WAPO Fake News in October?"Trump’s path to an electoral college victory isn’t narrow. It’s nonexist"

[ColonelAngus]

Trump’s path to an electoral college victory isn’t narrow. It’s nonexistent.



The trajectory of the 2016 presidential race — which will result in a Hillary Clinton victory — remains largely unchanged from May, when Donald Trump and Clinton were in the process of wrapping up their nominations.


It would be a mistake to call Trump’s current path to an electoral-college victory narrow. It is nonexistent. Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin, once part of the Trump scenario, have never been “in play,” and he is not competitive in states Obama won only narrowly in 2012, such as Virginia and Colorado. Trump is more likely to lose North Carolina than win it, which would put him under 200 electoral votes.



Why should anyone ever listen to anything this guy ever says?

This is the fake news. This Washington Post article is 100% pure bullshit.

 

[Eaglewings]

Using the Fake # words for your content writing job again? It is so obvious

 

[SYTFE]

Article posted October 18th. OP is a ****.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Remember when demographic changes were turning Texas blue?

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Trump’s path to an electoral college victory isn’t narrow. It’s nonexistent.



The trajectory of the 2016 presidential race — which will result in a Hillary Clinton victory — remains largely unchanged from May, when Donald Trump and Clinton were in the process of wrapping up their nominations.


It would be a mistake to call Trump’s current path to an electoral-college victory narrow. It is nonexistent. Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin, once part of the Trump scenario, have never been “in play,” and he is not competitive in states Obama won only narrowly in 2012, such as Virginia and Colorado. Trump is more likely to lose North Carolina than win it, which would put him under 200 electoral votes.



Why should anyone ever listen to anything this guy ever says?

This is the fake news. This Washington Post article is 100% pure bullshit.

Some people will believe anything...I actually thought Hillary was going to win going away and that Trump would get less than 190 electoral votes...I was a victim of the FAKE NEWS as well

 

[ColonelAngus]

Article posted October 18th. OP is a ****.

October article is the whole point. You are the ****.

This asshole said it was impossible for Trump to win the electoral college. He lied. Fake news.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Trump’s path to an electoral college victory isn’t narrow. It’s nonexistent.



The trajectory of the 2016 presidential race — which will result in a Hillary Clinton victory — remains largely unchanged from May, when Donald Trump and Clinton were in the process of wrapping up their nominations.


It would be a mistake to call Trump’s current path to an electoral-college victory narrow. It is nonexistent. Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin, once part of the Trump scenario, have never been “in play,” and he is not competitive in states Obama won only narrowly in 2012, such as Virginia and Colorado. Trump is more likely to lose North Carolina than win it, which would put him under 200 electoral votes.



Why should anyone ever listen to anything this guy ever says?

This is the fake news. This Washington Post article is 100% pure bullshit.

Some people will believe anything...I actually thought Hillary was going to win going away and that Trump would get less than 190 electoral votes...I was a victim of the FAKE NEWS as well

I love how some snowflakes claim the exit polls prove Hillary really won...yet no one can articulate how the election itself was hacked by anyone changing the vote tally.

 

[SYTFE]

Article posted October 18th. OP is a ****.

October article is the whole point. You are the ****.

This asshole said it was impossible for Trump to win the electoral college. He lied. Fake news.

It was an op-ed piece. What are you doing now, going back in time to find every op-ed that predicted a Trump loss and declare them all as "fake news? lol, get the **** over yourself. Even Trump himself was surprised he won.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Article posted October 18th. OP is a ****.

I think you may have missed the point of reposting it

 

[ColonelAngus]

Article posted October 18th. OP is a ****.

October article is the whole point. You are the ****.

This asshole said it was impossible for Trump to win the electoral college. He lied. Fake news.

It was an op-ed piece. What are you doing now, going back in time to find every op-ed that predicted a Trump loss and declare them all as "fake news? lol, get the **** over yourself. Even Trump himself was surprised he won.

No, his internal polling was accurate. He was surprised how wrong the MSM got it.

This dude said it was impossible for Trump to win. He was wrong.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Maybe snowflakes would be happy if we just have them all a participation trophy.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Trump’s path to an electoral college victory isn’t narrow. It’s nonexistent.



