Trump SUED for Enforcing the Law

Draft a strongly worded email to the prayer leader at your madrassah. Intifada is your Constitutional right.


Wrong. That’s what you assume they’re doing because you kook websites tell you that.

“ICE officers and agents are on the streets every day, prioritizing public safety by locating, arresting and removing criminal aliens and immigration violators from our neighborhoods.

ICE does not need judicial warrants to make arrests. Like all other law enforcement officers, ICE officers and agents can initiate consensual encounters and speak with people, briefly detain aliens when they have reasonable suspicion that the aliens are illegally present in the United States, and arrest people they believe are illegal aliens. ICE officers and agents can also detain and search people crossing the border.

All aliens who violate U.S. immigration law are subject to arrest and detention, regardless of their criminal histories. Those with final orders of removal are removed from the United States.”

“Everyone ICE arrests receives due process.”


Kristi Noem says you can’t trust the government but here you are repeating their propaganda.

Video shows otherwise. They’re just grabbing people because they’re minorities.
 
Kristi Noem says you can’t trust the government but here you are repeating their propaganda.

Video shows otherwise. They’re just grabbing people because they’re minorities.
What about being here illegally confuses you?
 
If a citizen is mistakenly arrested, they are released when their citizenship is verified…
It’s unconstitutional to detain someone and force them to prove their citizenship just because they’re a minority. The constitution requires reasonable suspicion.
 
Saw it on tic toc did you?
Video evidence is a lot more convincing than posting the ICE FAQ.

ICE says they didn’t violate the constitution which is good enough for you
 
It’s unconstitutional to detain someone and force them to prove their citizenship just because they’re a minority. The constitution requires reasonable suspicion.
Wrong, PA v Mimms
 
Wrong, PA v Mimms
Your referenced case is super irrelevant.

For starters, it deals with conduct of a lawful traffic stop. To be a lawful traffic stop, they have to have reasonable suspicion.

ICE is grabbing people without reasonable suspicion, so the case doesn’t even begin to come into play.
 
Kristi Noem says you can’t trust the government but here you are repeating their propaganda.

Video shows otherwise. They’re just grabbing people because they’re minorities.
Your pointless, ‘’because I say so” whining is tiresome.
 
That’s dumb. Minnesota didn’t ask for this. It’s been put upon them by your thugs.
Actually, Minnesota’istan asked for this by harboring, aiding and abetting criminal illegals.

You don’t understand that federal dollars are being used to shelter your criminal illegal heroes.
 
15th post
Your referenced case is super irrelevant.

For starters, it deals with conduct of a lawful traffic stop. To be a lawful traffic stop, they have to have reasonable suspicion.

ICE is grabbing people without reasonable suspicion, so the case doesn’t even begin to come into play.
You make that determination based on what exactly?
 

Is there any other way to read this?

They want him to enforce the law (expel illegal criminals) without inconveniencing anyone?

This is truly the Bizzarro Leftist World.
You realize that Donald and the Zionists enforce what laws they like and ignore other laws, right?

He thumbs his nose at laws he finds inconvenient, including the Supreme Law of The Land, but enforces other laws written by his Zionist handlers that violate his oath of office.

Is that cool?
 
Back
Top Bottom