UPDATE: Letter by Ted Cruz and 6 GOP Senators and 4 Senators-Elect Sign Letter to Reject Election –Call For Election Commission 10-Day Emergency Audit

[bripat9643]

You're fucking deranged, Fruitcake. BLM never stormed the White House.

One thing about you Nazis, you're pathological liars.

Trump was rushed to White House bunker due to breach of temporary barricades: report

President Trump was reportedly rushed to the White House’s secure bunker on Friday evening after protesters began dismantling a temporary barricade outside the building, despite his claims th…

thehill.com

LOLOLOL

You're fucking deranged, Fruitcake. Your own link shows they never stormed the White House. They never even got closer than 30 yards from the White House lawn.

You're a mental case. Seek professional help. Meds are in order.

The President was in such severe danger secret service had to move him to the Underground Bunker - the democrats posed a credible threat to his life.

During the Reichstag Fire, no one had be be hustled to a bunker.

Unarmed protestors with no guns, bombs, or incendiaries trespassed. . (despite blatant lies to the contrary by the Reich press at the time, lies you continue to repeat even though they were debunked long ago.)

You Nazis are trying to paint a protest as something it isn't and never was. You're lying scum and traitors, so that's expected.

But you don't get to get away with it.

Fuck you
Fuck your Reichstag Fire fiction
Fuck all Nazis, democrats or otherwise.

Fruitcake, BLM never stormed the White House. You really are out of your fucking mind.

Nazi; being a pathological liar is mental illness.

Trump was 'rushed to the White House underground bunker' on Friday

Secret Service agents on Friday night rushed President Trump and his family to an underground bunker in the White House while hundreds protested the death of George Floyd just across the street.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Get help, Nazi.

You're fucking deranged, Fruitcake.

Repeating Trump had to be taken to a secure location does not mean the White House was stormed. It wasn't and your own link corroborates that. Your own link states BLM skirmishes with police occurred "outside" the White House. That would be NOT storming the White House.

And your denial that Mike Pence had to be taken to a secure location on 1/6 was utterly destroyed by the video I posted of him being escorted to a secure location.

Get help Nazi.

You're mentally ill.

Slobbers the nutter who denies Mike Pence was escorted to a secure location because of the mob who stormed the Capitol; while also claiming BLM stormed the White House though they never did.

Just imagine what your crowd would have done if the situation was reversed? They burned, looted, rioted and took over city blocks for months for much less just a couple of months prior. Capital Hill would have been in flames and anything of value stolen. It somehow soothes the pain of whatever cause they are protesting if they get a flat screen TV or a few iPads while they are at it. That is how anti-Trumpers roll.

These were protestors who went to far, but funny not as far as the rioters and looters and did all over tehe country. Those folks took over an entire city block and a police station. This was CLEARLY not a planned insurection attempt. You don’t plan to overthrow a government without guns. Remember, these were largely Trump supporters. I can assure you the vast majority have guns. They left them at home. I guess they figured they wouldn’t need them during their attempted insurrection? LOL..you guys are idiots.

Fantasizing what Democrats might have done is irrelevant. Your side attacked our government and did so in the name of the loser of an election and with the intent on having him installed as president. That you try to equate that with other events is absurd as nothing like that has ever happened before in this country. That you try to minimize the situation by imagining what others would have done reveals even you understand that.

It's hardly irrelevant. It's a good logical exercise to determine whether Democrat Reich minions are just spewing the hot gas they've been ordered to spew, and that's all this whine is.

So we can assume the right would burn buildings down if a black cop kneeled on a white man's neck for nearly 10 minutes until he died. Isn't that right? That's what you're intimating.

No you can't. The right doesn't burn down cities. Only the left does that.

You failed to commit logic.

Using your logic, only the right seditiously attacks it's own Congress. So much for your fantasies about what Democrats would have done.

That isn't my logic, NAZI.

Of course it is. Folks on the left rioted because a black man was killed by a white cop by kneeling on his neck for almost 10 minutes. You say the right wouldn't do the same evidenced on the right doesn't do that. Yet when it's pointed out to you only folks on the right have attacked its own Congress to try and flip an election, you ignore your own logic and claim the left would have done the same, even though they never did.

You have a singular talent for misinterpreting what people say.

 

[bripat9643]

What part of "try" didn't you understand?

