Was Adam really the first human and if so...

[Taz]

Apparently Taz can’t know anything unless it is spoon fed to her by a link.

Funny thing is that when you do she searches for something which she can latch onto to dismiss it.

The only thing that will actually convince Taz is experiencing it. Some people have to learn things the hard way. Taz is one of those people.

A quick search showed that what hob said was nonsense. That's why you don't or can't provide links.

Actually no it didn’t.

It confirms what he said.

Can you show me where it said it didn’t happen?

So now you want a link?

No. I am asking you to explain how you can use a link which supports that the great flood which every culture has an account of, to support the opposite of what it said.

Of course every culture has had floods, but nobody ever said they covered the whole place for 40 days and killed everyone.

 

[ding]

Apparently Taz can’t know anything unless it is spoon fed to her by a link.

Funny thing is that when you do she searches for something which she can latch onto to dismiss it.

The only thing that will actually convince Taz is experiencing it. Some people have to learn things the hard way. Taz is one of those people.

A quick search showed that what hob said was nonsense. That's why you don't or can't provide links.

Actually no it didn’t.

It confirms what he said.

Can you show me where it said it didn’t happen?

So now you want a link?

No. I am asking you to explain how you can use a link which supports that the great flood which every culture has an account of, to support the opposite of what it said.

Of course every culture has had floods, but nobody ever said they covered the whole place for 40 days and killed everyone.

It’s an allegorical account dipshit.

 

[Taz]

Apparently Taz can’t know anything unless it is spoon fed to her by a link.

Funny thing is that when you do she searches for something which she can latch onto to dismiss it.

The only thing that will actually convince Taz is experiencing it. Some people have to learn things the hard way. Taz is one of those people.

A quick search showed that what hob said was nonsense. That's why you don't or can't provide links.

Actually no it didn’t.

It confirms what he said.

Can you show me where it said it didn’t happen?

So now you want a link?

You want a link, he wants a link everywhere a link link,

and have I got a nice a big a juicy salsiccia for a you.

The fartsmoke brothers.

 

[hobelim]

Apparently Taz can’t know anything unless it is spoon fed to her by a link.

Funny thing is that when you do she searches for something which she can latch onto to dismiss it.

The only thing that will actually convince Taz is experiencing it. Some people have to learn things the hard way. Taz is one of those people.

A quick search showed that what hob said was nonsense. That's why you don't or can't provide links.

Actually no it didn’t.

It confirms what he said.

Can you show me where it said it didn’t happen?

So now you want a link?

No. I am asking you to explain how you can use a link which supports that the great flood which every culture has an account of, to support the opposite of what it said.

Of course every culture has had floods, but nobody ever said they covered the whole place for 40 days and killed everyone.

No one has ever provided any proof that the big bad wolf ate grandma but after just one conversation with you I was convinced.

 

[Taz]

Apparently Taz can’t know anything unless it is spoon fed to her by a link.

Funny thing is that when you do she searches for something which she can latch onto to dismiss it.

The only thing that will actually convince Taz is experiencing it. Some people have to learn things the hard way. Taz is one of those people.

A quick search showed that what hob said was nonsense. That's why you don't or can't provide links.

You need links to believe things you have experienced?

Are you a drone?

What you say in your personal fartsmoke until you can back it up properly.

You aren’t a good loser.

You literally just took a link that said one thing to justify the exact opposite.

You are nothing but a troll. And you are not a very good one at that.

The link I found said no such thing for a 40 day flood that covered everything and killed everyone.

 

[Taz]

A quick search showed that what hob said was nonsense. That's why you don't or can't provide links.

Actually no it didn’t.

It confirms what he said.

Can you show me where it said it didn’t happen?

So now you want a link?

No. I am asking you to explain how you can use a link which supports that the great flood which every culture has an account of, to support the opposite of what it said.

Of course every culture has had floods, but nobody ever said they covered the whole place for 40 days and killed everyone.

It’s an allegorical account dipshit.

Is that your way of saying that you agree with me that it never happened?

 

[ding]

Apparently Taz can’t know anything unless it is spoon fed to her by a link.

Funny thing is that when you do she searches for something which she can latch onto to dismiss it.

The only thing that will actually convince Taz is experiencing it. Some people have to learn things the hard way. Taz is one of those people.

A quick search showed that what hob said was nonsense. That's why you don't or can't provide links.

You need links to believe things you have experienced?

Are you a drone?

What you say in your personal fartsmoke until you can back it up properly.

You aren’t a good loser.

You literally just took a link that said one thing to justify the exact opposite.

You are nothing but a troll. And you are not a very good one at that.

The link I found said no such thing for a 40 day flood that covered everything and killed everyone.

Don’t tell me what it didn’t say. Tell me what the link did say.

 

[Taz]

A quick search showed that what hob said was nonsense. That's why you don't or can't provide links.

Actually no it didn’t.

It confirms what he said.

Can you show me where it said it didn’t happen?

So now you want a link?

No. I am asking you to explain how you can use a link which supports that the great flood which every culture has an account of, to support the opposite of what it said.

Of course every culture has had floods, but nobody ever said they covered the whole place for 40 days and killed everyone.

No one has ever provided any proof that the big bad wolf ate grandma but after just one conversation with you I was convinced.

Doesn't take you much to set off another fantasy. Like that crater thing.

 

[ding]

Taz couldn’t play hopscotch as a young girl because she skipped too many steps.

 

[Taz]

A quick search showed that what hob said was nonsense. That's why you don't or can't provide links.

