Was Massive Vote Fraud Confirmed with a Fishtail?

LW loons make up their own Statistical Analysis. Ignoring Mathematicians world-wide as they know better. The fish-tail is normal sayeth the loons. what a bunch of stupid criminal forks.
That chart can just as easily be used to prove actual fish have somehow made it past the poll watchers, and voted.
 
How were the votes embedded at the last minute, before they knew how many voted, vs what they could embed, without being caught or noticed?
They didn't care....As the democrat cheater said when training the whistleblower, the cheating could only be caught in a recanvass....That's why the thug Garland threatened the people doing the recanvass in Maricopa.
What names did they use for the embedded votes, every vote, has a registered voter listed on a check in to poll roster/count, or absentee envelope count, that has to equal the number of votes cast?
Took them off the registered voter lists, which all the cheaters bought.
So, how did they get the voter check in roll count with voter signature, of those who came in to vote, to match the total votes cast, if 35,000 were embedded etc?
Who checks signatures anymore, silly?
 
Like parents protecting their children from faggots?
Yes. The crazies are always worried about faggots, or commies, or space aliens, or bigfoot. I'll bet that when you called, you had to wait on hold for the guy that usually takes nutbag calls like yours, didn't you?
 
Yes. The crazies are always worried about faggots, or commies, or space aliens, or bigfoot. I'll bet that when you called, you had to wait on hold for the guy that usually takes nutbag calls like yours, didn't you?
You do not worry about your children? Why doesn't that surprise me?
 












The figure below is a little complicated but worth studying. It is not an Ayyadurai graph, but is similar to the graphs in Dr. Ayyadurai's Pima County analysis. Ayyadurai calls it his “fishtail” graph, for obvious reasons. It is a fascinating diagram that seems to confirm massive fraud in the 2020 election.
Here is a challenge: Try to explain why there is a tail on this fish!
A rough approximation of a Shiva "fishtail" graph
244979_5_.jpg

Have at it.

LOLOLOL

Trump gets 39.7% of the votes in Pima County in 2016 ... gets 39.9% of the votes in 2020 ... and the forum loon cries conspiracy.

No wonder this thread was moved to the conspiracy threads.
 
They didn't care....As the democrat cheater said when training the whistleblower, the cheating could only be caught in a recanvass....That's why the thug Garland threatened the people doing the recanvass in Maricopa.
What is a recanvas vs a canvas? In canvassing which takes place after the election day is over...is...

For an election official, the canvass means aggregating or confirming every valid ballot cast and counted—absentee, early voting, Election Day, provisional, challenged, and uniformed and overseas citizen.

How would they know who hadn't voted, to invest the voter in to the voter roll roster at the polling place and how did they embed, their name on the roster, and vote it n to the machine oddball?

As I said, the machine can not count, more votes, than who walked in to vote and signed the roster. If the sign in to vote roster had 100 voters sign in, then they can NOT have more than 100 votes cast.

Unless in every single voting precinct that they claim the embedded votes were spread out to all precincts so nothing would stand out, get a volunteer soon to be felon, in each polling place, to add some of the names to the roster for the 35000 votes they allege they embedded, to make it match the embedding number?

And HOW were they embedded??! How how how? And by whom? A crook in each location precinct that knows how to get around the security in the voting machines, somehow? You are pulling in A LOT of people in to this conspiracy....

Simply put, it can't be done in our voting, with all the checks that have to balance.
Took them off the registered voter lists, which all the cheaters bought
you have to know the registered voter, with 100% certainty, will not cast an in person ballot, to steal their vote...it ain't that easy....at all! Especially in 2020 when we had huge increases in voters due to the pandemic and a large population of unemployed with time to vote. Checks are in place, to catch any voter, voting twice.
Who checks signatures anymore, silly?

I'm not talking about a signature match, I am saying there can not be more absentee votes, than the people requesting ballots to be sent to them, and there can not be more absentee ballots and votes cast, than the absentee envelopes that the ballots came from...

The registered voter had to request a ballot be sent to them at their home, if not out of town. That is checked, when checking absentee envelopes returned with votes in them....was it requested by a registered voter.... is one of the steps and checks.

Ballot stuffing can't be done, in any massive way....

But this article guy is not talking absentee, cuz he is using the word embedded, and embedded sounds like it means inserted in to voting machines? How? he doesn't say.
 
Last edited:
LOLOLOL

Trump gets 39.7% of the votes in Pima County in 2016 ... gets 39.9% of the votes in 2020 ... and the forum loon cries conspiracy.

No wonder this thread was moved to the conspiracy threads.


Trumps support is nearly 70% across the nation. 70% in AZ. Meaning they needed ~350,000 bogus votes to swing over Maricopa County alone.
 
What is a recanvas vs a canvas? In canvassing which takes place after the election day is over...is...

For an election official, the canvass means aggregating or confirming every valid ballot cast and counted—absentee, early voting, Election Day, provisional, challenged, and uniformed and overseas citizen.

How would they know who hadn't voted, to invest the voter in to the voter roll roster at the polling place and how did they embed, their name on the roster, and vote it n to the machine oddball?

As I said, the machine can not count, more votes, than who walked in to vote and signed the roster. If the sign in to vote roster had 100 voters sign in, then they can NOT have more than 100 votes cast.

Unless in every single voting precinct that they claim the embedded votes were spread out to all precincts so nothing would stand out, get a volunteer soon to be felon, in each polling place, to add some of the names to the roster for the 35000 votes they allege they embedded, to make it match the embedding number?

