Two Dead Republican Senators in Two Days ruled as Homicides in AK and OK.

[beautress]

What more investigating needs to be done? You mean over two years of it wasn't enough?

If the left wants to play this game, remember it comes at a cost. The Democrats refuse to accept a duly elected President, and are trying to do everything to reverse the vote of the people. How much more un-American can you get?

And at a cost means a Republican led Congress (which will happen some time or another) will do the same thing to the next Democrat President. An in depth investigation took place. No wrongdoing on the part of the real person they were actually investigating. And much like the last presidential election, the Democrats refuse to accept the results.

"What more investigating needs to be done? You mean over two years of it wasn't enough?"

If the president can swap out Attorney Generals to find one who is going to protect him from litigation, the Congress can certainly open their own investigations to determine if there was wrong doing or not.

But I especially like how you rightards ***** and moan over investigations and how they take too long. Seems you suffer from severe memory loss and must have forgotten how Ken Starr spent almost 6 years investigating Clinton over Whitewater, for which he was exonerated. And you have forgotten how the Republican-led Congress spent 4 years opening 8 separate investigations into Benghazi, for which Obama and Hillary were exonerated.

So when you say shit like, "if the left wants to play this game, remember it comes at a cost," the reality is -- it's the rights' game and the cost is it's now being done to you. So put on your big boy pants, strap yourself in for the ride, and **** you.

first - understand i do agree that hillary's investigations need to end UNLESS something major pops up that puts it beyond a shadow of a doubt. these BREAKING - NOW WE GOT HER are annoying as ****.

that said - trump was taken to task for a "secret" meeting where he was looking to get dirt on hillary.

hillary:
- was notified the senate committee wanted to see her benghazi mails
- she then had her IT look to change header info while she only turned in 8 e-mails. changing header info? hmmm - you don't do that and the system won't allow it. it's *is* for tracking so not alterable. but nice try.
when that didn't work she changed her retention policy to 60 days.

11 Rules for Using Government Email | GovLoop

wow. read through those requirements First 2:

1. First and foremost, you should avoid using your personal email to conduct official business.
2. There are three main types of emails, as far as Federal Records law is concerned: transitory, short-term, and long-term.

each of these has a specific retention policy. 90 days and up. what is her own retention policy again? given she had both business and personal e-mail here - a "mass delete" will simply nuke all. how can she be keeping her mail?

oh - archive / backup? well then again, she gets to choose what to keep and lose.

ultimately she destroyed 33k mails (at least she thinks she did) and then her hard drive. this all after a senate committee requested her mail so by her own actions she's still breaking laws in a supposed effort to destroy evidence. if this is not what she is doing then please explain to me the reasoning that makes these actions permissible WHILE CONSIDERING if trump does these things also, it will be ok because of your own reasons.
- blaming a video on the attack
- people involved in the attack who survived came after her hard for her own actions. do we have the same for trump? no.

so while you may think you're getting a revenge from the butthurt - hillary brought the investigation upon herself by her own actions and clearly is out to hide something.

show me trump deleting mail, destroying evidence and the like. firing someone didn't stop mueller from doing his job did it? no. so your comparison is faulty and limited AT BEST.

but again by your own words you don't give a **** about justice here; just revenge. revenge cause your side got caught and people went after them so now you're out to teach them a lesson all the while what are we collectively doing to our country again?

if this is where we gotta go - let's go. you want revenge - i want our laws followed and people playing games with them to be punished for it. when trump plays games to this level let me know and even then i'll just tell you YOUR SIDE made this ok. trying to say it's because they went after hillary is another bullshit excuse.

Sorry, but Republicans can't play this "game" against Bill, then Obama, then Hillary and not expect to have it thrown back at them.

Do recall ... after Republicans played this "game" against Clinton for some 6 years, Democrats had the chance for payback with Bush. When Democrats took control in 2007, they opted to not investigate over Bush's decision to invade Iraq over weapons that weren't there, despite pressure from the left to do just that with Obama and Hillary. That should have sent a message to Republicans to not play that "game." Regrettably, they did. So now the right can ***** and moan all they want as the left plays the rights' "game." And why shouldn't they? It helped Republicans win the White House, Senate and House in 2000 and 2016. Seems to be a very effective "game."

Clinton cheated.

On his wife? Of course he did. And?

Read the thread.

 

[iceberg]

Yes he was cleared of obstruction, by William Barr, the AG.

