Trump went to dinner with his family and didn't tell or take the press.......great....good for him...they openly colluded with the hilary campaign and no longer deserve to be respected in any way, shape or form....
Trump Ditches Press for Dinner, Tantrums Ensue
The press is soon going to learn that President Trump is the one who is making the decisions NOT the Press.
Watch for a list of press who are banned from coming within a mile of President Trump.
Believe me. President Trump NEVER FORGETS AND NEVER FORGIVES!!!!!
MSNBC will be shut out of ever having anyone who works for the Trump administration giving any interviews.
Same goes for a number of newspapers.
Then watch the fucking LIB MSM whine!
The assholes made their beds!
Good, once Trump violates the 1st Amendment then impeachment proceedings can begin. It will be one of his numerous crimes.
I know you have the 2nd Amendment stamped on your butt cheeks, but I would advise you to read the first one, too.
Could Donald Trump be impeached before being inaugurated?
"""In the hours after the results were made public, Google searches for "impeachment" surged and at least one law professor believes there may be enough evidence to impeach Trump for alleged fraud and racketeering activities.
Article II of the US Constitution states that presidents may be impeached if they are convicted of "treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors."
According to Mic, the process is kicked off by a vote by the House of Representatives and is followed by a formal impeachment trial in the Senate.
Unlike previous presidents-elect, Trump finds himself facing a number of lawsuits, including one for alleged fraud involving Trump University. University of Utah law professor Christopher Lewis Peterson claimed before the election that there could be evidence for Trump to be impeached based on his alleged crimes with Trump University.
"Unlike his promised crimes yet to come, the illegal acts in Trump's high-pressure wealth seminars have already occurred. Indeed, a federal judge appointed under Article III of the US Constitution has already determined that Trump's alleged actions, if true, constitute fraud and racketeering," Peterson wrote in an essay. "[Prior to Trump's inauguration,] Congress would be well within its legal rights under the Constitution to insist upon a president who is not a fraudster or a racketeer as defined in its own law."