U.S. Says Sheriff Could Face Prosecution for Releasing Immigrant

[Marener]

Moroner just stated that federal immigration law enforcement is a choice for any individual in law enforcement

It’s a choice for state and local law enforcement.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

~~~~~~
Typical of Tompkins County, the land of Cornell University

Creatures from the Ivy League Lagoon

 

[JWBooth]

~~~~~~~
Then he won't be disappointed when he asks for assistance from the Feds and they refuse to offer information to the county P.D....

No doubt

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Get a load of the Pride Flag.
Arrest him, prosecute him, jail him.

Up from Peewee League

Playing hardball, unburdened by past Republicans who played Tee-ball.

 

[Doc7505]

If ICE wants to detain them, they’re legally entitled to. If they want to issue a detainer, they’re legally entitled to.

But they can’t force other people to detain them on their behalf. They can’t force other people to communicate with them. That is what the detainer asks and is not legally enforceable.

~~~~~~

Delegation of Immigration Authority Section 287(g) Immigration and Nationality Act

www.ice.gov

**********​

Site Moving

 

[otto105]

Prosecute Mayors and governors of Sanctuary Cities/States who refuse to cooperate with the raids, too. By refusing to cooperate they are willfully obstructing justice.

Fascist deep state fuckery.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

No one asked him to enforce federal law. Different LE agencies work in cooperation with others. Think extradition laws. The sheriffs agency was finished with their issue with the illegal immigrant. Traditional cooperation would dictate that they release the illegal immigrant into the custody of the federal authorities. A good example would be a military member who is convicted of a civilian crime, upon release would be turned over to military LE. The sheriff is guilty of obstructing federal LE. A case could be made for aiding and abetting as well.

Governors, Too, Must Be Jailed

Not arresting the coyote sheriff is equivalent to not arresting the driver of a bank robber's getaway car.

 

[TemplarKormac]

You don’t have facts on your side.

Immigration law does not require local police to act as immigration police.

If you're referring to

New York v. United States (1992) and Printz v. United States (1997)

Those rulings were fundamentally flawed, in that they unduly took power from the government to enforce immigration law. Those were and are legally untenable rulings and interfere with proper immigration enforcement.

But this goes beyond detainers, it goes into the realm of state and local officials directly (by action or inaction) interfering with immigration enforcement.

The supremacy clause clearly does not require ICE to issue detainers, nor does it allow for states and municipalities to directly rebel against constitutionally enacted laws that aren't in the purview of the 10th Amendment or with ICE actions to go after illegal criminal aliens. Guess what, immigration law is the GOVERNMENT'S power. States and municipalities simply cannot do that.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Fascist deep state fuckery.

And completely beyond your little mind to comprehend.

 

[TemplarKormac]

"the states (like Arizona in 2010) are trying to supplant the federal government's role in setting immigration policy, and we can't have fifty different immigration policies"

-Donald B. Verilli, Jr.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

~~~~~~~
Unfortunately, the county is packed with Liberal Progressive Democrats, schooled by Cornell University. The main town in Tompkins County is Ithaca.
The County Sheriff is beholden to the the president of Cornell and not the people that elected him.

Read more:

Snapshot Highlights Cornell University’s Role in Local Economy

Visitors to Cornell’s Ithaca campus spent $78 million locally in the most recent fiscal year – surpassing pre-pandemic totals – while the university spent a similar sum on construction projects,

www.ithaca.com

**********​

Republican View: Cornell’s conundrum – Tompkins Weekly

The ongoing UAW strike at Cornell University has spotlighted the institution’s financial practices. Cornell's endowment, valued at approximately $10

tompkinsweekly.com

Beware of Fraternity Greeks Bearing Gifts

Ironic, since Ithaca was the home of Ulysses, who thought up the strategy of using a Trojan Horse.

 

[ColonelAngus]

So the sheriff does not want to keep the residents safe from criminals?

Wow.

 

[TemplarKormac]

They can’t force anyone else to enforce immigration law for them.

ICE detainers are requests. You are not violating any laws by declining to comply with the request.

Yeah, you are.

The Department of Homeland Security is federal agency charged enforcing immigration law. That means detaining anyone who comes across illegally, or anyone here illegally who commits a crime. The fact the ICE has arrest powers speaks to that.

By saying states and cities aren't required to cooperate with ICE, you are saying by default that the government has no power to compel cooperation where justified. By not cooperating they are thereby failing to cooperate with the DHS, which is legally allowed to enforce immigration law. When you refuse to cooperate (through action or inaction) with any legally justified action of the DHS, you are obstructing their ability to enforce the law.

In short, you are obstructing justice.

 

[Concerned American]

Beware of Fraternity Greeks Bearing Gifts

Ironic, since Ithaca was the home of Ulysses, who thought up the strategy of using a Trojan Horse.

LOL, beware of geeks bearing grifts.

 

[j-mac]

I'm looking forward to one of these progressive shitbirds getting frog marched on national TV.....Pritzger would be a perfect example but they may need three sets of cuffs for that fat fucker...

 

[Marener]

Yeah, you are.

The Department of Homeland Security is federal agency charged enforcing immigration law. That means detaining anyone who comes across illegally, or anyone here illegally who commits a crime. The fact the ICE has arrest powers speaks to that.

By saying states and cities aren't required to cooperate with ICE, you are saying by default that the government has no power to compel cooperation where justified. By not cooperating they are thereby failing to cooperate with the DHS, which is legally allowed to enforce immigration law. When you refuse to cooperate (through action or inaction) with any legally justified action of the DHS, you are obstructing their ability to enforce the law.

In short, you are obstructing justice.

Refusal to cooperate with law enforcement request is not obstruction.

Refusal to comply with lawful orders is obstruction.

ICE detainers are not orders. They are requests.

There is a significant difference.

 

[Marener]

I'm looking forward to one of these progressive shitbirds getting frog marched on national TV.....Pritzger would be a perfect example but they may need three sets of cuffs for that fat fucker...

Try it fascist.

 

[toobfreak]

He should be stripped of his authority and sent to jail. These people are traitors.

Let's hope so. I can't wait until the Fed starts busting the mayor of Chicago for giving out instructions to illegals on how to evade ICE.

 

[j-mac]

Try it fascist.

What cha gona do soi boi....?

 

[otto105]

And completely beyond your little mind to comprehend.

Nope, it’s all over this thread with fuckups like you.