Trump's legal crackdown on "sanctuary" cities and states yields few results so far

[C_Clayton_Jones]

‘Trump returned to the White House in January, his administration has mounted an aggressive effort to crack down on cities, counties and states that aren't participating in its mass deportation campaign, threatening these so-called "sanctuary" jurisdictions with lawsuits, funding cuts and other penalties.
[…]
But eight months into Mr. Trump's second administration, the effort to exert pressure on these jurisdictions has yielded few tangible results, with most lawsuits still unresolved and local Democratic leaders doubling down on policies that limit or bar cooperation with federal immigration officials.’

Trump's legal crackdown on "sanctuary" cities and states yields few results so far

The Trump administration has mounted an aggressive campaign against "sanctuary" jurisdictions, but the Justice Department has pointed to just one city that has abandoned its policies so far.

www.cbsnews.com

There’s no such thing as ‘sanctuary cities’ – immigrants enjoy no protections in any jurisdiction from Federal detention.

Moreover, the Constitution has long held that states and local jurisdictions cannot be compelled to enforce Federal laws, including immigration laws, which is why Trump’s criminal efforts are failing.

 

[Dagoth-Ur]

‘Trump returned to the White House in January, his administration has mounted an aggressive effort to crack down on cities, counties and states that aren't participating in its mass deportation campaign, threatening these so-called "sanctuary" jurisdictions with lawsuits, funding cuts and other penalties.
[…]
But eight months into Mr. Trump's second administration, the effort to exert pressure on these jurisdictions has yielded few tangible results, with most lawsuits still unresolved and local Democratic leaders doubling down on policies that limit or bar cooperation with federal immigration officials.’

Trump's legal crackdown on "sanctuary" cities and states yields few results so far

The Trump administration has mounted an aggressive campaign against "sanctuary" jurisdictions, but the Justice Department has pointed to just one city that has abandoned its policies so far.

www.cbsnews.com

There’s no such thing as ‘sanctuary cities’ – immigrants enjoy no protections in any jurisdiction from Federal detention.

Moreover, the Constitution has long held that states and local jurisdictions cannot be compelled to enforce Federal laws, including immigration laws, which is why Trump’s criminal efforts are failing.

Bullshit, they are not only refusing to help but actively supporting the invasion of the Country.

 

[wamose]

The people who were victims of illegal alien crime are more than happy that Trumpy is cracking down on them. In fact, everyone who wants to feel safe supports Trump.

 

[Seymour Flops]

and local Democratic leaders doubling down on policies that limit or bar cooperation with federal immigration officials.’

There’s no such thing as ‘sanctuary cities’ – immigrants enjoy no protections in any jurisdiction from Federal detention.

"Sanctuary City" is the term Democrats and "not Democrats" picked for their anti-Law policies on illegals.

That they cling to those policies in the face of pressure will demonstrate to their voters that they prioritize illegals over the safety and security of their voters.

 

[Hafar1014]

‘Trump returned to the White House in January, his administration has mounted an aggressive effort to crack down on cities, counties and states that aren't participating in its mass deportation campaign, threatening these so-called "sanctuary" jurisdictions with lawsuits, funding cuts and other penalties.
[…]
But eight months into Mr. Trump's second administration, the effort to exert pressure on these jurisdictions has yielded few tangible results, with most lawsuits still unresolved and local Democratic leaders doubling down on policies that limit or bar cooperation with federal immigration officials.’

Trump's legal crackdown on "sanctuary" cities and states yields few results so far

The Trump administration has mounted an aggressive campaign against "sanctuary" jurisdictions, but the Justice Department has pointed to just one city that has abandoned its policies so far.

www.cbsnews.com

There’s no such thing as ‘sanctuary cities’ – immigrants enjoy no protections in any jurisdiction from Federal detention.

Moreover, the Constitution has long held that states and local jurisdictions cannot be compelled to enforce Federal laws, including immigration laws, which is why Trump’s criminal efforts are failing.

