PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #21
You don't even understand Natural Selection. Without that understanding, you can't disprove anything in regards to Darwin.Ready to admit you are both clueless, and easily led?
I can't help you.
Edit: If you would like me to continue this discussion with you... Explain natural selection in your own words.
I don't expect you to. I don't blame you. I don't hold any grudges. I should have known better.
Wow!
The indoctrination is indelible with your sort, huh?
Of course I understand it.....and what it is not.
It never leads to a new species.....which is what you don't understand.
“In short, the notion that molecules of germ cells … are in states of perpetual change is not, in our present understanding of cell biology, tenable. This doesn’t mean that “molecular change” does not occur; only that mechanisms provoking such change in germ cells are likely instantaneous and stochastic and probably often lethal (Maresca and Schwartz 2006) – which will preclude their persistence into future generations.”
MIT Press Journals
In Darwin's time, paleontologist Louis Agassiz knew the fossil record better than any man alive.
"He recognized that the problem with Darwinism was not the survival of the fittest, but rather the arrival of the fittest. Agassiz knew, as did most all animal and plant breeders both then and today, that clear limits exist to variation and no known way exists to go beyond these limits in spite of 4,000 years of trying. ....
... all mutations known to us cannot even begin to produce the variety required for molecules to mankind evolution, but rather they create 'monstrosities, and the occurrence of these, under disturbing influences, are…only additional evidence of the fixity of species. '"
Louis Agassiz: Anti-Darwinist Harvard Paleontology Professor
Ready to admit you are both clueless, and easily led?
There's no 'discussion.'
I'm explaining the truth to you......you can accept it or not.
Ignoring every documented, linked and sourced quote that I provide explains your problem: indoctrination.