Twitter locks official Trump campaign account over sharing Hunter Biden video

[iceberg]

Who is surprised? Jack and his lackeys are hedging on the Dems winning and them gaining immense power and expansion within the U.S. They would lose millions of Trump supporters, but, there would be benefits for them for their loyalty.

The question is. If China succeeds in their objectives, wile Jack be spared for his high social credit score, or will he be lined up with the others?

Twitter locks official Trump campaign account over sharing Hunter Biden video

Twitter suspended the official account of the Trump campaign on Thursday, saying Team Trump’s tweet calling Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden a “liar” and posting a video about Hunter Biden’s business dealings is a violation of its policy.

The action comes just 19 days before Election Day.

“Your account has been locked,” the standard Twitter message read. “What happened? We have determined that this account violated the Twitter Rules. Specifically, for: Violating our rules against posting private information.”

They are a private company are they not? They can do whatever they want. Who cares?

Twitter doesn't make dog collars. As you certainly know it is the largest social media platform in the world. They wield tremendous power to influence public opinion and they are using that power selectively to help Biden win.

I don’t know how many different ways I can say it. They are a private company, they can control and present and do whatever they want with in the bounds of the law. If they broke the law then state the law and I’ll look. Otherwise be a good conservative and fight for the federal government to regulate them

personally I don’t give a shit if they want to filter out political disinformation during elections. We get enough of that crap as it is

Especially when Twitter selectively decides what is and is not "political disinformation", right? As a good Conservative, I want companies in control of information to stay out of politics.

Yes Twitter decides what they want and don’t want on their platform, it’s their platform, they decide what is fake and not, what’s appropriate and not, it’s THEIR PLATFORM.

That isn't platform, that's publisher. You mix to confuse or you are a dumbass.

Maybe all the above.

 

[justoffal]

Who is surprised? Jack and his lackeys are hedging on the Dems winning and them gaining immense power and expansion within the U.S. They would lose millions of Trump supporters, but, there would be benefits for them for their loyalty.

The question is. If China succeeds in their objectives, wile Jack be spared for his high social credit score, or will he be lined up with the others?

Twitter locks official Trump campaign account over sharing Hunter Biden video

Twitter suspended the official account of the Trump campaign on Thursday, saying Team Trump’s tweet calling Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden a “liar” and posting a video about Hunter Biden’s business dealings is a violation of its policy.

The action comes just 19 days before Election Day.

“Your account has been locked,” the standard Twitter message read. “What happened? We have determined that this account violated the Twitter Rules. Specifically, for: Violating our rules against posting private information.”

They are a private company are they not? They can do whatever they want. Who cares?

Private company yes but all business must operate within a framework of rules and regulations and l think it high time to yank the chains on Facebook, Twitter and the like.

Parler Free Speech Social Network

Parler is an unbiased social media focused on real user experiences and engagement. Free expression without violence and no censorship. Parler never shares your personal data.

share.par.pw

 

[ThisIsMe]

Who is surprised? Jack and his lackeys are hedging on the Dems winning and them gaining immense power and expansion within the U.S. They would lose millions of Trump supporters, but, there would be benefits for them for their loyalty.

The question is. If China succeeds in their objectives, wile Jack be spared for his high social credit score, or will he be lined up with the others?

Twitter locks official Trump campaign account over sharing Hunter Biden video

Twitter suspended the official account of the Trump campaign on Thursday, saying Team Trump’s tweet calling Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden a “liar” and posting a video about Hunter Biden’s business dealings is a violation of its policy.

The action comes just 19 days before Election Day.

“Your account has been locked,” the standard Twitter message read. “What happened? We have determined that this account violated the Twitter Rules. Specifically, for: Violating our rules against posting private information.”

They are a private company are they not? They can do whatever they want. Who cares?

They won't be for long, one way or another it will change. If not in the U.S, than certainly worldwide.

I suppose you are in the camp that believed Jack will get a pass due to his high social credit score.

A pass for what? Running his business how he wants? Is Hannity going to go to congress for censoring out all the negative Trump news stories on his show? No, he gets to run his show and cover the stories that he wants To cover, right?

I agree with you 100%. Twitter, as a private business, should be allowed to censor, restrict, ban, and remove any content they do not want in their platform.

First thing, though, since they are going to actively decide what content they are going to allow and not allow, they need to be labeled a publisher, and all legal protections they have regarding what their users post needs to be removed. In other words, social media platforms who censor specific content are now responsible for what their users post, and can be held liable.

