Turns out that even the skeptics agree, the earth is warming abnormally

[Vast LWC]

And, by the same token:

There is certainly no proof that some large-scale "conspiracy" is in place trying to "shut down industry" with some vague goal of "Socialism".

The only thing there is evidence of, in this regard, is a bunch of people who have been convinced by the existing evidence, and are trying to take action.

They may in fact be wrong, (though I think the probabilities are with them) but there is no evidence that they are doing anything maliciously.

 

[daveman]

It also seems that they failed to teach you that correlation doesn't equal causation (post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy) or the definitive and physically verifiable proof that CO2 concentrations follow ambient temperature increases, rather than being a precursor.

They don't do that kind of stuff in the Doctorate of Womyn's Studies program.

 

[thereisnospoon]

As I said...

Thus far no conclusive proof that Global Warming is not real.

A number of attempts without foundation or links for that matter.

Politicians are among the most uninformed paid for by special interest contributions therefore misleading the nation.

Thus far ,there is no conclusive proof that man made global warming exists.

 

[bripat9643]

It also seems that they failed to teach you that correlation doesn't equal causation (post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy) or the definitive and physically verifiable proof that CO2 concentrations follow ambient temperature increases, rather than being a precursor.

So you're saying there is no causal link between emitting CO2 into the atmosphere and CO2 being in the atmosphere.
Do I hear you right?

No, you didn't get it, dipstick. There's no causal link between CO2 emissions and global temperatures.

Jesus Christ you can't be that ******* stupid. If I took a dump in your bedroom you'd maintain there is no causal link between the bad smell in the air and the steaming pile of shit on the floor.

How did they measure CO2 emissions in the year 1000?

 

[Mr.Nick]

Anyone hear of climategate??

It's funny how some people still listen to the liars...

Yeah, alleged "experts" on the subject only got caught red-handed manipulated data -- not once but twice...

That alone speaks volumes about the AGW lie..

Of course the climate changes, however there is ZERO evidence to support AGW...

Besides, solar activity is one of the biggest factors of "climate change." As a matter of fact we're currently experiencing a solar storm as I type this...

If you're from northern states or from Canada you should be able to see the Aurora Borealis (Northern Lights) tonight...

 

[paulitician]

Global Warming is a Socialist/Communist Globalist scam. Looks who's behind all the fear mongering. Nuff said.

Obviously.

The old "Socialist/Communist/Globalist" scam.

Better alert the Illuminati that you guys are onto them!

Well, you would say that. Because you're a fellow Socialist/Communist Globalist. But you're all full of shite. And now more & more people are figuring that out. Time is almost up for your scam. You better really enjoy that 15 Minutes. Because it's almost up.

 

[bripat9643]

Thus far no conclusive proof that Global Warming is not real.

There's no proof that bigfoot doesn't exist, doofus. In science, no one needs to prove a theory isn't true. It's proponents are required to prove it is true. Otherwise it's scientifically irrelevant.

Claims such as yours are made only by scientific ignoramuses.

 

[bripat9643]

All the leading figures of the global warming cult are involved in the Climategate scandal, not just a few non-entities. These are the people who decide what gets into the IPCC reports every four years.

Your argument is a colossal fail

WOW, tens of thousands of people, including every major figure that believes Global Warming exists were sending e-mails in the "Climategate scandal"?

That's amazing!

Too bad it also happens to be a lie.

I said "ALL THE LEADING FIGURES." That doesn't come to "tens of thousands of people.

It's pathetic how weak and just plain stupid the arguments offered up by the AWG cult are.

 

[Oddball]

Thus far no conclusive proof that Global Warming is not real.

Thus far, no conclusive proof that God is not real.

Better get your ass to church...If you're wrong, you'll burn in Hell.

 

[Vast LWC]

Well, you would say that. Because you're a fellow Socialist/Communist Globalist. But you're all full of shite. And now more & more people are figuring that out. Time is almost up for your scam. You better really enjoy that 15 Minutes. Because it's almost up.

Yup, you got me. I'm one of the Illuminati.

Better watch out, I'm going to have to alert the higher-ups that you're onto us.

Nutjob.

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

It also seems that they failed to teach you that correlation doesn't equal causation (post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy) or the definitive and physically verifiable proof that CO2 concentrations follow ambient temperature increases, rather than being a precursor.

So you're saying there is no causal link between emitting CO2 into the atmosphere and CO2 being in the atmosphere.
Do I hear you right?

No, you didn't get it, dipstick. There's no causal link between CO2 emissions and global temperatures.

Jesus Christ you can't be that ******* stupid. If I took a dump in your bedroom you'd maintain there is no causal link between the bad smell in the air and the steaming pile of shit on the floor.

How did they measure CO2 emissions in the year 1000?

I posted the graph above, and you responded with "Correlation does not equal causation" It was surely reasonable for me to think you were referring to the above graph.

Do you then agree that it is evident man has caused the recent upward trend in atmospheric Co2?


Human Co2 emissions in 1000? Sorry, I didn't realize people were burning massive amounts of fossil fuels back then. There doesn't seem to be a record of that in history.


Do you ever intend to tell us how it is the recent global warming caused man to burn more fossil fuels?

 

[Vast LWC]

I said "ALL THE LEADING FIGURES." That doesn't come to "tens of thousands of people.

It's pathetic how weak and just plain stupid the arguments offered up by the AWG cult are.

There are hundreds of thousands of prominent scientists around the world that fully support the theory that Global Warming is man-made.

So, are you accusing them all of being in on the conspiracy, or are you saying the world scientific community are just stupid?

And of course, you are the genius that's figured it all out, and you can save the world's scientists from being duped by explaining to them how they're wrong.

