USAID was the second largest funder of the BBC.

[marvin martian]

Unreal. Is there anything our grandchildren aren't paying for?

The BBC's motto should be:
We Hate Conservatives, No Matter Where You Are From!

Our statement on USAID funding

www.bbc.co.uk

A free press is essential to freedom and democracy – and 75% of countries around the world do not have a free press. BBC Media Action supports local media around the world to deliver trusted information to people most in need.

Like many international development organisations, BBC Media Action has been affected by the temporary pause in US government funding, which amounts to about 8% (a lie) of our income in 2023-24. We’re doing everything we can to minimise the impact on our partners and the people we serve.

As the BBC’s international charity, we are completely separate from BBC News, and wholly reliant on our donors and supporters to carry out our work.

I've noticed since Trump busted the money-laundering scam at USAID, the quality of leftist propaganda has declined. No more fancy, pre-printed signs at their "protests". No more luxury buses to and from the "grass roots" protests. No more catering at "sit-ins". LOL

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

I've noticed since Trump busted the money-laundering scam at USAID, the quality of leftist propaganda has declined. No more fancy, pre-printed signs at their "protests". No more luxury buses to and from the "grass roots" protests. No more catering at "sit-ins". LOL

.

It's as if.................


.

 

[dudmuck]

I saw a chart posted on a website, which cannot be trusted to tell the truth. When your evidence comes from a conspiracy theory website rated as a “questionable source”, it’s not evidence.

according to this article, the 2.6 million pounds is correct. But its spread over 30 countries. Its a small pittance of an amount. More was sent to domestic media.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I saw a chart posted on a website, which cannot be trusted to tell the truth. When your evidence comes from a conspiracy theory website rated as a “questionable source”, it’s not evidence.

Um, OK