Trump's Wildly Unconstitutional Plot to Banish U.S. Citizens to Gulags

[Carl in Michigan]

Two questions:

1. Did your country try to revoke some people's citizenship?
2. Was it done properly?

If yes to both, you need to stop crying.

Yes, the U.S. can revoke citizenship under certain circumstances, primarily for naturalized citizens. This process is called denaturalization, and it can occur if it's proven in court that the naturalized citizen was not eligible for citizenship at the time of naturalization. Specifically, denaturalization can happen if the government can prove that the citizenship was obtained through fraud or concealment of material facts.

 

[buttercup]

Two questions:

1. Did your country try to revoke some people's citizenship?
2. Was it done properly?

If yes to both, you need to stop crying.

Don't boss me around. Even if that HAS happened, it is rare, and it would happen in cases like fraud in the naturalization process with naturalized citizens.....as opposed to natural born citizens.

But in any event, it's a logical fallacy to use that as argument for what we're talking about here.

Again, if you're not American, I can see why you support unAmerican unconstitutional stuff like this. Where are you from?

 

[konradv]

Yes, the U.S. can revoke citizenship under certain circumstances, primarily for naturalized citizens. This process is called denaturalization, and it can occur if it's proven in court that the naturalized citizen was not eligible for citizenship at the time of naturalization. Specifically, denaturalization can happen if the government can prove that the citizenship was obtained through fraud or concealment of material facts.

Trump, or rather his fascist think tank, will come up with some work around or, if push comes to shove, ignore the courts.

 

[Rambunctious]

Trump’s funnies have a way of becoming tomorrow’s policies.

Did you take your TDS pill?...

 

[konradv]

Did you take your TDS pill?...

It’s not a disease; it’s an immune reaction against fascism.

 

[MayorQuimby]

Don't boss me around.

Asking you questions is bossing you around? Dude, you need to be less sensitive.

Even if that HAS happened, it is rare, and it would happen in cases like fraud in the naturalization process with naturalized citizens.....as opposed to natural born citizens.

We are getting into legality here a little bit, I think.

I don't know if your country has any history of revoking natural born citizens' citizenship, but lets say it doesn't. I don't see why you can't set a precedent. As long as there are compelling reasons for it, it should be fine to do so. Citizenship is a privilege, not a right. If in the case of anchor babies who got their citizenship under false pretenses, I don't see why it can't be taken away from them.

Again, if you're not American, I can see why you support unAmerican unconstitutional stuff like this. Where are you from?

I am an immigrant. I currently live in Canada.

 

[BrokeLoser]

The admin said if there is a legal way to do it, he is down for it.
Can you name a citizen he has threatened?
Its pretty sickening just to hear him say it, you dont have to lie about it.

By any means necessary.
Filthy libs have forced his hand.
Time to unwind all the fucked up bullshit.
LET’S GO HITLER!!!

 

[Rambunctious]

I am an immigrant. I currently live in Canada.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Asking you questions is bossing you around? Dude, you need to be less sensitive.



We are getting into legality here a little bit, I think.

I don't know if your country has any history of revoking natural born citizens' citizenship, but lets say it doesn't. I don't see why you can't set a precedent. As long as there are compelling reasons for it, it should be fine to do so. Citizenship is a privilege, not a right. If in the case of anchor babies who got their citizenship under false pretenses, I don't see why it can't be taken away from them.



I am an immigrant. I currently live in Canada.

What Turd World shit hole was your place of birth Mr Mayor

 

[Carl in Michigan]

I don't see why you can't set a precedent. As long as there are compelling reasons for it, it should be fine to do so. Citizenship is a privilege, not a right

Yes, in the United States, citizenship is a legal right, particularly when it comes to birthright citizenship and naturalization. The Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution guarantees citizenship to those born within the United States, with some limited exceptions. This right is also recognized in international law, with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights stating that everyone has the right to a nationality.

 

[MayorQuimby]

What Turd World shit hole was your place of birth Mr Mayor

Lmao, my post riled you so much that you forgot that you were pro-darkie.

 

[MayorQuimby]

Yes, in the United States, citizenship is a legal right, particularly when it comes to birthright citizenship and naturalization. The Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution guarantees citizenship to those born within the United States, with some limited exceptions. This right is also recognized in international law, with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights stating that everyone has the right to a nationality.

Why did you ask me what shit hole I was born in? Is it because you are a racist?

 

[konradv]

Asking you questions is bossing you around? Dude, you need to be less sensitive.



We are getting into legality here a little bit, I think.

I don't know if your country has any history of revoking natural born citizens' citizenship, but lets say it doesn't. I don't see why you can't set a precedent. As long as there are compelling reasons for it, it should be fine to do so. Citizenship is a privilege, not a right. If in the case of anchor babies who got their citizenship under false pretenses, I don't see why it can't be taken away from them.



I am an immigrant. I currently live in Canada.

Borders are imaginary lines. The future is global.

 

[protectionist]

Technically, it's not a deportation. It is merely serving a sentence in a foreign country. Nothing wrong with that. It's a good solution to overcrowded prisons.

Any much different than sending convicted criminals to Guantanamo ?

 

[MayorQuimby]

Borders are imaginary lines. The future is global.

What about the lines between your house and your neighbor's house? Would you want your neighbor just walk into your house because "borders are imaginary lines"?

People like you never cease to astonish me with how disgusting you are.

 

[konradv]

Technically, it's not a deportation. It is merely serving a sentence in a foreign country. Nothing wrong with that. It's a good solution to overcrowded prisons.

If they were all actually criminals.

 

[fncceo]

What if they are thinking about deporting his/her ex?

If he or she is illegal, I support it.

 

[konradv]

What about the lines between your house and your neighbor's house? Would you want your neighbor just walk into your house because "borders are imaginary lines"?

People like you never cease to astonish me with how disgusting you are.

You’re enforcing borders to be cruel and conflating private rights with public rights. More MAGA gaslighting!

 

[MayorQuimby]

You’re enforcing borders to be cruel and conflating private rights with public rights. More MAGA gaslighting!

I see; so private rights exist, but public rights don't? Says who? A piece of fucking shit like you?

 

[MayorQuimby]

If they were all actually criminals.

If we strip them of their citizenship then we deport them, would that be better for you?