Value of Obama Promises...

[Antares]

ACA is the Pub style plan...That's when we should have known Pubs/dupes would never work with a black Dem president...they've blocked his promises and call him a liar- what total a-holes.

That half white cracka does NOTHING but lie.....much like yourself....are you here legally?

 

[Lumpy 1]

Even if that were true, which it isn't, it wouldn't change the essential nature of conservative policy makers. Conservatism can be apprehended as low-effort thinking oriented toward what is easy to believe even when the issue at hand is hard to understand. That never produces "bold new approaches" and statesman like qualities.

Name a truly successful liberal President..btw. forget Clinton he's a sexual deviant and only had 33.3 % of the federally elected power. His success is a myth, he's more of a bobble-headed President.

That would depend on your definition of "liberal" Assuming all Democrats to be liberal, FDR and LBJ were very successful. FDR changed the nature of American government by making it a resource for individual Americans with Social Security and collective bargaining legislation. LBJ furthered that wih Medicare and civil rights.

Social Security was a ponzi scheme to collect money and spend it on other liberal causes and guess what, that's what happened. It's true LBJ passed the civil rights legislation thankfully with mostly Republican support. The Democrat Party.. not sooo much.

BTW...They were both filthy rich and war Presidents..isn't that a huge problem for Democrats?

 

[Joe Steel]

Enough to know the conservative approach to fixing our failed health care system is pushing the same old ideas which they've been pushing for years: tort reform, interstate sales and health savings accounts. That's not bold.

So in other words you only consider socialist options going forward as new and bold. You haven't expended the required energy of thought into the actual solution because it's an old idea that was never put in place to begin with.

I haven't wasted time on obvious failures. No matter what the potential of Republican ideas to change the health care system, they won't solve the problems which are more pressing. They wouldn't guarantee coverage to nearly everyone. Why waste time on them?

 

[Joe Steel]

That would make the insurance nearly free to them, wouldn't it.

You throw the word free about as if there is NOBODY paying for it. ...

I'm using the word free according to the dictionary definition. Anyone who doesn't pay for something receives it "free."

 

[Joe Steel]

ACA is the Pub style plan...That's when we should have known Pubs/dupes would never work with a black Dem president...they've blocked his promises and call him a liar- what total a-holes.

The Republicans unwillingness is to work with a black President is shameful.

 

[Joe Steel]

That would depend on your definition of "liberal" Assuming all Democrats to be liberal, FDR and LBJ were very successful. FDR changed the nature of American government by making it a resource for individual Americans with Social Security and collective bargaining legislation. LBJ furthered that wih Medicare and civil rights.

Social Security was a ponzi scheme to collect money and spend it on other liberal causes and guess what, that's what happened. It's true LBJ passed the civil rights legislation thankfully with mostly Republican support. The Democrat Party.. not sooo much.

BTW...They were both filthy rich and war Presidents..isn't that a huge problem for Democrats?

No. Rich persons are a source of tax revenue.

 

[Duped]

He is a megalomaniac that does not have to be accountable to anyone in his mind; he says what he thinks to be politically expedient at the time, knowing that the vast majority of his followers are non discerning!

 

[dr.d]

Interesting that the ACA has be called "a failure" months. Before its implementation ....considering it is based on a model that was not only implemented by a GOP governor but has been actually WORKING WELL for years...
Talk about lying and bias...en masse.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[Duped]

Totally different circumstances - Romney explained it well - sorry for your mental block. Funny how now all you liberals including Obama refer to it now as ACA. It was Obamacare while you ideologues thought it was the greatest thing since sliced bread. Now that it is a miserable failure it is refered to as ACA.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Enough to know the conservative approach to fixing our failed health care system is pushing the same old ideas which they've been pushing for years: tort reform, interstate sales and health savings accounts. That's not bold.

So in other words you only consider socialist options going forward as new and bold. You haven't expended the required energy of thought into the actual solution because it's an old idea that was never put in place to begin with.

I haven't wasted time on obvious failures. No matter what the potential of Republican ideas to change the health care system, they won't solve the problems which are more pressing. They wouldn't guarantee coverage to nearly everyone. Why waste time on them?

Yet you will invest in proven failures. Social medicine is a drain on every economy that has it and provides far less healthcare than we have ever experienced here. Obiecare has caused 6 million people to lose the insurance they had purchased on an open market and were paying for by themselves. And you still parrot the line some people won't be insured unless the government does it.

Why would we waste our time with people like you?

 

[Missouri_Mike]

That would make the insurance nearly free to them, wouldn't it.

You throw the word free about as if there is NOBODY paying for it. ...

I'm using the word free according to the dictionary definition. Anyone who doesn't pay for something receives it "free."

You do understand the fundamental truth that even if you get something for 'free' someone else had to produce it right?

The dictionary definition lacks one key component. When the people that are supposed to provide the 'free' don't do it you sit there with your hand out and receive nothing.

Did your dictionary include any words such as slave labor, forced labor or theft? Without those words you can't continue forcing people to provide others the "free" that they want. What can you get for "free" when that requires labor and effort on another in order to provide that service or item doesn't take into account their losses in providing that item.

It's like you can't fathom why someone would refuse to provide something for "free" when they can't make a living providing this service for nothing.

 

[Wyld Kard]

The value of Obama's promises is absolutly worthless, unless you are a shit-for-brains liberal supporter of Obama than the value of his promises is absolutly priceless.