gipper
Diamond Member
- Jan 8, 2011
- 73,146
- 39,715
- 2,605
Jimmy Dore had good take on this as well. With Tucker gone there is literally no anti-war voice on any major network
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Jimmy Dore had good take on this as well. With Tucker gone there is literally no anti-war voice on any major network
Opinions on Twitter are about as sensibly relevant as
hand-picked boogers from homeless dregs in most any
Big Liberal City.And I'm being charitous.
Meaning caring or Master of their own destiny.
Like Biden and Co.
Except he didn't lie. He exposed the truth about Jan 6. And the truth is Nancy Pelosi got her Reichstag moment and Biden was installed like a toilet under barb wire and military guards. That's authoritarianism for you moronWell, this thread is about Carlson being fired, and the likely cause: lying to his audience, and being exposed as someone who expressed completely different views in private than he did on Fox’s airways.
Not as much as your parentsPutin is disappointed
Cry harder!If not for Tucker you would have Seen ...
NuT Tings.That is how Fair and Balanced Nancy Pelosi'
January 6th Stasi Hearings presented evidence.
Except he didn't lie. He exposed the truth about Jan 6. And the truth is Nancy Pelosi got her Reichstag moment and Biden was installed like a toilet under barb wire and military guards. That's authoritarianism for you moron
I think it was a simple business decision. Tucker cost a lot of $$. They just settled a nearly billion $$ lawsuit, and their stock took a hit as a result. Simple solution -- get rid of your largest cost.Jimmy Dore had good take on this as well. With Tucker gone there is literally no anti-war voice on any major network
Not as much as your parents
Oh wow you mean corrupt judges side with big corporations and remove their biggest threat on the air a few days later?The evidence developed in this civil proceeding demonstrates that is CRYSTAL clear that none ofthe Statements relating to Dominion about the 2020 election are true. Therefore , the Court will grant summary judgment in favor of Dominion on the element of falsity
Yeah, I'm gonna go with the court's ruling in granting summary judgment on falsity AGAINST Fox, over some random soul on the internet that the insists they know better.
And how's that stock looking nowI think it was a simple business decision. Tucker cost a lot of $$. They just settled a nearly billion $$ lawsuit, and their stock took a hit as a result. Simple solution -- get rid of your largest cost.
All authoritarians are DemocratsExcept, I can't think of a single example of an authoritarian Democrat.
Oh wow you mean corrupt judges side with big corporations and remove their biggest threat on the air a few days later?
Thinking is hard for you isn't it skippy
I'm not even going to bother trying to persuade you to see reason you're completely blind to it and too retarded to understandSo its a conspiracy, tinfoil?
And you still haven't explained why I would ignore the court and their summary judgment on falsity.....and instead believe you?
It's a start. Budweiser stock dropped 4-5 dollars and it cost them 6 billion. I know I know economics is hard for youOh no. A dollar.
I'm not even going to bother trying to persuade you to see reason you're completely blind to it and too retarded to understand
View attachment 779391
You
Ok have fun with thatYeah, I couldn't think of a single reason to ignore the court and believe your bullshit either.
So we have the court's summary judgment of falsity one one hand......you saying 'uh-uh' on the other, citing yourself.
There are 787,500,000 reasons that demonstrate my source is WAY better than yours.