Warren Blasts Elon Musk’s Government Power Grab

[TruthNotBS]

​

Senator Warren’s speech underscores a vital warning about the dangers of allowing one individual, especially one who is not an elected representative, to exert such extensive control over a major component of government operations. She highlights the fact that critical systems, like those responsible for sending Social Security checks, paying Medicare bills, and funding essential services, should remain in the hands of democratically accountable institutions rather than a single person’s private enterprise. Her concerns are particularly urgent because these are the mechanisms that safeguard our most vulnerable populations: seniors, patients, children, and ordinary families who rely on timely disbursement of federal funds.

In defending Senator Warren’s position, it’s clear that she champions the principle of government by the people, for the people. She rallies the public to resist concentrated power and reminds us that these systems were built to serve everyone, not to be subject to the personal decisions of someone who has never faced the voters. By calling attention to the broader implications of one individual’s influence, Senator Warren is advocating for a democratic check on power to ensure that vital services continue to flow responsibly. Her stance sends a powerful message that we should remain vigilant and engaged to protect the foundations of our democracy.

 

[daveman]

​

Senator Warren’s speech underscores a vital warning about the dangers of allowing one individual, especially one who is not an elected representative, to exert such extensive control over a major component of government operations. She highlights the fact that critical systems, like those responsible for sending Social Security checks, paying Medicare bills, and funding essential services, should remain in the hands of democratically accountable institutions rather than a single person’s private enterprise. Her concerns are particularly urgent because these are the mechanisms that safeguard our most vulnerable populations: seniors, patients, children, and ordinary families who rely on timely disbursement of federal funds.

In defending Senator Warren’s position, it’s clear that she champions the principle of government by the people, for the people. She rallies the public to resist concentrated power and reminds us that these systems were built to serve everyone, not to be subject to the personal decisions of someone who has never faced the voters. By calling attention to the broader implications of one individual’s influence, Senator Warren is advocating for a democratic check on power to ensure that vital services continue to flow responsibly. Her stance sends a powerful message that we should remain vigilant and engaged to protect the foundations of our democracy.

"democratically accountable institutions"

There are none of those in D.C.

Until now.

 

[Mashmont]

​

Senator Warren’s speech underscores a vital warning about the dangers of allowing one individual, especially one who is not an elected representative, to exert such extensive control over a major component of government operations. She highlights the fact that critical systems, like those responsible for sending Social Security checks, paying Medicare bills, and funding essential services, should remain in the hands of democratically accountable institutions rather than a single person’s private enterprise. Her concerns are particularly urgent because these are the mechanisms that safeguard our most vulnerable populations: seniors, patients, children, and ordinary families who rely on timely disbursement of federal funds.

In defending Senator Warren’s position, it’s clear that she champions the principle of government by the people, for the people. She rallies the public to resist concentrated power and reminds us that these systems were built to serve everyone, not to be subject to the personal decisions of someone who has never faced the voters. By calling attention to the broader implications of one individual’s influence, Senator Warren is advocating for a democratic check on power to ensure that vital services continue to flow responsibly. Her stance sends a powerful message that we should remain vigilant and engaged to protect the foundations of our democracy.

Is Pocahontas so dumb as to think Musk is doing anything other than passing along his findings to the elected Trump? Or is she just intentionally lying?

 

[TruthNotBS]

Is Pocahontas so dumb as to think Musk is doing anything other than passing along his findings to the elected Trump? Or is she just intentionally lying?

The irony here is that most of you who support Elon here on the forum, are pensioners, living on your Social Security, and relying on Medicare for your healthcare. You're placing all of that, at risk. It's not just the poor people on Medicaid or food stamps that you don't particularly care about, who are going to be affected. You, the MAGA working class, are essentially handing our government to a bunch of billionaire plutocrats, who don't give a rat's ass about you or anyone else, but themselves.

