Tucker Carlson: Tony Blinken’s Statement Is an Admission the US Was Behind Nord Stream Pipeline Bombings (VIDEO)

[MinTrut]

That's why Tucker Carlson is one of the best journalists in the US today! He is not afraid of telling it how it is!

Tucker Carlson: Tony Blinken's Statement Is an Admission the US Was Behind Nord Stream Pipeline Bombings (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Aerial view of blown Nord Stream pipeline near Bornholm Island.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Yup.

He's the best - by far - in the MSM.

 

[MinTrut]

So Carlson is now pushing a conspiracy theory.

No - he's saying the US did it, not Putin.

Putin wouldn't blow up a multi-billion dollar Russian asset.

 

[MinTrut]

I know.

It's very difficult for the Leftist people here to accept reality!

But accept they must, like it or not. They can not deny reality.

Liberal, not leftist.

There are only two leftists posters on this thread, and they both agree with you - why insult them by calling them liberals?

 

[Winco]

<<<<< tucker is preaching to the sheep.

Like skye , Journalist????? LOOLOOLLOOLLLOLL

That's why Tucker Carlson is one of the best journalists in the US today! He is not afraid of telling it how it is!

 

[Lesh]

Oh, so you want to do Putin in private! I understand!

There ya go Skye. Just wanted you to see that

 

[Lesh]

Wrong.
All the evidence points to the US, because the US was the only one who wanted to impose economic sanctions against Russia.

Other countries do not want to, but are being extorted by the US.

And it is not like Russia ever did anything to harm the US.
The US is the guilty party in China, Korea, Vietnam, Nicaragua, Cuba, Panama, Grenada, Angola, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Egypt, Syria, etc.

There ya have it.

Our resident Russia troll says it was Biden so ya KNOW now it was Putin

 

[skye]

Your theory is ridiculous.
If Moscow wanted to cut the gas supplies to Germany, all they had to do was to shut the valve.
Blowing up their own pipeline is about 1000 times more difficult, expensive for them to later have to repair, and accomplishes nothing.

Obviously it had to be the US that blew it up, because we did not want Russia to get any income, and go broke.

Exactly right!

 

[eagle7-31]

Carlson is a moron

To the looney left I'm sure. But this was Tony B's words not Carlsons dimbulb.

 

[eagle7-31]

That's why Tucker Carlson is one of the best journalists in the US today! He is not afraid of telling it how it is!

Tucker Carlson: Tony Blinken's Statement Is an Admission the US Was Behind Nord Stream Pipeline Bombings (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Aerial view of blown Nord Stream pipeline near Bornholm Island.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

In stunning interview with Tucker Carlson last night, Tony Bobulinski explained how the FBI fixed the 2020 election

Most readers already know that Tony Bobulinski was the business partner of Hunter Biden and his uncle, Jim Biden, the president's brother, as they attempted to put together deals with foreign actors. That partnership broke up, and Bobu...

www.americanthinker.com

And that is not all.

 

[rightwinger]

To the looney left I'm sure. But this was Tony B's words not Carlsons dimbulb.

Carlson keeps getting stranger
His Conspiracy rants are getting worse

 

[Jim H - VA USA]

So Carlson is now pushing a conspiracy theory.

Trump says so....

https://www.usmessageboard.com/threads/former-president-trump-posts-truth-indicating-that-biden-blew-up-nord-stream-1-2-and-it-may-lead-us-into-wwiii.995534/

Jeffrey Sachs, director of the Center for Sustainable Development at Columbia University, says so...

Columbia prof says it's widely believed US behind Nord Stream sabotage

Jeffrey Sachs on Monday said he 'would bet' that the United States was behind last Monday's sabotage of the Nord Stream pipeline.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Putin says so (he says "The West," but implies US had a hand in it)...

Putin accuses West of blowing up pipelines as Europe steps up vigilance

Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday blamed the United States and its allies for blowing up the undersea Nord Stream pipelines, raising the temperature in a crisis that has left Europe racing to its energy infrastructure and supplies.

www.reuters.com

Non-partisan Logic and deduction say that the US has the most to gain from it compared to others....

Who gains most from Nord Stream sabotage? - Asia Times

The US has long opposed NATO's (especially Germany's) dependence on Russian, formerly Soviet, natural gas. The United States, in fact, used export

asiatimes.com

But, you, Taz, call it a "conspiracy theory."

Please explain. Reasoned speculation is not a conspiracy theory. Conspiracy theories are nutty theories which are highly sinister and/or political which are proposed when there is no proof, and other explanations are much more plausible.

Biden said he would put an end to Nord Stream even though he had no legal means to do so. Blinken said it's a wonderful to happen, since it is a tremendous opportunity and the US is now the biggest exporter of LNG to Europe.

So, please explain, Taz, what do you think is much more likely and why?