In regards to this current situation, I agree with twitter if personal information, such as names and phone numbers, are displayed, that needs to be removed. However, as to the overall context of your post, that a private business should be able to do as they please, i agree, and my above postings would apply.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Who is surprised? Jack and his lackeys are hedging on the Dems winning and them gaining immense power and expansion within the U.S. They would lose millions of Trump supporters, but, there would be benefits for them for their loyalty.

The question is. If China succeeds in their objectives, wile Jack be spared for his high social credit score, or will he be lined up with the others?

Twitter locks official Trump campaign account over sharing Hunter Biden video

Twitter suspended the official account of the Trump campaign on Thursday, saying Team Trump’s tweet calling Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden a “liar” and posting a video about Hunter Biden’s business dealings is a violation of its policy.

The action comes just 19 days before Election Day.

“Your account has been locked,” the standard Twitter message read. “What happened? We have determined that this account violated the Twitter Rules. Specifically, for: Violating our rules against posting private information.”

They are a private company are they not? They can do whatever they want. Who cares?

Private company yes but all business must operate within a framework of rules and regulations and l think it high time to yank the chains on Facebook, Twitter and the like.

Should Rush get regulated by gov for not covering negative stories about Trump or should he get to run his show they way he wants to run it?

The difference is, Rush is regulated. He is considered a publisher and is responsible for the content of his show. If he says something, or allows someone else to say something slanderous or defamatory, on his show, rush can be held liable, and even sued for that.

I'm all for Twitter, or any social media, having those same freedoms, as long as they are held to the same legal standard.

 

[Slade3200]

Who is surprised? Jack and his lackeys are hedging on the Dems winning and them gaining immense power and expansion within the U.S. They would lose millions of Trump supporters, but, there would be benefits for them for their loyalty.

The question is. If China succeeds in their objectives, wile Jack be spared for his high social credit score, or will he be lined up with the others?

Twitter locks official Trump campaign account over sharing Hunter Biden video

Twitter suspended the official account of the Trump campaign on Thursday, saying Team Trump’s tweet calling Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden a “liar” and posting a video about Hunter Biden’s business dealings is a violation of its policy.

The action comes just 19 days before Election Day.

“Your account has been locked,” the standard Twitter message read. “What happened? We have determined that this account violated the Twitter Rules. Specifically, for: Violating our rules against posting private information.”

They are a private company are they not? They can do whatever they want. Who cares?

They won't be for long, one way or another it will change. If not in the U.S, than certainly worldwide.

I suppose you are in the camp that believed Jack will get a pass due to his high social credit score.

A pass for what? Running his business how he wants? Is Hannity going to go to congress for censoring out all the negative Trump news stories on his show? No, he gets to run his show and cover the stories that he wants To cover, right?

I agree with you 100%. Twitter, as a private business, should be allowed to censor, restrict, ban, and remove any content they do not want in their platform.

First thing, though, since they are going to actively decide what content they are going to allow and not allow, they need to be labeled a publisher, and all legal protections they have regarding what their users post needs to be removed. In other words, social media platforms who censor specific content are now responsible for what their users post, and can be held liable.

In regards to this current situation, I agree with twitter if personal information, such as names and phone numbers, are displayed, that needs to be removed. However, as to the overall context of your post, that a private business should be able to do as they please, i agree, and my above postings would apply.

Good post. I agree

 

[Slade3200]

Who is surprised? Jack and his lackeys are hedging on the Dems winning and them gaining immense power and expansion within the U.S. They would lose millions of Trump supporters, but, there would be benefits for them for their loyalty.

The question is. If China succeeds in their objectives, wile Jack be spared for his high social credit score, or will he be lined up with the others?

Twitter locks official Trump campaign account over sharing Hunter Biden video

Twitter suspended the official account of the Trump campaign on Thursday, saying Team Trump’s tweet calling Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden a “liar” and posting a video about Hunter Biden’s business dealings is a violation of its policy.

The action comes just 19 days before Election Day.

“Your account has been locked,” the standard Twitter message read. “What happened? We have determined that this account violated the Twitter Rules. Specifically, for: Violating our rules against posting private information.”

They are a private company are they not? They can do whatever they want. Who cares?

Private company yes but all business must operate within a framework of rules and regulations and l think it high time to yank the chains on Facebook, Twitter and the like.