Which is a good reason for the Congress to start up their own investigations into the matter.

What more investigating needs to be done? You mean over two years of it wasn't enough?

If the left wants to play this game, remember it comes at a cost. The Democrats refuse to accept a duly elected President, and are trying to do everything to reverse the vote of the people. How much more un-American can you get?

And at a cost means a Republican led Congress (which will happen some time or another) will do the same thing to the next Democrat President. An in depth investigation took place. No wrongdoing on the part of the real person they were actually investigating. And much like the last presidential election, the Democrats refuse to accept the results.

"What more investigating needs to be done? You mean over two years of it wasn't enough?"

If the president can swap out Attorney Generals to find one who is going to protect him from litigation, the Congress can certainly open their own investigations to determine if there was wrong doing or not.

But I especially like how you rightards ***** and moan over investigations and how they take too long. Seems you suffer from severe memory loss and must have forgotten how Ken Starr spent almost 6 years investigating Clinton over Whitewater, for which he was exonerated. And you have forgotten how the Republican-led Congress spent 4 years opening 8 separate investigations into Benghazi, for which Obama and Hillary were exonerated.

So when you say shit like, "if the left wants to play this game, remember it comes at a cost," the reality is -- it's the rights' game and the cost is it's now being done to you. So put on your big boy pants, strap yourself in for the ride, and **** you.

first - understand i do agree that hillary's investigations need to end UNLESS something major pops up that puts it beyond a shadow of a doubt. these BREAKING - NOW WE GOT HER are annoying as ****.

that said - trump was taken to task for a "secret" meeting where he was looking to get dirt on hillary.

hillary:
- was notified the senate committee wanted to see her benghazi mails
- she then had her IT look to change header info while she only turned in 8 e-mails. changing header info? hmmm - you don't do that and the system won't allow it. it's *is* for tracking so not alterable. but nice try.
when that didn't work she changed her retention policy to 60 days.

11 Rules for Using Government Email | GovLoop

wow. read through those requirements First 2:

1. First and foremost, you should avoid using your personal email to conduct official business.
2. There are three main types of emails, as far as Federal Records law is concerned: transitory, short-term, and long-term.

each of these has a specific retention policy. 90 days and up. what is her own retention policy again? given she had both business and personal e-mail here - a "mass delete" will simply nuke all. how can she be keeping her mail?

oh - archive / backup? well then again, she gets to choose what to keep and lose.

ultimately she destroyed 33k mails (at least she thinks she did) and then her hard drive. this all after a senate committee requested her mail so by her own actions she's still breaking laws in a supposed effort to destroy evidence. if this is not what she is doing then please explain to me the reasoning that makes these actions permissible WHILE CONSIDERING if trump does these things also, it will be ok because of your own reasons.
- blaming a video on the attack
- people involved in the attack who survived came after her hard for her own actions. do we have the same for trump? no.

so while you may think you're getting a revenge from the butthurt - hillary brought the investigation upon herself by her own actions and clearly is out to hide something.

show me trump deleting mail, destroying evidence and the like. firing someone didn't stop mueller from doing his job did it? no. so your comparison is faulty and limited AT BEST.

but again by your own words you don't give a **** about justice here; just revenge. revenge cause your side got caught and people went after them so now you're out to teach them a lesson all the while what are we collectively doing to our country again?

if this is where we gotta go - let's go. you want revenge - i want our laws followed and people playing games with them to be punished for it. when trump plays games to this level let me know and even then i'll just tell you YOUR SIDE made this ok. trying to say it's because they went after hillary is another bullshit excuse.

Sorry, but Republicans can't play this "game" against Bill, then Obama, then Hillary and not expect to have it thrown back at them.

Do recall ... after Republicans played this "game" against Clinton for some 6 years, Democrats had the chance for payback with Bush. When Democrats took control in 2007, they opted to not investigate over Bush's decision to invade Iraq over weapons that weren't there, despite pressure from the left to do just that with Obama and Hillary. That should have sent a message to Republicans to not play that "game." Regrettably, they did. So now the right can ***** and moan all they want as the left plays the rights' "game." And why shouldn't they? It helped Republicans win the White House, Senate and House in 2000 and 2016. Seems to be a very effective "game."

what game?

you break the law we come after you somehow equates to "well for that we're going to make shit up and investigate you now - neener neener!"

you're side is the one making this all a "catch me if you can" game for their side.