​

 

[Darkwind]

1.1M views · 15K reactions | Congress Introduces Bill To Reduce Skull Fucking | The Onion

Congress Introduces Bill To Reduce Skull *******

www.facebook.com

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

​

Senator Warren’s speech underscores a vital warning about the dangers of allowing one individual, especially one who is not an elected representative, to exert such extensive control over a major component of government operations. She highlights the fact that critical systems, like those responsible for sending Social Security checks, paying Medicare bills, and funding essential services, should remain in the hands of democratically accountable institutions rather than a single person’s private enterprise. Her concerns are particularly urgent because these are the mechanisms that safeguard our most vulnerable populations: seniors, patients, children, and ordinary families who rely on timely disbursement of federal funds.

In defending Senator Warren’s position, it’s clear that she champions the principle of government by the people, for the people. She rallies the public to resist concentrated power and reminds us that these systems were built to serve everyone, not to be subject to the personal decisions of someone who has never faced the voters. By calling attention to the broader implications of one individual’s influence, Senator Warren is advocating for a democratic check on power to ensure that vital services continue to flow responsibly. Her stance sends a powerful message that we should remain vigilant and engaged to protect the foundations of our democracy.

You don't think we're going to go after musk if he does something blatantly wrong
You people are f****** retarded
He backtracked on H-1B

They had to hide the street shitter for 2 months and he'll be lucky if he wins Ohio
He's already leading in the polls but that's H1B s*** is going to haunt him

 

[Mashmont]

The irony here is that most of you who support Elon here on the forum, are pensioners, living on your Social Security, and relying on Medicare for your healthcare. You're placing all of that, at risk. It's not just the poor people on Medicaid or food stamps that you don't particularly care about, who are going to be affected. You, the MAGA working class, are essentially handing our government to a bunch of billionaire plutocrats, who don't give a rat's ass about you or anyone else, but themselves.

It's hard to imagine why leftwingers are against simply auditing agencies that haven't been audited for years, if ever. Don't you people want ANY accountability?

 

[TruthNotBS]

You don't think we're going to go after musk if he does something blatantly wrong
You people are f****** retarded
He backtracked on H-1B

They had to hide the street shitter for 2 months and he'll be lucky if he wins Ohio
He's already leading in the polls but that's H1B s*** is going to haunt him

 

[TruthNotBS]

"democratically accountable institutions"

There are none of those in D.C.

Until now.

What institution is that? Trump? You're out of your mind.

 

[TruthNotBS]

1.1M views · 15K reactions | Congress Introduces Bill To Reduce Skull Fucking | The Onion

Congress Introduces Bill To Reduce Skull *******

www.facebook.com

?

 

[WelfareQueen]

It's hard to imagine why leftwingers are against simply auditing agencies that haven't been audited for years, if ever. Don't you people want ANY accountability?

I think I can answer for the Dims. Ah....no we want no auditing and zero accountability. We love it when the Deep States runs amok and does fucked up transgender Marxist shit around the globe to **** up everybody else.

 

[TruthNotBS]

It's hard to imagine why leftwingers are against simply auditing agencies that haven't been audited for years, if ever. Don't you people want ANY accountability?

Who's auditing these billionaire oligarchs, who just want to strip the American people of as many government services as possible and then cash in, with more tax breaks and no regulations that protect the working class?

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

It's hard to imagine why leftwingers are against simply auditing agencies that haven't been audited for years, if ever. Don't you people want ANY accountability?

Oh no you can't have that

That makes way too much sense..... Racist

 

[Mashmont]

Who's auditing these billionaire oligarchs, who just want to strip the American people of as many government services as possible and then cash in, with more tax breaks and no regulations that protect the working class?

View attachment 1074640

Back to the question. Elon is discovering many of these agencies have spent way out of control without ever being audited. Are you OK with that?

 

[TruthNotBS]

I think I can answer for the Dims. Ah....no we want no auditing and zero accountability. We love it when the Deep States runs amok and does fucked up transgender Marxist shit around the globe to **** up everybody else.

Is that really what should be your priority or what you should be focused on? I don't like all of the LGBTQ crap either, and I'm a socialist. But is that really the core issue to focus on while these billionaires strip you of your rights as a worker, and senior relying on government programs for your income and healthcare? They want to strip down the government to a barebones minimum and replace the government with their private companies and power. Stripping you of your rights as an American citizen, and any services your government can provide you with.