The trajectory of the 2016 presidential race — which will result in a Hillary Clinton victory — remains largely unchanged from May, when Donald Trump and Clinton were in the process of wrapping up their nominations.


It would be a mistake to call Trump’s current path to an electoral-college victory narrow. It is nonexistent. Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin, once part of the Trump scenario, have never been “in play,” and he is not competitive in states Obama won only narrowly in 2012, such as Virginia and Colorado. Trump is more likely to lose North Carolina than win it, which would put him under 200 electoral votes.



Why should anyone ever listen to anything this guy ever says?

This is the fake news. This Washington Post article is 100% pure bullshit.

Trump’s path to an electoral college victory isn’t narrow. It’s nonexistent.



The trajectory of the 2016 presidential race — which will result in a Hillary Clinton victory — remains largely unchanged from May, when Donald Trump and Clinton were in the process of wrapping up their nominations.


It would be a mistake to call Trump’s current path to an electoral-college victory narrow. It is nonexistent. Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin, once part of the Trump scenario, have never been “in play,” and he is not competitive in states Obama won only narrowly in 2012, such as Virginia and Colorado. Trump is more likely to lose North Carolina than win it, which would put him under 200 electoral votes.



Why should anyone ever listen to anything this guy ever says?

This is the fake news. This Washington Post article is 100% pure bullshit.

Some people will believe anything...I actually thought Hillary was going to win going away and that Trump would get less than 190 electoral votes...I was a victim of the FAKE NEWS as well

I love how some snowflakes claim the exit polls prove Hillary really won...yet no one can articulate how the election itself was hacked by anyone changing the vote tally.

Some people will believe anything...I actually thought Hillary was going to win going away and that Trump would get less than 190 electoral votes...I was a victim of the FAKE NEWS as well

I love how some snowflakes claim the exit polls prove Hillary really won...yet no one can articulate how the election itself was hacked by anyone changing the vote tally.

I don't think they really believe it...I mean look at it, where would they be without these bogus news stories right now?...just lets them feel like they're saving face and keeps them in the game for a while longer.

 

[miketx]

Trump’s path to an electoral college victory isn’t narrow. It’s nonexistent.



The trajectory of the 2016 presidential race — which will result in a Hillary Clinton victory — remains largely unchanged from May, when Donald Trump and Clinton were in the process of wrapping up their nominations.


It would be a mistake to call Trump’s current path to an electoral-college victory narrow. It is nonexistent. Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin, once part of the Trump scenario, have never been “in play,” and he is not competitive in states Obama won only narrowly in 2012, such as Virginia and Colorado. Trump is more likely to lose North Carolina than win it, which would put him under 200 electoral votes.



Why should anyone ever listen to anything this guy ever says?

This is the fake news. This Washington Post article is 100% pure bullshit.

With a side order of turd.

 

[miketx]

Article posted October 18th. OP is a ****.

October article is the whole point. You are the ****.

This asshole said it was impossible for Trump to win the electoral college. He lied. Fake news.

It was an op-ed piece. What are you doing now, going back in time to find every op-ed that predicted a Trump loss and declare them all as "fake news? lol, get the **** over yourself. Even Trump himself was surprised he won.

Poor butthurt baby.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

It was an op-ed piece. What are you doing now, going back in time to find every op-ed that predicted a Trump loss and declare them all as "fake news? lol,

Just the ones that really hurt

get the **** over yourself. Even Trump himself was surprised he won.

Wow, so much hate...so so much

 

[miketx]

It was an op-ed piece. What are you doing now, going back in time to find every op-ed that predicted a Trump loss and declare them all as "fake news? lol,

Just the ones that really hurt

get the **** over yourself. Even Trump himself was surprised he won.

Wow, so much hate...so so much

Golly.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Dems are still at Grief stage 2, denial.

It might last 8 years.

 

[miketx]

Closer to 16.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Maybe snowflakes would be happy if we just have them all a participation trophy.

lol...Ya know, now that I think about it, they may not have been protesting, that may just have been the line for them to pick up their trophies and the fake news agencies just portrayed them as protests

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Dems are still at Grief stage 2, denial.

It might last 8 years.

Ah, "Grief", the opium of the misfits