SHOW ME ANYTHING CLOSE on what trump has done to be this harassed that hillary did and i'm with you. hell, i'll join in. but this "revenge" doesn't mean you get to make shit up and create your own rage. so if you wanna go - let's go.

WHAT EVIDENCE HAS TRUMP DESTROYED THAT IS AS WELL DOCUMENTED AS HILLARY's ISSUES?

and now you're lobbing bush into this? Anything to clutter up the picture huh?

FOCUS DANIELSAN.

this is like being a murderer and getting pissed you got caught and thinking that gives you the right to accuse and do the same to others. like i said - your own words give you away in that you think this is a "game" of tit for tat. only your side so far is committing the crimes and making up shit for the other side.

we'll see what barr continues to find and go from there. your words are simply bullshit so i'm tired of reading them.

 

[Olde Europe]

The OP is wrong. No surprise there. Both killings have not been "ruled as homicides". In the Oklahoma death, suspects are not being sought, and it is most likely a suicide. The Arkansas killing is being investigated as a homicide. The victim was involved in a bitter divorce with her ex-husband, who was forced to give up his role as a Judge due to testimony from the divorce case. That reprimand was finalized this year. It's far more likely to be domestic violence than a conspiracy dreamed by nutbags.

Stopping a mindless conspiracy nitwit in the middle of an extended hyperventilation by polluting the environment with facts and a hint of common sense - don't you know how dangerous that is? Popped arteries at unspeakable places and all? Really...

 

[HappyJoy]

"What more investigating needs to be done? You mean over two years of it wasn't enough?"

If the president can swap out Attorney Generals to find one who is going to protect him from litigation, the Congress can certainly open their own investigations to determine if there was wrong doing or not.

But I especially like how you rightards ***** and moan over investigations and how they take too long. Seems you suffer from severe memory loss and must have forgotten how Ken Starr spent almost 6 years investigating Clinton over Whitewater, for which he was exonerated. And you have forgotten how the Republican-led Congress spent 4 years opening 8 separate investigations into Benghazi, for which Obama and Hillary were exonerated.

So when you say shit like, "if the left wants to play this game, remember it comes at a cost," the reality is -- it's the rights' game and the cost is it's now being done to you. So put on your big boy pants, strap yourself in for the ride, and **** you.

first - understand i do agree that hillary's investigations need to end UNLESS something major pops up that puts it beyond a shadow of a doubt. these BREAKING - NOW WE GOT HER are annoying as ****.

that said - trump was taken to task for a "secret" meeting where he was looking to get dirt on hillary.

hillary:
- was notified the senate committee wanted to see her benghazi mails
- she then had her IT look to change header info while she only turned in 8 e-mails. changing header info? hmmm - you don't do that and the system won't allow it. it's *is* for tracking so not alterable. but nice try.
when that didn't work she changed her retention policy to 60 days.

11 Rules for Using Government Email | GovLoop

wow. read through those requirements First 2:

1. First and foremost, you should avoid using your personal email to conduct official business.
2. There are three main types of emails, as far as Federal Records law is concerned: transitory, short-term, and long-term.

each of these has a specific retention policy. 90 days and up. what is her own retention policy again? given she had both business and personal e-mail here - a "mass delete" will simply nuke all. how can she be keeping her mail?

oh - archive / backup? well then again, she gets to choose what to keep and lose.

ultimately she destroyed 33k mails (at least she thinks she did) and then her hard drive. this all after a senate committee requested her mail so by her own actions she's still breaking laws in a supposed effort to destroy evidence. if this is not what she is doing then please explain to me the reasoning that makes these actions permissible WHILE CONSIDERING if trump does these things also, it will be ok because of your own reasons.
- blaming a video on the attack
- people involved in the attack who survived came after her hard for her own actions. do we have the same for trump? no.

so while you may think you're getting a revenge from the butthurt - hillary brought the investigation upon herself by her own actions and clearly is out to hide something.

show me trump deleting mail, destroying evidence and the like. firing someone didn't stop mueller from doing his job did it? no. so your comparison is faulty and limited AT BEST.

but again by your own words you don't give a **** about justice here; just revenge. revenge cause your side got caught and people went after them so now you're out to teach them a lesson all the while what are we collectively doing to our country again?

if this is where we gotta go - let's go. you want revenge - i want our laws followed and people playing games with them to be punished for it. when trump plays games to this level let me know and even then i'll just tell you YOUR SIDE made this ok. trying to say it's because they went after hillary is another bullshit excuse.

