US Jobless claims fall to 4 decade low

[Oldstyle]

I AM NOT A LIAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

That's what Georgie considers proof. He'd be a lot more convincing about the whole "integrity" thing if he provided the formula for determining "Jobs Saved"...but at this point it's rather obvious that won't be happening!

Do you actually think there is a simple single formula, or do you realize it's a lot more complicated than that? Or do you think there was no methodology and the numbers were just pulled out of somebody's ass?

It's amusing to watch Rshermr declare that my question has nothing to do with this string! It's a string about jobs. My question was about how the Obama group came up with their numbers for their "Jobs Saved" statistic. How can THAT have nothing to do with this string?

This board's answer to George Costanza has once again painted himself into a corner claiming expertise in something to do with economics (because he taught the subject at the college level you know!). It's what he always does. Then he whines for weeks about personal attacks when it's pointed out that he's clueless about economics.

 

[Oldstyle]

Ever notice how the board's biggest bullshit artists always post in CAPITAL LETTERS? They must think that caps or a red font makes them more "forceful"!

So, apparently oldstyle has been using capital letters. And thinks the purpose is to make himself look forceful. Comical.

That was sarcasm, Georgie...
I know it's hard for someone with your limited intelligence to pick up on these things. Would you like me to post some sort of "alert" to let you know?

 

[Rshermr]

I AM NOT A LIAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

That's what Georgie considers proof. He'd be a lot more convincing about the whole "integrity" thing if he provided the formula for determining "Jobs Saved"...but at this point it's rather obvious that won't be happening!

Do you actually think there is a simple single formula, or do you realize it's a lot more complicated than that? Or do you think there was no methodology and the numbers were just pulled out of somebody's ass?

Of course the numbers were just pulled out of somebody's ass, Pinqy! That was the whole purpose of "Jobs Saved"! It let the Obama Administration avoid having to tell the American public how few jobs they created with the stimulus by substituting a statistic that couldn't be verified! You can TELL they're pulling their numbers out of their asses by the wide range of estimates.

So, the con tool says what con tools always say. The number they do not like was just pulled out of someone's ass. But they do not admit that their statements are just cut and paste from con talking points. So, what dipshit is saying is that gov economists are all just tools of the president. Like he is a con tool. Of course, the past republican president is apparently a tool also, because he saw jobs being lost in bushels. And passed a quick bill to help stop the losses so the next president could address it before the economy fell into a depression. And the government numbers of jobs being lost, for months at over 500,000 per month must all be from tools of the president to be, named Obama. And the ue rate must be from tools, at least until the new democratic president came to office, then they became unemployed by the new presidents policies (though there were none until approved by congress). Nice try at an economic argument. But it was no economic argument. It was, very obviously, just the normal bullshit coming from a conservative tool. And at that, one who could care less about the truth.
Because, you see, economists are mostly not tools. They are mostly honest. Which is a difficult concept for some con tools, eh me boy. Because, if you loose over half a million jobs per month, and the ue rate is going up like a rocket, and then it slows and stops, and starts going the other way, any rational person knows something that is seemingly beyond you. Jobs are being saved, regardless of how badly you want to say they are not. Only you, a mere employee in the food service industry, with no tag attached to your name saying you are an economist, with no team of economists working for you studying unemployment, have no idea of what you are talking about. No impartial source for your statements at all. And you are not trying to understand anything. As usual, you are simply posting con talking points, with no backing of ANY kind. Which makes you, and what you say, COMPLETELY IRRELIVENT.

 

[Rshermr]

Ever notice how the board's biggest bullshit artists always post in CAPITAL LETTERS? They must think that caps or a red font makes them more "forceful"!

So, apparently oldstyle has been using capital letters. And thinks the purpose is to make himself look forceful. Comical.

That was sarcasm, Georgie...
I know it's hard for someone with your limited intelligence to pick up on these things. Would you like me to post some sort of "alert" to let you know?

TWENTY FOUR. DO YOU EVER DO ANYTHING BUT INSULT AND ATTACK? EVER? DO YOU EVER TELL THE TRUTH? DO YOU EVER FEEL GUILT FOR WASTING PEOPLE'S TIME. OF COURSE NOT!
DO YOU EVER POST ECONOMIC ARGUMENTS, OR DO YOU SIMPLY ADMIT YOU ARE INCAPABLE?

