- Thread starter
- #181
Read the thread.Clinton cheated.Sorry, but Republicans can't play this "game" against Bill, then Obama, then Hillary and not expect to have it thrown back at them.first - understand i do agree that hillary's investigations need to end UNLESS something major pops up that puts it beyond a shadow of a doubt. these BREAKING - NOW WE GOT HER are annoying as fuck."What more investigating needs to be done? You mean over two years of it wasn't enough?"What more investigating needs to be done? You mean over two years of it wasn't enough?
If the left wants to play this game, remember it comes at a cost. The Democrats refuse to accept a duly elected President, and are trying to do everything to reverse the vote of the people. How much more un-American can you get?
And at a cost means a Republican led Congress (which will happen some time or another) will do the same thing to the next Democrat President. An in depth investigation took place. No wrongdoing on the part of the real person they were actually investigating. And much like the last presidential election, the Democrats refuse to accept the results.
If the president can swap out Attorney Generals to find one who is going to protect him from litigation, the Congress can certainly open their own investigations to determine if there was wrong doing or not.
But I especially like how you rightards bitch and moan over investigations and how they take too long. Seems you suffer from severe memory loss and must have forgotten how Ken Starr spent almost 6 years investigating Clinton over Whitewater, for which he was exonerated. And you have forgotten how the Republican-led Congress spent 4 years opening 8 separate investigations into Benghazi, for which Obama and Hillary were exonerated.
So when you say shit like, "if the left wants to play this game, remember it comes at a cost," the reality is -- it's the rights' game and the cost is it's now being done to you. So put on your big boy pants, strap yourself in for the ride, and fuck you.
that said - trump was taken to task for a "secret" meeting where he was looking to get dirt on hillary.
hillary:
- was notified the senate committee wanted to see her benghazi mails
- she then had her IT look to change header info while she only turned in 8 e-mails. changing header info? hmmm - you don't do that and the system won't allow it. it's *is* for tracking so not alterable. but nice try.
when that didn't work she changed her retention policy to 60 days.
11 Rules for Using Government Email | GovLoop
wow. read through those requirements First 2:
each of these has a specific retention policy. 90 days and up. what is her own retention policy again? given she had both business and personal e-mail here - a "mass delete" will simply nuke all. how can she be keeping her mail?
- First and foremost, you should avoid using your personal email to conduct official business.
- There are three main types of emails, as far as Federal Records law is concerned: transitory, short-term, and long-term.
oh - archive / backup? well then again, she gets to choose what to keep and lose.
ultimately she destroyed 33k mails (at least she thinks she did) and then her hard drive. this all after a senate committee requested her mail so by her own actions she's still breaking laws in a supposed effort to destroy evidence. if this is not what she is doing then please explain to me the reasoning that makes these actions permissible WHILE CONSIDERING if trump does these things also, it will be ok because of your own reasons.
- blaming a video on the attack
- people involved in the attack who survived came after her hard for her own actions. do we have the same for trump? no.
so while you may think you're getting a revenge from the butthurt - hillary brought the investigation upon herself by her own actions and clearly is out to hide something.
show me trump deleting mail, destroying evidence and the like. firing someone didn't stop mueller from doing his job did it? no. so your comparison is faulty and limited AT BEST.
but again by your own words you don't give a fuck about justice here; just revenge. revenge cause your side got caught and people went after them so now you're out to teach them a lesson all the while what are we collectively doing to our country again?
if this is where we gotta go - let's go. you want revenge - i want our laws followed and people playing games with them to be punished for it. when trump plays games to this level let me know and even then i'll just tell you YOUR SIDE made this ok. trying to say it's because they went after hillary is another bullshit excuse.
Do recall ... after Republicans played this "game" against Clinton for some 6 years, Democrats had the chance for payback with Bush. When Democrats took control in 2007, they opted to not investigate over Bush's decision to invade Iraq over weapons that weren't there, despite pressure from the left to do just that with Obama and Hillary. That should have sent a message to Republicans to not play that "game." Regrettably, they did. So now the right can bitch and moan all they want as the left plays the rights' "game." And why shouldn't they? It helped Republicans win the White House, Senate and House in 2000 and 2016. Seems to be a very effective "game."
On his wife? Of course he did. And?