Trump should delay State of the Union until impeachment trial ends

[AzogtheDefiler]

Of course you wouldnt.....dont blame you.
And what lies did Trump tell about the drone strike?

He lied about the reason he did it. He’s still lying. That’s the whole problem. He’s lying to you. You don’t care.

Well than surely you can prove your assertions.
Right?

Absolutely. It’s clear. He has lied about it since the day it happened. There was no imminent attack. That’s a lie. Period.

Any honest person will tell you the same thing. I’m not going to waste the time with you though. You are far too dishonest.

Define “imminent”
So if he coordinates another 9/11 type attack in August he was not worth killing? You’re such a *****, Lone Leftist.

Morons think that wanting to follow the rule of law and not liking the fact that the president is lying to us means that someone doesn’t think that Soleimani is a person who was worth killing.

I never heard the name Soleimani before he was killed. I’ve heard enough credible people say that he was a bad dude. So I’m not upset in the least that he was taken out. Asshole.

But even we have to follow some ******* rules. And unless he was in the ******* process of attacking Americans, we did not have the ******* right to kill him.

That said, the US has broken international law many times. We’re arrogant fuckers. So, no punishment would come down on Trump for this unlawful act. That’s the way it is when you’re the big dog and you are arrogant.

The bigger problem is that he is lying to you and to me about the matter. Period. His motives are not pure. And YOU are OK with that.

He was killed in Iraq not Iran and he was sanctioned by the UN and not allowed to leave Iran. We did not bomb or assassinate him in his home country. He deserved to die as he is responsible for so many American deaths. You’re a *****

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Not to mention the people in Iran are thrilled. They hate their dictators. Lone Leftist and his ***** ilk refuse to discuss that. They are more worried about allowing men to pee in ladies rooms.

Idiot. You hate the Iranian people. You do not care if every one of them is killed today.

The people of Iran want democracy and the want sovereignty. You are OK with banning them from coming here.

Idiot. You have no idea who is who when they come here. Better safe than sorry. You’re a fat loser.

 

[Rye Catcher]

#me too. The Trump Administration has much to do with the lives of many, and if you had kids you too would be worried about the outcome of the trial.

Why would I, if I had kids, be worried about the the outcome of the trial?

Their future. Regulations may be burdensome but government handcuffed will allow the private sector to continue to foul our land, water and air; putting profit before people as we saw recently with the Vaping Industry which trump has allowed to continue, his promise to fix the opiate crisis and do nothing to end it and siding with the NRA which allowed over 3,000 children to die from a gun in 2016; and his so far failed efforts to repeal and replace health care in America.

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsr1804754

If the Senate decided to convict Trump, then Pence would become President and the Republican party would be out in force and defeat the Democratic front runner. So the trial in my opinion would not help you in any way shape or form.

The vaping industry is a result of big tobacco wanting to get rid of a new rival industry and it worked. You have vaping deaths, not by legit vaping companies but from cheap illegal knockoffs. You make vaping illegal it would allow illegal companies to sell their products and as a result see more deaths. Cigarettes also carries several deadly toxins that vapes don't carry. I am against inhaling tobacco into your system whether it is by cigarettes or vaping, however vaping is is no worse and evidence show it is better than smoking cigarettes.

You miss the point entirely. I agree, at my age (72) the guys I knew who smoked tobacco began to die of cancer and/or heart disease at age 50. Vaping has caused the death of teenagers, and trump once supported the prohibition of vaping, until the vaping companies got to him. He then flipped.

Trump's behavior has continued go make our nation and its citizens less safe by every EO, tweet, policy and rally.

Again, the deaths were from homemade vape pins, if we banned them then the legal companies would quit making them and homemade ones would continue to kill people. But you are upset because he realized making vape pens would kill more people and listened to experts and saved lives. They also found that a vitamin e compound was responsible for the deaths.

Once again, he back peddled his original policy of total prohibition.

 

[LoneLaugher]

He lied about the reason he did it. He’s still lying. That’s the whole problem. He’s lying to you. You don’t care.

Well than surely you can prove your assertions.
Right?

Absolutely. It’s clear. He has lied about it since the day it happened. There was no imminent attack. That’s a lie. Period.

Any honest person will tell you the same thing. I’m not going to waste the time with you though. You are far too dishonest.

