rupol2000
Gold Member
- Aug 22, 2021
- 18,215
- 2,630
- 138
- Banned
- #1
Germany in the late 19th century emerged from the remnants of Austro-Hungarian hegemony in eastern and central Europe. The initiators of the creation of Germany were not the Germans, but the Prussians. They proclaimed first a small way of unification, then a big one, and so the so-called "germania" was formed. the Germans themselves have nothing to do with this.
The Prussian regime was leftist, it is the first welfare state in the world, Prussian Junker capitalism( Bismarck etc).
However, Hitler was right, and it appears that the right wing of the National Socialist Party dominated the left. In particular, they proclaimed patriarchy, chivalry, aristocracy of spirit, rejected pernicious trends in art that corrupting popular morality, rejected communist equality, advocated the preservation of private property, and so on.
Nationalization affected only some strategically important sectors
That is, they were basically right.
This means that it is neither Prussian nor Germanic, but Austro-Hungarian political heritage.
The split in 1943 could be connected with this.
The Prussian regime was leftist, it is the first welfare state in the world, Prussian Junker capitalism( Bismarck etc).
However, Hitler was right, and it appears that the right wing of the National Socialist Party dominated the left. In particular, they proclaimed patriarchy, chivalry, aristocracy of spirit, rejected pernicious trends in art that corrupting popular morality, rejected communist equality, advocated the preservation of private property, and so on.
Nationalization affected only some strategically important sectors
That is, they were basically right.
This means that it is neither Prussian nor Germanic, but Austro-Hungarian political heritage.
The split in 1943 could be connected with this.
Last edited: