Third Party
Gold Member
- Jan 1, 2019
- 7,616
- 636
- 275
Trump Will Be Impeached
- Thread starter IM2
- Start date
- Mar 11, 2015
- 102,350
- 114,584
- 3,645
- Thread starter
- #982
He may be impeached but they better get it done quickly before....
That's not going to happen.
- Mar 11, 2015
- 102,350
- 114,584
- 3,645
- Thread starter
- #983
Obama got Bin Laden after Bush couldn't find him. And he didn't have to get permission from Russia to do it.
Third Party
Gold Member
- Jan 1, 2019
- 7,616
- 636
- 275
- Mar 11, 2015
- 102,350
- 114,584
- 3,645
- Thread starter
- #985
We all know you're lying so we'll just move on.
lennypartiv
Diamond Member
- Jul 16, 2019
- 28,070
- 21,668
- 2,320
Exactly. McConnell is loyal to Trump, as he should be.
Third Party
Gold Member
- Jan 1, 2019
- 7,616
- 636
- 275
The Original Tree
Diamond Member
Apparently it’s coming out The Fake Whistle Blower was involved with the Fake Russian Collusion Hoax now.
LMFAO.
The New Democrat Party is Evil and should not be allowed to have power.
LMFAO.
The New Democrat Party is Evil and should not be allowed to have power.
g5000
Diamond Member
- Nov 26, 2011
- 132,566
- 76,424
- 2,605
Wrong. McConnell should be loyal to the Constitution, not Trump.
To be literally correct, you can say Trump is LIKELY to be impeached. To make a more accurate prediction, one must examine each representative's voting locale, whether it is a red or blue state and the party each representative belongs to. Then we can see this is not for the truth but for the political strength.You are the one with the problem, friend. Neither you nor your friend can fortell the future. Did you not learn that in 2016?I didn't bother reading your novel, for the premise is blatantly stupid. It's as if you are certain of the winner of the next Super Bowl. You and your link don't know any more than anyone else.The time has come for Trump.
Trump Will Be Impeached
Ambassador William Taylor’s testimony sealed the deal.
October 22, 2019
by John Podhoretz
Remember when I said last week that October 17 was the worst day of the Trump presidency? Well, October 22 and has now come along to break the record. This is the day that, I think, has ensured Donald Trump’s impeachment. Not his removal. But impeachment will be bad enough.
Today’s key sentence: “Ambassador Sondland said, ‘everything’ was dependent on such an announcement, including security assistance.”
It comes from the testimony of acting U.S. ambassador to the Ukraine William Taylor before House impeachment investigators, and it instantly makes all but impossible the task of anyone seeking to defend Trump against the charge that he held up American military aid to Ukraine to secure a political advantage in the 2020 election.
There were three defenses of Trump following the revelations of the “whistleblower” and the phone-call transcript of the conversation between the presidents of the United States and Ukraine. The first was that he is only interested in investigating corruption relating to the 2016 election. The second is that even though Trump himself said he wanted the Ukranian to do him a favor, there was no quid pro quo. The third is that the only thing Trump was trading for was a White House visit, which is no great shakes.
There’s no need to talk about the “whistleblower” and his findings any longer, and there’s no need for the whistleblower to be heard any further. We have a veteran U.S. diplomat on the record saying that a Trump intimate told him Trump was holding up Congressionally authorized and appropriated military aid to Ukraine because he wanted a public statement from the Zelensky government that it was investigating Joe Biden’s son.
Taylor said this of a September 1 phone call with Gordon Sondland, our ambassador to the European Union about the $275 million in U.S. security assistance to Ukraine as well as a possible meeting between Trump and Ukranian president Zelensky:
“Ambassador Sondland told me that President Trump had told him that he wants President Zelensky to state publicly that Ukraine will investigate Burisma and alleged Ukrainian interference in the 2016 U.S. election. Ambassador Sondland also told me that he now recognized that he had made a mistake by earlier telling the Ukrainian officials to whom he spoke that a White House meeting with President Zelenskyy was dependent on a public announcement of investigations—in fact, Ambassador Sondland said, ‘everything’ was dependent on such an announcement, including security assistance. He said that President Trump wanted President Zelenskyy ‘in a public box’ by making a public statement about ordering such investigations.”
