Virginia Democrats Push Legislation to Make Criticism of Government Officials a Criminal Offense

The Purge

Platinum Member
Aug 16, 2018
17,881
7,863
400
In the wake of the Virginia gun rights rally on Monday, Democrats in the Capitol are not slowing down their push for tyranny. They are moving a bill through the legislature that would effectively criminalize dissent against Governor Blackface Northam and other state government officials.

House Bill 1627 was introduced by Delegate Jeffrey M. Bourne last week. The legislation “provides that certain crimes relating to threats and harassment may be prosecuted in the City of Richmond if the victim is the Governor, Governor-elect, Lieutenant Governor, Lieutenant Governor-elect, Attorney General, or Attorney General-elect, a member or employee of the General Assembly, a justice of the Supreme Court of Virginia, or a judge of the Court of Appeals of Virginia.”

Language in the bill explicitly criminalizes free speech, in what would constitute a blatant attack on the 1st Amendment of the Constitution.

(Excerpt) Read more at bigleaguepolitics.com ...

DemonRATS Sounding more and more like Bejing.and North Korea politically each day....Is Virginia the TRIAL STATE for American communism as DemonRATS now have full control of all 3 branches of the government? One has to wonder after the GUN RALLY this week where thousands showed up to protest the governments taking away 2nd Amendment rights!
 
Funny how the attack on the second amendment was immediately followed by an attack on the First Amendment
 
Democrats Seek Civil War, But Will Get Revolution
By William L. Gensert


Democrats conspired with foreign agents, lied, cheated, and denied due process to Donald Trump. If they were willing to do that to a duly elected president in order to obtain power, what should Americans expect them to do to them should they refuse attempts to be disarmed?

Read so much


Read more: https://www.americanthinker.com/art...ar_but_will_get_revolution.html#ixzz6Bl7ImnFt

71648833-dcfc-4ee2-b2e4-c645d6af2081.jpeg
 
In the wake of the Virginia gun rights rally on Monday, Democrats in the Capitol are not slowing down their push for tyranny. They are moving a bill through the legislature that would effectively criminalize dissent against Governor Blackface Northam and other state government officials.

House Bill 1627 was introduced by Delegate Jeffrey M. Bourne last week. The legislation “provides that certain crimes relating to threats and harassment may be prosecuted in the City of Richmond if the victim is the Governor, Governor-elect, Lieutenant Governor, Lieutenant Governor-elect, Attorney General, or Attorney General-elect, a member or employee of the General Assembly, a justice of the Supreme Court of Virginia, or a judge of the Court of Appeals of Virginia.”

Language in the bill explicitly criminalizes free speech, in what would constitute a blatant attack on the 1st Amendment of the Constitution.

(Excerpt) Read more at bigleaguepolitics.com ...

DemonRATS Sounding more and more like Bejing.and North Korea politically each day....Is Virginia the TRIAL STATE for American communism as DemonRATS now have full control of all 3 branches of the government? One has to wonder after the GUN RALLY this week where thousands showed up to protest the governments taking away 2nd Amendment rights!
We need laws to make it a felony to incite violence against Trump supporters.
 
No more threats and harassment against public officials? Whatever will the hatemongers do now?
 
No more threats and harassment against public officials? Whatever will the hatemongers do now?
Dissent is not necessarily a threat or harassment

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
Here's the bill.

Threats and harassment of certain officials and property; venue. Provides that certain crimes relating to threats and harassment may be prosecuted in the City of Richmond if the victim is the Governor, Governor-elect, Lieutenant Governor, Lieutenant Governor-elect, Attorney General, or Attorney General-elect, a member or employee of the General Assembly, a justice of the Supreme Court of Virginia, or a judge of the Court of Appeals of Virginia. In addition, threats to damage property may be prosecuted in the City of Richmond if the property is owned by the Commonwealth and located in the Capitol District.

Don't see the word "dissent" anywhere.
 
No more threats and harassment against public officials? Whatever will the hatemongers do now?
Dissent is not necessarily a threat or harassment

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
Here's the bill.

Threats and harassment of certain officials and property; venue. Provides that certain crimes relating to threats and harassment may be prosecuted in the City of Richmond if the victim is the Governor, Governor-elect, Lieutenant Governor, Lieutenant Governor-elect, Attorney General, or Attorney General-elect, a member or employee of the General Assembly, a justice of the Supreme Court of Virginia, or a judge of the Court of Appeals of Virginia. In addition, threats to damage property may be prosecuted in the City of Richmond if the property is owned by the Commonwealth and located in the Capitol District.

Don't see the word "dissent" anywhere.
Aren't there already "threat" statutes on the books?

Sent from my SM-T587P using Tapatalk
 
No more threats and harassment against public officials? Whatever will the hatemongers do now?
Dissent is not necessarily a threat or harassment

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
Here's the bill.

Threats and harassment of certain officials and property; venue. Provides that certain crimes relating to threats and harassment may be prosecuted in the City of Richmond if the victim is the Governor, Governor-elect, Lieutenant Governor, Lieutenant Governor-elect, Attorney General, or Attorney General-elect, a member or employee of the General Assembly, a justice of the Supreme Court of Virginia, or a judge of the Court of Appeals of Virginia. In addition, threats to damage property may be prosecuted in the City of Richmond if the property is owned by the Commonwealth and located in the Capitol District.

