Tulsi Gabbard as Director of National Intelligence Terrifies the Establishment

1srelluc

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2021
Messages
54,983
Reaction score
80,506
Points
3,488
Location
Shenandoah Valley of Virginia


Well, if you look at as a sports trade we got a first round pick for Liz Cheney. ;)

There are a number of neo-cons and swamp republicans, the terms republican and democrat don't mean much.

Question is are they a constitutionalist per the original writing and intent. We need government to return to the
basics in the original intent of the Constitution.
 
I don't see nothing terrifying....

Tulsi1.webp


Tulsi2.webp
 
YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND, SHE'S NOT TOUGH ON OUR ENEMIES. NOT KICKING OFF A NEW WAR EVERY FEW YEARS SENDS A SIGNAL TO DICTATORS EVERYWHERE THAT WE'RE WEAK! IF YOU DON'T SUPPORT NEO-CON CAMPAIGNS TO BOMB BROWN PEOPLE THEN SOVIET TROOPS WILL BE ON THE WHITE HOUSE LAWN TOMORROW! DON'T THINK. JUST APPROVE THE LATEST DEFENSE BUDGET.
 
Every single nomination from Trump terrifies the left.

Be concerned if they agree with any of them.

The corrupt ones cry the loudest….for example SCHIFF ABOUT GAETZ.

Exactly. The more hate and fear we see from the left, the more it's clear we're on the right track.
 


Well, if you look at as a sports trade we got a first round pick for Liz Cheney. ;)

There are a number of neo-cons and swamp republicans, the terms republican and democrat don't mean much.

Question is are they a constitutionalist per the original writing and intent. We need government to return to the
basics in the original intent of the Constitution.

How long has the DOJ, the FBI, and the CIA, etc., been leftist terrorist organizations? They should be terrified. The game is over for them.
 
Every single nomination from Trump terrifies the left.

Be concerned if they agree with any of them.

The corrupt ones cry the loudest….for example SCHIFF ABOUT GAETZ.
Well, I'm not sanguine about Gaetz, either. Honestly, he won't get past the Senate.

I have a theory though. He nominated Gaetz to give him more time to find a solid candidate for AG. Remember what his first AG did to him? I think he wants to be well-researched into the real candidate.
 
Lookers scare 80% of the Dem “males”
 
Tulsi Gabbard as Director of National Intelligence Terrifies the Establishment

No, it doesn't.

The election is over. Your usefulness has run its course and she'll do precisely what the establishment tells her to do.







Surprise!
 
Last edited:
No, it doesn't.

The election is over. Your usefulness has run its course and she'll do precisely what the establishment tells her to do.







Surprised.


I've long noted a support for Gabbard but this saddens me. She helped expose the Democrats war mongering and she really needs to stick with exposing the unconstitutional spying on both sides even if it means she isn't confirmed.
 
I've long noted a support for Gabbard but this saddens me. She helped expose the Democrats war mongering and she really needs to stick with exposing the unconstitutional spying on both sides even if it means she isn't confirmed.
Our (former) allies will certainly be reticent to provide certain types of information.

Any American intelligence personnel who have survived the blind loyalty vetting process will be, as well.

America alone, here we go.

:popcorn:
 
Back
Top Bottom