Nothing. People who are impeached are subject to an impeachment trial. Just as the constitution says.

Our founders were smarter than you idiots. They knew exactly what they were talking about.

No, The Constitution says the President will be tried if he is impeached. Trump wasn't the president, douchebag.

It's hilarious that you Democrat Reich minions keep trying to justify this trial. Apparently you don't want people to believe that you're just a bunch of lawless goose stepper who wipe their ass on the Constitution.

Well, it's too late for that.

Fucking moron, he had a trial.

An illligitimate trial. Even if the charge was legitimate, which it wasn't, that was like trying someone for a committing crime that had passed the statute limitations.

 

[Faun]

What part of "try" didn't you understand?

Nothing. People who are impeached are subject to an impeachment trial. Just as the constitution says.

Our founders were smarter than you idiots. They knew exactly what they were talking about.

No, The Constitution says the President will be tried if he is impeached. Trump wasn't the president, douchebag.

It's hilarious that you Democrat Reich minions keep trying to justify this trial. Apparently you don't want people to believe that you're just a bunch of lawless goose stepper who wipe their ass on the Constitution.

Well, it's too late for that.

LOL

Quote the Constitution stating "the President will be tried if he is impeached."

​

The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.​

​

Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.​

Great, so it doesn't state "the President will be tried if he is impeached," as you falsely claimed. It states...

The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments.​

 

[bripat9643]

You can't be impeached if you aren't the president.

He was impeached while he was President.
Twice.
What he wasn't was convicted, like every President who has been impeached.
How many times do you numskulls have to be told that?

That doesn't matter. He can't be removed from office if he isn't in office, so the trial is invalid. It doesn't matter how many times you goose stepping NAZIs claim otherwise.

But he could have been prevented from running for office again. Why do you think that Republicans refused to bar him from office every again, Bripat?

Only if he was tried before his term ended.

 

[Faun]

You're fucking deranged, Fruitcake. BLM never stormed the White House.

One thing about you Nazis, you're pathological liars.

Trump was rushed to White House bunker due to breach of temporary barricades: report

President Trump was reportedly rushed to the White House’s secure bunker on Friday evening after protesters began dismantling a temporary barricade outside the building, despite his claims th…

thehill.com

LOLOLOL

You're fucking deranged, Fruitcake. Your own link shows they never stormed the White House. They never even got closer than 30 yards from the White House lawn.

You're a mental case. Seek professional help. Meds are in order.

The President was in such severe danger secret service had to move him to the Underground Bunker - the democrats posed a credible threat to his life.

During the Reichstag Fire, no one had be be hustled to a bunker.

Unarmed protestors with no guns, bombs, or incendiaries trespassed. . (despite blatant lies to the contrary by the Reich press at the time, lies you continue to repeat even though they were debunked long ago.)

You Nazis are trying to paint a protest as something it isn't and never was. You're lying scum and traitors, so that's expected.

But you don't get to get away with it.

Fuck you
Fuck your Reichstag Fire fiction
Fuck all Nazis, democrats or otherwise.

Fruitcake, BLM never stormed the White House. You really are out of your fucking mind.

Nazi; being a pathological liar is mental illness.

Trump was 'rushed to the White House underground bunker' on Friday

Secret Service agents on Friday night rushed President Trump and his family to an underground bunker in the White House while hundreds protested the death of George Floyd just across the street.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Get help, Nazi.

You're fucking deranged, Fruitcake.

Repeating Trump had to be taken to a secure location does not mean the White House was stormed. It wasn't and your own link corroborates that. Your own link states BLM skirmishes with police occurred "outside" the White House. That would be NOT storming the White House.

And your denial that Mike Pence had to be taken to a secure location on 1/6 was utterly destroyed by the video I posted of him being escorted to a secure location.

Get help Nazi.

You're mentally ill.

Slobbers the nutter who denies Mike Pence was escorted to a secure location because of the mob who stormed the Capitol; while also claiming BLM stormed the White House though they never did.

Just imagine what your crowd would have done if the situation was reversed? They burned, looted, rioted and took over city blocks for months for much less just a couple of months prior. Capital Hill would have been in flames and anything of value stolen. It somehow soothes the pain of whatever cause they are protesting if they get a flat screen TV or a few iPads while they are at it. That is how anti-Trumpers roll.

