Still, these are the numbers we have. Saying they are equally contagious is pure speculation.No, they're not contagious at the same level. After 54 days since the first case detected in the U.S., there were nearly 3 times as many H1N1 cases as there are COVID-19 cases...In reality, it was far more contagious. But true, less deadly.Swine flu wasn’t nearly as contagious or deadly. And the Hussein didn’t declare a national emergency until 1000 Americans were dead. Now go pound sand, dolt.
Not so fast. They're both contagious at the same level. H1N1 was less deadly, correct. Let's see... we had far lees deadly virus, and still had 12,400 dead people.
I'm not saying it was needed, because vaccines already existed in some form, but if the same measures were taken for H1N1 as for corona virus, would we have less dead?
Coronavirus
Cases: 6534
Deaths: 116
Percent: 1.78
Ratio: 17,753 per million
Swine flu
Cases: 17855
Deaths: 44
Percent: 0.25
Ratio: 2,464 per million
Except, H1N1 could've been detected almost as soon as it started, while for coronavirus (that is new virus) kits had to be developed.
Since you're comparing data of known and unknown (apple and oranges), saying that one is more contagious than the other is speculation as well.