Define “imminent”
So if he coordinates another 9/11 type attack in August he was not worth killing? You’re such a *****, Lone Leftist.

Morons think that wanting to follow the rule of law and not liking the fact that the president is lying to us means that someone doesn’t think that Soleimani is a person who was worth killing.

I never heard the name Soleimani before he was killed. I’ve heard enough credible people say that he was a bad dude. So I’m not upset in the least that he was taken out. Asshole.

But even we have to follow some ******* rules. And unless he was in the ******* process of attacking Americans, we did not have the ******* right to kill him.

That said, the US has broken international law many times. We’re arrogant fuckers. So, no punishment would come down on Trump for this unlawful act. That’s the way it is when you’re the big dog and you are arrogant.

The bigger problem is that he is lying to you and to me about the matter. Period. His motives are not pure. And YOU are OK with that.

He was killed in Iraq not Iran and he was sanctioned by the UN and not allowed to leave Iran. We did not bomb or assassinate him in his home country. He deserved to die as he is responsible for so many American deaths. You’re a *****

This point bears no weight on the legality. You bring it up because you are weird.

If being responsible for American deaths is the reason he was killed, why did Trump wait three years?

 

[LoneLaugher]

Not to mention the people in Iran are thrilled. They hate their dictators. Lone Leftist and his ***** ilk refuse to discuss that. They are more worried about allowing men to pee in ladies rooms.

Idiot. You hate the Iranian people. You do not care if every one of them is killed today.

The people of Iran want democracy and the want sovereignty. You are OK with banning them from coming here.

Idiot. You have no idea who is who when they come here. Better safe than sorry. You’re a fat loser.

You didn’t admit that you don’t care about what the Iranian people want. Why not?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Well than surely you can prove your assertions.
Right?

Absolutely. It’s clear. He has lied about it since the day it happened. There was no imminent attack. That’s a lie. Period.

Any honest person will tell you the same thing. I’m not going to waste the time with you though. You are far too dishonest.

Define “imminent”
So if he coordinates another 9/11 type attack in August he was not worth killing? You’re such a *****, Lone Leftist.

Morons think that wanting to follow the rule of law and not liking the fact that the president is lying to us means that someone doesn’t think that Soleimani is a person who was worth killing.

I never heard the name Soleimani before he was killed. I’ve heard enough credible people say that he was a bad dude. So I’m not upset in the least that he was taken out. Asshole.

But even we have to follow some ******* rules. And unless he was in the ******* process of attacking Americans, we did not have the ******* right to kill him.

That said, the US has broken international law many times. We’re arrogant fuckers. So, no punishment would come down on Trump for this unlawful act. That’s the way it is when you’re the big dog and you are arrogant.

The bigger problem is that he is lying to you and to me about the matter. Period. His motives are not pure. And YOU are OK with that.

He was killed in Iraq not Iran and he was sanctioned by the UN and not allowed to leave Iran. We did not bomb or assassinate him in his home country. He deserved to die as he is responsible for so many American deaths. You’re a *****

This point bears no weight on the legality. You bring it up because you are weird.

If being responsible for American deaths is the reason he was killed, why did Trump wait three years?

He was waiting for the right intel. That order was not given on a whim and this is not the first time the President of the US has had a terrorist killed. This is a good thing but your TDS won’t allow you to see that because you’re a crazy fat leftist.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Not to mention the people in Iran are thrilled. They hate their dictators. Lone Leftist and his ***** ilk refuse to discuss that. They are more worried about allowing men to pee in ladies rooms.

Idiot. You hate the Iranian people. You do not care if every one of them is killed today.

The people of Iran want democracy and the want sovereignty. You are OK with banning them from coming here.

Idiot. You have no idea who is who when they come here. Better safe than sorry. You’re a fat loser.

You didn’t admit that you don’t care about what the Iranian people want. Why not?

What people? There are 80 mil. I care What the non radical Islamists want. You need to be more specific, Lone Leftist.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

impeachment is the sole responsibility of the house.

Yet they won't accept and act on that responsibility
Why?

there's nothing that says the articles have to go to the senate in a specific time frame. pelosi never intended on holding them forever. they will be on their way most likely this week. she held onto them for a while for a few good reasons & it came to work in her favor.

They will be on their way this week? How do you know?