These were protestors who went to far, but funny not as far as the rioters and looters and did all over tehe country. Those folks took over an entire city block and a police station. This was CLEARLY not a planned insurection attempt. You don’t plan to overthrow a government without guns. Remember, these were largely Trump supporters. I can assure you the vast majority have guns. They left them at home. I guess they figured they wouldn’t need them during their attempted insurrection? LOL..you guys are idiots.

Fantasizing what Democrats might have done is irrelevant. Your side attacked our government and did so in the name of the loser of an election and with the intent on having him installed as president. That you try to equate that with other events is absurd as nothing like that has ever happened before in this country. That you try to minimize the situation by imagining what others would have done reveals even you understand that.

It's hardly irrelevant. It's a good logical exercise to determine whether Democrat Reich minions are just spewing the hot gas they've been ordered to spew, and that's all this whine is.

So we can assume the right would burn buildings down if a black cop kneeled on a white man's neck for nearly 10 minutes until he died. Isn't that right? That's what you're intimating.

No you can't. The right doesn't burn down cities. Only the left does that.

You failed to commit logic.

Using your logic, only the right seditiously attacks it's own Congress. So much for your fantasies about what Democrats would have done.

That isn't my logic, NAZI.

Of course it is. Folks on the left rioted because a black man was killed by a white cop by kneeling on his neck for almost 10 minutes. You say the right wouldn't do the same evidenced on the right doesn't do that. Yet when it's pointed out to you only folks on the right have attacked its own Congress to try and flip an election, you ignore your own logic and claim the left would have done the same, even though they never did.

You have a singular talent for misinterpreting what people say.

It's what you're saying, fucking moron. Why wouldn't the right riot if a black cop killed a white man like George Floyd was killed? Your answer is the right doesn't do that. Why would the left attack the Congress to flip an election like the right did? According to you, they just would even though they never have.

 

[Faun]

You can't be impeached if you aren't the president.

He was impeached while he was President.
Twice.
What he wasn't was convicted, like every President who has been impeached.
How many times do you numskulls have to be told that?

That doesn't matter. He can't be removed from office if he isn't in office, so the trial is invalid. It doesn't matter how many times you goose stepping NAZIs claim otherwise.

But he could have been prevented from running for office again. Why do you think that Republicans refused to bar him from office every again, Bripat?

Only if he was tried before his term ended.

Nope, the Constitution doesn't say that. What it does say is...

The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments.​

... and of course, Trump, no longer president, still had a trial despite your mindless blather that it's unconstitutional.

 

[Faun]

What part of "try" didn't you understand?

Nothing. People who are impeached are subject to an impeachment trial. Just as the constitution says.

Our founders were smarter than you idiots. They knew exactly what they were talking about.

No, The Constitution says the President will be tried if he is impeached. Trump wasn't the president, douchebag.

It's hilarious that you Democrat Reich minions keep trying to justify this trial. Apparently you don't want people to believe that you're just a bunch of lawless goose stepper who wipe their ass on the Constitution.

Well, it's too late for that.

Fucking moron, he had a trial.

An illligitimate trial. Even if the charge was legitimate, which it wasn't, that was like trying someone for a committing crime that had passed the statute limitations.

No, it's not like trying someone after a statute of limitations. It's like trying someone who can't be found to be incarcerated should they lose their trial.

 

[bripat9643]

What part of "try" didn't you understand?

Nothing. People who are impeached are subject to an impeachment trial. Just as the constitution says.

Our founders were smarter than you idiots. They knew exactly what they were talking about.

No, The Constitution says the President will be tried if he is impeached. Trump wasn't the president, douchebag.

It's hilarious that you Democrat Reich minions keep trying to justify this trial. Apparently you don't want people to believe that you're just a bunch of lawless goose stepper who wipe their ass on the Constitution.

Well, it's too late for that.

LOL

Quote the Constitution stating "the President will be tried if he is impeached."

​

The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.​

​

Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.​

Great, so it doesn't state "the President will be tried if he is impeached," as you falsely claimed. It states...

The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments.​

I didn't say that, NAZI. You just made it up. You haven't proven your point.

Yes, the Senate can try all impeachements that are still in effect. Trumps were null and void the day he left office.

If you claim that the judge of Maricopa county shall try all cases originating in Maricopa county, that doesn't include cases that have passed the statute of limitations.

