Lesh
Diamond Member
- Dec 21, 2016
- 82,399
- 41,251
- 2,615
That assumes they were evenly distributed across space and time. They weren’t.You realize that equates to between 8-10 every minute for four hours?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That assumes they were evenly distributed across space and time. They weren’t.You realize that equates to between 8-10 every minute for four hours?
censorship is a red flag that you have been caught, that you are wrong and that you are lying
View attachment 764095
There was a surge when the doors were opened, then it thinned out, hence the Shaman wandering around in relatively empty halls.That assumes they were evenly distributed across space and time. They weren’t.
Obviously you are a loyal Democrat sheeple. That’s fine. I am a conservative Libertarian.Everythiing
Trump was and is utterly incompetent. Every problem he addressed he made worse.
Joe Biden will never face prosecution because no one prosecutes rumours and lies. It’s why the Clintons never faced prosecution. Republicans made accusations on no evidence and now they’re doing the same thing with the Bidens.
25+ investigations of the Clintons couldn’t even find a crime they committed. Every investigation was based on Fox lies, and Republican rumors.
Republicans get prosecuted because other Republicans turn them in for committing crimes. Republicans ratted out Donald Trump on his perfect phone call to the Ukraine. Every witness against him at the first impeachment trial was a Republican. Ditto the second impeachment trial, and the January 6 committee hearings.
The people ”going after”, Donald Trump throught his administration, were all Republicans that he hired to work him.
I’ve come to the conclusion that Republicans think that Democrats are just as dishonest as they are. They have to be, because Republicans keep accusing Democrats are doing the things that Republicans are being arrested and sent to jail for.
My favourite quote from Fox in the latest round of filings was the senior executive who emailed a coworker that the only evidence of election fraud that FOX had seen had been the Trump administration’s attempt to overturn the election.
The courts are pretty good at sussing out truth and lies and this is why Republican lies are never prosecuted. Democrats wait until an actual crime has been committed and then investigate.
Donald Trump made the specious claim that his campaign was spied on by the Obama administration and then spent six years trying to prove it. When Dungam found nothing, he filed weak charges that were tossed by the juries in less time than it takes to order coffee.
Trump really screwed up Biden's border.Trump was and is utterly incompetent. Every problem he addressed he made worse.
Odd then how there so many MAGArats in the well of the Senate while he was there thenThere was a surge when the doors were opened, then it thinned out, hence the Shaman wandering around in relatively empty halls.
Odd how Durham came up so appallingly empty then huh?Obviously you are a loyal Democrat sheeple. That’s fine. I am a conservative Libertarian.
I’ll just address one claim in your post.
![]()
Rep. Jordan: Durham filing shows Trump was right about being spied on
Rep. Jim Jordan noted Special Counsel John Durham alleged that Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign paid an Internet company to “infiltrate” servers at Trump Tower and t…nypost.com
![]()
Pavlich: It was always spying
As President Trump often said, he was spied on and the Clinton campaign was guilty of the act. The question now is, who will be held accountable for this egregious assault on democracy?thehill.com
![]()
Opinion | Trump Really Was Spied On
Durham says techies linked to the Clinton campaign had access to White House and Trump Tower internet data.www.wsj.com
I am not a court, not a prosecuting attorney, not an FBI agent, not even a court stenographer. Nor am I an investigative reporter.Repeat: Prove it.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Look, mon ami, YOU claimed it. YOU asserted it. YOU alleged it.
So, YOU....prove it.
That is the way real-world responsible adult discourse occurs in real reality away from conspiracy nutters, MAGA-nutters, and FOX talking heads.
You allege it.
You prove it.
Or, don't allege it.
Duh!
And?Odd then how there so many MAGArats in the well of the Senate while he was there then
You think so?Odd how Durham came up so appallingly empty then huh?
"Influence peddling" is not illegalI am not a court, not a prosecuting attorney, not an FBI agent, not even a court stenographer. Nor am I an investigative reporter.
I am a simply a poster who links to articles often from the conservative media to demonstrate my views.
You apparently can’t even do that.
![]()
User Clip: Hard evidence that Joe Biden was involved in Influence peddling
Hard evidence that Joe Biden was involved in Influence peddling and is in fact "The Big Guy"www.c-span.org
So to you the Bidens getting millions of dollars from the Chinese government is just perfectly fine. In your opinion is influence peddling ethical? Do you want a President who sells his influence all over the world?"Influence peddling" is not illegal
Prove it in a court of law, and then we nail them.So to you the Bidens getting millions of dollars from the Chinese government is just perfectly fine. In your opinion is influence peddling ethical? Do you want a President who sells his influence all over the world?
Now I have often posted the the Bidens will never be charged with anything as they are Democrats. If the Trumps were involved in similar schemes where you got paid millions to handle affairs you have absolutely no expertise in, you can bet some legal expert would find some way to prosecute the Trumps.
![]()
CNN’s Burnett admits that evidence of Chinese funneling money to Biden family ‘doesn’t look good’
CNN anchor Erin Burnett claimed that evidence showing Chinese money possibly going to members of the Biden family "doesn't look good" to the regular American.www.foxnews.com
But perhaps Hunter Biden could end up in prison. Of course, if convicted while Joe was in office, Joe would pardon him.
