Trump supports immigration visas backed by Musk: ‘I have many H-1B visas on my properties’

[jc456]

Yes, they would. However, they should not be granted a tourist visa if she was close to giving birth.

Isn’t part of the fourteenth amendment. Was for slaves only. Not immigrants anywhere else. I challenge you to show where you got your data

 

[jc456]

^ I don't know what off topic nonsense you're yapping about now, jc, but I do know this... I'm not in the one in agreement with Curried Goats and Gavin Newsom, YOU are. How does that make you feel?

I don’t agree with demofks

 

[buttercup]

I don’t agree with demofks

You do with Gavin Newsom, on H-1B. And you agreed with Curried Goats on it too.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Isn’t part of the fourteenth amendment. Was for slaves only. Not immigrants anywhere else. I challenge you to show where you got your data

The Supreme Court ruled in 1898 that it did. You keep harping and showing your ignorance. You have been schooled on this before.

 

[jc456]

The Supreme Court ruled in 1898 that it did. You keep harping and showing your ignorance. You have been schooled on this before.

Nope. They don’t amend amendments

 

[jc456]

You do with Gavin Newsom, on H-1B. And you agreed with Curried Goats on it too.

Nope. I stated the MAGA stance

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Nope. They don’t amend amendments

They rule on them, and they said the 14th applied to immigrants too. You are just too stubborn to admit when you are wrong.

 

[jc456]

They rule on them, and they said the 14th applied to immigrants too. You are just too stubborn to admit when you are wrong.

Show the language

 

[Curried Goats]

Isn’t part of the fourteenth amendment. Was for slaves only. Not immigrants anywhere else. I challenge you to show where you got your data

We get it from reality you stupid frail ****.

You can feel any way you like but the facts are that my parents were visa holders when I was born in America and I've been a citizen all my life as has my daughter and my grandson who's celebrating his third birthday today. Your frail feelings don't mean shit you dumb Cuck.

 

[jc456]

We get it from reality you stupid frail ****.

You can feel any way you like but the facts are that my parents were visa holders when I was born in America and I've been a citizen all my life as has my daughter and my grandson who's celebrating his third birthday today. Your frail feelings don't mean shit you dumb Cuck.

so you got feewings, feewings aren't law.

 

[Curried Goats]

so you got feewings, feewings aren't law.

My passport and voter registration are though, Cuck.

 

[Mac-7]

You even got that part wrong. The decision was 6-2, with one not participating. 6-2 is pretty decisive.

Ok, 8-2

Big deal

Its still still rule by 8 unelected demogods in black robes

 

[Mac-7]

Yes, they would. However, they should not be granted a tourist visa if she was close to giving birth.

Ok, we agree on that

 

[buttercup]

Nope. I stated the MAGA stance

I've been reading lot of MAGA folks who disagree with Elon on H-1B, as well as his comments against Americans, so I'm not sure which MAGA stance you're with. But in any event, Gavin Newsom is on board with the new MAGA. At least on this topic. So there ya go, standing arm in arm with Gavin.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Show the language

The court case was:

United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), was a landmark decision[4] of the U.S. Supreme Court which held that "a child born in the United States, of parents of Chinese descent, who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of the Emperor of China, but have a permanent domicile and residence in the United States, and are there carrying on business, and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the Emperor of China", automatically became a U.S. citizen at birth.[6] This decision established an important precedent in its interpretation of the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution.

United States v. Wong Kim Ark - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

This has been posted in immigration threads many times. Perhaps you should memorize it, so we don't have to embarrass you yet again!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Ok, 8-2

Big deal

Its still still rule by 8 unelected demogods in black robes

You need to read that again. It was six to two!

What's a demogod?

 

[Mac-7]

You need to read that again. It was six to two!

What's a demogod?

The unelected ambulance chasers on the SC

 

[jc456]

They rule on them, and they said the 14th applied to immigrants too. You are just too stubborn to admit when you are wrong.

Birthright Citizenship: A Fundamental Misunderstanding of the 14th Amendment

What’s the citizenship status of the children of illegal aliens? That question has spurred quite a debate over the 14th Amendment lately, with the news that several states—including Pennsylvania, Arizona, Oklahoma, Georgia, and South Carolina—may launch efforts to deny automatic citizenship to...

www.heritage.org

But that is not what that qualifying phrase means. Its original meaning refers to the political allegiance of an individual and the jurisdiction that a foreign government has over that individual.

The fact that a tourist or illegal alien is subject to our laws and our courts if they violate our laws does not place them within the political “jurisdiction” of the United States as that phrase was defined by the framers of the 14th Amendment.

 

[jc456]

We get it from reality you stupid frail ****.

You can feel any way you like but the facts are that my parents were visa holders when I was born in America and I've been a citizen all my life as has my daughter and my grandson who's celebrating his third birthday today. Your frail feelings don't mean shit you dumb Cuck.

Birthright Citizenship: A Fundamental Misunderstanding of the 14th Amendment

What’s the citizenship status of the children of illegal aliens? That question has spurred quite a debate over the 14th Amendment lately, with the news that several states—including Pennsylvania, Arizona, Oklahoma, Georgia, and South Carolina—may launch efforts to deny automatic citizenship to...

www.heritage.org

Critics erroneously believe that anyone present in the United States has “subjected” himself “to the jurisdiction” of the United States, which would extend citizenship to the children of tourists, diplomats, and illegal aliens alike.
But that is not what that qualifying phrase means. Its original meaning refers to the political allegiance of an individual and the jurisdiction that a foreign government has over that individual.

The fact that a tourist or illegal alien is subject to our laws and our courts if they violate our laws does not place them within the political “jurisdiction” of the United States as that phrase was defined by the framers of the 14th Amendment.

 

[konradv]

Birthright Citizenship: A Fundamental Misunderstanding of the 14th Amendment

What’s the citizenship status of the children of illegal aliens? That question has spurred quite a debate over the 14th Amendment lately, with the news that several states—including Pennsylvania, Arizona, Oklahoma, Georgia, and South Carolina—may launch efforts to deny automatic citizenship to...

www.heritage.org

Critics erroneously believe that anyone present in the United States has “subjected” himself “to the jurisdiction” of the United States, which would extend citizenship to the children of tourists, diplomats, and illegal aliens alike.
But that is not what that qualifying phrase means. Its original meaning refers to the political allegiance of an individual and the jurisdiction that a foreign government has over that individual.

The fact that a tourist or illegal alien is subject to our laws and our courts if they violate our laws does not place them within the political “jurisdiction” of the United States as that phrase was defined by the framers of the 14th Amendment.

SCOTUS says otherwise.