They've hoodwinked you due to your exaggerated focus on social issues like gays and abortion. I don't like all of the gender BS confusion, the 100 pronouns of "the woke" and, children being indoctrinated in school about transsexualism and how they can supposedly change their genders. All of this leads to confused children, on puberty blockers. I agree, I get it, but you chose the wrong man to fight against these social issues because he's using that to get inside the government and reduce to the point where the billionaires are in power and you're not.

Read this again:

He's only interested in short-term profits. He doesn't care about the American working class. Those who need to rent themselves to someone like him, on a daily basis, in order to earn a wage. He's a plutocrat, an oligarch, who just cares about his own interests. Elon hires Indians, from India, because he can control and threaten them with deportation, if they complain or try to unionize. He hates Americna workers, and wants to fill his companies with people he can control and exploit, with impunity and without consequences. He can't do that with American workers, but he can with desperate Indians looking for a better life in America than what they have now in India.

Listen to the father of industrial-age capitalism, Adam Smith:

Adam Smith the father of capitalism, called capitalists "masters":

"What are the common wages of labor, depends everywhere upon the contract usually made between those two parties, whose interests are by no means the same. The workmen desire to get as much, the masters to give as little as possible. The former are disposed to combine (To form labor unions) in order to raise, the latter in order to lower the wages of labor.

It is not, however, difficult to foresee which of the two parties must, upon all ordinary occasions, have the advantage in the dispute, and force the other into a compliance with their terms. The masters, being fewer in number, can combine (In the form of chambers of commerce, industry-specific associations, guilds, super-PACs, non-profit front organizations/NGOs, armies of lobbyists bribing politicians in the halls of government, think tanks staffed by Ivy league educated analysts and scholars who write the papers and legislation that they hand to the lobbyists, to then give to their cronies in Congress) much more easily; and the law, besides, authorises, or at least does not prohibit their combinations, while it prohibits those of the workmen.

We have no acts of parliament against combining to lower the price of work; but many against combining to raise it. In all such disputes the masters can hold out much longer. A landlord, a farmer, a master manufacturer, or merchant, though they did not employ a single workman, could generally live a year or two upon the stocks which they have already acquired. Many workmen could not subsist a week, few could subsist a month, and scarce any a year without employment. In the long-run the workman may be as necessary to his master as his master is to him, but the necessity is not so immediate.

We rarely hear, it has been said, of the combinations of masters, though frequently of those of workmen. But whoever imagines, upon this account, that masters rarely combine, is as ignorant of the world as of the subject. Masters are always and every where in a sort of tacit, but constant and uniform combination, not to raise the wages of labour above their actual rate. To violate this combination is every where a most unpopular action, and a sort of reproach to a master among his neighbours and equals." (Wealth Of Nations - Book I, Chapter VIII)

Emphasis is mine.

You've elected your masters into the government, who don't give an F about you. All they want is power, and control over the government and they now have it, thanks to all of you MAGA-hats who elected them.

​

 

[TruthNotBS]

Back to the question. Elon is discovering many of these agencies have spent way out of control without ever being audited. Are you OK with that?

No, I'm not, but you have the wrong people doing the auditing. They're using that as a pretense to cut much more. Don't you get it?

 

[TruthNotBS]

It's hard to imagine why leftwingers are against simply auditing agencies that haven't been audited for years, if ever. Don't you people want ANY accountability?

You have the wrong people doing it.

 

[Mashmont]

No, I'm not, but you have the wrong people doing the auditing. They're using that as a pretense to cut much more. Don't you get it?

Good. Cut the hell out of it.

 

[TheGreatSatan]

The AI is finding the money and soon will reveal the thieves and the traitors.

Nuremberg 2.0 is near

 

[whitehall]

"A vital warning of the dangers"? Typical left wing spin from you tube designed to support a phony Native American and placate the disappointed angry incoherent democrat base with B.S. . No surprise.