Trump Photo of Bullet Whizzing by - It is VERY UNUSUAL for a photographer to use 1/8000 shutter speed @ 30 FPS in broad daylight.

[Donald H]

No. A mechanical shutter is completely different from digital capture. Digital imaging goes through immediate post-processing when the image is captured.

You're confused again. hutter speed is adjustable on the camera used.

You have to lick faster in hot weather.

 

[toobfreak]

He said he had it set at 1/8000.

Who, the actual photographer? This is a rather high speed just to take pictures of people at an event, but no matter, it is possible, but that would have reduced the blur trail to about 5 inches and the trail looks to be more in the 10-12" range, so maybe he is mistaken.

Ironic, your usage of 'live action targets'.

Yeah, well, that occurred to me too, but this is what you call your subject when shooting pictures.

 

[Donald H]

Who, the actual photographer? This is a rather high speed just to take pictures of people at an event, but no matter, it is possible, but that would have reduced the blur trail to about 5 inches and the trail looks to be more in the 10-12" range, so maybe he is mistaken.


Yeah, well, that occurred to me too, but this is what you call your subject when shooting pictures.

Hopefully nobody relies on 'your' bullet velocity.

The conspiracy theory experts will get all this figured out.

If only we had this board and technology back in the Kennedy, MLK, etc. days?

 

[Donald H]

Everybody remember their basics on taking picutures now!

Shutter speed can do more than just shutter speed. It's also about the photographer's choice on depth of field.

And with America's SS agents' capabilities, they could have missed that one too?

 

[pknopp]

Probably not unusual, liberals are always seeking the most unflattering pictures of Trump possible. It is all about trying to create a negative image with still shots that aren't subject to context or reality.

You all are so paranoid. You don't do that with shutter speed.

He was shooting in RAW as opposed to JPG.

Shooting in RAW allows the camera to gather a ton more info than jpg.

Any negative changes would be made in processing.

Being a journalist photographer he just wants to capture the event. If he is slight under or over exposed that can be fixed easily in post processing shooting in RAW.

 

[toobfreak]

Hopefully nobody relies on 'your' bullet velocity.

Really, shit for brains? I am using a speed of 3200 fps, what was quoted me earlier on a website.

Here is another I just looked up:

Wanna try putting your foot in your mouth again?

 

[Rambunctious]

It was a wide angle lens and it didn't stop the round mid air... this is why it shows the streak of the bullet and not just the bullet itself...
like taking pictures at night of moving lights from cars....

 

[toobfreak]

I'm pretty sure that's HD digital, not film. A digital "shutter" is different from a film camera shutter.

I think what you mean is an /electronic/ shutter vs. a mechanical one.

 

[luiza]

When I first encountered the photo of the bullet passing by Trump, and posted it here days ago, something struck me as odd.

In analysing the False Flag , Miles Mathis focussed on this very point immediately and demonstrated what utter nonsense it was .
The photo was manipulated .
It was not a bullet and none were fired anywhere near Donny, our new Super Hero and Oscar contender .

But hardly anybody is really interested in the truth once they have been entrained to believe it was an assassination attempt .

 

[luiza]

Here is how Miles ripped "the bullet photo" hoax to shreds ;-

---- that was allegedly captured by a NYT photographer. Convenient.
So how fast was his shutter speed?
Well, they saw that question coming, because they tell us he was using a Sony A1 at 1/8000s.
Since Trump is not known to move 1000 feet per second himself, it is unclear why the photographer would be using that shutter speed.
But let's say he was.
At that shutter speed, how far would the bullet move? Since this was an AR15, thebullet would have slowed to about 2000fps.
So we just multiply.
The bullet should have traveled ¼foot, or three inches.
Is that track 3 inches?
No, it is about a foot, which is four times too long.
Obviously, the bullet would need to be moving 8000 fps to make a track one foot long on a film open for 1/8000s.
Anyone can do that math. 8000/8000 = 1.

The NYT photographer Doug Mills who allegedly took that photo is also covered in red flags. He has won two Pulitzers, one for coverage of the Monica Lewinsky scandal, which I have shown was also staged. So, like the various government attorneys I have blown the cover of—Vincent Bugliosi,Marcia Clark, F. Lee Bailey, etc.—Mills appears to be a plant from Intel.

 

[pknopp]

Here is how Miles ripped "the bullet photo" hoax to shreds ;-

---- that was allegedly captured by a NYT photographer. Convenient.
So how fast was his shutter speed?
Well, they saw that question coming, because they tell us he was using a Sony A1 at 1/8000s.
Since Trump is not known to move 1000 feet per second himself, it is unclear why the photographer would be using that shutter speed.
But let's say he was.
At that shutter speed, how far would the bullet move? Since this was an AR15, thebullet would have slowed to about 2000fps.
So we just multiply.
The bullet should have traveled ¼foot, or three inches.
Is that track 3 inches?
No, it is about a foot, which is four times too long.
Obviously, the bullet would need to be moving 8000 fps to make a track one foot long on a film open for 1/8000s.
Anyone can do that math. 8000/8000 = 1.

The NYT photographer Doug Mills who allegedly took that photo is also covered in red flags. He has won two Pulitzers, one for coverage of the Monica Lewinsky scandal, which I have shown was also staged. So, like the various government attorneys I have blown the cover of—Vincent Bugliosi,Marcia Clark, F. Lee Bailey, etc.—Mills appears to be a plant from Intel.

It's been explained why.

 

[Donald H]

Really, shit for brains? I am using a speed of 3200 fps, what was quoted me earlier on a website.

Here is another I just looked up:


View attachment 979505

Wanna try putting your foot in your mouth again?

A hint for the slower gun goons: Was the muzzle at Trump's ear?