Should Rush get regulated by gov for not covering negative stories about Trump or should he get to run his show they way he wants to run it?

The difference is, Rush is regulated. He is considered a publisher and is responsible for the content of his show. If he says something, or allows someone else to say something slanderous or defamatory, on his show, rush can be held liable, and even sued for that.

I'm all for Twitter, or any social media, having those same freedoms, as long as they are held to the same legal standard.

So let’s say a business is not a publisher, they are a platform that enables social interactions... they still have a responsibility to moderate, right? For example they can make rules against posting lewd, offensive, violent, provocative, pornographic and the like... and they do have the ability and obligation to moderate their platform appropriately, right? So what’s fines the boundaries around a publisher and a platform with content guidelines.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

I'm REALLY excited to see Twitter and Facebook totally block Republicans.
I'm 100% for it.

Hopefully they will 100% block every Trump ad and every Republican ad.
I'm hoping YouTube does the same.

You see....it takes such a complete annihilation for Republicans to wake up
Conservatives will allow their children to die, their churches to burn, their country enslaved.......
Who cares ?
I've been warning my conservative friends about leftists Social media for YEARS.
But then later, they keep telling me of their new exploits, and to go check them out on Facebook.

Easy now...I side with Conservatives, I vote with Conservatives BUT they are the most nutless, spinless, big mouth pieces of shit that ever were. Come on man...they didn’t have the balls to keep heterosexual white Christians cool in a nation founded, built, run and funded by heterosexual white Christians. The Left has owned their sackless asses for decades....Sad but true.

I Want YouTube, Twitter and Facebook to totally block ALL Republicans (and they might)
It's the right thing to do.

In other "conservatives do nothing news"

Did you hear? Another white child was brutally murdered by a savage.
Kimonie Bryant pleads not guilty in death of Rowan Sweeney

 

[Michelle420]

Who is surprised? Jack and his lackeys are hedging on the Dems winning and them gaining immense power and expansion within the U.S. They would lose millions of Trump supporters, but, there would be benefits for them for their loyalty.

The question is. If China succeeds in their objectives, will little Jack be spared for his high social credit score, or will he be lined up with the others?

Twitter locks official Trump campaign account over sharing Hunter Biden video

Twitter suspended the official account of the Trump campaign on Thursday, saying Team Trump’s tweet calling Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden a “liar” and posting a video about Hunter Biden’s business dealings is a violation of its policy.

The action comes just 19 days before Election Day.

“Your account has been locked,” the standard Twitter message read. “What happened? We have determined that this account violated the Twitter Rules. Specifically, for: Violating our rules against posting private information.”

Well republicans need to make a different alternative to twitter and grow your base that way.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

Who is surprised? Jack and his lackeys are hedging on the Dems winning and them gaining immense power and expansion within the U.S. They would lose millions of Trump supporters, but, there would be benefits for them for their loyalty.

The question is. If China succeeds in their objectives, will little Jack be spared for his high social credit score, or will he be lined up with the others?

Twitter locks official Trump campaign account over sharing Hunter Biden video

Twitter suspended the official account of the Trump campaign on Thursday, saying Team Trump’s tweet calling Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden a “liar” and posting a video about Hunter Biden’s business dealings is a violation of its policy.

The action comes just 19 days before Election Day.

“Your account has been locked,” the standard Twitter message read. “What happened? We have determined that this account violated the Twitter Rules. Specifically, for: Violating our rules against posting private information.”

Well republicans need to make a different alternative to twitter and grow your base that way.

Are you CRAZY ?!?!!?

Isn't it MUCH better to stay loyal to platforms that OBVIOUSLY disagree with you and censor you?

I mean, that is EXACTLY what the conservative Right has done ???

 

[ThisIsMe]

Who is surprised? Jack and his lackeys are hedging on the Dems winning and them gaining immense power and expansion within the U.S. They would lose millions of Trump supporters, but, there would be benefits for them for their loyalty.

The question is. If China succeeds in their objectives, wile Jack be spared for his high social credit score, or will he be lined up with the others?

Twitter locks official Trump campaign account over sharing Hunter Biden video

Twitter suspended the official account of the Trump campaign on Thursday, saying Team Trump’s tweet calling Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden a “liar” and posting a video about Hunter Biden’s business dealings is a violation of its policy.

The action comes just 19 days before Election Day.

