CountofTuscany
Senior Member
- Aug 6, 2010
- 1,061
- 642
- 48
You are claiming it was NOT politically motivated.
That is yours to prove
How many Obama voters actually have cars? Ones they haven't stolen anyway?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You are claiming it was NOT politically motivated.
That is yours to prove
You are claiming it was NOT politically motivated.
That is yours to prove
idiot... you say it IS
so that puts the burden of prof on YOU
You are claiming it was NOT politically motivated.
That is yours to prove
Prove it was NOT politically motivated.
They had to change it for some reason huh?
Why did they change the law after people called it political?
Are you truly this dense? I'm not the one making a claim and then not proving it. How can I possibly disprove something that has never been proven?
Your original post states that these closing are politically motivated and there is no proof of this claim. Now you want me to disprove something that you've never offered proof of?
I guess the correct answer is that you just lied and expected us to believe it blindly like you do.
Rick
Yes I say it was politically motivated.
I have decades of republicans actions in elections to keep people from voting along with the fact that once it was scrutinized they had to change the plan.
Now prove it was not politically motivated like you claim.
And I proved there is pleanty of evidence to show that the republican party has used these types of tactics in the past to keep voters from voting.
Then the capper is they did NOT impliment the plan after it was publicized WHAT they were doing.
If it was not scrapped because of the beliefs of people it was politically motivated WHY did they scrap the idea?
The Bush five year study found no such voter problems as you suggest.
Why make laws for a crime that doesnt exist?
Why spend millions when you dont have to?
And I proved there is pleanty of evidence to show that the republican party has used these types of tactics in the past to keep voters from voting.
Then the capper is they did NOT impliment the plan after it was publicized WHAT they were doing.
If it was not scrapped because of the beliefs of people it was politically motivated WHY did they scrap the idea?
And I proved there is pleanty of evidence to show that the republican party has used these types of tactics in the past to keep voters from voting.
Then the capper is they did NOT impliment the plan after it was publicized WHAT they were doing.
If it was not scrapped because of the beliefs of people it was politically motivated WHY did they scrap the idea?
WHY did they scrap the idea?
what reason did they give?
The state Division of Motor Vehicles unveiled details of a major expansion of services Thursday, tweaking a preliminary proposal that had created a controversy among some lawmakers.
Department of Transportation Secretary Mark Gottlieb said the expansion leaves all current offices open, increases the total number of offices across the state from 88 to 92 and drastically expands the hours of operation for some 40 counties.
Read more: DMV to add hours, offices to address increased demand for photo IDs
I wonder if our friend TM knows the difference between a preliminary proposal and a finished bill?
Gottlieb said Thursday that politics was never a consideration. He said DOT tweaked the original plan after feedback from lawmakers.
"We listened to the concerns of legislators and others impacted by the potential changes," he said.
And this is why you release a proposal. To get feedback from the community to see if anything is wrong with the proposal, and make needed changes.
They didn't "dump" the idea, they worked to make it better.
No, it was after it was pointed out that the proposal would leave some areas without motor vehicle services.
And, come to think of it, you never did get around to explaining how the closure of these offices would keep the Democratic voters from getting ID's, while the Republican voters in the same towns would have no such problems. How about filling us in on that?
You really dont understand?
When you cut them predomantly Dem areas it comes out in the republican partys favor.
That was the whole point
And once again, it was NEVER proven that they were cutting them in Dem areas. You keep saying that without offering one shred of proof of it. Prove it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Rick
Prove it was NOT politically motivated.
They had to change it for some reason huh?
Why did they change the law after people called it political?
WHY did they scrap the idea?
what reason did they give?
Yes I say it was politically motivated.
I have decades of republicans actions in elections to keep people from voting along with the fact that once it was scrutinized they had to change the plan.
Now prove it was not politically motivated like you claim.
You are claiming it was NOT politically motivated.
That is yours to prove
idiot... you say it IS
so that puts the burden of prof on YOU
The idiot was already discredited way early in the thread, with an article that detailed the decisions.
Hey truthmangler, where's my apology?
You're nothing but a liar and it has been proven time and again.
Liar. Liar. Liar.