![]()
Exclusive | Hunter Biden almost certainly broke foreign lobbying laws: experts
While Hunter Biden was registered as a lobbyist for domestic interests, he failed to registered under the Federal Agents Registration Act.nypost.com
He didn’t come up empty.Odd how Durham came up so appallingly empty then huh?
So do you think Ivanka would have gotten all those Chinese trademarks if she had a different daddy?So to you the Bidens getting millions of dollars from the Chinese government is just perfectly fine. In your opinion is influence peddling ethical? Do you want a President who sells his influence all over the world?
Now I have often posted the the Bidens will never be charged with anything as they are Democrats. If the Trumps were involved in similar schemes where you got paid millions to handle affairs you have absolutely no expertise in, you can bet some legal expert would find some way to prosecute the Trumps.
![]()
CNN’s Burnett admits that evidence of Chinese funneling money to Biden family ‘doesn’t look good’
CNN anchor Erin Burnett claimed that evidence showing Chinese money possibly going to members of the Biden family "doesn't look good" to the regular American.www.foxnews.com
But perhaps Hunter Biden could end up in prison. Of course, if convicted while Joe was in office, Joe would pardon him.
![]()
Exclusive | Hunter Biden almost certainly broke foreign lobbying laws: experts
While Hunter Biden was registered as a lobbyist for domestic interests, he failed to registered under the Federal Agents Registration Act.nypost.com
At least Ivanka had been running a business. Hunter Biden had no background knowledge of anything he was paid for because he was being paid solely for the purchase of his dad’s influence.So do you think Ivanka would have gotten all those Chinese trademarks if she had a different daddy?
I hope eventually Hunter Biden is prosecuted for something. Otherwise it just reinforces the argument that there are different rules of law in our nation and high level Demnocrats are above all of them.Prove it in a court of law, and then we nail them.
I'd imagine there is some way to track the money on the Bidens' end.
If you think those trademarks had nothing to do with her being trump's daughter, you are as crazy as I thought.At least Ivanka had been running a business. Hunter Biden had no background knowledge of anything he was paid for because he was being paid solely for the purchase of his dad’s influence.
![]()
Hunter Biden gave 'no discernible business services' in exchange for deals with ties to Chinese intelligence
Author Peter Schweizer, author of "Red-Handed: How American Elites Get Rich Helping China Win" told Fox Business that Biden offered nothing of value to firms tied to Chinese intelligence in exchange for moneywww.lawenforcementtoday.com
However at the time the trademarks were issued Ivanka was not involved in her business.
![]()
Ivanka Trump's brand ramped up China trademark work in 2016
Ivanka Trump's brand intensified its work in China as her father closed in on the Republican nomination for U.S. president, with her company applying for nearly twice as many trademarks in a five-month span as it had in the preceding eight years.www.foxnews.com
***snip***
Eisen is part of a lawsuit brought by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a watchdog group, against President Trump for alleged violations of the emoluments clause of the U.S. Constitution, involving, among other things, his China trademarks. Eisen argues that if President Trump or his daughter received special treatment from China in winning intellectual property protection, it would be a violation of the Constitution, which bars federal officials from accepting gifts from foreign governments unless approved by Congress.
An attorney for Ivanka Trump said she has no role in her company's trademark filings. "She left her company in January and she does not know what is filed, where it is filed, or whether it is approved or rejected," attorney Jamie Gorelick said. "She has not sought, and would not want, any special treatment for the company." …emphasis added
"The brand has filed, updated, and rigorously protected its international trademarks over the past several years, which included those filed in China" since 2016, Abigail Klem, the president of Ivanka Trump's brand, said in a statement Friday. She said a surge in trademark filings by "unrelated third parties trying to capitalize on the name" emphasizes the need to protect the trademark.
After the election, Ivanka's name took on new commercial glamour for Chinese copycats who filed hundreds of applications for trademarks on variations of Ivanka Trump's name in English and Mandarin, covering an unlikely array of goods, including toothpaste, diapers, diet pills and biscuits.
At least Ivanka had a business involving those trademarks even if she wan’t running it at the time. The Chinese might have been playing nice to see if they could get on the good side of Trump.If you think those trademarks had nothing to do with her being trump's daughter, you are as crazy as I thought.
I'm sure we can agree that NO ONE is above the law.I hope eventually Hunter Biden is prosecuted for something. Otherwise it just reinforces the argument that there are different rules of law in our nation and high level Demnocrats are above all of them.
Bullshit.At least Ivanka had a business involving those trademarks even if she wan’t running it at the time. The Chinese might have been playing nice to see if they could get on the good side of Trump.
![]()
The Trump Administration’s Laudable ‘Tough on China’ Legacy
The days since the election have not seen a slowing of the Trump administration’s focus on China, to the vexation of Chinese officials.www.dailysignal.com
Hunter Biden had nothing of value to sell except for his father’s influence. The Chinese paid for it and now they own Joe Biden. \
View attachment 767077