You need links to believe things you have experienced?

Are you a drone?

What you say in your personal fartsmoke until you can back it up properly.

You aren’t a good loser.

You literally just took a link that said one thing to justify the exact opposite.

You are nothing but a troll. And you are not a very good one at that.

The link I found said no such thing for a 40 day flood that covered everything and killed everyone.

Don’t tell me what it didn’t say. Tell me what the link did say.

Total speculation. Burckle Crater - Wikipedia

 

[ding]

Actually no it didn’t.

It confirms what he said.

Can you show me where it said it didn’t happen?

So now you want a link?

No. I am asking you to explain how you can use a link which supports that the great flood which every culture has an account of, to support the opposite of what it said.

Of course every culture has had floods, but nobody ever said they covered the whole place for 40 days and killed everyone.

It’s an allegorical account dipshit.

Is that your way of saying that you agree with me that it never happened?

No. That’s my way of telling you how they passed down history and lessons 6000 years ago.

 

[Taz]

So now you want a link?

No. I am asking you to explain how you can use a link which supports that the great flood which every culture has an account of, to support the opposite of what it said.

Of course every culture has had floods, but nobody ever said they covered the whole place for 40 days and killed everyone.

It’s an allegorical account dipshit.

Is that your way of saying that you agree with me that it never happened?

No. That’s my way of telling you how they passed down history and lessons 6000 years ago.

So you claim it's history now, not allegorical?

 

[ding]

You need links to believe things you have experienced?

Are you a drone?

What you say in your personal fartsmoke until you can back it up properly.

You aren’t a good loser.

You literally just took a link that said one thing to justify the exact opposite.

You are nothing but a troll. And you are not a very good one at that.

The link I found said no such thing for a 40 day flood that covered everything and killed everyone.

Don’t tell me what it didn’t say. Tell me what the link did say.

Total speculation. Burckle Crater - Wikipedia

The total speculation is your take.

You are literally arguing against what the link says.

 

[Taz]

What you say in your personal fartsmoke until you can back it up properly.

You aren’t a good loser.

You literally just took a link that said one thing to justify the exact opposite.

You are nothing but a troll. And you are not a very good one at that.

The link I found said no such thing for a 40 day flood that covered everything and killed everyone.

Don’t tell me what it didn’t say. Tell me what the link did say.

Total speculation. Burckle Crater - Wikipedia

The total speculation is your take.

You are literally arguing against what the link says.

You're an idiot. Where does it say anything about a 40 days worldwide flood?

 

[ding]

No. I am asking you to explain how you can use a link which supports that the great flood which every culture has an account of, to support the opposite of what it said.

Of course every culture has had floods, but nobody ever said they covered the whole place for 40 days and killed everyone.

It’s an allegorical account dipshit.

Is that your way of saying that you agree with me that it never happened?

No. That’s my way of telling you how they passed down history and lessons 6000 years ago.

So you claim it's history now, not allegorical?

Both. That’s how they passed down information 6000 years ago.

 

[Taz]

Of course every culture has had floods, but nobody ever said they covered the whole place for 40 days and killed everyone.

It’s an allegorical account dipshit.

Is that your way of saying that you agree with me that it never happened?

No. That’s my way of telling you how they passed down history and lessons 6000 years ago.

So you claim it's history now, not allegorical?

Both. That’s how they passed down information 6000 years ago.

So both, so it's history that there was a 40 day flood that covered everything?

 

[ding]

You aren’t a good loser.

You literally just took a link that said one thing to justify the exact opposite.

You are nothing but a troll. And you are not a very good one at that.

The link I found said no such thing for a 40 day flood that covered everything and killed everyone.

Don’t tell me what it didn’t say. Tell me what the link did say.

Total speculation. Burckle Crater - Wikipedia

The total speculation is your take.

You are literally arguing against what the link says.

You're an idiot. Where does it say anything about a 40 days worldwide flood?

It provides the mechanism that supports the legend recorded by ancient civilizations.

They didn’t have CNN back in those days.

 

[ding]

It’s an allegorical account dipshit.

Is that your way of saying that you agree with me that it never happened?

No. That’s my way of telling you how they passed down history and lessons 6000 years ago.

So you claim it's history now, not allegorical?

Both. That’s how they passed down information 6000 years ago.

So both, so it's history that there was a 40 day flood that covered everything?

You want to specify 40 days when all it is meant to convey is that the event lasted a long time.

It was such a special event that all ancient civilizations recorded it.

 

[Taz]

The link I found said no such thing for a 40 day flood that covered everything and killed everyone.

Don’t tell me what it didn’t say. Tell me what the link did say.

Total speculation. Burckle Crater - Wikipedia

The total speculation is your take.

You are literally arguing against what the link says.

You're an idiot. Where does it say anything about a 40 days worldwide flood?

It provides the mechanism that supports the legend recorded by ancient civilizations.

They didn’t have CNN back in those days.

No wonder you don't provide links, you don't know what they say.

 

[Taz]

Is that your way of saying that you agree with me that it never happened?

No. That’s my way of telling you how they passed down history and lessons 6000 years ago.

So you claim it's history now, not allegorical?

Both. That’s how they passed down information 6000 years ago.

So both, so it's history that there was a 40 day flood that covered everything?

You want to specify 40 days when all it is meant to convey is that the event lasted a long time.

It was such a special event that all ancient civilizations recorded it.

How could ancient civilizations record the flood if it covered everything and killed everyone except Noah's posse?