M14 Shooter
The Light of Truth
An odd way to concede the points made, but... accepted.In which case she would not have authority to order the destruction on her own.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
An odd way to concede the points made, but... accepted.In which case she would not have authority to order the destruction on her own.
An odd way to concede the points made, but... accepted.
In which case she would not have authority to order the destruction on her own.
Which makes the question: "Did she send the email and order it on her own or did she do it as the direction of her superiors?".
WW
The FBI needs to investigate this.
OK then - you ran away from points you could not address.Not conceding anything...
OK then - you ran away from points you could not address.
Good enough for me.
Who is the official that sent the email?11 Mar 2025 ~~ Ace of Spades HQ
USAID Official Orders All Remaining Employees to Shed All Remaining Documents
Politico:
A senior official at USAID instructed the agency's remaining staff to convene at the agency's now-former headquarters in Washington on Tuesday for an "all day" group effort to destroy documents stored there, many of which contain sensitive information.The materials earmarked for destruction include contents of the agency's "classified safes and personnel documents" at the Ronald Reagan Building, said an email sent by USAID's acting executive director, Erica Carr, and obtained by POLITICO.
"Shred as many documents first, and reserve the burn bags for when the shredder becomes unavailable or needs a break," the email said. Carr instructed staff to label the burn bags with the words "SECRET" and "USAID/B/IO/" (agency shorthand for "bureau or independent office") in dark Sharpie.
The email didn't provide any reason for the document destruction.
Unbelievable.
But wait -- the Highly Suspicious Shredding Party is Trump's fault, Politico has decided.
The effort also underscores the tumultuous way in which the Trump administration is dismantling an agency that once managed a $40 billion annual budget and had more than 10,000 staff around the world.Trump made them destroy evidence of their lawbreaking!
Commentary:
Hmmm...., Burn bags? Aren't they used at the CIA, DNI and embassies? Why would a Federa; agency located in Washington D.C. require "Burn Bags"
Even the State Dept just uses shredders.
Would the DoJ consider this as an act of obstruction and destruction of Government property, destruction of evidence?.
Destroying government documents is a felony. Arrest all that committed the crime and charge them hard.
Obviously, the effort also underscores the tumultuous way in which the Trump administration is dismantling an agency that once managed a $40 billion p;os annual budget and had more than 10,000 staff around the world.
Nothing says GUILTY like shredding fucking documents...
Seems Neo- Marxist Democrat had apoplectic fits over a general taking his binder home as just some sort of beyond the pale irresponsible treatment of government documents.
Who is the official that sent the email?
Now you're just lying to yourself.I haven't run away from anything
I’m on the correct threadCORRECTION: Wrong thread. Link below.
WW
Now you're just lying to yourself.
You have wasted too much of my time. No more.
I’m on the correct thread
And its a simple question
What is the sender’s name?
I think she could be fired for causeI was in the wrong thread, not you.
Erica Carr.
WW
And prosecuted.I think she could be fired for cause
HopefullyAnd prosecuted.
"Oh shit. Joe's not in charge any more."Hopefully
~~~~~~Trump is President, Rubio is Secretary of State.
She's still in her position.
Therefore Trump and Rubio decided to let her stay as lead in an organization that has drawn much attention and was being shut down.
They allowed her to keep her leadship role instead of replacing her.
Logic doesn't need a cite/copy/paste - something it just takes thinking.
WW
I think she should be fired for cause with no pension and maybe facing criminal charges~~~~~~
Indeed, at least for the present. Her decision to order the destruction of records has shown she is partisan and bent toward Neo-Marxist Democrats in opposition to the administration. Her move has ensured her demise as acting director.
Before the month is out she will be replaced...
~~~~~~I haven't run away from anything (which is different than not admitting I was wrong which I'm willing to do).
By original point going back to the beginning of the thread remains:
The question: "Did she send the email and order it on her own or did she do it as the direction of her superiors?".
WW
That should be -painfully- obvious.~~~~~~
Good Question... Obviously the order didn't come from Trump, or Rubio, nor Musk.