Twitter Okays Death Threats but Bans Jordan Peterson

[Deplorable Yankee]

Jul 02 2022

Twitter Okays Death Threats but Bans Jordan Peterson​

Jordan Peterson has been banned from Twitter for refusing to delete the following:

Remember when Pride was a sin? And Ellen Page just had her breasts removed by a criminal physician.

The reference is to a mentally ill actress who had herself surgically mutilated by a scoundrel in the delusional belief this would transform her into a man.

Why was this tweet such a serious thought crime that Twitter would rather further discredit itself by banning a major intellectual figure than let it stand? Why would Peterson rather die than delete it? Read his explanation here or watch him explain below:



Meanwhile, as intellectual giants are banned for observing that women are not men, Twitter has no problem with calls to assassinate a Supreme Court justice for doing his job by defending the Constitution from politicization:

Shortly after Roe v. Wade was overturned, a Twitter user with the handle @redfrnn, who has since deleted his or her or xis account, tweeted: “i’m going to assassinate supreme court justice Clarence Thomas.” The same Twitter user had just before that tweeted a photo of a gun, saying: “im considering buying a mac mini.” Twitter, however, did not find this murderous psychopath to be in violation of their rules, despite the fact that those rules say, “You may not threaten violence against an individual or a group of people.”

Thomas is a conservative, so he doesn’t count as a person from the viewpoint of the radical leftists running Twitter. Neither does Donald Trump:

On New Year’s Day 2022, Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, tweeted, “Martyr Soleimani is an eternal reality that will live on forever. His assassins – including Trump & the like – will go down in history’s garbage bin, but of course after receiving retribution in this world for the crime they committed.” That “retribution in this world” bit was a clear threat, but Twitter did nothing to restrict Khamenei’s account.

Qasem Soleimani was a top terrorist taken out on Trump’s orders.

Nor did Twitter do anything to the account of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps when it tweeted nine days later, “The Islamic Republic of Iran considers vengeance against those responsible for the Baghdad crime to be the right of all believers; whether they are drops in the ocean or bits of sand in the desert they’ll seek vengeance next to the criminals’ homes.”

This was a call to all Muslims worldwide to assassinate a former US President — whom Twitter had permanently banned on a bogus charge of encouraging violence.

Imagine a ballgame where the referees are avid fans of one team, vehemently hate the other team, and don’t even pretend to be fair. That’s the situation we are in with liberals controlling the information infrastructure.


All links highlighted

100 shekels seez sometime in the not so distant future she regrets it and during de transition apologizes to Peterson

 

[Moonglow]

Elon Musk must not have Twitter humming like a Tesla, yet.

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

Elon Musk must not have Twitter humming like a Tesla, yet.

It would be on fire

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Well Twitter is Left Wing garbage, and the Twitter CEO is a racist.
People should stop using Twitter.

Twitter CEO Parag Agrawal accused of racism over tweet asking …​

New Twitter CEO accused of racism over past controversial tweet

NEW Twitter CEO Parag Agrawal has been accused of racism over a tweet asking, “why should I distinguish between white people and racists?” For context, the tweet, from 2010, was apparen…

www.thesun.co.uk

NEW Twitter CEO Parag Agrawal has been accused of racism over a tweet asking, "why should I distinguish between white people and racists?" For context, the tweet, from 2010, was …

 

[Baron Von Murderpaws]

How does this man get "pride" out of a "sex change"???

Elon must have not gotten into changing Twitter rules yet. Of course, he will have to fight the board members to get rules changed. So that will take some time. I don't think that Elon has been fully authorized and accepted as owner yet though. Last I heard the board was pushing back on "cashing the check", so no money has changed hands yet.....that I know of.

Although I pretty much agree with this guy, he doesn't understand a lot of nuances involved in this kind of thing.
To him, it's just somebody mutilating their body for the sake of it.

And even with that, he was only expressing his OPINION. He wasn't harassing anyone and wasn't threatening anyone. He wasn't even making fun or ridiculing anyone. He just made a personal opinion statement regarding what this Page person did. Isn't that what they "social" in Social Media is? Personal opinions?