US Soldiers NOT Allowed To Defend US Borders From Foreign Enemies

[AzogtheDefiler]

Again, how much of my hard earned money is someone else aka you entitled to? Spending on the military at least helps the private sector and helps defend the country. Giving money to illegals does nothing.

You merely appeal to ignorance of the law and economics. There is no general warfare clause nor any common offense clause. And, military spending does not produce as much of a multiplier effect as more free market capitalism does in general. Why do right wingers only have socialism on a national basis solutions that only have the effect of wasting Your hard earned tax money instead of the fine and wonderful, free market Capitalism solutions they allege to be for in socialism threads?

Bullshit. How many jobs in the private sector depend on military spends? 100s of thousands. Also helps with innovation and such and you’re still deflecting. You were not raised well. I have Directly answered your questions. Shame on you.

You only have right wing propaganda. We are not supposed to be wasting Your hard earned tax monies on a standing army at all. What part of, there is no general warfare clause or common offense clause do you not understand? And, military spending for innovation is worse than spending on Solyndra. I am not deflecting. We have a welfare clause in general and a commerce clause in particular and even a central bank. I advocate for merely using Capitalism for All of its capital worth in modern economic times. We should not be losing money for the people but making money for the people.

You’re talking in theories. What should we spend on the military? Give me a number.

Endless wars are not right wing theories in practice with Your hard earned tax monies?

What is necessary and proper for the common defense? We have no general warfare clause nor any common offense clause. I can't give you real numbers only imaginary numbers without going over our entire "defense" establishment.

Here is one number I can give you:

• Since 1971, the war on drugs has cost the United States an estimated $1 trillion. In 2015, the federal government spent an estimated $9.2 million every day to incarcerate people charged with drug-related offenses—that’s more than $3.3 billion annually.19--https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/criminal-justice/reports/2018/06/27/452819/ending-war-drugs-numbers/#:~:text=Economic%20impact,more%20than%20%243.3%20billion%20annually.

And. You’re not supposed to give more than six thumbs down per user per day. You don’t follow rules. You were raised poorly and you deflect. You’re an awful person.

Who said that? I merely use them literally. I disagree. I also use them for place markers to help with the flow of the thread.

USMB rules. Read them. Christ you’re a stupid person.

 

[danielpalos]

Response is it is needed to upgrade the military and it’s a short term issue.

Afghanistan is a short term issue? You need to get better answers from the right wing.

Endless wars are awful. It was upgrading the military to be more precise. I never said I agreed with it.

Endless wars are awful. It was upgrading the military to be more precise. I never said I agreed with it.

If upgrading the military is Good, why does the right wing have a problem upgrading infrastructure which must be even better for our economy?

They don’t. You’re moving the goal posts again. You are a very rude person.

You are being more rude. The republicans had nothing but repeal for all of those shovel ready jobs that were supposed to come online and help the previous administration look better economically instead of as weak as right wingers alleged.

Keep deflecting. You were raised poorly. You are an awful human being.

You simply need to ask better questions. Projection is what right wingers do best.

I ask You direct questions. I am An Independent. I have Told you this 100x. You don’t listen. You were raised very poorly. You are a very rude and ignorant person.

Begging the question is an informal fallacy. You need to ask a better question.

 

[danielpalos]

Again, how much of my hard earned money is someone else aka you entitled to? Spending on the military at least helps the private sector and helps defend the country. Giving money to illegals does nothing.

You merely appeal to ignorance of the law and economics. There is no general warfare clause nor any common offense clause. And, military spending does not produce as much of a multiplier effect as more free market capitalism does in general. Why do right wingers only have socialism on a national basis solutions that only have the effect of wasting Your hard earned tax money instead of the fine and wonderful, free market Capitalism solutions they allege to be for in socialism threads?

Bullshit. How many jobs in the private sector depend on military spends? 100s of thousands. Also helps with innovation and such and you’re still deflecting. You were not raised well. I have Directly answered your questions. Shame on you.