 

[bripat9643]

You can't be impeached if you aren't the president.

He was impeached while he was President.
Twice.
What he wasn't was convicted, like every President who has been impeached.
How many times do you numskulls have to be told that?

That doesn't matter. He can't be removed from office if he isn't in office, so the trial is invalid. It doesn't matter how many times you goose stepping NAZIs claim otherwise.

But he could have been prevented from running for office again. Why do you think that Republicans refused to bar him from office every again, Bripat?

No he can't. He wasn't president. You can't have a senate trial for a private citizen, moron.

Says who? Fucking morons like you?

'Cause guess what? We just had one. And it wasn't the first nor will it be the last.

Yeah, and NAZI German made being Jewish a crime.

So what?

 

[bripat9643]

What part of "try" didn't you understand?

Nothing. People who are impeached are subject to an impeachment trial. Just as the constitution says.

Our founders were smarter than you idiots. They knew exactly what they were talking about.

No, The Constitution says the President will be tried if he is impeached. Trump wasn't the president, douchebag.

It's hilarious that you Democrat Reich minions keep trying to justify this trial. Apparently you don't want people to believe that you're just a bunch of lawless goose stepper who wipe their ass on the Constitution.

Well, it's too late for that.

Fucking moron, he had a trial.

An illligitimate trial. Even if the charge was legitimate, which it wasn't, that was like trying someone for a committing crime that had passed the statute limitations.

No, it's not like trying someone after a statute of limitations. It's like trying someone who can't be found to be incarcerated should they lose their trial.

Wrong. Dim "logic": I would like 'A' to be true, so it must be true.

 

[bripat9643]

I trial when you haven't done anything to justify a trial isn't due process, NAZI.

Your opinion on what he did is irrelevant. Congress’s opinion is what matters. He did get due process.

Just as the constitution says.

Sorry, turd, but the law matters. You just said it doesn't. That's what makes you a frikken NAZI.

You idea of "due process" would include trying people for charges that aren't even on the books. Sorry, NAZI, but going through the motions and holding a fake trial doesn't constitute process.

The law was followed for his impeachment. This was an impeachment, not a criminal trial.

You got a problem with it? Take it up with the founding fathers.

Please refrain from forcing me to use the exact language the prevents you turds from pretending you don't know what I mean.

 

[XponentialChaos]

You believe what your filthy party tells you to believe.

Or maybe your tinfoil hat nonsense isn’t credible and it’s just a crybaby temper tantrum because your candidate lost.

No.

Do you ever get tired of being wrong?

How is that kraken thing going? LoL

 

[bripat9643]

You believe what your filthy party tells you to believe.

Or maybe your tinfoil hat nonsense isn’t credible and it’s just a crybaby temper tantrum because your candidate lost.

No.

Do you ever get tired of being wrong?

How is that kraken thing going? LoL

When was I ever wrong?

 

[lennypartiv]

Nothing is going to be decertified.

Better late than never. A Trump inauguration in March is better than four years of Biden.

 

[Faun]

What part of "try" didn't you understand?

Nothing. People who are impeached are subject to an impeachment trial. Just as the constitution says.

Our founders were smarter than you idiots. They knew exactly what they were talking about.

No, The Constitution says the President will be tried if he is impeached. Trump wasn't the president, douchebag.

It's hilarious that you Democrat Reich minions keep trying to justify this trial. Apparently you don't want people to believe that you're just a bunch of lawless goose stepper who wipe their ass on the Constitution.

Well, it's too late for that.

LOL

Quote the Constitution stating "the President will be tried if he is impeached."

​

The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.​

​

Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.​

Great, so it doesn't state "the President will be tried if he is impeached," as you falsely claimed. It states...

The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments.​

I didn't say that, NAZI. You just made it up. You haven't proven your point.

Yes, the Senate can try all impeachements that are still in effect. Trumps were null and void the day he left office.

If you claim that the judge of Maricopa county shall try all cases originating in Maricopa county, that doesn't include cases that have passed the statute of limitations.

LOLOL

You didn't say that?? Are you ever not a fucking moron...? Ever???

No, The Constitution says the President will be tried if he is impeached.

Great, so it doesn't state "the President will be tried if he is impeached," as you falsely claimed.