“Your account has been locked,” the standard Twitter message read. “What happened? We have determined that this account violated the Twitter Rules. Specifically, for: Violating our rules against posting private information.”

They are a private company are they not? They can do whatever they want. Who cares?

Private company yes but all business must operate within a framework of rules and regulations and l think it high time to yank the chains on Facebook, Twitter and the like.

Should Rush get regulated by gov for not covering negative stories about Trump or should he get to run his show they way he wants to run it?

The difference is, Rush is regulated. He is considered a publisher and is responsible for the content of his show. If he says something, or allows someone else to say something slanderous or defamatory, on his show, rush can be held liable, and even sued for that.

I'm all for Twitter, or any social media, having those same freedoms, as long as they are held to the same legal standard.

So let’s say a business is not a publisher, they are a platform that enables social interactions... they still have a responsibility to moderate, right? For example they can make rules against posting lewd, offensive, violent, provocative, pornographic and the like... and they do have the ability and obligation to moderate their platform appropriately, right? So what’s fines the boundaries around a publisher and a platform with content guidelines.

Well, yes, but with reservation. When the content is obviously and blatantly harmful, yes, and when it displays personally identifiable information. On its face, that would be correct. However, with some of that, you can get into the weeds a little. For example, who decides what is offensive and violent? One side wants to label the other as a hate group. We see that all the time these days.

Just because its politically in opposition to what you believe doesn't mean its hateful. Therein lies the minutiae. Twitter, being obviously left biased, is going to be much more critical of anything that a right wing person posts, and will often restrict content, just because they don't like it, even if the content is not actually bad, its just in opposition.

Its at this point when that social media platform has to make a choice. Do they want to allow their users to be able to freely post content and express their ideas, and be able to enjoy the protection that they cannot be held liable for what those users post, or do they want to give up that protection, and now have to comb through all of the posts that millions of users make on a daily basis to make sure there is nothing there that can get them in trouble?

As long as those social media outlets allow the fair and unhindered free flow of political ideas, even those you don't agree with, as long as those posts are not actually harmful, then that is a good thing.

 

[Michelle420]

Who is surprised? Jack and his lackeys are hedging on the Dems winning and them gaining immense power and expansion within the U.S. They would lose millions of Trump supporters, but, there would be benefits for them for their loyalty.

The question is. If China succeeds in their objectives, will little Jack be spared for his high social credit score, or will he be lined up with the others?

Twitter locks official Trump campaign account over sharing Hunter Biden video

Twitter suspended the official account of the Trump campaign on Thursday, saying Team Trump’s tweet calling Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden a “liar” and posting a video about Hunter Biden’s business dealings is a violation of its policy.

The action comes just 19 days before Election Day.

“Your account has been locked,” the standard Twitter message read. “What happened? We have determined that this account violated the Twitter Rules. Specifically, for: Violating our rules against posting private information.”

Well republicans need to make a different alternative to twitter and grow your base that way.

Are you CRAZY ?!?!!?

Isn't it MUCH better to stay loyal to platforms that OBVIOUSLY disagree with you and censor you?

I mean, that is EXACTLY what the conservative Right has done ???

No that is not better. The republicans need alternative social media options for facebook, twitter etc.

 

[Slade3200]

Who is surprised? Jack and his lackeys are hedging on the Dems winning and them gaining immense power and expansion within the U.S. They would lose millions of Trump supporters, but, there would be benefits for them for their loyalty.

The question is. If China succeeds in their objectives, wile Jack be spared for his high social credit score, or will he be lined up with the others?

Twitter locks official Trump campaign account over sharing Hunter Biden video

Twitter suspended the official account of the Trump campaign on Thursday, saying Team Trump’s tweet calling Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden a “liar” and posting a video about Hunter Biden’s business dealings is a violation of its policy.

The action comes just 19 days before Election Day.

“Your account has been locked,” the standard Twitter message read. “What happened? We have determined that this account violated the Twitter Rules. Specifically, for: Violating our rules against posting private information.”

They are a private company are they not? They can do whatever they want. Who cares?

Private company yes but all business must operate within a framework of rules and regulations and l think it high time to yank the chains on Facebook, Twitter and the like.

Should Rush get regulated by gov for not covering negative stories about Trump or should he get to run his show they way he wants to run it?

The difference is, Rush is regulated. He is considered a publisher and is responsible for the content of his show. If he says something, or allows someone else to say something slanderous or defamatory, on his show, rush can be held liable, and even sued for that.