You only have right wing propaganda. We are not supposed to be wasting Your hard earned tax monies on a standing army at all. What part of, there is no general warfare clause or common offense clause do you not understand? And, military spending for innovation is worse than spending on Solyndra. I am not deflecting. We have a welfare clause in general and a commerce clause in particular and even a central bank. I advocate for merely using Capitalism for All of its capital worth in modern economic times. We should not be losing money for the people but making money for the people.

You’re talking in theories. What should we spend on the military? Give me a number.

Endless wars are not right wing theories in practice with Your hard earned tax monies?

What is necessary and proper for the common defense? We have no general warfare clause nor any common offense clause. I can't give you real numbers only imaginary numbers without going over our entire "defense" establishment.

Here is one number I can give you:

• Since 1971, the war on drugs has cost the United States an estimated $1 trillion. In 2015, the federal government spent an estimated $9.2 million every day to incarcerate people charged with drug-related offenses—that’s more than $3.3 billion annually.19--https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/criminal-justice/reports/2018/06/27/452819/ending-war-drugs-numbers/#:~:text=Economic%20impact,more%20than%20%243.3%20billion%20annually.

And. You’re not supposed to give more than six thumbs down per user per day. You don’t follow rules. You were raised poorly and you deflect. You’re an awful person.

Who said that? I merely use them literally. I disagree. I also use them for place markers to help with the flow of the thread.

USMB rules. Read them. Christ you’re a stupid person.

So, no limit to thumbs up but free speech limit to thumbs down; how rude and arbitrary and capricious.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Response is it is needed to upgrade the military and it’s a short term issue.

Afghanistan is a short term issue? You need to get better answers from the right wing.

Endless wars are awful. It was upgrading the military to be more precise. I never said I agreed with it.

Endless wars are awful. It was upgrading the military to be more precise. I never said I agreed with it.

If upgrading the military is Good, why does the right wing have a problem upgrading infrastructure which must be even better for our economy?

They don’t. You’re moving the goal posts again. You are a very rude person.

You are being more rude. The republicans had nothing but repeal for all of those shovel ready jobs that were supposed to come online and help the previous administration look better economically instead of as weak as right wingers alleged.

Keep deflecting. You were raised poorly. You are an awful human being.

You simply need to ask better questions. Projection is what right wingers do best.

I ask You direct questions. I am An Independent. I have Told you this 100x. You don’t listen. You were raised very poorly. You are a very rude and ignorant person.

Begging the question is an informal fallacy. You need to ask a better question.

If we spend $800bn on the military now how much should we spend? How much in your opinion should we reduce spending by? Give me a number or a %?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Again, how much of my hard earned money is someone else aka you entitled to? Spending on the military at least helps the private sector and helps defend the country. Giving money to illegals does nothing.

You merely appeal to ignorance of the law and economics. There is no general warfare clause nor any common offense clause. And, military spending does not produce as much of a multiplier effect as more free market capitalism does in general. Why do right wingers only have socialism on a national basis solutions that only have the effect of wasting Your hard earned tax money instead of the fine and wonderful, free market Capitalism solutions they allege to be for in socialism threads?

Bullshit. How many jobs in the private sector depend on military spends? 100s of thousands. Also helps with innovation and such and you’re still deflecting. You were not raised well. I have Directly answered your questions. Shame on you.

You only have right wing propaganda. We are not supposed to be wasting Your hard earned tax monies on a standing army at all. What part of, there is no general warfare clause or common offense clause do you not understand? And, military spending for innovation is worse than spending on Solyndra. I am not deflecting. We have a welfare clause in general and a commerce clause in particular and even a central bank. I advocate for merely using Capitalism for All of its capital worth in modern economic times. We should not be losing money for the people but making money for the people.

You’re talking in theories. What should we spend on the military? Give me a number.

Endless wars are not right wing theories in practice with Your hard earned tax monies?