How is her holding on to them worked in her favor?

let me correct myself - there is much reporting saying it will be this week & i've seen nothing nor anyone disputing it. her holding them over xmas vacation gave the more reasonable (R)s time to see what their constituents are saying, & give them a reason to think & question about the total blackout of any witness' & hard copy docs. & by the delay, bolton came fwd about testifying if subpoenaed, & the emails showing more proof of the nefarious shenanigans donny engaged in. & now the house may subpoena bolton if the senate doesn't. AND it drove president dotard nuts & his xmas probably sucked. i say that's a pretty good outcome.

Explosive new documents reveal the lengths to which the Justice Department went to conceal the Pentagon's concerns about Trump's Ukraine aid freeze

If only causing concern was a crime

If only

someone who has nothing to hide is hiding everything.

that's a fact jack. & intelligent people are having a problem with that as they should. you not having any problems at all explains all i need to know about you.

Iran Nan has 2 articles of impeachment, neither of which is a crime

 

[LoneLaugher]

Absolutely. It’s clear. He has lied about it since the day it happened. There was no imminent attack. That’s a lie. Period.

Any honest person will tell you the same thing. I’m not going to waste the time with you though. You are far too dishonest.

Define “imminent”
So if he coordinates another 9/11 type attack in August he was not worth killing? You’re such a *****, Lone Leftist.

Morons think that wanting to follow the rule of law and not liking the fact that the president is lying to us means that someone doesn’t think that Soleimani is a person who was worth killing.

I never heard the name Soleimani before he was killed. I’ve heard enough credible people say that he was a bad dude. So I’m not upset in the least that he was taken out. Asshole.

But even we have to follow some ******* rules. And unless he was in the ******* process of attacking Americans, we did not have the ******* right to kill him.

That said, the US has broken international law many times. We’re arrogant fuckers. So, no punishment would come down on Trump for this unlawful act. That’s the way it is when you’re the big dog and you are arrogant.

The bigger problem is that he is lying to you and to me about the matter. Period. His motives are not pure. And YOU are OK with that.

He was killed in Iraq not Iran and he was sanctioned by the UN and not allowed to leave Iran. We did not bomb or assassinate him in his home country. He deserved to die as he is responsible for so many American deaths. You’re a *****

This point bears no weight on the legality. You bring it up because you are weird.

If being responsible for American deaths is the reason he was killed, why did Trump wait three years?

He was waiting for the right intel. That order was not given on a whim and this is not the first time the President of the US has had a terrorist killed. This is a good thing but your TDS won’t allow you to see that because you’re a crazy fat leftist.

You are ignoring things that I am saying. That is how dishonest people behave.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Not to mention the people in Iran are thrilled. They hate their dictators. Lone Leftist and his ***** ilk refuse to discuss that. They are more worried about allowing men to pee in ladies rooms.

Idiot. You hate the Iranian people. You do not care if every one of them is killed today.

The people of Iran want democracy and the want sovereignty. You are OK with banning them from coming here.

Idiot. You have no idea who is who when they come here. Better safe than sorry. You’re a fat loser.

You didn’t admit that you don’t care about what the Iranian people want. Why not?

What people? There are 80 mil. I care What the non radical Islamists want. You need to be more specific, Lone Leftist.

You don’t care about any of them. You will now lie.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Define “imminent”
So if he coordinates another 9/11 type attack in August he was not worth killing? You’re such a *****, Lone Leftist.

Morons think that wanting to follow the rule of law and not liking the fact that the president is lying to us means that someone doesn’t think that Soleimani is a person who was worth killing.

I never heard the name Soleimani before he was killed. I’ve heard enough credible people say that he was a bad dude. So I’m not upset in the least that he was taken out. Asshole.

But even we have to follow some ******* rules. And unless he was in the ******* process of attacking Americans, we did not have the ******* right to kill him.

That said, the US has broken international law many times. We’re arrogant fuckers. So, no punishment would come down on Trump for this unlawful act. That’s the way it is when you’re the big dog and you are arrogant.

The bigger problem is that he is lying to you and to me about the matter. Period. His motives are not pure. And YOU are OK with that.

He was killed in Iraq not Iran and he was sanctioned by the UN and not allowed to leave Iran. We did not bomb or assassinate him in his home country. He deserved to die as he is responsible for so many American deaths. You’re a *****

This point bears no weight on the legality. You bring it up because you are weird.

If being responsible for American deaths is the reason he was killed, why did Trump wait three years?

