That's right a moonbat democrook who can only be elected by people even dumber than him believes an island can capsize.
Rep. Hank Johnson: ‘Free Market Way of Thinking Doesn’t Work’ - Breitbart
A blithering idiot said:
“There has been a movement over the last 30, 40 years to turn people against the government. This mantra is that government is too big, we don’t need any rules to govern human conduct, let everything work itself out and the free market system will make it rain for everybody. Well, we’ve seen after 30, 40 years of practicing that free market way of thinking, that it doesn’t work.”
If free markets had been allowed to work, and the political whores who allow elitist pigs to escape prosecution in exchange for campaign cash been prosecuted there would be no democrook party, and the republicrats would be fighting the libertarian Party for influence.
Dear
Pete7469
A. Even in a free market, where we can choose to join a socialist group, a Catholic church, an environmental nonprofit, or start a business;
all collective organizations run into the same battle of wills between individuals and the greater goal of the group. This is human nature.
We are social, we are interconnected, and need to balance and resolve conflicts so that everyone's interests and consent are included in decisions to get along.
So we all need the same "checks and balances" and "due process of laws" just to manage our own affairs in the given groups of our choosing.
Free market works, but each community, each organization has its structures, process and rules to follow.
The difference is we CHOOSE what groups and what rules we want to be under.
Of course there are still rules, even in a free market we are going to need those to organize.
What people don't want is big groups like global corporations running so amok with free market and capitalism, there is no check.
They can do whatever they want because they wield greater COLLECTIVE resources and influence than any individual. So individuals are not protected equally.
Instead of asking govt to micromanage corporations, why not require that any large collective entity that registers to operate within a state
be required to subscribe to some grievance or petitioning process so any abuses of resources power or influence can be addressed, similar to
the Bill of Rights applied to federal govt to protect INDIVIDUAL rights.
Require some similar "due process" in place where people affected by that group's actions or policies can report any abuse or violation and get it resolved.
Would that help to prevent corporate or collective abuses, while respecting the free market right to set up and manage private entities, businesses, churches, schools, nonprofits, etc.
so there can be free market, but some way to prevent abuse of such freedom by corporations claiming personhood and individual rights,
when in fact, these larger groups have the same collective influence and resources as govt that does have the Bill of Rights to check against.
=========
B. About fallacies and judging people
1. Leonardo Da Vinci was a genius at scientific and artistic innovations
But I read that he falsely theorized that breath is what caused the penis to stay erect and thus there might be some connection between the
lungs and the lower genitalia
Now, if this is true, are you or I going to disregard Da Vinci's historic contributions as nonsense
just because of this?
2. Walt Disney has been criticized for his racist beliefs of white supremacy. Jefferson for his belief that slaves needed to be deported back to Africa.
The Nobel winning economist in "Beautiful Mind" also has been criticized for racist beliefs, in addition to schizophrenic voices in his head he knew weren't real.
Can you really take one bad flaw out of context with the rest,
and dismiss a person's value based on their worst faults?
What are we missing out on when we do this?