What is necessary and proper for the common defense? We have no general warfare clause nor any common offense clause. I can't give you real numbers only imaginary numbers without going over our entire "defense" establishment.

Here is one number I can give you:

• Since 1971, the war on drugs has cost the United States an estimated $1 trillion. In 2015, the federal government spent an estimated $9.2 million every day to incarcerate people charged with drug-related offenses—that’s more than $3.3 billion annually.19--https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/criminal-justice/reports/2018/06/27/452819/ending-war-drugs-numbers/#:~:text=Economic%20impact,more%20than%20%243.3%20billion%20annually.

And. You’re not supposed to give more than six thumbs down per user per day. You don’t follow rules. You were raised poorly and you deflect. You’re an awful person.

Who said that? I merely use them literally. I disagree. I also use them for place markers to help with the flow of the thread.

USMB rules. Read them. Christ you’re a stupid person.

So, no limit to thumbs up but free speech limit to thumbs down; how rude and arbitrary and capricious.

LOL. Then start your own website and make your own rules. How is it capricious? Do you even know what the word means? Pretty sure it doesn’t apply to a website. You are a very stupid person. I sincerely mean it.

 

[danielpalos]

Response is it is needed to upgrade the military and it’s a short term issue.

Afghanistan is a short term issue? You need to get better answers from the right wing.

Endless wars are awful. It was upgrading the military to be more precise. I never said I agreed with it.

Endless wars are awful. It was upgrading the military to be more precise. I never said I agreed with it.

If upgrading the military is Good, why does the right wing have a problem upgrading infrastructure which must be even better for our economy?

They don’t. You’re moving the goal posts again. You are a very rude person.

You are being more rude. The republicans had nothing but repeal for all of those shovel ready jobs that were supposed to come online and help the previous administration look better economically instead of as weak as right wingers alleged.

Keep deflecting. You were raised poorly. You are an awful human being.

You simply need to ask better questions. Projection is what right wingers do best.

I ask You direct questions. I am An Independent. I have Told you this 100x. You don’t listen. You were raised very poorly. You are a very rude and ignorant person.

Begging the question is an informal fallacy. You need to ask a better question.

If we spend $800bn on the military now how much should we spend? How much in your opinion should we reduce spending by? Give me a number or a %?

It only works that way once we determine what is necessary and proper for the common defense.

According to the right wing, they can do more with a common defense clause than the left should be allowed to do for the general welfare.

 

[danielpalos]

Again, how much of my hard earned money is someone else aka you entitled to? Spending on the military at least helps the private sector and helps defend the country. Giving money to illegals does nothing.

You merely appeal to ignorance of the law and economics. There is no general warfare clause nor any common offense clause. And, military spending does not produce as much of a multiplier effect as more free market capitalism does in general. Why do right wingers only have socialism on a national basis solutions that only have the effect of wasting Your hard earned tax money instead of the fine and wonderful, free market Capitalism solutions they allege to be for in socialism threads?

Bullshit. How many jobs in the private sector depend on military spends? 100s of thousands. Also helps with innovation and such and you’re still deflecting. You were not raised well. I have Directly answered your questions. Shame on you.

You only have right wing propaganda. We are not supposed to be wasting Your hard earned tax monies on a standing army at all. What part of, there is no general warfare clause or common offense clause do you not understand? And, military spending for innovation is worse than spending on Solyndra. I am not deflecting. We have a welfare clause in general and a commerce clause in particular and even a central bank. I advocate for merely using Capitalism for All of its capital worth in modern economic times. We should not be losing money for the people but making money for the people.

You’re talking in theories. What should we spend on the military? Give me a number.

Endless wars are not right wing theories in practice with Your hard earned tax monies?

What is necessary and proper for the common defense? We have no general warfare clause nor any common offense clause. I can't give you real numbers only imaginary numbers without going over our entire "defense" establishment.