The purpose of sanctuary cities is to attract illegals to democrat states that have lost population resulting in a loss of seats in the house when the 2030 census is taken. These seats will shift to GOP states. Illegals are supposed to make up the difference. So far 2 million have been deported so thats not going to happen. The sanctuary city attracts them to democrat cities with free benefits but what they got was rapists gang members killers child molesters drug dealers drunks and other criminals. How did that work out? So far 2 million have been deported.

You might want to look up the supremacy clause

 

[1srelluc]

I still don't understand why federal monies can't be withheld from those jurisdictions that designate themselves as sanctuary jurisdictions.

 

[CrazyTrader55]

‘Trump returned to the White House in January, his administration has mounted an aggressive effort to crack down on cities, counties and states that aren't participating in its mass deportation campaign, threatening these so-called "sanctuary" jurisdictions with lawsuits, funding cuts and other penalties.
[…]
But eight months into Mr. Trump's second administration, the effort to exert pressure on these jurisdictions has yielded few tangible results, with most lawsuits still unresolved and local Democratic leaders doubling down on policies that limit or bar cooperation with federal immigration officials.’

Trump's legal crackdown on "sanctuary" cities and states yields few results so far

The Trump administration has mounted an aggressive campaign against "sanctuary" jurisdictions, but the Justice Department has pointed to just one city that has abandoned its policies so far.

www.cbsnews.com

There’s no such thing as ‘sanctuary cities’ – immigrants enjoy no protections in any jurisdiction from Federal detention.

Moreover, the Constitution has long held that states and local jurisdictions cannot be compelled to enforce Federal laws, including immigration laws, which is why Trump’s criminal efforts are failing.

Lies

 

[Rogue AI]

I still don't understand why federal monies can't be withheld from those jurisdictions that designate themselves as sanctuary jurisdictions.

I was under the impression that is how the feds pressured states to increase the drinking age to 21.

I imagine Schumer's shutdown can be effectively used to withhold funding in all sorts of productive ways.

 

[Seymour Flops]

I was under the impression that is how the feds pressured states to increase the drinking age to 21.

Yup.

I imagine Schumer's shutdown can be effectively used to withhold funding in all sorts of productive ways.

Already on it. Billions in contracts for construction in New York held up because the contract processors have been furloughed.

I don't know if Schumer is familiar with who runs construction in New York, but it ain't the Boy Scouts.

 

[TimFitz]

Bullshit, they are not only refusing to help but actively supporting the invasion of the Country.

There is no invasion. Im sure you'll come back with some empty fact free nonsense. But you won't have a shred of evidence.

 

[TimFitz]

Yup.

Already on it. Billions in contracts for construction in New York held up because the contract processors have been furloughed.

I don't know if Schumer is familiar with who runs construction in New York, but it ain't the Boy Scouts.

It refers to the New York Gateway project. which was green lighted during the Obama Administration.

Trump promptly squashed it and held up funding for four years beginning in 2017.

It was reenergized by Biden in the Inflation Reduction Act.

And now Trump is monkeying with it again.

Presumably because his former home state didn't vote for him, something which he takes personally. In his typical small petty way.

 

[Hafar1014]

There is no invasion. Im sure you'll come back with some empty fact free nonsense. But you won't have a shred of evidence.

11 million illegals is an invasion especially when thousands are criminals. The good news is they all went to democrat cities HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. How did that work out

 

[Seymour Flops]

It refers to the New York Gateway project. which was green lighted during the Obama Administration.

Trump promptly squashed it and held up funding for four years beginning in 2017.

It was reenergized by Biden in the Inflation Reduction Act.

And now Trump is monkeying with it again.

Same thing I said but in disparaging terms.

Presumably because his former home state didn't vote for him, something which he takes personally. In his typical small petty way.

Maybe?

I thought it is because the two leaders of the shutdown are lawmakers from New York.

Isn't it fitting that their constituents get the first benefits of the shutdown?

 

[Dagoth-Ur]

There is no invasion. Im sure you'll come back with some empty fact free nonsense. But you won't have a shred of evidence.

12 million invaders under Biden alone.