US Military Documents: Ivermectin “Works Throughout All Phases of Illness”

Your words make you a ghoul. The science makes you wrong. Israel is on Booster Two or shot four. And this is why. BTW, good luck. You're gonna need it. Beaumont hospital systems, SE Michigan.

View attachment 594160

Do you have any charts that show us what the numbers are on those who have been treated with Ivermectin?
 
I.E. it is effective and works as intended. Is there some mystery about a claim that something "works"?

And what is Ivermectin meant to do? Mostly it's designed to treat animals with heartworm and acariasis. So, I guess if "it works" then covid patients are doing really well on the heartworm and acariasis front, wouldn't you say?
 
And what is Ivermectin meant to do? Mostly it's designed to treat animals with heartworm and acariasis. So, I guess if "it works" then covid patients are doing really well on the heartworm and acariasis front, wouldn't you say?
Medicines can have two functions. Did you realize that Viagra was originally developed to treat
cardiovascular problems and not as boner medicine? Now you know.

So if humans are finding that Ivermectin works quite well treating Covid I don't see
what the problem is...unless Trump said the medicine would stop Covid and that can't
be tolerated, admitting he may have been right.

Or that Anthony Faucci can't help his friends out in Big Pharmaceuticals by telling people
that Ivermectin is an effective anti Covid drug. How do they cash in on that?
So that can't be tolerated either.

And in general anything that takes authority away from Medi-crats and Big Authoritarian Government
is not tolerated well by the uber powerful in charge.

I'm not sure what your position is here, I guess.
 
Medicines can have two functions. Did you realize that Viagra was originally developed to treat
cardiovascular problems and not as boner medicine? Now you know.

So if humans are finding that Ivermectin works quite well treating Covid I don't see
what the problem is...unless Trump said the medicine would stop Covid and that can't
be tolerated, admitting he may have been right.

Or that Anthony Faucci can't help his friends out in Big Pharmaceuticals by telling people
that Ivermectin is an effective anti Covid drug. How do they cash in on that?
So that can't be tolerated either.

And in general anything that takes authority away from Medi-crats and Big Authoritarian Government
is not tolerated well by the uber powerful in charge.

I'm not sure what your position is here, I guess.

I understand that. However the claim was that "Invermectin works".... such a silly thing to say.

Things "work" based on your expectations of them. What the expectations for Invermectin? People can claim it "works" when it doesn't do much at all. Or that it "Doesn't work" because some people still die after having used it. You know?
 
I understand that. However the claim was that "Invermectin works".... such a silly thing to say.

Things "work" based on your expectations of them. What the expectations for Invermectin? People can claim it "works" when it doesn't do much at all. Or that it "Doesn't work" because some people still die after having used it. You know?

Conclusions​

According to the findings obtained, ivermectin can provide an increase in clinical recovery, improvement in prognostic laboratory parameters and a decrease in mortality rates even when used in patients with severe COVID-19. Consequently, ivermectin should be considered as an alternative drug that can be used in the treatment of COVID-19 disease or as an additional option to existing protocols.
Evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of adding ivermectin to treatment in severe COVID-19 patients - BMC Infectious Diseases

Not such a "silly thing to say" after all.


What do you think? It looks like everything the US military said about Ivermectin is true.
So why are people still trying to denigrate it?
 
Last edited:

Conclusions​

According to the findings obtained, ivermectin can provide an increase in clinical recovery, improvement in prognostic laboratory parameters and a decrease in mortality rates even when used in patients with severe COVID-19. Consequently, ivermectin should be considered as an alternative drug that can be used in the treatment of COVID-19 disease or as an additional option to existing protocols.
Evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of adding ivermectin to treatment in severe COVID-19 patients - BMC Infectious Diseases

Not such a "silly thing to say" after all.


What do you think? It looks like everything the US military said about Ivermectin is true.
So why are people still trying to denigrate it?

Well, it depends on how it compares to other medicines and its cost effectiveness. Also depends on how other studies find things.


