So you people are just absolutely cool with having a first lady whose nude, sexually posed, pictures are all over the internet and will be publicized further if he actually becomes the president? Interesting.
Well lets start with this - I can't speak for anyone else (including other true conservatives). So am I ok with having a first lady who was nude, sexually posed, etc., etc., etc.? No. Not at all. But I'm not ok with Donald Trump sitting in the Oval Office for that matter (though he is an exponentially better choice than Bernie Sanders and Bernie is a gazillion times better option than Hillary Clinton).
But I would also like to add that I wasn't ok with Michelle Obama being a first lady who used the White House as her personal toy - to purchase $60,000 ball gowns and travel the world while telling the rest of America how they need to share their own wealth with those less fortunate.
I wasn't ok with a Kenyan-born marxist who lied his way into the White House.
I wasn't ok with Bill Clinton sticking a cigar into the vagina of an intern (while he was married no less) and while he was on the phone with foreign heads of state.
I wasn't ok with Lyndon B. Johnson calling black people "n*ggers" while he sat in the White House
I wasn't ok with John F. Kennedy cheating on his wife two or three times per day while he sat in the White House
I wasn't ok with Richard Nixon hating Jews and engaging in WaterGate while he sat in the White House.
I haven't been ok with
anything that has gone on in the White House outside of the Ronald Reagan administration since the mid-1800's. So with
all of
that criminal activity, does it really matter if the 1st lady has the body of a porn star? The 1st lady doesn't run the country my dear - the President does. Why don't you focus on the substantive policies of the candidates instead of what their spouse did a decade ago?