I'm all for Twitter, or any social media, having those same freedoms, as long as they are held to the same legal standard.

So let’s say a business is not a publisher, they are a platform that enables social interactions... they still have a responsibility to moderate, right? For example they can make rules against posting lewd, offensive, violent, provocative, pornographic and the like... and they do have the ability and obligation to moderate their platform appropriately, right? So what’s fines the boundaries around a publisher and a platform with content guidelines.

Well, yes, but with reservation. When the content is obviously and blatantly harmful, yes, and when it displays personally identifiable information. On its face, that would be correct. However, with some of that, you can get into the weeds a little. For example, who decides what is offensive and violent? One side wants to label the other as a hate group. We see that all the time these days.

Just because its politically in opposition to what you believe doesn't mean its hateful. Therein lies the minutiae. Twitter, being obviously left biased, is going to be much more critical of anything that a right wing person posts, and will often restrict content, just because they don't like it, even if the content is not actually bad, its just in opposition.

Its at this point when that social media platform has to make a choice. Do they want to allow their users to be able to freely post content and express their ideas, and be able to enjoy the protection that they cannot be held liable for what those users post, or do they want to give up that protection, and now have to comb through all of the posts that millions of users make on a daily basis to make sure there is nothing there that can get them in trouble?

As long as those social media outlets allow the fair and unhindered free flow of political ideas, even those you don't agree with, as long as those posts are not actually harmful, then that is a good thing.

Well let’s drill down on that a bit. Where are the conditions defined that a Platform has the right to moderate harmful content? And where is “harmful” defined? What you say makes sense but we are talking law here so these things must be written and defined... Right?

 

[lantern2814]

Who is surprised? Jack and his lackeys are hedging on the Dems winning and them gaining immense power and expansion within the U.S. They would lose millions of Trump supporters, but, there would be benefits for them for their loyalty.

The question is. If China succeeds in their objectives, wile Jack be spared for his high social credit score, or will he be lined up with the others?

Twitter locks official Trump campaign account over sharing Hunter Biden video

Twitter suspended the official account of the Trump campaign on Thursday, saying Team Trump’s tweet calling Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden a “liar” and posting a video about Hunter Biden’s business dealings is a violation of its policy.

The action comes just 19 days before Election Day.

“Your account has been locked,” the standard Twitter message read. “What happened? We have determined that this account violated the Twitter Rules. Specifically, for: Violating our rules against posting private information.”

They are a private company are they not? They can do whatever they want. Who cares?

They won't be for long, one way or another it will change. If not in the U.S, than certainly worldwide.

I suppose you are in the camp that believed Jack will get a pass due to his high social credit score.

A pass for what? Running his business how he wants? Is Hannity going to go to congress for censoring out all the negative Trump news stories on his show? No, he gets to run his show and cover the stories that he wants To cover, right?

SO Trump's private tax returns are ok to put out there when they are obtained ILLEGALLY but Biden's evidence of corruption, obtained LEGALLY, is not....

Fuck you!

Put whatever you want out there about Biden, I never said you can’t. The smear tactic is transparent and the lies obvious but knock yourself out if it makes you feel better

Smears and lies? Yeah fuck you boing boing boy. The Post listed how they got their information and Twatter and Fakebook are lying to try to save Hiding Biden. Love showing your ignorance don’t you?

Yes I read how they got their information. From a blind shop owner with shifting store about Hunter Biden dropping off his computer and leaving it there, then he tried to give it to the FBI who saw nothing there so he gave it to Rudy Giuliani who sat on it until he could give it to the post for an October surprise political smear. Super reliable!!!! So amateur, are you really taking this thing seriously?!?!

You truly are a stupid fuck. Not ONE person has questioned the authenticity of the emails. Not one. STFU boing boing boy. You’re a total joke. Of course you walk around with your head up your ass so you can avoid the truth at all costs.

 

[Michelle420]

Who is surprised? Jack and his lackeys are hedging on the Dems winning and them gaining immense power and expansion within the U.S. They would lose millions of Trump supporters, but, there would be benefits for them for their loyalty.

The question is. If China succeeds in their objectives, wile Jack be spared for his high social credit score, or will he be lined up with the others?

Twitter locks official Trump campaign account over sharing Hunter Biden video

Twitter suspended the official account of the Trump campaign on Thursday, saying Team Trump’s tweet calling Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden a “liar” and posting a video about Hunter Biden’s business dealings is a violation of its policy.