Ambassador William Taylor’s Testimony Ensured Trump’s Impeachment
Trump has a guest coming to visit
And he doesn't worry about invitations
Go talk to John Podhoretz, editor of Commentary Magazine if you have a problem.
No, you have the problem. I don't know John Podhoretz. And it is not 2016. You Trump lickers can't see that. Number 1, we are talking about an impeachment after a public hearing where we see the facts. Trump can't lose the congressional vote and be saved by the electoral college. Once congress votes to impeach, he's impeached. And as the article points out, the evidence of the misdeeds have been shown. The Russians can't flood congress with bots Jackson. Trump will be impeached. The question is whether the senate will convict him.
The worst one can say about Trump is that impeachment iis likely due to his penchance for tweeting,and immature name calliing. On the other hand, he has become the most effective president we've had.
He is a very popular president with most of the nation, I wonder what the 2020 election will be like if he is impeached but not convicted, proving this was an excercise of politics when the nation's work went on without an effective congress.
And that is the truth..
M14 Shooter
The Light of Truth
Sandy Shanks
Gold Member
- Jul 10, 2018
- 3,550
- 1,027
- 210
- Banned
- #994
An emerging defense of Trump by Trump Republicans is they will admit the obvious, but they are being coy about it. Some are saying that, yes, it is true, Trump did ask the Ukrainian President to investigate the Bidens, but that is not an impeachable offense.
That is like saying, yes, it is true, my friend did withdraw money from the bank, omitting the fact that the man's friend robbed the bank.
Similarly, Trump Republicans will not say that, in the wake of the 2016 election, Russian interference in our election on behalf of Trump, and the Mueller Report, that Trump requested foreign interference in our Presidential election on his behalf.
Nor will they admit that Trump's own chief of staff told a television audience that Trump used quid pro quo to get what he wanted. That amounts to bribery, an impeachable offense in its own right.
Trump Republicans may try to get this by American voters, but, when the impeachment inquiry goes public, Americans will learn the truth. Following the 2016 election and foreign interference in that election, it is extremely doubtful Americans will accept that as business as usual in 2020.
There is no wonder why Trump will not allow his people to testify to all this. Thus, his obstruction of Congress and the game of delay. It is the only thing he can do.
That is like saying, yes, it is true, my friend did withdraw money from the bank, omitting the fact that the man's friend robbed the bank.
Similarly, Trump Republicans will not say that, in the wake of the 2016 election, Russian interference in our election on behalf of Trump, and the Mueller Report, that Trump requested foreign interference in our Presidential election on his behalf.
Nor will they admit that Trump's own chief of staff told a television audience that Trump used quid pro quo to get what he wanted. That amounts to bribery, an impeachable offense in its own right.
Trump Republicans may try to get this by American voters, but, when the impeachment inquiry goes public, Americans will learn the truth. Following the 2016 election and foreign interference in that election, it is extremely doubtful Americans will accept that as business as usual in 2020.
There is no wonder why Trump will not allow his people to testify to all this. Thus, his obstruction of Congress and the game of delay. It is the only thing he can do.
Third Party
Gold Member
- Jan 1, 2019
- 7,616
- 636
- 275
How's this-He did not ask for dirt on Biden-he wanted to make sure corruption was not going to take our money and that they help us clear up the 2016 election interference. Fixed it for you.
M14 Shooter
The Light of Truth
Look at you, still spamming the same nonsense across several topics.
Why do you think people running against an incumbent white house are immune to federal investigations into their past acts while in federal office?
Why do you think asking the government of another country to help investigate the possible corrupt actions of a VPotUS with regard to that country is immoral, illegal or impeachable?
Third Party
Gold Member
- Jan 1, 2019
- 7,616
- 636
- 275
There should be no defense necessary-Russia hoax, Mueller hoax, now Ukraine hoax. Democrats usually tax us to death, now they are hoaxing us to death.