 

[Oldstyle]

I AM NOT A LIAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

That's what Georgie considers proof. He'd be a lot more convincing about the whole "integrity" thing if he provided the formula for determining "Jobs Saved"...but at this point it's rather obvious that won't be happening!

Do you actually think there is a simple single formula, or do you realize it's a lot more complicated than that? Or do you think there was no methodology and the numbers were just pulled out of somebody's ass?

Of course the numbers were just pulled out of somebody's ass, Pinqy! That was the whole purpose of "Jobs Saved"! It let the Obama Administration avoid having to tell the American public how few jobs they created with the stimulus by substituting a statistic that couldn't be verified! You can TELL they're pulling their numbers out of their asses by the wide range of estimates.

So, the con tool says what con tools always say. The number they do not like was just pulled out of someone's ass. But they do not admit that their statements are just cut and paste from con talking points. So, what dipshit is saying is that gov economists are all just tools of the president. Like he is a con tool. Of course, the past republican president is apparently a tool also, because he saw jobs being lost in bushels. And passed a quick bill to help stop the losses so the next president could address it before the economy fell into a depression. And the government numbers of jobs being lost, for months at over 500,000 per month must all be from tools of the president to be, named Obama. And the ue rate must be from tools, at least until the new democratic president came to office, then they became unemployed by the new presidents policies (though there were none until approved by congress). Nice try at an economic argument. But it was no economic argument. It was, very obviously, just the normal bullshit coming from a conservative tool. And at that, one who could care less about the truth.
Because, you see, economists are mostly not tools. They are mostly honest. Which is a difficult concept for some con tools, eh me boy. Because, if you loose over half a million jobs per month, and the ue rate is going up like a rocket, and then it slows and stops, and starts going the other way, any rational person knows something that is seemingly beyond you. Jobs are being saved, regardless of how badly you want to say they are not. Only you, a mere employee in the food service industry, with no tag attached to your name saying you are an economist, with no team of economists working for you studying unemployment, have no idea of what you are talking about. No impartial source for your statements at all. And you are not trying to understand anything. As usual, you are simply posting con talking points, with no backing of ANY kind. Which makes you, and what you say, COMPLETELY IRRELIVENT.

All that 'CAPS LOCKED AND HIGHLIGHTED' bluster, Georgie...but you STILL can't come up with the formula that those "honest" Obama economists used to determine "Jobs Saved"? Why do you even bother coming here?

 

[Oldstyle]

I'm amused by your belief that the President's economic advisors...his economic team...is impartial. Next you'll be telling me that his Press Secretary's job isn't to spin things in a favorable light for the President! Are you back on your pain killers again? Is that why you're posting the nonsense that you are?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

I'm amused by your belief that the President's economic advisors...his economic team...is impartial. Next you'll be telling me that his Press Secretary's job isn't to spin things in a favorable light for the President! Are you back on your pain killers again? Is that why you're posting the nonsense that you are?

yes job claims are low which is good but still it is worst recovery since Great Depression sine while people have jobs they are low paying jobs. Here's how Bill Clinton described it:

“The problem is, 80% of the American people are still living on what they were living on the day before the [2008 finnan*cial] crash. And about half the American people, after you adjust for inflation, are living on what they were living on the last day I was president 15 years ago. So that’s what’s the matter.”

 

[Rshermr]

I AM NOT A LIAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

That's what Georgie considers proof. He'd be a lot more convincing about the whole "integrity" thing if he provided the formula for determining "Jobs Saved"...but at this point it's rather obvious that won't be happening!

Do you actually think there is a simple single formula, or do you realize it's a lot more complicated than that? Or do you think there was no methodology and the numbers were just pulled out of somebody's ass?

Of course the numbers were just pulled out of somebody's ass, Pinqy! That was the whole purpose of "Jobs Saved"! It let the Obama Administration avoid having to tell the American public how few jobs they created with the stimulus by substituting a statistic that couldn't be verified! You can TELL they're pulling their numbers out of their asses by the wide range of estimates.