Don't see the word "dissent" anywhere.
Why are you even bothering to post it?

These idiots either can't read or don't care to read it even if they could.

All you are doing is interrupting another nutter circle jerk.
 
No more threats and harassment against public officials? Whatever will the hatemongers do now?
Dissent is not necessarily a threat or harassment

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
Here's the bill.

Threats and harassment of certain officials and property; venue. Provides that certain crimes relating to threats and harassment may be prosecuted in the City of Richmond if the victim is the Governor, Governor-elect, Lieutenant Governor, Lieutenant Governor-elect, Attorney General, or Attorney General-elect, a member or employee of the General Assembly, a justice of the Supreme Court of Virginia, or a judge of the Court of Appeals of Virginia. In addition, threats to damage property may be prosecuted in the City of Richmond if the property is owned by the Commonwealth and located in the Capitol District.

Don't see the word "dissent" anywhere.
Aren't there already "threat" statutes on the books?

Sent from my SM-T587P using Tapatalk
Probably, but then again the hateful right probably does not know the difference between threats and dissent.
 
No more threats and harassment against public officials? Whatever will the hatemongers do now?
Dissent is not necessarily a threat or harassment

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
Here's the bill.

Threats and harassment of certain officials and property; venue. Provides that certain crimes relating to threats and harassment may be prosecuted in the City of Richmond if the victim is the Governor, Governor-elect, Lieutenant Governor, Lieutenant Governor-elect, Attorney General, or Attorney General-elect, a member or employee of the General Assembly, a justice of the Supreme Court of Virginia, or a judge of the Court of Appeals of Virginia. In addition, threats to damage property may be prosecuted in the City of Richmond if the property is owned by the Commonwealth and located in the Capitol District.

Don't see the word "dissent" anywhere.
Here's the thing it's already illegal to threaten politicians or anyone else it's also already illegal to damage property so why do they need a special law?

What they want to do is lower the threshold for the definitions of harassment and threatening so they can silence their critics
 
No more threats and harassment against public officials? Whatever will the hatemongers do now?
Dissent is not necessarily a threat or harassment

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
Here's the bill.

Threats and harassment of certain officials and property; venue. Provides that certain crimes relating to threats and harassment may be prosecuted in the City of Richmond if the victim is the Governor, Governor-elect, Lieutenant Governor, Lieutenant Governor-elect, Attorney General, or Attorney General-elect, a member or employee of the General Assembly, a justice of the Supreme Court of Virginia, or a judge of the Court of Appeals of Virginia. In addition, threats to damage property may be prosecuted in the City of Richmond if the property is owned by the Commonwealth and located in the Capitol District.

Don't see the word "dissent" anywhere.
Why are you even bothering to post it?

These idiots either can't read or don't care to read it even if they could.

All you are doing is interrupting another nutter circle jerk.

Why do they need a special law when those things are already illegal?
 
The demoncrats have no shame and are not even trying to hide their tyranny in Virginia

House Bill 1627 was introduced by Delegate Jeffrey M. Bourne last week. The legislation “provides that certain crimes relating to threats and harassment may be prosecuted in the City of Richmond if the victim is the Governor, Governor-elect, Lieutenant Governor, Lieutenant Governor-elect, Attorney General, or Attorney General-elect, a member or employee of the General Assembly, a justice of the Supreme Court of Virginia, or a judge of the Court of Appeals of Virginia.
Language in the bill explicitly criminalizes free speech, in what would constitute a blatant attack on the 1st Amendment of the Constitution.
Virginia Democrats Push Legislation to Make Criticism of Government Officials a Criminal Offense - Big League Politics
 
The demoncrats have no shame and are not even trying to hide their tyranny in Virginia

House Bill 1627 was introduced by Delegate Jeffrey M. Bourne last week. The legislation “provides that certain crimes relating to threats and harassment may be prosecuted in the City of Richmond if the victim is the Governor, Governor-elect, Lieutenant Governor, Lieutenant Governor-elect, Attorney General, or Attorney General-elect, a member or employee of the General Assembly, a justice of the Supreme Court of Virginia, or a judge of the Court of Appeals of Virginia.
Language in the bill explicitly criminalizes free speech, in what would constitute a blatant attack on the 1st Amendment of the Constitution.
Virginia Democrats Push Legislation to Make Criticism of Government Officials a Criminal Offense - Big League Politics
All those scumbags should be pulled out and hung.
 
No more threats and harassment against public officials? Whatever will the hatemongers do now?
Dissent is not necessarily a threat or harassment

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
Here's the bill.

Threats and harassment of certain officials and property; venue. Provides that certain crimes relating to threats and harassment may be prosecuted in the City of Richmond if the victim is the Governor, Governor-elect, Lieutenant Governor, Lieutenant Governor-elect, Attorney General, or Attorney General-elect, a member or employee of the General Assembly, a justice of the Supreme Court of Virginia, or a judge of the Court of Appeals of Virginia. In addition, threats to damage property may be prosecuted in the City of Richmond if the property is owned by the Commonwealth and located in the Capitol District.

Don't see the word "dissent" anywhere.

harassment is a broad term. A person being criticized could claim they were being harassed.
 

Forum List

Back
Top