"However, a mortality benefit was not seen with ivermectin treatment before and after PSM (p values = 0.07 and 0.11, respectively). ICU admission, and intubation rate were not significantly different between the groups (p = 0.49, and p = 1.0, respectively). No differences were found between groups regarding the length of hospital stay, ICU admission, intubation rate, and in-hospital mortality."

The thing with science is that one study doesn't usually tell you the whole story because science is when you find the same occurrences again and again.
 
Well, it depends on how it compares to other medicines and its cost effectiveness. Also depends on how other studies find things.


"However, a mortality benefit was not seen with ivermectin treatment before and after PSM (p values = 0.07 and 0.11, respectively). ICU admission, and intubation rate were not significantly different between the groups (p = 0.49, and p = 1.0, respectively). No differences were found between groups regarding the length of hospital stay, ICU admission, intubation rate, and in-hospital mortality."

The thing with science is that one study doesn't usually tell you the whole story because science is when you find the same occurrences again and again.
Like when the study I cited is in alignment with the studies done by our military?
And all the empirical data from around the world where Ivermectin has been found to be a useful, efficacious and cost effective medicine? I agree.

Multiple studies are useful. The only thing Ivermectin has going against it is Big Pharma can't make billions
of dollars off it so they get their many little devils in government and the media to go around bad mouthing the drug and that includes our brain damaged president.
 
Like when the study I cited is in alignment with the studies done by our military?
And all the empirical data from around the world where Ivermectin has been found to be a useful, efficacious and cost effective medicine? I agree.

Multiple studies are useful. The only thing Ivermectin has going against it is Big Pharma can't make billions
of dollars off it so they get their many little devils in government and the media to go around bad mouthing the drug and that includes our brain damaged president.

All the studies? I showed you one that said they didn't see much of a difference between using it and not using it.

And you might be right, or not, about the big pharma companies not being able to make money out of it.


"Some limited studies suggest that ivermectin can help treat COVID-19; others show no significant impact. Many of the studies had small sample sizes and other limitations."

The first thing I noticed about the study you presented was how small that study was.

"Subsequent studies may show positive outcomes from ivermectin. Currently, there are no "mountains of data" to show its benefit."

How much data is there? The question you might want to ask is why isn't there more data on this? Rather than "it works".

I think the thing people worry about the most is that someone decided that Invermectin "works" and has been pushing it as a government conspiracy.

Merck & Co. (MRK) owns Invermectin.


"Merck states that the drug can have severe side effects, including fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, abdominal pain, dizziness, vertigo, tremors, constipation, and vomiting. Merck emphasizes that neither the animal nor human version of the drug is suitable for treating COVID-19."

But seems that the company itself says it's not suitable.
 
All the studies? I showed you one that said they didn't see much of a difference between using it and not using it.
And I showed you one that did. And the US military has done their studies too and
found affirmative aspects of Ivermektin
And you might be right, or not, about the big pharma companies not being able to make money out of it.


"Some limited studies suggest that ivermectin can help treat COVID-19; others show no significant impact. Many of the studies had small sample sizes and other limitations."

The first thing I noticed about the study you presented was how small that study was.

"Subsequent studies may show positive outcomes from ivermectin. Currently, there are no "mountains of data" to show its benefit."

How much data is there? The question you might want to ask is why isn't there more data on this? Rather than "it works".
Ivermectin has been used around the world to treat Covid.
I'm not here to change minds. I'm just pissed at the way anyone who stands up for
this medicine is attacked mercilessly.
You don't find that troubling?
I think the thing people worry about the most is that someone decided that Invermectin "works" and has been pushing it as a government conspiracy.
I think the medicine is at least as effective as Pfizer, Moderna or any of the vaccines I've been given
as far as I can tell.
Merck & Co. (MRK) owns Invermectin.


