Tulsi fired all 100+ sex chatters...

[WEATHER53]

Russia may have hired Tulsi if Dotard hadn't.

Even before Gabbard left the Democratic Party, ingratiated herself with Donald Trump and secured his nomination to become director of National Intelligence, she was known as a prolific peddler of Russian propaganda.

In almost every foreign conflict in which Russia had a hand, Gabbard backed Moscow and railed against the US. Her past promotion of Kremlin propaganda has provoked significant opposition on both sides of the aisle to her nomination.

Tulsi Gabbard’s history with Russia is even more concerning than you think

One expert says her views are ‘so wildly fringe that her potential appointment as DNI is genuinely alarming’, Richard Hall and Andrew Feinberg write

www.independent.co.uk

Russians Russians
The never ending fairy tale comic book

 

[otto105]

And please the nation

Most Americans - yourself excluded - dont want sex change freaks involved in transgender chatrooms when they should be working

Again, provide an example of what was being discussed. You think that you know, right sycophant.

 

[WEATHER53]

And please the nation

Most Americans - yourself excluded - dont want sex change freaks involved in transgender chatrooms when they should be working

Subject to blackmail incredibly high and unacceptable in an incredibly high secured agency

 

[Mac-7]

What does firing those people have to do with enhancing our national security? The latter being her job. Not sucking up to Dotard.

I asked you first

Libs always try to avoid answering a question by changing the subject

 

[Nostra]

Again, provide an example of what was being discussed. You think that you know, right sycophant.

Why should he have to provide n example?

 

[WEATHER53]

Again, provide an example of what was being discussed. You think that you know, right sycophant.

Likely not released by an agency such as that . Deflection defeated

 

[WEATHER53]

Why should he have to provide n example?

For misdirection and thread thwarting purposes.

 

[M14 Shooter]

I asked you first

Libs always try to avoid answering a question by changing the subject

This is why God invented he ignore button.

 

[Mac-7]

Again, provide an example of what was being discussed. You think that you know, right sycophant.

Its not necessary that I read what the perverts were saying

If you want to know then file a Freedom of Information request

 

[otto105]

Why should he have to provide n example?

Because he doesn't have any examples. He just has the work of a sycophant.

 

[otto105]

Its not necessary that I read what the perverts were saying

If you want to know then file a Freedom of Information request

All that you are doing is sycophanting.

 

[Nostra]

Because he doesn't have any examples. He just has the work of a sycophant.

How do you know?

 

[Mac-7]

Because he doesn't have any examples. He just has the work of a sycophant.

Since when do I have to convince you of anything?

Your approval is not necessary to fire the fruity 100

 

[otto105]

How do you know?

Has he posted an example yet.

simpy

 

[Billiejeens]

She said the chats were an “egregious violation of trust” that violated “basic rules and standards” of workplace professionalism.

Sure she wasn't describing her traitorous comments about Syria and Russia?

More than sure

 

[Billiejeens]

Even before Gabbard left the Democratic Party, ingratiated herself with Donald Trump and secured his nomination to become director of National Intelligence, she was known as a prolific peddler of Russian propaganda.

She wasn't known as that, by anyone.

 

[Nostra]

Has he posted an example yet.

simpy

So, you are so stupid that you think nothing exists unless it is posted here?

You need to get out more, Simp.

 

[Mac-7]

Has he posted an example yet.

simpy

You are nobody

Providing an example to you is not necessary

 

[BluesLegend]

Freaks and depraved Dem weirdos have fallen out of favor.

 

[otto105]

Since when do I have to convince you of anything?

Your approval is not necessary to fire the fruity 100

You're asserting and posting just based on a statement from a deep state loyalist for a grifter without any evidence.