The action comes just 19 days before Election Day.

“Your account has been locked,” the standard Twitter message read. “What happened? We have determined that this account violated the Twitter Rules. Specifically, for: Violating our rules against posting private information.”

They are a private company are they not? They can do whatever they want. Who cares?

Private company yes but all business must operate within a framework of rules and regulations and l think it high time to yank the chains on Facebook, Twitter and the like.

Should Rush get regulated by gov for not covering negative stories about Trump or should he get to run his show they way he wants to run it?

The difference is, Rush is regulated. He is considered a publisher and is responsible for the content of his show. If he says something, or allows someone else to say something slanderous or defamatory, on his show, rush can be held liable, and even sued for that.

I'm all for Twitter, or any social media, having those same freedoms, as long as they are held to the same legal standard.

So let’s say a business is not a publisher, they are a platform that enables social interactions... they still have a responsibility to moderate, right? For example they can make rules against posting lewd, offensive, violent, provocative, pornographic and the like... and they do have the ability and obligation to moderate their platform appropriately, right? So what’s fines the boundaries around a publisher and a platform with content guidelines.

Well, yes, but with reservation. When the content is obviously and blatantly harmful, yes, and when it displays personally identifiable information. On its face, that would be correct. However, with some of that, you can get into the weeds a little. For example, who decides what is offensive and violent? One side wants to label the other as a hate group. We see that all the time these days.

Just because its politically in opposition to what you believe doesn't mean its hateful. Therein lies the minutiae. Twitter, being obviously left biased, is going to be much more critical of anything that a right wing person posts, and will often restrict content, just because they don't like it, even if the content is not actually bad, its just in opposition.

Its at this point when that social media platform has to make a choice. Do they want to allow their users to be able to freely post content and express their ideas, and be able to enjoy the protection that they cannot be held liable for what those users post, or do they want to give up that protection, and now have to comb through all of the posts that millions of users make on a daily basis to make sure there is nothing there that can get them in trouble?

As long as those social media outlets allow the fair and unhindered free flow of political ideas, even those you don't agree with, as long as those posts are not actually harmful, then that is a good thing.

Well let’s drill down on that a bit. Where are the conditions defined that a Platform has the right to moderate harmful content? And where is “harmful” defined? What you say makes sense but we are talking law here so these things must be written and defined... Right?

Why do corporations want biden to win so bad?

 

[beautress]

Don't like it, don't use it.
Problem solved.

Don't like the Amy Barrett confirmation?

Stop watching.

Problem solved.

I don't have a problem with her confirmation. I question why they even had hearings in the first place.
Your post and you IRL have a lot in common. Both are failures.

They had hearings so American citizens could understand why good character in the judicial is one of many keys as to why America needs to have persons of great judicial fairness with a complete understanding of the law. I learned a lot this week about the amazing human being that Amy Coney Barrett became in her life's quest to be an impartial spokesperson to the laws that the United States Congress passes. If she hasn't already been confirmed, I hope she will be within the week. This would make anyone seeking to damage America with wrongful votes would think twice and decline such mischief that would liquidate the Constitution, the Laws acceptable to the American people, and to reconcile the parties to be on each others' side not only in wzr, but also in peace.

 

[candycorn]

Who is surprised? Jack and his lackeys are hedging on the Dems winning and them gaining immense power and expansion within the U.S. They would lose millions of Trump supporters, but, there would be benefits for them for their loyalty.

The question is. If China succeeds in their objectives, wile Jack be spared for his high social credit score, or will he be lined up with the others?

Twitter locks official Trump campaign account over sharing Hunter Biden video

Twitter suspended the official account of the Trump campaign on Thursday, saying Team Trump’s tweet calling Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden a “liar” and posting a video about Hunter Biden’s business dealings is a violation of its policy.

The action comes just 19 days before Election Day.

“Your account has been locked,” the standard Twitter message read. “What happened? We have determined that this account violated the Twitter Rules. Specifically, for: Violating our rules against posting private information.”

They are a private company are they not? They can do whatever they want. Who cares?

Private company yes but all business must operate within a framework of rules and regulations and l think it high time to yank the chains on Facebook, Twitter and the like.

Should Rush get regulated by gov for not covering negative stories about Trump or should he get to run his show they way he wants to run it?