Sorry, but Republicans can't play this "game" against Bill, then Obama, then Hillary and not expect to have it thrown back at them.

Do recall ... after Republicans played this "game" against Clinton for some 6 years, Democrats had the chance for payback with Bush. When Democrats took control in 2007, they opted to not investigate over Bush's decision to invade Iraq over weapons that weren't there, despite pressure from the left to do just that with Obama and Hillary. That should have sent a message to Republicans to not play that "game." Regrettably, they did. So now the right can ***** and moan all they want as the left plays the rights' "game." And why shouldn't they? It helped Republicans win the White House, Senate and House in 2000 and 2016. Seems to be a very effective "game."

Clinton cheated.

On his wife? Of course he did. And?

Read the thread.

Oh, your point is worse than I thought. Ok.

 

[joaquinmiller]

The OP is wrong. No surprise there. Both killings have not been "ruled as homicides". In the Oklahoma death, suspects are not being sought, and it is most likely a suicide. The Arkansas killing is being investigated as a homicide. The victim was involved in a bitter divorce with her ex-husband, who was forced to give up his role as a Judge due to testimony from the divorce case. That reprimand was finalized this year. It's far more likely to be domestic violence than a conspiracy dreamed by nutbags.

I remind you of my opening question: "Is someone targeting Republicans who've served to represent their districts in two different states?" As an American citizen, I have the right to ask questions and to list facts that I find in print, which is precisely what I did.

Perhaps you can show where both have been "ruled as homicides". Then ask the questions you're entitled to ask. Proceeding from a false premise is just so Trumpian.

 

[joaquinmiller]

The OP is wrong. No surprise there. Both killings have not been "ruled as homicides". In the Oklahoma death, suspects are not being sought, and it is most likely a suicide. The Arkansas killing is being investigated as a homicide. The victim was involved in a bitter divorce with her ex-husband, who was forced to give up his role as a Judge due to testimony from the divorce case. That reprimand was finalized this year. It's far more likely to be domestic violence than a conspiracy dreamed by nutbags.

Stopping a mindless conspiracy nitwit in the middle of an extended hyperventilation by polluting the environment with facts and a hint of common sense - don't you know how dangerous that is? Popped arteries at unspeakable places and all? Really...

It's a relief to read what they think and feel - as opposed to the braindead TDS-sufferers telling me what I think and feel. (Which was the death of our old place, as far as I was concerned.)

 

[beautress]

The OP is wrong. No surprise there. Both killings have not been "ruled as homicides". In the Oklahoma death, suspects are not being sought, and it is most likely a suicide. The Arkansas killing is being investigated as a homicide. The victim was involved in a bitter divorce with her ex-husband, who was forced to give up his role as a Judge due to testimony from the divorce case. That reprimand was finalized this year. It's far more likely to be domestic violence than a conspiracy dreamed by nutbags.

I remind you of my opening question: "Is someone targeting Republicans who've served to represent their districts in two different states?" As an American citizen, I have the right to ask questions and to list facts that I find in print, which is precisely what I did.

Perhaps you can show where both have been "ruled as homicides". Then ask the questions you're entitled to ask. Proceeding from a false premise is just so Trumpian.

Already listed my links.

 

[joaquinmiller]

The OP is wrong. No surprise there. Both killings have not been "ruled as homicides". In the Oklahoma death, suspects are not being sought, and it is most likely a suicide. The Arkansas killing is being investigated as a homicide. The victim was involved in a bitter divorce with her ex-husband, who was forced to give up his role as a Judge due to testimony from the divorce case. That reprimand was finalized this year. It's far more likely to be domestic violence than a conspiracy dreamed by nutbags.

I remind you of my opening question: "Is someone targeting Republicans who've served to represent their districts in two different states?" As an American citizen, I have the right to ask questions and to list facts that I find in print, which is precisely what I did.

Perhaps you can show where both have been "ruled as homicides". Then ask the questions you're entitled to ask. Proceeding from a false premise is just so Trumpian.

Already listed my links.

Your link doesn't say both are "ruled as homicides". Do you mean you 'already twisted your links'?

 

[Olde Europe]

It's a relief to read what they think and feel - as opposed to the braindead TDS-sufferers telling me what I think and feel. (Which was the death of our old place, as far as I was concerned.)