Here is one number I can give you:

• Since 1971, the war on drugs has cost the United States an estimated $1 trillion. In 2015, the federal government spent an estimated $9.2 million every day to incarcerate people charged with drug-related offenses—that’s more than $3.3 billion annually.19--https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/criminal-justice/reports/2018/06/27/452819/ending-war-drugs-numbers/#:~:text=Economic%20impact,more%20than%20%243.3%20billion%20annually.

And. You’re not supposed to give more than six thumbs down per user per day. You don’t follow rules. You were raised poorly and you deflect. You’re an awful person.

Who said that? I merely use them literally. I disagree. I also use them for place markers to help with the flow of the thread.

USMB rules. Read them. Christ you’re a stupid person.

So, no limit to thumbs up but free speech limit to thumbs down; how rude and arbitrary and capricious.

LOL. Then start your own website and make your own rules. How is it capricious? Do you even know what the word means? Pretty sure it doesn’t apply to a website. You are a very stupid person. I sincerely mean it.

You sound like a biased right winger with an agenda. Are you going to list this site as a right wing bigoted site for truth in advertising purposes?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Again, how much of my hard earned money is someone else aka you entitled to? Spending on the military at least helps the private sector and helps defend the country. Giving money to illegals does nothing.

You merely appeal to ignorance of the law and economics. There is no general warfare clause nor any common offense clause. And, military spending does not produce as much of a multiplier effect as more free market capitalism does in general. Why do right wingers only have socialism on a national basis solutions that only have the effect of wasting Your hard earned tax money instead of the fine and wonderful, free market Capitalism solutions they allege to be for in socialism threads?

Bullshit. How many jobs in the private sector depend on military spends? 100s of thousands. Also helps with innovation and such and you’re still deflecting. You were not raised well. I have Directly answered your questions. Shame on you.

You only have right wing propaganda. We are not supposed to be wasting Your hard earned tax monies on a standing army at all. What part of, there is no general warfare clause or common offense clause do you not understand? And, military spending for innovation is worse than spending on Solyndra. I am not deflecting. We have a welfare clause in general and a commerce clause in particular and even a central bank. I advocate for merely using Capitalism for All of its capital worth in modern economic times. We should not be losing money for the people but making money for the people.

You’re talking in theories. What should we spend on the military? Give me a number.

Endless wars are not right wing theories in practice with Your hard earned tax monies?

What is necessary and proper for the common defense? We have no general warfare clause nor any common offense clause. I can't give you real numbers only imaginary numbers without going over our entire "defense" establishment.

Here is one number I can give you:

• Since 1971, the war on drugs has cost the United States an estimated $1 trillion. In 2015, the federal government spent an estimated $9.2 million every day to incarcerate people charged with drug-related offenses—that’s more than $3.3 billion annually.19--https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/criminal-justice/reports/2018/06/27/452819/ending-war-drugs-numbers/#:~:text=Economic%20impact,more%20than%20%243.3%20billion%20annually.

And. You’re not supposed to give more than six thumbs down per user per day. You don’t follow rules. You were raised poorly and you deflect. You’re an awful person.

Who said that? I merely use them literally. I disagree. I also use them for place markers to help with the flow of the thread.

USMB rules. Read them. Christ you’re a stupid person.

So, no limit to thumbs up but free speech limit to thumbs down; how rude and arbitrary and capricious.

LOL. Then start your own website and make your own rules. How is it capricious? Do you even know what the word means? Pretty sure it doesn’t apply to a website. You are a very stupid person. I sincerely mean it.

You sound like a biased right winger with an agenda. Are you going to list this site as a right wing bigoted site for truth in advertising purposes?

You sound like someone who just lost a debate.

 

[danielpalos]

Again, how much of my hard earned money is someone else aka you entitled to? Spending on the military at least helps the private sector and helps defend the country. Giving money to illegals does nothing.

You merely appeal to ignorance of the law and economics. There is no general warfare clause nor any common offense clause. And, military spending does not produce as much of a multiplier effect as more free market capitalism does in general. Why do right wingers only have socialism on a national basis solutions that only have the effect of wasting Your hard earned tax money instead of the fine and wonderful, free market Capitalism solutions they allege to be for in socialism threads?