M14 Shooter
The Light of Truth
You can believe whatever delusional crap you want - It won't change anything.
Trump will remain your President until at least January 2021
Sandy Shanks
Gold Member
- Jul 10, 2018
- 3,550
- 1,027
- 210
- Banned
- #999
The Times reports, "John R. Bolton, President Trump’s former national security adviser, knows about “many relevant meetings and conversations” connected to the Ukraine pressure campaign that House impeachment investigators have not yet been informed about, his lawyer told lawmakers on Friday.
"The lawyer, Charles J. Cooper, made that tantalizing point in a letter to the chief House lawyer in response to House committee chairmen who have sought Mr. Bolton’s testimony in their impeachment proceedings, arguing that his client would be willing to talk but only if a court rules that he should ignore White House objections."
Bolton did not show up for a deposition scheduled on Thursday because, his lawyer said, he wants a judge to determine whether he should testify in defiance of the White House.
What is Bolton trying to say here? Bolton strongly opposed Trump's attempt to use extortion in a request for foreign interference in our Presidential election to benefit the President politically, and he referred to Trump's personal lawyer, Giuliani, as a “hand grenade who’s going to blow everybody up,”, describing exactly what is happening now. The whole mess is blowing up in Trump's face.
Bolton was fired on September 10, about the time the hand grenade was going off in the Oval Office. Schiff was informed of the whistleblower's complaint on September 11.
Despite not showing up this week, does Bolton want to testify? Testifying would certainly help his book sales.
Or, despite their differences, does the outspoken conservative want to come to Trump's aid? Is he trying to drag this out with court fight?
One thing is true. If it is the latter, the Democrats are not biting although they would to have Bolton testify. They have had their fill of Trump's delaying tactics. They will welcome Bolton if he comes in voluntarily, but they are through with the subpoena business. In the meantime they will trot out their own witnesses.
They will be unimpeded by Trump. Stupidly, Trump will not allow his witnesses to appear in the impeachment inquiry which will go public next week.
The Democrats are delighted with Trump's incriminating recalcitrance.
"The lawyer, Charles J. Cooper, made that tantalizing point in a letter to the chief House lawyer in response to House committee chairmen who have sought Mr. Bolton’s testimony in their impeachment proceedings, arguing that his client would be willing to talk but only if a court rules that he should ignore White House objections."
Bolton did not show up for a deposition scheduled on Thursday because, his lawyer said, he wants a judge to determine whether he should testify in defiance of the White House.
What is Bolton trying to say here? Bolton strongly opposed Trump's attempt to use extortion in a request for foreign interference in our Presidential election to benefit the President politically, and he referred to Trump's personal lawyer, Giuliani, as a “hand grenade who’s going to blow everybody up,”, describing exactly what is happening now. The whole mess is blowing up in Trump's face.
Bolton was fired on September 10, about the time the hand grenade was going off in the Oval Office. Schiff was informed of the whistleblower's complaint on September 11.
Despite not showing up this week, does Bolton want to testify? Testifying would certainly help his book sales.
Or, despite their differences, does the outspoken conservative want to come to Trump's aid? Is he trying to drag this out with court fight?
One thing is true. If it is the latter, the Democrats are not biting although they would to have Bolton testify. They have had their fill of Trump's delaying tactics. They will welcome Bolton if he comes in voluntarily, but they are through with the subpoena business. In the meantime they will trot out their own witnesses.
They will be unimpeded by Trump. Stupidly, Trump will not allow his witnesses to appear in the impeachment inquiry which will go public next week.
The Democrats are delighted with Trump's incriminating recalcitrance.
Wow! Number 1000
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
-
Video: During Under Oath Testimony, Democrat Gov. Can't Recall Citizen Being Burned Alive By Illegal In Their Capital City- Started by RhodyPatriot
- Replies: 1
-
9th Circuit Court reverses Judge Breyer over control of National Guard- Started by TemplarKormac
- Replies: 48
-
Black Woman Maces Anti Cop Race Baiter At His Own Event
- Started by RhodyPatriot
- Replies: 8
