Trump supporters: If Trump broke the law, should he be held legally accountable?

How do you know there was?

No, wait. No need to answer. WE know that your answer is always going to add up to "Because I say so and you're a right-wing bully".
I avoided that question in my response to him for that very reason. Because they own the media.
 
Again, how do you know? You haven't seen the search warrant. You have no idea what's in it.
because they didn't say so. did i stutter?
 
How do you know there was?

No, wait. No need to answer. WE know that your answer is always going to add up to "Because I say so and you're a right-wing bully".

LOLOL

Now you're arguing with yourself. :lmao:
 
WHOOOOOOOOOOOSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

1660149018236.webp
:lmao:
 
because they didn't say so.

donny can release the copy of the warrant at anytime to di-vulge what they were looking for - but hasn't.

hmmmmm.... curious dat.
 
LOL

Suuuure, uh-huh.

:itsok:
It makes me wonder when I see someone like you who loves hanging out in a crowd, most of whom dislike you or at least disagree with you. You must not have a very healthy self image if you like being disliked.
 
Yes the same as it should be with Hunter and Joe Biden and their business dealings the Clintons or anyone else regardless of their political party affiliation. That is how it should be but we all know it’s not.
 
because they didn't say so. did i stutter?

Again, they say so in the search warrant which you haven't seen. Meaning you have no ******* clue.
 
15th post
Again, they say so in the search warrant which you haven't seen. Meaning you have no ******* clue.
They are silent about why they raided a former president's resident, that's not a smart move. So, silent is so demofk.
 
Maybe on your planet that's what it would look like.

When you spout what you think my argument is, you're arguing with yourself. Now I get to sit back and laugh at you as you chase your own tail.

:abgg2q.jpg:
 
donny can release the copy of the warrant at anytime to di-vulge what they were looking for - but hasn't.

hmmmmm.... curious dat.
why can't the DOJ? He's a former president. That's outside scope. So it is their obligation to tell americans why.
 
Back
Top Bottom