"Merck states that the drug can have severe side effects, including fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, abdominal pain, dizziness, vertigo, tremors, constipation, and vomiting. Merck emphasizes that neither the animal nor human version of the drug is suitable for treating COVID-19."

But seems that the company itself says it's not suitable.
I find it odd that Merck is reporting troubling side effects no one else reports.
 
And I showed you one that did. And the US military has done their studies too and
found affirmative aspects of Ivermektin

Ivermectin has been used around the world to treat Covid.
I'm not here to change minds. I'm just pissed at the way anyone who stands up for
this medicine is attacked mercilessly.
You don't find that troubling?

I think the medicine is at least as effective as Pfizer, Moderna or any of the vaccines I've been given
as far as I can tell.

I find it odd that Merck is reporting troubling side effects no one else reports.

You find it odd that the people who make the drug seem to have an issue with their drug being used for the coronvirus? Well, surely research would have made you aware of this.

Do I find that people on all sides will attack mercilessly? Yes, I do. However the people complaining about this might also do the same thing. People have their narratives, get emotionally attached to them.

The US has a rubbish electoral system that leads to bad politicians that manipulate emotions and that's all that exists now. So much information is unreliable because they want to confuse people in order to get them on their narrative.

There's a lot wrong with the US and many issues end up at the same point, the way "representatives" are elected fucks up every issue.
 

Conclusions​

According to the findings obtained, ivermectin can provide an increase in clinical recovery, improvement in prognostic laboratory parameters and a decrease in mortality rates even when used in patients with severe COVID-19. Consequently, ivermectin should be considered as an alternative drug that can be used in the treatment of COVID-19 disease or as an additional option to existing protocols.
Evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of adding ivermectin to treatment in severe COVID-19 patients - BMC Infectious Diseases

Not such a "silly thing to say" after all.


What do you think? It looks like everything the US military said about Ivermectin is true.
So why are people still trying to denigrate it?
I am going at it with them on several threads still saying it is horse dewormer. Langley is busy on these boards.
 
You find it odd that the people who make the drug seem to have an issue with their drug being used for the coronvirus? Well, surely research would have made you aware of this.
As matter of fact I don't find it odd that the people who make Ivemectin seem to have an issue with their drug being used for treating the Covid virus. Because that view of their own product is not shared by others,
for whatever reason I can only speculate about,

Merck is trash talking their own product when it comes to Covid, although others are not.
Why? That's for you to find out.

Do I find that people on all sides will attack mercilessly? Yes, I do. However the people complaining about this might also do the same thing. People have their narratives, get emotionally attached to them.
Makes no sense.
The US has a rubbish electoral system that leads to bad politicians that manipulate emotions and that's all that exists now. So much information is unreliable because they want to confuse people in order to get them on their narrative.

There's a lot wrong with the US and many issues end up at the same point, the way "representatives" are elected fucks up every issue.
Too obtuse for me to reply.
 
As matter of fact I don't find it odd that the people who make Ivemectin seem to have an issue with their drug being used for treating the Covid virus. Because that view of their own product is not shared by others,
for whatever reason I can only speculate about,

Merck is trash talking their own product when it comes to Covid, although others are not.
Why? That's for you to find out.


Makes no sense.

Too obtuse for me to reply.

Well, doesn't look like we have much of a conversation then, does it?
 
It won't save anyone.



Complete fabrication.


~~~~~~
Terll that to the countries that have used it to treat their Covid patients successfully>

**********​
**********​
 
Last edited:
It won't save anyone.



Complete fabrication.
Hmm...., a closed mid and Fauci cultist.
 
Hmm...., a closed mid and Fauci cultist.
1643962991310.png


Are you bringing up this crazy-assed site to try to make Gatewaypunshit look more distinguished?
 
I am going at it with them on several threads still saying it is horse dewormer. Langley is busy on these boards.

I wonder if they hire temps of use regular CIA/NSA. I would be pissed if I signed up for cloak and dagger and then got stuck as a keyboard warrior shilling for big pharma.
 

Forum List

Back
Top