So, the con tool says what con tools always say. The number they do not like was just pulled out of someone's ass. But they do not admit that their statements are just cut and paste from con talking points. So, what dipshit is saying is that gov economists are all just tools of the president. Like he is a con tool. Of course, the past republican president is apparently a tool also, because he saw jobs being lost in bushels. And passed a quick bill to help stop the losses so the next president could address it before the economy fell into a depression. And the government numbers of jobs being lost, for months at over 500,000 per month must all be from tools of the president to be, named Obama. And the ue rate must be from tools, at least until the new democratic president came to office, then they became unemployed by the new presidents policies (though there were none until approved by congress). Nice try at an economic argument. But it was no economic argument. It was, very obviously, just the normal bullshit coming from a conservative tool. And at that, one who could care less about the truth.
Because, you see, economists are mostly not tools. They are mostly honest. Which is a difficult concept for some con tools, eh me boy. Because, if you loose over half a million jobs per month, and the ue rate is going up like a rocket, and then it slows and stops, and starts going the other way, any rational person knows something that is seemingly beyond you. Jobs are being saved, regardless of how badly you want to say they are not. Only you, a mere employee in the food service industry, with no tag attached to your name saying you are an economist, with no team of economists working for you studying unemployment, have no idea of what you are talking about. No impartial source for your statements at all. And you are not trying to understand anything. As usual, you are simply posting con talking points, with no backing of ANY kind. Which makes you, and what you say, COMPLETELY IRRELIVENT.

All that 'CAPS LOCKED AND HIGHLIGHTED' bluster, Georgie...but you STILL can't come up with the formula that those "honest" Obama economists used to determine "Jobs Saved"? Why do you even bother coming here?

TWENTY FIVE. DO YOU EVER DO ANYTHING BUT INSULT AND ATTACK? EVER? DO YOU EVER TELL THE TRUTH? DO YOU EVER FEEL GUILT FOR WASTING PEOPLE'S TIME. OF COURSE NOT!
DO YOU EVER POST ECONOMIC ARGUMENTS, OR DO YOU SIMPLY ADMIT YOU ARE INCAPABLE?

 

[Oldstyle]

I AM NOT A LIAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

That's what Georgie considers proof. He'd be a lot more convincing about the whole "integrity" thing if he provided the formula for determining "Jobs Saved"...but at this point it's rather obvious that won't be happening!

Do you actually think there is a simple single formula, or do you realize it's a lot more complicated than that? Or do you think there was no methodology and the numbers were just pulled out of somebody's ass?

Of course the numbers were just pulled out of somebody's ass, Pinqy! That was the whole purpose of "Jobs Saved"! It let the Obama Administration avoid having to tell the American public how few jobs they created with the stimulus by substituting a statistic that couldn't be verified! You can TELL they're pulling their numbers out of their asses by the wide range of estimates.

So, the con tool says what con tools always say. The number they do not like was just pulled out of someone's ass. But they do not admit that their statements are just cut and paste from con talking points. So, what dipshit is saying is that gov economists are all just tools of the president. Like he is a con tool. Of course, the past republican president is apparently a tool also, because he saw jobs being lost in bushels. And passed a quick bill to help stop the losses so the next president could address it before the economy fell into a depression. And the government numbers of jobs being lost, for months at over 500,000 per month must all be from tools of the president to be, named Obama. And the ue rate must be from tools, at least until the new democratic president came to office, then they became unemployed by the new presidents policies (though there were none until approved by congress). Nice try at an economic argument. But it was no economic argument. It was, very obviously, just the normal bullshit coming from a conservative tool. And at that, one who could care less about the truth.
Because, you see, economists are mostly not tools. They are mostly honest. Which is a difficult concept for some con tools, eh me boy. Because, if you loose over half a million jobs per month, and the ue rate is going up like a rocket, and then it slows and stops, and starts going the other way, any rational person knows something that is seemingly beyond you. Jobs are being saved, regardless of how badly you want to say they are not. Only you, a mere employee in the food service industry, with no tag attached to your name saying you are an economist, with no team of economists working for you studying unemployment, have no idea of what you are talking about. No impartial source for your statements at all. And you are not trying to understand anything. As usual, you are simply posting con talking points, with no backing of ANY kind. Which makes you, and what you say, COMPLETELY IRRELIVENT.

All that 'CAPS LOCKED AND HIGHLIGHTED' bluster, Georgie...but you STILL can't come up with the formula that those "honest" Obama economists used to determine "Jobs Saved"? Why do you even bother coming here?