Understood. But how do you get over that sinking feeling over the sight of what it is they "think" and feel?

For it appears to me, "Child trafficking -> Arkansas -> Clinton dunnit!", or whatever wildly bouncing dots were connected across this universe we all co-inhabit, should strike despair into even the most stoical of humans.

 

[joaquinmiller]

It's a relief to read what they think and feel - as opposed to the braindead TDS-sufferers telling me what I think and feel. (Which was the death of our old place, as far as I was concerned.)

Understood. But how do you get over that sinking feeling over the sight of what it is they "think" and feel?

For it appears to me, "Child trafficking -> Arkansas -> Clinton dunnit!", or whatever wildly bouncing dots were connected across this universe we all co-inhabit, should strike despair into even the most stoical of humans.

They reflect their message-makers. It's akin to being in the right-wing-echo-chamber, but without the body odor.

 

[whitehall]

It's a stretch to try to turn it into a conspiracy since the woman in Arkansas was a lifelong democrat who turned republican and lost the election. The guy was term limited and no longer affiliated with politics. If you want to connect homicide victims several states apart by apparent political affiliation in state elections go ahead. It will keep you busy for a while.

 

[JustAnotherNut]

IIRC.....there was another death in recent days of a former Senator's ex son in law.

They may or may not be connected, but was strange timing of his death & having political relationship

Do you have an online link or recall where you read about it? Thx.

Sorry, no can do......I had looked before posting that and I looked again now and still can't find anything. I am wondering if the reporter wrote a bogus story & it's been pulled, IDK


But I know I had read a story either on MSNBC or Yahoo, about a prominent death. The article didn't say how they died, but did mention he was the ex son in law of a former politician (may or may not have been Senator). I didn't keep the details in mind cause it wasn't in the area of the other 2 deaths and a Democrat to boot.

I run into the same problem from time to time. Thanks, anyway, J.A.N. I'll see if I can find it. Chances are slim though, because the DNC owns the press, and if they don't support the DNC party line, there are consequences on their boss' P&L line due to withholding of funding.

Yes, I've had more than a few hot stories suddenly disappear.

 

[beautress]

The OP is wrong. No surprise there. Both killings have not been "ruled as homicides". In the Oklahoma death, suspects are not being sought, and it is most likely a suicide. The Arkansas killing is being investigated as a homicide. The victim was involved in a bitter divorce with her ex-husband, who was forced to give up his role as a Judge due to testimony from the divorce case. That reprimand was finalized this year. It's far more likely to be domestic violence than a conspiracy dreamed by nutbags.

I remind you of my opening question: "Is someone targeting Republicans who've served to represent their districts in two different states?" As an American citizen, I have the right to ask questions and to list facts that I find in print, which is precisely what I did.

Perhaps you can show where both have been "ruled as homicides". Then ask the questions you're entitled to ask. Proceeding from a false premise is just so Trumpian.

Already listed my links.

Your link doesn't say both are "ruled as homicides". Do you mean you 'already twisted your links'?

No.

 

[bodecea]

Motive?

Motive?

Really?

Yes, really. Motive? Show us how deep into the rabbit hole you've gone.

Same as James Hodgkinson.

Which is? Tell us.

 

[bodecea]

Nobody framed POTUS, please stop spreading this rediculous bullshit.

And while you are at it stop jumping to DEMOCRATS-DID-IT conclusions to these shootings before the facts are out.

You tell that one to Tom Fitton and Judicial Watch, Mister Lawyer.

I'm telling it to you idiot.

There was a due process by the FBI and Trump was CLEARED on the charges of criminal conspiracy.

He was not cleared on Obstruction of Justice but THATS ON HIM and his corrupt ways, nobody "framed him" into breaking the law.

Yes he was cleared of obstruction, by William Barr, the AG.

Which is a good reason for the Congress to start up their own investigations into the matter.

They're going to do nothing but start a war, and they're not going to win it.

Who is "they"?

 

[JustAnotherNut]

The OP is wrong. No surprise there. Both killings have not been "ruled as homicides". In the Oklahoma death, suspects are not being sought, and it is most likely a suicide. The Arkansas killing is being investigated as a homicide. The victim was involved in a bitter divorce with her ex-husband, who was forced to give up his role as a Judge due to testimony from the divorce case. That reprimand was finalized this year. It's far more likely to be domestic violence than a conspiracy dreamed by nutbags.