Thanks,
Jim
cc: Coyote ColonelAngus

 

[skye]

Trump says so....

https://www.usmessageboard.com/threads/former-president-trump-posts-truth-indicating-that-biden-blew-up-nord-stream-1-2-and-it-may-lead-us-into-wwiii.995534/

Jeffrey Sachs, director of the Center for Sustainable Development at Columbia University, says so...

Columbia prof says it's widely believed US behind Nord Stream sabotage

Jeffrey Sachs on Monday said he 'would bet' that the United States was behind last Monday's sabotage of the Nord Stream pipeline.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Putin says so (he says "The West," but implies US had a hand in it)...

Putin accuses West of blowing up pipelines as Europe steps up vigilance

Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday blamed the United States and its allies for blowing up the undersea Nord Stream pipelines, raising the temperature in a crisis that has left Europe racing to its energy infrastructure and supplies.

www.reuters.com

Non-partisan Logic and deduction say that the US has the most to gain from it compared to others....

Who gains most from Nord Stream sabotage? - Asia Times

The US has long opposed NATO's (especially Germany's) dependence on Russian, formerly Soviet, natural gas. The United States, in fact, used export

asiatimes.com

But, you, Taz, call it a "conspiracy theory."

Please explain. Reasoned speculation is not a conspiracy theory. Conspiracy theories are nutty theories which are highly sinister and/or political which are proposed when there is no proof, and other explanations are much more plausible.

Biden said he would put an end to Nord Stream even though he had no legal means to do so. Blinken said it's a wonderful to happen, since it is a tremendous opportunity and the US is now the biggest exporter of LNG to Europe.

So, please explain, Taz, what do you think is much more likely and why?

Thanks,
Jim
cc: Coyote ColonelAngus

And this one too....there are so many voices telling the truth....thanks God!

It's Not Crazy To Think Biden Sabotaged The Nord Stream Pipeline

Escalating with Russia might be President Biden’s only chance to save his failing administration. Don’t put it past him.

thefederalist.com

 

[skye]

 

[Leo123]

The leftie loonies here don't watch Carlson as evidenced by their stupid posts.

 

[bodecea]

That's why Tucker Carlson is one of the best journalists in the US today! He is not afraid of telling it how it is!

Tucker Carlson: Tony Blinken's Statement Is an Admission the US Was Behind Nord Stream Pipeline Bombings (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Aerial view of blown Nord Stream pipeline near Bornholm Island.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Putin ass-kissers.

 

[Leo123]

Putin ass-kissers.

Biden ass-kisser. ^^^^^^

 

[eagle7-31]

Carlson keeps getting stranger
His Conspiracy rants are getting worse

Tony B's words, not Carlson. keep your head in the sand.

 

[busybee01]

They usually own him. See Burisma where Hunter used to work or The Chinese Energy Company Hunter is now working for that Joe sold Billions of Barrels of Oil to from our Strategic Reserve.

They don't call him Quid Pro Joe for nothing and they don't call Hunter his Bag Man for no reason.

You are a liar. The oil was sold in a blind bidding process. No one knew who was buying the oil. It's a shame that you feel you have to lie.

 

[Jim H - VA USA]

Putin ass-kissers.

He is not. We watch Tucker, we would know.

His opinion is that the US should have stayed out of the conflict, and should stay out of it. Let the Europeans handle it, and don't get the US involved in a war we don't need to be dragged into while we have enough domestic problems which need to be addressed.

Even if one does not agree with this stance, it certainly has some merit.

You don't watch, yet you have an opinion about how terrible the show is. That's kind of weird if you think about it.

I assure you that his show is often fantastic. Tucker has unique insight you will not find elsewhere. He backs up his stuff with lots of data and guests who have first-hand knowledge, not "people familiar with the situation" like the stuff you watch. He throws in a bunch of humor. He is an incredible journalist.

His show is brain food, but I can understand if you don't want to watch it. Tucker is not pro-Putin; he is against US involvement in foreign wars, and definitely against the current Admin escalating things.

So, I think you are completely mischaracterizing Tucker (and me).

Regards,
Jim

 

[rightwinger]

He is not. We watch Tucker, we would know.

His opinion is that the US should have stayed out of the conflict, and should stay out of it. Let the Europeans handle it, and don't get the US involved in a war we don't need to be dragged into while we have enough domestic problems which need to be addressed.

Even if one does not agree with this stance, it certainly has some merit.

You don't watch, yet you have an opinion about how terrible the show is. That's kind of weird if you think about it.

I assure you that his show is often fantastic. Tucker has unique insight you will not find elsewhere. He backs up his stuff with lots of data and guests who have first-hand knowledge, not "people familiar with the situation" like the stuff you watch. He throws in a bunch of humor. He is an incredible journalist.

His show is brain food, but I can understand if you don't want to watch it. Tucker is not pro-Putin; he is against US involvement in foreign wars, and definitely against the current Admin escalating things.

So, I think you are completely mischaracterizing Tucker (and me).

Regards,
Jim

Tucker Carlson sucks Putin’s dick