TWENTY FIVE. DO YOU EVER DO ANYTHING BUT INSULT AND ATTACK? EVER? DO YOU EVER TELL THE TRUTH? DO YOU EVER FEEL GUILT FOR WASTING PEOPLE'S TIME. OF COURSE NOT!
DO YOU EVER POST ECONOMIC ARGUMENTS, OR DO YOU SIMPLY ADMIT YOU ARE INCAPABLE?

Still posting in Caps and STILL not coming up with the formula that Obama's "honest" economists used to determine "Jobs Saved"? Same old, Rshermr...can't support your assertions so you turn the string into this...

 

[Oldstyle]

I'm amused by your belief that the President's economic advisors...his economic team...is impartial. Next you'll be telling me that his Press Secretary's job isn't to spin things in a favorable light for the President! Are you back on your pain killers again? Is that why you're posting the nonsense that you are?

yes job claims are low which is good but still it is worst recovery since Great Depression sine while people have jobs they are low paying jobs. Here's how Bill Clinton described it:

“The problem is, 80% of the American people are still living on what they were living on the day before the [2008 finnan*cial] crash. And about half the American people, after you adjust for inflation, are living on what they were living on the last day I was president 15 years ago. So that’s what’s the matter.”

Bill Clinton's memory might be just a little "off", Ed...if you'll recall the economy was already headed for a recession as Slick Willie was leaving office. The Dot Com Boom was over.

 

[Rshermr]

Do you actually think there is a simple single formula, or do you realize it's a lot more complicated than that? Or do you think there was no methodology and the numbers were just pulled out of somebody's ass?

Of course the numbers were just pulled out of somebody's ass, Pinqy! That was the whole purpose of "Jobs Saved"! It let the Obama Administration avoid having to tell the American public how few jobs they created with the stimulus by substituting a statistic that couldn't be verified! You can TELL they're pulling their numbers out of their asses by the wide range of estimates.

So, the con tool says what con tools always say. The number they do not like was just pulled out of someone's ass. But they do not admit that their statements are just cut and paste from con talking points. So, what dipshit is saying is that gov economists are all just tools of the president. Like he is a con tool. Of course, the past republican president is apparently a tool also, because he saw jobs being lost in bushels. And passed a quick bill to help stop the losses so the next president could address it before the economy fell into a depression. And the government numbers of jobs being lost, for months at over 500,000 per month must all be from tools of the president to be, named Obama. And the ue rate must be from tools, at least until the new democratic president came to office, then they became unemployed by the new presidents policies (though there were none until approved by congress). Nice try at an economic argument. But it was no economic argument. It was, very obviously, just the normal bullshit coming from a conservative tool. And at that, one who could care less about the truth.
Because, you see, economists are mostly not tools. They are mostly honest. Which is a difficult concept for some con tools, eh me boy. Because, if you loose over half a million jobs per month, and the ue rate is going up like a rocket, and then it slows and stops, and starts going the other way, any rational person knows something that is seemingly beyond you. Jobs are being saved, regardless of how badly you want to say they are not. Only you, a mere employee in the food service industry, with no tag attached to your name saying you are an economist, with no team of economists working for you studying unemployment, have no idea of what you are talking about. No impartial source for your statements at all. And you are not trying to understand anything. As usual, you are simply posting con talking points, with no backing of ANY kind. Which makes you, and what you say, COMPLETELY IRRELIVENT.

All that 'CAPS LOCKED AND HIGHLIGHTED' bluster, Georgie...but you STILL can't come up with the formula that those "honest" Obama economists used to determine "Jobs Saved"? Why do you even bother coming here?

TWENTY FIVE. DO YOU EVER DO ANYTHING BUT INSULT AND ATTACK? EVER? DO YOU EVER TELL THE TRUTH? DO YOU EVER FEEL GUILT FOR WASTING PEOPLE'S TIME. OF COURSE NOT!
DO YOU EVER POST ECONOMIC ARGUMENTS, OR DO YOU SIMPLY ADMIT YOU ARE INCAPABLE?

Still posting in Caps and STILL not coming up with the formula that Obama's "honest" economists used to determine "Jobs Saved"? Same old, Rshermr...can't support your assertions so you turn the string into this...