Liar...…..get your Senators and your stories straight...…..both are investigated as homicide

Norman police investigating death of former state lawmaker

Jonathan Nichols’ body was found in his Norman home, and a gun was on a table across the room, law enforcement sources told The Oklahoman.

Jonathan Nichols, the OK Senator, was shot to death and the gun was on a table across the room...…….Even with long arms how in the hell does that happen??? Oh yeah, like 2 gunshots to the back of the head kinda suicide


And Collins-Smith (Arkansas) may or may not be from her ex-husband. It hasn't been determined yet..........but shooting her & wrapping her in a blanket seems very sloppy for a judge

 

[bodecea]

Just how far will the lunacy go?

Until the new FBI or Secret Service issues indictments to Clinton, Blumenthal, comprised FBI leaders past, and other Democrat criminals or hired hit men involved in treasonous criminal conspiracy to remove President Trump or other Republican based on calumny the Democrats manufactured illegally and with ignoring their oaths of US office if they hold them. Using elected office to solicit the removal of a President is treason. To incite citizens to murder members of the executive branch falls under high crimes and misdemeanors. Since incitement is a verbal act, the best gag order is solitary confinement, no visitors.

America is good and sick of Democrat evil against Republicans.

No that's not treason. You really need to quit believe what Trump tells yo to believe. What you are talking about did not happen.

It not only is treason, sir. It is extremist treason. I have never spoken with Donald Trump in my life. And I believe you are judgmental with malice aforethought when you are speaking to those who do not believe your lies and do not tolerate the calumny you helped perpetrate against a President I support, and to my happiness, he's been proved to be a good man who takes his oath of office seriously and brushes off defeat from a party that is notorious for shooting itself in the foot with not a lick of grace.

What is "extremist treason"?

 

[bodecea]

I'm telling it to you idiot.

There was a due process by the FBI and Trump was CLEARED on the charges of criminal conspiracy.

He was not cleared on Obstruction of Justice but THATS ON HIM and his corrupt ways, nobody "framed him" into breaking the law.

Yes he was cleared of obstruction, by William Barr, the AG.

Which is a good reason for the Congress to start up their own investigations into the matter.

They're going to do nothing but start a war, and they're not going to win it.

LOLOLOL

You're crazy.

Congress doing their job is not about to start a war.

Congress is a sick poop.

Congress is the First mentioned in the Constitution and one third of our federal government. Their power is equal to the Executive Branch and have Constitutionally established checks and balances to keep the Executive Branch under control. CRCs want donnie to be a dictator.

 

[iceberg]

The OP is wrong. No surprise there. Both killings have not been "ruled as homicides". In the Oklahoma death, suspects are not being sought, and it is most likely a suicide. The Arkansas killing is being investigated as a homicide. The victim was involved in a bitter divorce with her ex-husband, who was forced to give up his role as a Judge due to testimony from the divorce case. That reprimand was finalized this year. It's far more likely to be domestic violence than a conspiracy dreamed by nutbags.

Liar...…..get your Senators and your stories straight...…..both are investigated as homicide

Norman police investigating death of former state lawmaker

Jonathan Nichols’ body was found in his Norman home, and a gun was on a table across the room, law enforcement sources told The Oklahoman.

Jonathan Nichols, the OK Senator, was shot to death and the gun was on a table across the room...…….Even with long arms how in the hell does that happen??? Oh yeah, like 2 gunshots to the back of the head kinda suicide


And Collins-Smith (Arkansas) may or may not be from her ex-husband. It hasn't been determined yet..........but shooting her & wrapping her in a blanket seems very sloppy for a judge

i don't find a single article saying it's being investigated as a homicide. while i agree the gun across the room is highly suspect, no determination has been made as of yet that i have read in a story.

 

[bodecea]

The OP is wrong. No surprise there. Both killings have not been "ruled as homicides". In the Oklahoma death, suspects are not being sought, and it is most likely a suicide. The Arkansas killing is being investigated as a homicide. The victim was involved in a bitter divorce with her ex-husband, who was forced to give up his role as a Judge due to testimony from the divorce case. That reprimand was finalized this year. It's far more likely to be domestic violence than a conspiracy dreamed by nutbags.

I was wondering when someone else would bring up that when a woman is killed, the most likely suspect (for good reason) their male significant other.