But what's really underscored by all of your lying is that you've once again failed miserably in a string having to do with economics. Why? Because you know almost nothing about the subject despite your rather pathetic attempts to pretend that you do. It's why you promise economic formulas that don't exist and then have to lie about them to try to extricate yourself from the lies you've already told.
You ARE the George Costanza of the US Message Board!
Oldstyle, your normal personal attacks are way stupid. The fact you can not prove I have ever lied, and continue to lie when I have categorically proven you lie is crazy. But you do so scores of times. Over and over with the same lies.
So, saying that I or anyone lies is pretty hollow, me boy. People usually do not lie. It is a trait that you yourself have, and that few others do. Consider these lies you have tried:
1. So, you lied what, 50 plus times, when you claimed that I did not know what the Chicago School of economics was when you mentioned it to me in a post. But, when I brought up your post, copied and pasted it to show what the truth was, it proved that you were lying not once, but at least 50 times. Because the post I copied and pasted for you to see plainly said nothing about the Chicago school. But by now, you have made that same claim at least 50 times.
There was never a mention of the Chicago School until you started making the lie about it.
2. You lied today when you said I claimed to have a secretary who proofed my typing. I brought forward the post and proved I said that I had previously had a secretary that did check my writing. Which was true, And offered to prove it to you, offering you a bet. You ran from that, because you had no proof and knew you would have lost.
3. You have said many, many times that I have lied when I said I have a college degree in economics. Again, I offered you a bet that would have made you a nice check if I could not produce a diploma. You again ran from the bet, knowing you would loose. But you continue to make the same claim.
4. You claimed that I said I worked with executives at BP as an employee there. I proved that I said no such thing. By the time I took the time to disprove you lie in this instance, you had claimed that I had lied on several occasions. Again, I proved you lied and that I never made the claim you were trying to say I had.
Most of those few cases you stated time after time after time. Each time you knew better, but it did not stop you. But the number of times you have intentionally lied about me is over 100 times. That is not just dishonest, it proves you to be SICK.
So, you see, you lie a lot. It is expected of you at this time. And you have made such claims knowing you were lying, after they were proven untrue to you. You are, me boy, not just a liar, but a serial liar. You have a major problem with lying. Or, maybe you just have no class, no integrity, no honesty. What is your problem, Oldstyle?