I didn't say that, NAZI. You just made it up.

"Yes, the Senate can try all impeachements that are still in effect. Trumps were null and void the day he left office."

Great, now let's see you quote the Constitution where it states an impeachment becomes null and void should the impeached person leave office before their trial....

 

[Faun]

You believe what your filthy party tells you to believe.

Or maybe your tinfoil hat nonsense isn’t credible and it’s just a crybaby temper tantrum because your candidate lost.

No.

Do you ever get tired of being wrong?

How is that kraken thing going? LoL

When was I ever wrong?

LOLOL

 

[Faun]

You can't be impeached if you aren't the president.

He was impeached while he was President.
Twice.
What he wasn't was convicted, like every President who has been impeached.
How many times do you numskulls have to be told that?

That doesn't matter. He can't be removed from office if he isn't in office, so the trial is invalid. It doesn't matter how many times you goose stepping NAZIs claim otherwise.

But he could have been prevented from running for office again. Why do you think that Republicans refused to bar him from office every again, Bripat?

No he can't. He wasn't president. You can't have a senate trial for a private citizen, moron.

Says who? Fucking morons like you?

'Cause guess what? We just had one. And it wasn't the first nor will it be the last.

Yeah, and NAZI German made being Jewish a crime.

So what?

LOLOL

So now you're equating Nazi Germany making it a crime to be Jewish with trying an individual for impeachment??

You're batshit crazy, fucking moron.

 

[Faun]

What part of "try" didn't you understand?

Nothing. People who are impeached are subject to an impeachment trial. Just as the constitution says.

Our founders were smarter than you idiots. They knew exactly what they were talking about.

No, The Constitution says the President will be tried if he is impeached. Trump wasn't the president, douchebag.

It's hilarious that you Democrat Reich minions keep trying to justify this trial. Apparently you don't want people to believe that you're just a bunch of lawless goose stepper who wipe their ass on the Constitution.

Well, it's too late for that.

Fucking moron, he had a trial.

An illligitimate trial. Even if the charge was legitimate, which it wasn't, that was like trying someone for a committing crime that had passed the statute limitations.

No, it's not like trying someone after a statute of limitations. It's like trying someone who can't be found to be incarcerated should they lose their trial.

Wrong. Dim "logic": I would like 'A' to be true, so it must be true.

LOLOL

Fucking moron, that's actually your logic. You're the one saying an impeached person leaving office is like passing a statute of limitations. And while that's not true, you claim it to be so because you said it is so.

 

[Faun]

Nothing is going to be decertified.

Better late than never. A Trump inauguration in March is better than four years of Biden.

March of which year?

 

[bripat9643]

What part of "try" didn't you understand?

Nothing. People who are impeached are subject to an impeachment trial. Just as the constitution says.

Our founders were smarter than you idiots. They knew exactly what they were talking about.

No, The Constitution says the President will be tried if he is impeached. Trump wasn't the president, douchebag.

It's hilarious that you Democrat Reich minions keep trying to justify this trial. Apparently you don't want people to believe that you're just a bunch of lawless goose stepper who wipe their ass on the Constitution.

Well, it's too late for that.

LOL

Quote the Constitution stating "the President will be tried if he is impeached."

​

The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.​

​

Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.​

Great, so it doesn't state "the President will be tried if he is impeached," as you falsely claimed. It states...

The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments.​

I didn't say that, NAZI. You just made it up. You haven't proven your point.

Yes, the Senate can try all impeachements that are still in effect. Trumps were null and void the day he left office.

If you claim that the judge of Maricopa county shall try all cases originating in Maricopa county, that doesn't include cases that have passed the statute of limitations.

LOLOL

You didn't say that?? Are you ever not a fucking moron...? Ever???

No, The Constitution says the President will be tried if he is impeached.

​

Great, so it doesn't state "the President will be tried if he is impeached," as you falsely claimed.

​

I didn't say that, NAZI. You just made it up.

"Yes, the Senate can try all impeachements that are still in effect. Trumps were null and void the day he left office."

Great, now let's see you quote the Constitution where it states an impeachment becomes null and void should the impeached person leave office before their trial....

The bottom line, FAUX, is that your interpretation of the clause is idiosynchratic and self serving. It's horseshit. I'm not going to get into another one of these debates with your where we argue about the meaning of "is."