So, tell me, what's your degree in?

Now, I fully admit that I believe all the data isn't in to make the man-made theory 100% credible, but I don't think that the world scientific community are all in on some kind of conspiracy, because that would be patently ridiculous.

And I certainly don't claim to be better informed than they are on the subject in question.

 

[paulitician]

Well, you would say that. Because you're a fellow Socialist/Communist Globalist. But you're all full of shite. And now more & more people are figuring that out. Time is almost up for your scam. You better really enjoy that 15 Minutes. Because it's almost up.

Yup, you got me. I'm one of the Illuminati.

Better watch out, I'm going to have to alert the higher-ups that you're onto us.

Nutjob.

Didn't say that Dummy. I said you are a fellow Socialist/Communist Globalist. And I stand by that assessment of you 100%.

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

Anyone hear of climategate??

It's funny how some people still listen to the liars...

Yeah, alleged "experts" on the subject only got caught red-handed manipulated data -- not once but twice...

That alone speaks volumes about the AGW lie..

Of course the climate changes, however there is ZERO evidence to support AGW...

Besides, solar activity is one of the biggest factors of "climate change." As a matter of fact we're currently experiencing a solar storm as I type this...

If you're from northern states or from Canada you should be able to see the Aurora Borealis (Northern Lights) tonight...

Lots of people - some with very nice websites - have said climategate is very damning. They even have the content of the emails on their websites.

Al Gore Hockey Sticks!

 

[thereisnospoon]

I said "ALL THE LEADING FIGURES." That doesn't come to "tens of thousands of people.

It's pathetic how weak and just plain stupid the arguments offered up by the AWG cult are.

There are hundreds of thousands of prominent scientists around the world that fully support the theory that Global Warming is man-made.

So, are you accusing them all of being in on the conspiracy, or are you saying the world scientific community are just stupid?

And of course, you are the genius that's figured it all out, and you can save the world's scientists from being duped by explaining to them how they're wrong.

So, tell me, what's your degree in?

Now, I fully admit that I believe all the data isn't in to make the man-made theory 100% credible, but I don't think that the world scientific community are all in on some kind of conspiracy, because that would be patently ridiculous.

And I certainly don't claim to be better informed than they are on the subject in question.

You post these things yet you have not offered a single fact or link or a shred of evidence.
Earlier ,I asked you what your solution to the problem might be. Dozens of posts later, you have not bothered to answer.
Until you show some balls and come up with something positive, you are simply crying foul and that's about it.
Now, let's remember no proof has been offered indicating the rise in the Earth's average temperature in the last 100 years is man caused.

 

[bripat9643]

I posted the graph above, and you responded with "Correlation does not equal causation" It was surely reasonable for me to think you were referring to the above graph.

Do you then agree that it is evident man has caused the recent upward trend in atmospheric Co2?


Human Co2 emissions in 1000? Sorry, I didn't realize people were burning massive amounts of fossil fuels back then. There doesn't seem to be a record of that in history.


Do you ever intend to tell us how it is the recent global warming caused man to burn more fossil fuels?

Actually, I don't think I'm the one who said "correlation is not causation." However, the statement was in the context of your claim that the increase in C02 corresponds with an increase in global temperatures. It didn't refer to your graphs.

Humans are not the only emitters of C02. So, again, how did anyone measure CO2 emissions in the year 1000?

 

[bripat9643]

Didn't say that Dummy. I said you are a fellow Socialist/Communist Globalist. And I stand by that assessment of you 100%.

He's more of a useful idiot with the emphasis on "idiot."

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

I posted the graph above, and you responded with "Correlation does not equal causation" It was surely reasonable for me to think you were referring to the above graph.

Do you then agree that it is evident man has caused the recent upward trend in atmospheric Co2?


Human Co2 emissions in 1000? Sorry, I didn't realize people were burning massive amounts of fossil fuels back then. There doesn't seem to be a record of that in history.


Do you ever intend to tell us how it is the recent global warming caused man to burn more fossil fuels?

Actually, I don't think I'm the one who said "correlation is not causation." However, the statement was in the context of your claim that the increase in C02 corresponds with an increase in global temperatures. It didn't refer to your graphs.

Humans are not the only emitters of C02.

Is it evident from the posted graph that the cause of the recent upward trend in Co2 is due to man's emissions of Co2?

So, again, how did anyone measure CO2 emissions in the year 1000?

That's like asking how people measured how far airplanes flew in 1000. People didn't burn fossil fuels in 1000 except in extremely limited quantities primarily for warmth. Please stop being a total moron.

 

[paulitician]

Didn't say that Dummy. I said you are a fellow Socialist/Communist Globalist. And I stand by that assessment of you 100%.

He's more of a useful idiot with the emphasis on "idiot."

Oh i know. He or she is a Socialist/Communist Globalist. So i expect them to defend the Global Warming scam with all their might. What else is a fellow Socialist/Communst Globalist gonna do? After all, it is they who are pushing the whole scam. Just take a close look at who is doing all the fear mongering on this. And i'm positive you will quickly see that they're all hardcore Socialist Globalists. And that is not just a coincidence.

 

[bripat9643]

Is it evident from the posted graph that the cause of the recent upward trend in Co2 is due to man's emissions of Co2?

As I have tried to point out, your top graph is a work of fiction. No one knows what CO2 emissions were in the year 1000. Someone just made up the numbers.

So, again, how did anyone measure CO2 emissions in the year 1000?

That's like asking how people measured how far airplanes flew in 1000. People didn't burn fossil fuels in 1000 except in extremely limited quantities primarily for warmth. Please stop being a total moron.

Again, how did they measure total CO2 emissions in the year 1000?