And HOW were they embedded??! How how how? And by whom? A crook in each location precinct that knows how to get around the security in the voting machines, somehow? You are pulling in A LOT of people in to this conspiracy....

Simply put, it can't be done in our voting, with all the checks that have to balance.

you have to know the registered voter, with 100% certainty, will not cast an in person ballot, to steal their vote...it ain't that easy....at all! Especially in 2020 when we had huge increases in voters due to the pandemic and a large population of unemployed with time to vote. Checks are in place, to catch any voter, voting twice.


I'm not talking about a signature match, I am saying there can not be more absentee votes, than the people requesting ballots to be sent to them, and there can not be more absentee ballots and votes cast, than the absentee envelopes that the ballots came from...

The registered voter had to request a ballot be sent to them at their home, if not out of town. That is checked, when checking absentee envelopes returned with votes in them....was it requested by a registered voter....?

Ballot stuffing can't be done, in any massive way....

But this article guy is not talking absentee, cuz he is using the word embedded, and embedded sounds like it means inserted in to voting machines?


Like this poster never heard of 2000 mules. What a friggin time wasting POS this one is. Not worth it.//
 
You do not worry about your children? Why doesn't that surprise me?
Unless your son has some inner desire already existing within him, seeing a male dress as a female, is not going to affect your son, in any way.... Same with a gay male being around him... imo.
 
Last edited:
What is a recanvas vs a canvas? In canvassing which takes place after the election day is over...is...

For an election official, the canvass means aggregating or confirming every valid ballot cast and counted—absentee, early voting, Election Day, provisional, challenged, and uniformed and overseas citizen.
It involved people going to the addresses listed on the voter rolls and asking them if they voted and how many people in that residence voted....They don't ask who they voted for....In Maricopa they found thousands who didn't live at the given address, the address was a commercial building or empty lot, the person didn't vote at all but was listed as casting a ballot, etcetera....Open cheating.
How would they know who hadn't voted, to invest the voter in to the voter roll roster at the polling place and how did they embed, their name on the roster, and vote it n to the machine oddball?
Algorithms, which are already programmed into the machines....If one person is one vote, you don't need algorithms.
As I said, the machine can not count, more votes, than who walked in to vote and signed the roster. If the sign in to vote roster had 100 voters sign in, then they can NOT have more than 100 votes cast.
Sure it can...Computers can be rigged to do just about anything.
Unless in every single voting precinct that they claim the embedded votes were spread out to all precincts so nothing would stand out, get a volunteer soon to be felon, in each polling place, to add some of the names to the roster for the 35000 votes they allege they embedded, to make it match the embedding number?

And HOW were they embedded??! How how how? And by whom? A crook in each location precinct that knows how to get around the security in the voting machines, somehow? You are pulling in A LOT of people in to this conspiracy....

Simply put, it can't be done in our voting, with all the checks that have to balance.
Your opinion...Yet it happened.
Ballot stuffing can't be done, in any massive way....
The hell it can't...It was done in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania right in front of your face.
 
Trumps support is nearly 70% across the nation. 70% in AZ. Meaning they needed ~350,000 bogus votes to swing over Maricopa County alone.

a) Trump has nowhere near 70% support. His favorability is around 39%.

b) There were not ~350,000 bogus votes in Maricopa County. Every single ballot in Maricopa county was audited and recounted. They didn't find bogus votes. What they did find was that Biden won Maricopa County by an even bigger margin than previously counted.
 
Like this poster never heard of 2000 mules. What a friggin time wasting POS this one is. Not worth it.//

LOL

2000 Mules utterly failed to prove their claims that 54,000 people dropped off multiple ballots, multiple times.
 
This data being examined. It is fact, not conspiracy.

Sometimes fraud is so far beyond the pale, so egregious, that it is difficult to accept that it happened. But evidence can be too blatant to explain away, especially when two totally different sources of information confirm the existence of the very same fraudulent activity. Such a convergence of evidence occurred in the 2020 election.

Remember whistleblowers can cause an impeachment.
An explosive allegation was made: In Pima County, thirty-five thousand (35,000) votes had been added to each Democrat candidate in the election, including Joe Biden. The allegation was made anonymously by someone claiming that he or she met with Democrat Pima County election officials on September 10, 2020, where a plan to rig the vote was hatched.

The tipster’s written words were described and posted at a meeting of the Arizona Senate on November 30, 2020. Retired Army Col. Phil Waldron told the Senate members,


More than a year ago, in 2021, I sent a FOIA request to the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice. I requested all documents related to the Division’s investigation of the Pima County election fraud allegation. The Division acknowledged my communication and promised a quick response, as required by regulation. However, a response was never issued, despite multiple follow-up requests.

Did the FBI check into this? I doubt it has the time. Right now, the agency is busy trying to distinguish Proud Boys from FBI agents pretending to be Proud Boys.


It is factual, showing conspiracy. Just to nit pick...;)
 
No there wasn't. He lost. End of story.
The fact that you're still whining about it more than two years later is pathetic.

But keep it up. If he's the nominee, he'll lose even bigger in 2024. :)
The fact that no one believes your lies has you repeating them for two years.
 
Unless your son has some inner desire already existing within him, seeing a male dress as a female, is not going to affect your son, in any way.... Same with a gay male being around him... imo.


Bull hockey. That Gay male around him is working 24-7 to get fresh young meat back into his lair. They will do anything to get new recruits to the cult.
 

Forum List

Back
Top