The difference is, Rush is regulated. He is considered a publisher and is responsible for the content of his show. If he says something, or allows someone else to say something slanderous or defamatory, on his show, rush can be held liable, and even sued for that.

I'm all for Twitter, or any social media, having those same freedoms, as long as they are held to the same legal standard.

So let’s say a business is not a publisher, they are a platform that enables social interactions... they still have a responsibility to moderate, right? For example they can make rules against posting lewd, offensive, violent, provocative, pornographic and the like... and they do have the ability and obligation to moderate their platform appropriately, right? So what’s fines the boundaries around a publisher and a platform with content guidelines.

Well, yes, but with reservation. When the content is obviously and blatantly harmful, yes, and when it displays personally identifiable information. On its face, that would be correct. However, with some of that, you can get into the weeds a little. For example, who decides what is offensive and violent? One side wants to label the other as a hate group. We see that all the time these days.

Just because its politically in opposition to what you believe doesn't mean its hateful. Therein lies the minutiae. Twitter, being obviously left biased, is going to be much more critical of anything that a right wing person posts, and will often restrict content, just because they don't like it, even if the content is not actually bad, its just in opposition.

Its at this point when that social media platform has to make a choice. Do they want to allow their users to be able to freely post content and express their ideas, and be able to enjoy the protection that they cannot be held liable for what those users post, or do they want to give up that protection, and now have to comb through all of the posts that millions of users make on a daily basis to make sure there is nothing there that can get them in trouble?

As long as those social media outlets allow the fair and unhindered free flow of political ideas, even those you don't agree with, as long as those posts are not actually harmful, then that is a good thing.

Well let’s drill down on that a bit. Where are the conditions defined that a Platform has the right to moderate harmful content? And where is “harmful” defined? What you say makes sense but we are talking law here so these things must be written and defined... Right?

Why do corporations want biden to win so bad?

Under Obama the DJIA climbed 149%. Stability will do that.

 

[Leo123]

Go to Parler.com, opposite of Twitter for some perspective.

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

They're playing chicken with the wrong guy

 

[ThisIsMe]

Who is surprised? Jack and his lackeys are hedging on the Dems winning and them gaining immense power and expansion within the U.S. They would lose millions of Trump supporters, but, there would be benefits for them for their loyalty.

The question is. If China succeeds in their objectives, wile Jack be spared for his high social credit score, or will he be lined up with the others?

Twitter locks official Trump campaign account over sharing Hunter Biden video

Twitter suspended the official account of the Trump campaign on Thursday, saying Team Trump’s tweet calling Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden a “liar” and posting a video about Hunter Biden’s business dealings is a violation of its policy.

The action comes just 19 days before Election Day.

“Your account has been locked,” the standard Twitter message read. “What happened? We have determined that this account violated the Twitter Rules. Specifically, for: Violating our rules against posting private information.”

They are a private company are they not? They can do whatever they want. Who cares?

Private company yes but all business must operate within a framework of rules and regulations and l think it high time to yank the chains on Facebook, Twitter and the like.

Should Rush get regulated by gov for not covering negative stories about Trump or should he get to run his show they way he wants to run it?

The difference is, Rush is regulated. He is considered a publisher and is responsible for the content of his show. If he says something, or allows someone else to say something slanderous or defamatory, on his show, rush can be held liable, and even sued for that.

I'm all for Twitter, or any social media, having those same freedoms, as long as they are held to the same legal standard.

So let’s say a business is not a publisher, they are a platform that enables social interactions... they still have a responsibility to moderate, right? For example they can make rules against posting lewd, offensive, violent, provocative, pornographic and the like... and they do have the ability and obligation to moderate their platform appropriately, right? So what’s fines the boundaries around a publisher and a platform with content guidelines.

Well, yes, but with reservation. When the content is obviously and blatantly harmful, yes, and when it displays personally identifiable information. On its face, that would be correct. However, with some of that, you can get into the weeds a little. For example, who decides what is offensive and violent? One side wants to label the other as a hate group. We see that all the time these days.

Just because its politically in opposition to what you believe doesn't mean its hateful. Therein lies the minutiae. Twitter, being obviously left biased, is going to be much more critical of anything that a right wing person posts, and will often restrict content, just because they don't like it, even if the content is not actually bad, its just in opposition.

