United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice Totally VINDICATED

[GoneBezerk]

Stupid *****...he was being blackmailed over his affair.

You are such a ******* idiot.

Petraeus said it was removed.

Rep. Peter King also said General Petraeus ok'd the removal.

 

[USNavyVet]

Petraeus said it was removed.

Rep. Peter King also said General Petraeus ok'd the removal.

So now you agree that it was removed?

 

[Rocko]

Petraeus said it was removed.

Rep. Peter King also said General Petraeus ok'd the removal.

Who removed it?

 

[GoneBezerk]

Oh, Obamination "really, really" didn't know his CIA director was being investigated by the FBI....because he's an idiot or a liar.

Your choice.

 

[GuyPinestra]

May god you hate the truth. The ***** went in front of the world in lied 5 ******* times about the cause of the terrorist attack.

Obama want in front of the UN dissing our freedom of speech. WTF?

I know you're retarded, but we learned the facts today straight from Petraeus. He signed off on the unclassified talking points Ambassador Rice used on the Sunday talk shows following the embassy attack. Even wingnut Rep. Peter King stated the same thing after the hearing.

Spin away, Mr. Dervish. You're so full of shit you look like a septic tank.

What we found out today is that the talking points given TO the White House were not the same talking points coming FROM the White House.

Pack your lying ass off to the Spirit World, idiot!

 

[Lakhota]

Petraeus said it was removed.

Rep. Peter King also said General Petraeus ok'd the removal.

So now you agree that it was removed?

Who gives a shit whether it was removed or not? What difference does that make to you NaziCons regarding Susan Rice's initial statements? As someone who once held a Top Secret security clearance, it would make sense to withhold that information following the embassy attack. It ain't rocket science...

 

[Trajan]

She simply used the unclassified talking points signed off on by the entire intelligence community.

Another NaziCon conspiracy theory thoroughly debunked by facts in today's hearing with General Petraeus.

Susan Rice Libya Remarks Defended By Democrats Deploring Efforts To 'Pillory' UN Ambassador

Wow, you blew this one to

 

[USNavyVet]

Rep. Peter King also said General Petraeus ok'd the removal.

So now you agree that it was removed?

Who gives a shit whether it was removed or not? What difference does that make to you NaziCons regarding Susan Rice's initial statements? As someone who once held a Top Secret security clearance, it would make sense to withhold that information following the embassy attack. It ain't rocket science...

Settle down, you internet tough guy. Geez you just can't keep your bullshit straight.

 

[GuyPinestra]

Rep. Peter King also said General Petraeus ok'd the removal.

So now you agree that it was removed?

Who gives a shit whether it was removed or not? What difference does that make to you NaziCons regarding Susan Rice's initial statements? As someone who once held a Top Secret security clearance, it would make sense to withhold that information following the embassy attack. It ain't rocket science...

The only thing you've ever held is a stranger's cock in the gym shower.

The ***** lied on orders from the White House. The BOSS ***** IN the White House (Valerie Jarrett) gave the order. Obama himself is too ******* convinced of his own greatness to even deign to pay attention while the shit went down.

He went to bed so he'd be 'rested' for his Vegas fundraiser!

 

[Lakhota]

Fox Covers Up Acknowledgement That Petraeus Was OK With Benghazi Talking Points | Blog | Media Matters for America

 

[thereisnospoon]

So those of you on the left are so desperate to protect Obama your ready to completely ignore Benghazi and the fact that our Ambassador his aide and two former Navy Seals were murdered there that matters more to you than getting to the truth of how and why this happened. If you want to talk about something that is truly pathetic that is.

They don't care. As long as they can survive this politically, all is right with the world.

 

[GoneBezerk]

1) You never had a TS clearance.
2) The attack wasn't TS because we knew about it, you stupid pile of shit.

When CIA and State Department people in Libya are calling back to the US reporting what they see real time, there is no TS info to hide from the American public. What were you idiots going to deny the Ambassador died if you could sneak in and take his body?

Rep. Peter King also said General Petraeus ok'd the removal.

So now you agree that it was removed?

Who gives a shit whether it was removed or not? What difference does that make to you NaziCons regarding Susan Rice's initial statements? As someone who once held a Top Secret security clearance, it would make sense to withhold that information following the embassy attack. It ain't rocket science...

 

[USNavyVet]

Fox Covers Up Acknowledgement That Petraeus Was OK With Benghazi Talking Points | Blog | Media Matters for America

From HuffPo to MM. No wonder you're so messed up.

 

[Stephanie]

The rightwing lie about this will never die. Except in normal America.

you don't give a damn what this administration does, do you?
they blamed a American citizen and his film then called a terrorist attack against OUR EMBASSY, RIOTS

the thing is you Obama worshippers aren't normal

 

[Trajan]

Fox Covers Up Acknowledgement That Petraeus Was OK With Benghazi Talking Points | Blog | Media Matters for America

Try again....
here, CBS.....


House Intelligence Committee member Peter King, R-N.Y., told reporters that the original CIA talking points regarding the attack clearly attributed the incident to al Qaeda affiliates, but that the talking points changed after being vetted by several agencies, including the Justice Department and State Department. "No one knows yet exactly who came up with the final talking points," King said.


"The original talking points prepared by the CIA were different than the final ones put out," King continued. Originally, he said, they were "much more specific on al Qaeda involvement."

Petraeus told lawmakers today that he consistently told Congress that there were terrorist elements involved in the attack, but King said he remembers Petraeus' Sept. 14 testimony differently.


Petraeus testifies on Benghazi attack - CBS News


Get it now?

 

[Rocko]

So Lahkota, who removed Al Qaeda from the talking points? What, you don't know. I guess no one is exonerated then.

 

[Trajan]

Next question, why did Obama and Hillary continue to blame the video?

 

[Lakhota]

So Lahkota, who removed Al Qaeda from the talking points? What, you don't know. I guess no one is exonerated then.

What difference does that make if General Petraeus ok'd it?

 

[GoneBezerk]

When your re-election campaign is pushing for downsizing the military and shutting down the war on terror....you can't have terrorists killing the Ambassador in Libya, a country that is where it is at today because (drumroll) of Obamination.

This is like a bad movie.

 

[Stephanie]

Lakhota is just a mouth organ for Obama, give him the facts he gives you mediamatters whining about Fox news..