Bullshit. How many jobs in the private sector depend on military spends? 100s of thousands. Also helps with innovation and such and you’re still deflecting. You were not raised well. I have Directly answered your questions. Shame on you.

You only have right wing propaganda. We are not supposed to be wasting Your hard earned tax monies on a standing army at all. What part of, there is no general warfare clause or common offense clause do you not understand? And, military spending for innovation is worse than spending on Solyndra. I am not deflecting. We have a welfare clause in general and a commerce clause in particular and even a central bank. I advocate for merely using Capitalism for All of its capital worth in modern economic times. We should not be losing money for the people but making money for the people.

You’re talking in theories. What should we spend on the military? Give me a number.

Endless wars are not right wing theories in practice with Your hard earned tax monies?

What is necessary and proper for the common defense? We have no general warfare clause nor any common offense clause. I can't give you real numbers only imaginary numbers without going over our entire "defense" establishment.

Here is one number I can give you:

• Since 1971, the war on drugs has cost the United States an estimated $1 trillion. In 2015, the federal government spent an estimated $9.2 million every day to incarcerate people charged with drug-related offenses—that’s more than $3.3 billion annually.19--https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/criminal-justice/reports/2018/06/27/452819/ending-war-drugs-numbers/#:~:text=Economic%20impact,more%20than%20%243.3%20billion%20annually.

And. You’re not supposed to give more than six thumbs down per user per day. You don’t follow rules. You were raised poorly and you deflect. You’re an awful person.

Who said that? I merely use them literally. I disagree. I also use them for place markers to help with the flow of the thread.

USMB rules. Read them. Christ you’re a stupid person.

So, no limit to thumbs up but free speech limit to thumbs down; how rude and arbitrary and capricious.

LOL. Then start your own website and make your own rules. How is it capricious? Do you even know what the word means? Pretty sure it doesn’t apply to a website. You are a very stupid person. I sincerely mean it.

You sound like a biased right winger with an agenda. Are you going to list this site as a right wing bigoted site for truth in advertising purposes?

You sound like someone who just lost a debate.

You sound like someone who had no debate only right wing bias while falsely alleging to be a centrist. How rude and false.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Again, how much of my hard earned money is someone else aka you entitled to? Spending on the military at least helps the private sector and helps defend the country. Giving money to illegals does nothing.

You merely appeal to ignorance of the law and economics. There is no general warfare clause nor any common offense clause. And, military spending does not produce as much of a multiplier effect as more free market capitalism does in general. Why do right wingers only have socialism on a national basis solutions that only have the effect of wasting Your hard earned tax money instead of the fine and wonderful, free market Capitalism solutions they allege to be for in socialism threads?

Bullshit. How many jobs in the private sector depend on military spends? 100s of thousands. Also helps with innovation and such and you’re still deflecting. You were not raised well. I have Directly answered your questions. Shame on you.

You only have right wing propaganda. We are not supposed to be wasting Your hard earned tax monies on a standing army at all. What part of, there is no general warfare clause or common offense clause do you not understand? And, military spending for innovation is worse than spending on Solyndra. I am not deflecting. We have a welfare clause in general and a commerce clause in particular and even a central bank. I advocate for merely using Capitalism for All of its capital worth in modern economic times. We should not be losing money for the people but making money for the people.

You’re talking in theories. What should we spend on the military? Give me a number.

Endless wars are not right wing theories in practice with Your hard earned tax monies?

What is necessary and proper for the common defense? We have no general warfare clause nor any common offense clause. I can't give you real numbers only imaginary numbers without going over our entire "defense" establishment.