Its at this point when that social media platform has to make a choice. Do they want to allow their users to be able to freely post content and express their ideas, and be able to enjoy the protection that they cannot be held liable for what those users post, or do they want to give up that protection, and now have to comb through all of the posts that millions of users make on a daily basis to make sure there is nothing there that can get them in trouble?

As long as those social media outlets allow the fair and unhindered free flow of political ideas, even those you don't agree with, as long as those posts are not actually harmful, then that is a good thing.

Well let’s drill down on that a bit. Where are the conditions defined that a Platform has the right to moderate harmful content? And where is “harmful” defined? What you say makes sense but we are talking law here so these things must be written and defined... Right?

Well, now we are getting into defining "what is hate speech". Well, unfortunately, that definition changes based on what political spectrum you align to. Now, that doesn't mean its an accurate definition. There is true hate speech, and then there are varying politically correct opinions of hate speech.

Just because someone disagrees doesn't mean they are hating. If I say "I dont like YOU because you do x,y, and z" is not the same as "I dont like the fact that you do x,y, and z". See what I mean? One is a difference of opinion, the other could be considered hate speech.

We can disagree, vigorously, about abortion, doesnt mean i hate you because you support abortion.

Its not so much about "law" as it is about Twitter (or any other platform) using their own definition to censor content, which, as ive said before, they are completely free to do, but if they are going to moderate their content, and only allow free expression from one side, then they can't enjoy protections as a platform, if they are going to function as a publisher.

I apologize if I'm not explaining well enough, got a plate of fajitas in front of me so my attention is divided

 

[Slade3200]

Who is surprised? Jack and his lackeys are hedging on the Dems winning and them gaining immense power and expansion within the U.S. They would lose millions of Trump supporters, but, there would be benefits for them for their loyalty.

The question is. If China succeeds in their objectives, wile Jack be spared for his high social credit score, or will he be lined up with the others?

Twitter locks official Trump campaign account over sharing Hunter Biden video

Twitter suspended the official account of the Trump campaign on Thursday, saying Team Trump’s tweet calling Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden a “liar” and posting a video about Hunter Biden’s business dealings is a violation of its policy.

The action comes just 19 days before Election Day.

“Your account has been locked,” the standard Twitter message read. “What happened? We have determined that this account violated the Twitter Rules. Specifically, for: Violating our rules against posting private information.”

They are a private company are they not? They can do whatever they want. Who cares?

Private company yes but all business must operate within a framework of rules and regulations and l think it high time to yank the chains on Facebook, Twitter and the like.

Should Rush get regulated by gov for not covering negative stories about Trump or should he get to run his show they way he wants to run it?

The difference is, Rush is regulated. He is considered a publisher and is responsible for the content of his show. If he says something, or allows someone else to say something slanderous or defamatory, on his show, rush can be held liable, and even sued for that.

I'm all for Twitter, or any social media, having those same freedoms, as long as they are held to the same legal standard.

So let’s say a business is not a publisher, they are a platform that enables social interactions... they still have a responsibility to moderate, right? For example they can make rules against posting lewd, offensive, violent, provocative, pornographic and the like... and they do have the ability and obligation to moderate their platform appropriately, right? So what’s fines the boundaries around a publisher and a platform with content guidelines.

Well, yes, but with reservation. When the content is obviously and blatantly harmful, yes, and when it displays personally identifiable information. On its face, that would be correct. However, with some of that, you can get into the weeds a little. For example, who decides what is offensive and violent? One side wants to label the other as a hate group. We see that all the time these days.

Just because its politically in opposition to what you believe doesn't mean its hateful. Therein lies the minutiae. Twitter, being obviously left biased, is going to be much more critical of anything that a right wing person posts, and will often restrict content, just because they don't like it, even if the content is not actually bad, its just in opposition.

Its at this point when that social media platform has to make a choice. Do they want to allow their users to be able to freely post content and express their ideas, and be able to enjoy the protection that they cannot be held liable for what those users post, or do they want to give up that protection, and now have to comb through all of the posts that millions of users make on a daily basis to make sure there is nothing there that can get them in trouble?

As long as those social media outlets allow the fair and unhindered free flow of political ideas, even those you don't agree with, as long as those posts are not actually harmful, then that is a good thing.

Well let’s drill down on that a bit. Where are the conditions defined that a Platform has the right to moderate harmful content? And where is “harmful” defined? What you say makes sense but we are talking law here so these things must be written and defined... Right?

Why do corporations want biden to win so bad?

Which corporations are you talking about?