He was waiting for the right intel. That order was not given on a whim and this is not the first time the President of the US has had a terrorist killed. This is a good thing but your TDS won’t allow you to see that because you’re a crazy fat leftist.

You are ignoring things that I am saying. That is how dishonest people behave.

Nope. I disagree With what you’re saying as usual. That is how logical people behave. Lone Leftist.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Not to mention the people in Iran are thrilled. They hate their dictators. Lone Leftist and his ***** ilk refuse to discuss that. They are more worried about allowing men to pee in ladies rooms.

Idiot. You hate the Iranian people. You do not care if every one of them is killed today.

The people of Iran want democracy and the want sovereignty. You are OK with banning them from coming here.

Idiot. You have no idea who is who when they come here. Better safe than sorry. You’re a fat loser.

You didn’t admit that you don’t care about what the Iranian people want. Why not?

What people? There are 80 mil. I care What the non radical Islamists want. You need to be more specific, Lone Leftist.

You don’t care about any of them. You will now lie.

Define “care”? I do not know them. You’re such a *****. My God.

 

[the other mike]

Didn't Nancy extend the invitation and didn't Trump accept? That's kind of a line in the sand....and if he backs out, doesn't he end up looking like the...uh..well, the decisive wimp that he is??

Donald Trump agrees to deliver State of the Union on February 4 - CNNPolitics

When Bannon, Nunes, Gowdy and others give him sound advice and he accepts it,
how does that make him look like a wimp ? I'd say the opposite.

 

[MAGAman]

I am not TOO stupid to know the facts. He accepts the invite or it isn't scheduled. He cannot
change it without her issuing another invite. Get it, He does not make the schedule.

Speaker invites.

POTUS either accepts or does not.

Like it or not, Pelosi has no power to make Trump attend.

 

[Papageorgio]

Why would I, if I had kids, be worried about the the outcome of the trial?

Their future. Regulations may be burdensome but government handcuffed will allow the private sector to continue to foul our land, water and air; putting profit before people as we saw recently with the Vaping Industry which trump has allowed to continue, his promise to fix the opiate crisis and do nothing to end it and siding with the NRA which allowed over 3,000 children to die from a gun in 2016; and his so far failed efforts to repeal and replace health care in America.

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsr1804754

If the Senate decided to convict Trump, then Pence would become President and the Republican party would be out in force and defeat the Democratic front runner. So the trial in my opinion would not help you in any way shape or form.

The vaping industry is a result of big tobacco wanting to get rid of a new rival industry and it worked. You have vaping deaths, not by legit vaping companies but from cheap illegal knockoffs. You make vaping illegal it would allow illegal companies to sell their products and as a result see more deaths. Cigarettes also carries several deadly toxins that vapes don't carry. I am against inhaling tobacco into your system whether it is by cigarettes or vaping, however vaping is is no worse and evidence show it is better than smoking cigarettes.

You miss the point entirely. I agree, at my age (72) the guys I knew who smoked tobacco began to die of cancer and/or heart disease at age 50. Vaping has caused the death of teenagers, and trump once supported the prohibition of vaping, until the vaping companies got to him. He then flipped.

Trump's behavior has continued go make our nation and its citizens less safe by every EO, tweet, policy and rally.

Again, the deaths were from homemade vape pins, if we banned them then the legal companies would quit making them and homemade ones would continue to kill people. But you are upset because he realized making vape pens would kill more people and listened to experts and saved lives. They also found that a vitamin e compound was responsible for the deaths.

Once again, he back peddled his original policy of total prohibition.

Glad he did, he saved lives by doing so.

 

[playtime]

Okay, I'm not surprised given your posts.

My posts are factual. 100%. I am not surprised you cannot refute them. Run and hide.

I'm not surprised you defaulted to an ad hominem. Your facts are in fact opinions on the issue of impeachment. My opinion is factual, the Republican's Caucus offered no exculpatory evidence and the Democratic Caucus provided a good deal of incriminating evidence which lead to the passage of two Articles of Impeachment.

This may be news to you, but the words “I think” and “ I heard somebody say that they heard somebody else say....” are not proof. What is it with you idiot Dims and this “ you have to show exculpatory evidence” bullshit? There is no need to prove you didn’t do something. Burden of proof is on YOU and you failed miserably.

ummmm....

