof the act of crossing the border is a criminal, not civil violation, provide it.

 

[Rogue AI]

If you have proof the act of crossing the border is a criminal, not civil violation, provide it.

Now, now no need to be churlish for having been wrong. US Code 8 section 1227 and 1251 covers this. Try harder.

 

[berg80]

Now, now no need to be churlish for having been wrong. US Code 8 section 1227 and 1251 covers this. Try harder.

Not even close. Don't you think you've embarrassed yourself quite enough for one day? Though I admit your capacity for it is infinite.

 

[Rogue AI]

Not even close. Don't you think you've embarrassed yourself quite enough for one day? Though I admit your capacity for it is infinite.

I have given you the answer you seek, both of the codes provided cover the authority to deport illegal aliens. Are you really stupid enough to dispute what is clearly written in black letter law? I believe you are, go for it.

 

[berg80]

Is the fact of being present in the United States in violation of the immigration laws a crime? No.

The act of being present in the United States in violation of the immigration laws is not, standing alone, a crime. While federal immigration law does criminalize some actions that may be related to undocumented presence in the United States, undocumented presence alone is not a violation of federal criminal law. Thus, many believe that the term “illegal alien,” which may suggest a criminal violation, is inaccurate or misleading. Entering the United States without being inspected and admitted, i.e., illegal entry, is a misdemeanor or can be a felony, depending on the circumstances. 8 U.S.C. § 1325.

But many undocumented immigrants do not enter the United States illegally. They enter legally but overstay, work without authorization, drop out of school or violate the conditions of their visas in some other way. Current estimates are that approximately 45% of undocumented immigrants did not enter illegally. See Pew Hispanic Center, Modes of Entry for the Unauthorized Migrant Population [May 22, 2006].Undocumented presence in the United States is only criminally punishable if it occurs after an individual was previously formally removed from the United States and then returned without permission.

8 U.S.C. § 1326 (any individual previously “deported or removed” who “enters ,attempts to enter, or is at any time found in” the United States without authorization may be punished by imprisonment up to two years). Mere undocumented presence in the United States alone, however, in the absence of a previous removal order and unauthorized re-entry, is not a crime under federal law.

https://www.aclu.org/sites/default/files/field_document/FINAL_criminalizing_undocumented_immigrants_issue_brief_PUBLIC_VERSION.pdf

 

[Rogue AI]

Is the fact of being present in the United States in violation of the immigration laws a crime? No.

The act of being present in the United States in violation of the immigration laws is not, standing alone, a crime. While federal immigration law does criminalize some actions that may be related to undocumented presence in the United States, undocumented presence alone is not a violation of federal criminal law. Thus, many believe that the term “illegal alien,” which may suggest a criminal violation, is inaccurate or misleading. Entering the United States without being inspected and admitted, i.e., illegal entry, is a misdemeanor or can be a felony, depending on the circumstances. 8 U.S.C. § 1325.

But many undocumented immigrants do not enter the United States illegally. They enter legally but overstay, work without authorization, drop out of school or violate the conditions of their visas in some other way. Current estimates are that approximately 45% of undocumented immigrants did not enter illegally. See Pew Hispanic Center, Modes of Entry for the Unauthorized Migrant Population [May 22, 2006].Undocumented presence in the United States is only criminally punishable if it occurs after an individual was previously formally removed from the United States and then returned without permission.

8 U.S.C. § 1326 (any individual previously “deported or removed” who “enters ,attempts to enter, or is at any time found in” the United States without authorization may be punished by imprisonment up to two years). Mere undocumented presence in the United States alone, however, in the absence of a previous removal order and unauthorized re-entry, is not a crime under federal law.

https://www.aclu.org/sites/default/files/field_document/FINAL_criminalizing_undocumented_immigrants_issue_brief_PUBLIC_VERSION.pdf

When you get tired of being a dumbass, take second and THINK. The government needs authority to deport for various reasons and your lame reliance on a single section of law ignores all other sections that actually grant said authority. Try harder and stop using a machine to 'think' for you, try and rub both your brain cells together for once.