TWENTY SIX. DO YOU EVER DO ANYTHING BUT INSULT AND ATTACK? EVER? DO YOU EVER TELL THE TRUTH? DO YOU EVER FEEL GUILT FOR WASTING PEOPLE'S TIME. OF COURSE NOT!
DO YOU EVER POST ECONOMIC ARGUMENTS, OR DO YOU SIMPLY ADMIT YOU ARE INCAPABLE?

 

[Oldstyle]

I'm curious, Georgie...do you think all this counting and CAPS in any way changes the fact that you can't come up with the formula that Obama Administration economists used to arrive at their estimation of "Jobs Saved"? You can count to a hundred and I'll still be asking why you can't provide what you said you could!

So do the board a favor and either admit that there really isn't a formula for "Jobs Saved" because it's basically a "made up" number...or if it's your contention the number is verifiable...show us all the formula used to arrive at that number. It's really that simple at this point.

 

[Rshermr]

I'm curious, Georgie...do you think all this counting and CAPS in any way changes the fact that you can't come up with the formula that Obama Administration economists used to arrive at their estimation of "Jobs Saved"? You can count to a hundred and I'll still be asking why you can't provide what you said you could!

So do the board a favor and either admit that there really isn't a formula for "Jobs Saved" because it's basically a "made up" number...or if it's your contention the number is verifiable...show us all the formula used to arrive at that number. It's really that simple at this point.

TWENTY SEVEN. DO YOU EVER DO ANYTHING BUT INSULT AND ATTACK? EVER? DO YOU EVER TELL THE TRUTH? DO YOU EVER FEEL GUILT FOR WASTING PEOPLE'S TIME. OF COURSE NOT!
DO YOU EVER POST ECONOMIC ARGUMENTS, OR DO YOU SIMPLY ADMIT YOU ARE INCAPABLE?

 

[Oldstyle]

That's all you've got...isn't it? Small wonder you've got the rating you do!

 

[Rshermr]

That's all you've got...isn't it? Small wonder you've got the rating you do!

Poor ignorant con tool All you do is attack, and lie. Over and over and over. But have you noticed, me poor ignorant con tool. No one is paying attention any more. Congratulations.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

DO YOU EVER POST ECONOMIC ARGUMENTS?

why not cut the BS and make your argument for communism?

 

[Oldstyle]

That's all you've got...isn't it? Small wonder you've got the rating you do!

Poor ignorant con tool All you do is attack, and lie. Over and over and over. But have you noticed, me poor ignorant con tool. No one is paying attention any more. Congratulations.

Why should anyone "pay attention" to you refusing to answer a question? You're spamming the same response...over and over again...a non answer! Congrats, Georgie...you've managed to bore everyone on the board including me!

 

[Rshermr]

That's all you've got...isn't it? Small wonder you've got the rating you do!

That's all you've got...isn't it? Small wonder you've got the rating you do!

Poor ignorant con tool All you do is attack, and lie. Over and over and over. But have you noticed, me poor ignorant con tool. No one is paying attention any more. Congratulations.

Why should anyone "pay attention" to you refusing to answer a question? You're spamming the same response...over and over again...a non answer! Congrats, Georgie...you've managed to bore everyone on the board including me!

So let me provide you with one more piece of education, me con tool. When no one comments on the link, it is a sure indication that they are not paying attention to anything you post. Because, by now, everyone knows you are a stupid ****.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

That's all you've got...isn't it? Small wonder you've got the rating you do!

That's all you've got...isn't it? Small wonder you've got the rating you do!

Poor ignorant con tool All you do is attack, and lie. Over and over and over. But have you noticed, me poor ignorant con tool. No one is paying attention any more. Congratulations.

Why should anyone "pay attention" to you refusing to answer a question? You're spamming the same response...over and over again...a non answer! Congrats, Georgie...you've managed to bore everyone on the board including me!

So let me provide you with one more piece of education, me con tool. When no one comments on the link, it is a sure indication that they are not paying attention to anything you post. Because, by now, everyone knows you are a stupid ****.

vile typical liberal still cant say why he's a communist but has tons to say about everything else. Ever see a conservative run when asked to say why he's a conservative? What does that teach you?

 

[Likkmee]

UM. Thank you Jimmy Carter !