More garbage. Still no proof. Not a first hand witness, thus hearsay and inadmissible from this loser. Try again. Another loss in a life of them for you.

that's a lie. wtf are you talking about? he was in on that call AND the so called transcript donny tried peddling is edited per the testimony of the first hand direct knowledge of that phone call.

 

[playtime]

Okay, I'm not surprised given your posts.

My posts are factual. 100%. I am not surprised you cannot refute them. Run and hide.

I'm not surprised you defaulted to an ad hominem. Your facts are in fact opinions on the issue of impeachment. My opinion is factual, the Republican's Caucus offered no exculpatory evidence and the Democratic Caucus provided a good deal of incriminating evidence which lead to the passage of two Articles of Impeachment.

This may be news to you, but the words “I think” and “ I heard somebody say that they heard somebody else say....” are not proof. What is it with you idiot Dims and this “ you have to show exculpatory evidence” bullshit? There is no need to prove you didn’t do something. Burden of proof is on YOU and you failed miserably.

ummmm....

He was giving an opinion.

his opinion that he gave based on the fact he was a participant in transcribing the phone call in which he was a first hand witness (that the idiot you are defending said vindman wasn't)

but he was also an expert witness given his background, & expertise.

 

[playtime]

there's nothing that says the articles have to go to the senate in a specific time frame. pelosi never intended on holding them forever. they will be on their way most likely this week. she held onto them for a while for a few good reasons & it came to work in her favor.

They will be on their way this week? How do you know?

How is her holding on to them worked in her favor?

let me correct myself - there is much reporting saying it will be this week & i've seen nothing nor anyone disputing it. her holding them over xmas vacation gave the more reasonable (R)s time to see what their constituents are saying, & give them a reason to think & question about the total blackout of any witness' & hard copy docs. & by the delay, bolton came fwd about testifying if subpoenaed, & the emails showing more proof of the nefarious shenanigans donny engaged in. & now the house may subpoena bolton if the senate doesn't. AND it drove president dotard nuts & his xmas probably sucked. i say that's a pretty good outcome.

Explosive new documents reveal the lengths to which the Justice Department went to conceal the Pentagon's concerns about Trump's Ukraine aid freeze

I disagree with you, however I thought the House impeachment was a political ploy and the Senate will vote not to convict and it is a political ploy. I think we are wasting time and money.

if it was a political ploy, pelosi woulda done it a lot earlier. she didn't even go after W & had a good shot at him. turtleboy & ms lindsey are blatant about their obvious bias & hopefully justice roberts will have a problem with that.

Pelosi gave in to the political ploy, she had resisted until this fall. Until then she didn't want to move forward however her colleagues, who wanted to impeach before Trump stepped into office showed their hands early on. Not sure who the people you are name calling but it just shows the maturity the country is dealing with when it comes to politics and partisans.

nancy 'gave in'? lol......................... yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa that's the ticket.

 

[playtime]

Are we going to talk about Barry now?

If you'd like to.

Not especially. He’s not the president. He didn’t lie about any of those strikes like your asshole has.

Next dodge....

Of course you wouldnt.....dont blame you.
And what lies did Trump tell about the drone strike?

He lied about the reason he did it. He’s still lying. That’s the whole problem. He’s lying to you. You don’t care.

Well than surely you can prove your assertions.
Right?

donny has to prove it was a justified strike. he hasn't so far & the story keeps changing, so its unlikely he'll be believed given his history of lying.

 

[Billiejeens]

My posts are factual. 100%. I am not surprised you cannot refute them. Run and hide.

I'm not surprised you defaulted to an ad hominem. Your facts are in fact opinions on the issue of impeachment. My opinion is factual, the Republican's Caucus offered no exculpatory evidence and the Democratic Caucus provided a good deal of incriminating evidence which lead to the passage of two Articles of Impeachment.

This may be news to you, but the words “I think” and “ I heard somebody say that they heard somebody else say....” are not proof. What is it with you idiot Dims and this “ you have to show exculpatory evidence” bullshit? There is no need to prove you didn’t do something. Burden of proof is on YOU and you failed miserably.

ummmm....

He was giving an opinion.

his opinion that he gave based on the fact he was a participant in transcribing the phone call in which he was a first hand witness (that the idiot you are defending said vindman wasn't)

but he was also an expert witness given his background, & expertise.

An expert on what?