Here is one number I can give you:

• Since 1971, the war on drugs has cost the United States an estimated $1 trillion. In 2015, the federal government spent an estimated $9.2 million every day to incarcerate people charged with drug-related offenses—that’s more than $3.3 billion annually.19--https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/criminal-justice/reports/2018/06/27/452819/ending-war-drugs-numbers/#:~:text=Economic%20impact,more%20than%20%243.3%20billion%20annually.

And. You’re not supposed to give more than six thumbs down per user per day. You don’t follow rules. You were raised poorly and you deflect. You’re an awful person.

Who said that? I merely use them literally. I disagree. I also use them for place markers to help with the flow of the thread.

USMB rules. Read them. Christ you’re a stupid person.

So, no limit to thumbs up but free speech limit to thumbs down; how rude and arbitrary and capricious.

LOL. Then start your own website and make your own rules. How is it capricious? Do you even know what the word means? Pretty sure it doesn’t apply to a website. You are a very stupid person. I sincerely mean it.

You sound like a biased right winger with an agenda. Are you going to list this site as a right wing bigoted site for truth in advertising purposes?

You sound like someone who just lost a debate.

You sound like someone who had no debate only right wing bias while falsely alleging to be a centrist. How rude and false.

LOL

You have not answered one question and you don’t know what capricious means. You’re the dumbest person on this board. And you don’t know the board rules.

 

[danielpalos]

Again, how much of my hard earned money is someone else aka you entitled to? Spending on the military at least helps the private sector and helps defend the country. Giving money to illegals does nothing.

You merely appeal to ignorance of the law and economics. There is no general warfare clause nor any common offense clause. And, military spending does not produce as much of a multiplier effect as more free market capitalism does in general. Why do right wingers only have socialism on a national basis solutions that only have the effect of wasting Your hard earned tax money instead of the fine and wonderful, free market Capitalism solutions they allege to be for in socialism threads?

Bullshit. How many jobs in the private sector depend on military spends? 100s of thousands. Also helps with innovation and such and you’re still deflecting. You were not raised well. I have Directly answered your questions. Shame on you.

You only have right wing propaganda. We are not supposed to be wasting Your hard earned tax monies on a standing army at all. What part of, there is no general warfare clause or common offense clause do you not understand? And, military spending for innovation is worse than spending on Solyndra. I am not deflecting. We have a welfare clause in general and a commerce clause in particular and even a central bank. I advocate for merely using Capitalism for All of its capital worth in modern economic times. We should not be losing money for the people but making money for the people.

You’re talking in theories. What should we spend on the military? Give me a number.

Endless wars are not right wing theories in practice with Your hard earned tax monies?

What is necessary and proper for the common defense? We have no general warfare clause nor any common offense clause. I can't give you real numbers only imaginary numbers without going over our entire "defense" establishment.

Here is one number I can give you:

• Since 1971, the war on drugs has cost the United States an estimated $1 trillion. In 2015, the federal government spent an estimated $9.2 million every day to incarcerate people charged with drug-related offenses—that’s more than $3.3 billion annually.19--https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/criminal-justice/reports/2018/06/27/452819/ending-war-drugs-numbers/#:~:text=Economic%20impact,more%20than%20%243.3%20billion%20annually.

And. You’re not supposed to give more than six thumbs down per user per day. You don’t follow rules. You were raised poorly and you deflect. You’re an awful person.

Who said that? I merely use them literally. I disagree. I also use them for place markers to help with the flow of the thread.

USMB rules. Read them. Christ you’re a stupid person.

So, no limit to thumbs up but free speech limit to thumbs down; how rude and arbitrary and capricious.

LOL. Then start your own website and make your own rules. How is it capricious? Do you even know what the word means? Pretty sure it doesn’t apply to a website. You are a very stupid person. I sincerely mean it.

You sound like a biased right winger with an agenda. Are you going to list this site as a right wing bigoted site for truth in advertising purposes?

You sound like someone who just lost a debate.

You sound like someone who had no debate only right wing bias while falsely alleging to be a centrist. How rude and false.

LOL

You have not answered one question and you don’t know what capricious means. You’re the dumbest person on this board. And you don’t know the board rules.

You are more rude and have no valid questions only fallacy; how dumb is that?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Again, how much of my hard earned money is someone else aka you entitled to? Spending on the military at least helps the private sector and helps defend the country. Giving money to illegals does nothing.

You merely appeal to ignorance of the law and economics. There is no general warfare clause nor any common offense clause. And, military spending does not produce as much of a multiplier effect as more free market capitalism does in general. Why do right wingers only have socialism on a national basis solutions that only have the effect of wasting Your hard earned tax money instead of the fine and wonderful, free market Capitalism solutions they allege to be for in socialism threads?

Bullshit. How many jobs in the private sector depend on military spends? 100s of thousands. Also helps with innovation and such and you’re still deflecting. You were not raised well. I have Directly answered your questions. Shame on you.

You only have right wing propaganda. We are not supposed to be wasting Your hard earned tax monies on a standing army at all. What part of, there is no general warfare clause or common offense clause do you not understand? And, military spending for innovation is worse than spending on Solyndra. I am not deflecting. We have a welfare clause in general and a commerce clause in particular and even a central bank. I advocate for merely using Capitalism for All of its capital worth in modern economic times. We should not be losing money for the people but making money for the people.

You’re talking in theories. What should we spend on the military? Give me a number.

Endless wars are not right wing theories in practice with Your hard earned tax monies?

What is necessary and proper for the common defense? We have no general warfare clause nor any common offense clause. I can't give you real numbers only imaginary numbers without going over our entire "defense" establishment.

Here is one number I can give you:

• Since 1971, the war on drugs has cost the United States an estimated $1 trillion. In 2015, the federal government spent an estimated $9.2 million every day to incarcerate people charged with drug-related offenses—that’s more than $3.3 billion annually.19--https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/criminal-justice/reports/2018/06/27/452819/ending-war-drugs-numbers/#:~:text=Economic%20impact,more%20than%20%243.3%20billion%20annually.

And. You’re not supposed to give more than six thumbs down per user per day. You don’t follow rules. You were raised poorly and you deflect. You’re an awful person.

Who said that? I merely use them literally. I disagree. I also use them for place markers to help with the flow of the thread.

USMB rules. Read them. Christ you’re a stupid person.

So, no limit to thumbs up but free speech limit to thumbs down; how rude and arbitrary and capricious.

LOL. Then start your own website and make your own rules. How is it capricious? Do you even know what the word means? Pretty sure it doesn’t apply to a website. You are a very stupid person. I sincerely mean it.

You sound like a biased right winger with an agenda. Are you going to list this site as a right wing bigoted site for truth in advertising purposes?

You sound like someone who just lost a debate.

You sound like someone who had no debate only right wing bias while falsely alleging to be a centrist. How rude and false.

LOL

You have not answered one question and you don’t know what capricious means. You’re the dumbest person on this board. And you don’t know the board rules.

You are more rude and have no valid questions only fallacy; how dumb is that?

I directly asked you how much you would reduce military spend by. I directly Asked you how a website could be capricious....crickets....you’re ugly and you dress funny.

 

[easyt65]

'Does the United States military exist only to defend the borders of foreign countries in the Middle East or is it allowed to defend the borders of the U.S. against terrorist cartels, espionage, infiltrations, and smuggling?'

Sound like a stupid question? Here's one that's going to sound even MORE stupid:

Do US military troops have the right to DEFED THEMSELVES in their own country, on their own die of the border, when approached by foreign troops who order them to surrender their weapons?

According to a NorthCom spokesman, the military troops are there NOT in a Law Enforcement capacity.
-- Well, NO SHIT! The US military is used for the defense of the United States...and since there is an illegal invasion going on right now, why can't they be accepted as being there to protect this nation during this 'invasion'?


Military's mission doesn't include enforcement, so smugglers cross Rio Grande right in front of them

The sauds want assad gone from syria---that war will be back once biden/ho and whoever they really want as president is put in.

BARRY'S war in Syria never stopped. There are US troops still in Syria fighting the Nobel Peace Prize Winner's war.

 

[danielpalos]

I directly asked you how much you would reduce military spend by.

I directly responded that I cannot give you real numbers without determining what is necessary and proper for the common defense. However, I can tell you that according the literature I have read recently, military spending is about the same as welfare spending or a fiscal multiplier of around .6 to .8. The difference is that spending for the general welfare should include upgrading our infrastructure which can increase the multiplier for general welfare spending while common defense spending does not. Thus, general welfare spending can grow our economy more while common defense spending is more limited in its fiscal impact in the long run.

 

[danielpalos]

'Does the United States military exist only to defend the borders of foreign countries in the Middle East or is it allowed to defend the borders of the U.S. against terrorist cartels, espionage, infiltrations, and smuggling?'

Sound like a stupid question? Here's one that's going to sound even MORE stupid:

Do US military troops have the right to DEFED THEMSELVES in their own country, on their own die of the border, when approached by foreign troops who order them to surrender their weapons?

According to a NorthCom spokesman, the military troops are there NOT in a Law Enforcement capacity.
-- Well, NO SHIT! The US military is used for the defense of the United States...and since there is an illegal invasion going on right now, why can't they be accepted as being there to protect this nation during this 'invasion'?


Military's mission doesn't include enforcement, so smugglers cross Rio Grande right in front of them

The sauds want assad gone from syria---that war will be back once biden/ho and whoever they really want as president is put in.

BARRY'S war in Syria never stopped. There are US troops still in Syria fighting the Nobel Peace Prize Winner's war.

How is it, "Barry's war"? Just because a right winger proclaims it. What about the wars on crime, drugs, and terror?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

I directly asked you how much you would reduce military spend by.

I directly responded that I cannot give you real numbers without determining what is necessary and proper for the common defense. However, I can tell you that according the literature I have read recently, military spending is about the same as welfare spending or a fiscal multiplier of around .6 to .8. The difference is that spending for the general welfare should include upgrading our infrastructure which can increase the multiplier for general welfare spending while common defense spending does not. Thus, general welfare spending can grow our economy more while common defense spending is more limited in its fiscal impact in the long run.

So you don’t know. Thank you.

 

[justinacolmena]

They're kids, with good references on their job applications, their backgrounds check out perfectly, no arrest records, they're young, white, male, no reason not to hire them. Nothing to prohibit them from purchasing or possessing firearms if they so choose.

 

[danielpalos]

I directly asked you how much you would reduce military spend by.

I directly responded that I cannot give you real numbers without determining what is necessary and proper for the common defense. However, I can tell you that according the literature I have read recently, military spending is about the same as welfare spending or a fiscal multiplier of around .6 to .8. The difference is that spending for the general welfare should include upgrading our infrastructure which can increase the multiplier for general welfare spending while common defense spending does not. Thus, general welfare spending can grow our economy more while common defense spending is more limited in its fiscal impact in the long run.

So you don’t know. Thank you.

I do know that general welfare spending is more of a priority than general warfare and common offense spending.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

I directly asked you how much you would reduce military spend by.

I directly responded that I cannot give you real numbers without determining what is necessary and proper for the common defense. However, I can tell you that according the literature I have read recently, military spending is about the same as welfare spending or a fiscal multiplier of around .6 to .8. The difference is that spending for the general welfare should include upgrading our infrastructure which can increase the multiplier for general welfare spending while common defense spending does not. Thus, general welfare spending can grow our economy more while common defense spending is more limited in its fiscal impact in the long run.

So you don’t know. Thank you.

I do know that general welfare spending is more of a priority than general warfare and common offense spending.

You don’t know that either.

 

[easyt65]

How is it, "Barry's war"?

Thank you for proving you are a mindless, emotional retard. BARRY ordered the invasion of Syria, Dumbass. It's HIS war.